RE: General Vikes Talkk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message

Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 8:06:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

[&:]

TJ, I read your statement as WAS the 1st time, WASN'T the 2nd. Lol [&:]

Thank you.


Why Marty?
Apologize and take the repercussions or simply start actually talking football.



Daniel Lee Young -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 8:21:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

And here I was worried that Marty wasn't going to say something stupid that everyone would be arguing about all week.

That’s the vikes version of the other p-named idjit in the other p- named threads of the lounge..[&:]



Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 8:48:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

And here I was worried that Marty wasn't going to say something stupid that everyone would be arguing about all week.

That’s the vikes version of the other p-named idjit in the other p- named threads of the lounge..[&:]


Well you started it bully.



TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 9:02:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

And here I was worried that Marty wasn't going to say something stupid that everyone would be arguing about all week.

That’s the vikes version of the other p-named idjit in the other p- named threads of the lounge..[&:]


Well you started it bully.

Oh good, a tangential stupid argument is about to start.



Daniel Lee Young -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 9:24:54 AM)

No it’s not..



marty -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 9:47:40 AM)

Thanks for the passive aggressive name call Dan, I would call you names back, but it seems impossible to do knowing some of the hardships you have endured.



Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:11:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Thanks for the passive aggressive name call Dan, I would call you names back, but it seems impossible to do knowing some of the hardships you have endured.


You mistakenly labeled his post as passive aggressive but your reply is textbook passive aggressive.



Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:14:19 AM)

How about we talk football?

Skor North suggested keeping all 3 WR....what do you think a Nailor extension would cost? $8 million per?



Rob Viking -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:29:31 AM)

Depends on Felton's development.

I really like Addison, in a sophisticated passing offense he would put up 90 rec, 1,200 yds and 8-10 tds. He could be 1B on any team. But we've tied too much into Jettas. He could demand 15M+ on the open market.

As for Nailor, something like 8M seems reasonable. There could be some decent WRs on day 2 of the draft like Antonio Williams or Makai Lemon.



Rob Viking -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:32:19 AM)

Nailor could get upwards of 12M on the open market.



Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:44:12 AM)

Skor North thinks the highest pick we could get for Addison is a 2nd or 3rd. If we can't use 3 WR sets as much......do we need all 3?



Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:45:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Viking

Depends on Felton's development.

I really like Addison, in a sophisticated passing offense he would put up 90 rec, 1,200 yds and 8-10 tds. He could be 1B on any team. But we've tied too much into Jettas. He could demand 15M+ on the open market.

As for Nailor, something like 8M seems reasonable. There could be some decent WRs on day 2 of the draft like Antonio Williams or Makai Lemon.


Mentioned recently it would be good to know their cap limit or philosophy for spending on one position. Addison at say $17 brings the average to ~ $65M w/o factoring in a third WR. They can easily set things up to limit the time where the high years of the two contracts overlap, but it's still cap.



Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 10:49:54 AM)

Depends on Felton's development.

So far, 2 receptions for 19 yards.



Jeff Jesser -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 12:47:05 PM)

This is what I would do if I were KAM.


Obviously, we don't get the closeup views on their attitudes but from a far, it seems like Nailor is much more buttoned up. If you could lock him in for 8-10 mill for 4/5 years I'd do that and get what you can for Addison. This draft class is supposed to be pretty deep. Grab a guy in the 2nd/3rd and roll with it. That 8-10 Mill is a bit low IMO though.



beo -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 12:57:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

How about we talk football?

Skor North suggested keeping all 3 WR....what do you think a Nailor extension would cost? $8 million per?


Love Nailor.
Think JJ/Addison/Nailor would be near tops of the league in WR triplets.

BUT

Are you really going to spend limited money on 3rd WR when the offense is least effective right now running 3 wr sets?
And you have a 3rd round pick sitting on the bench?

Not sure that would be best use of assets.



Rob Viking -> RE: General Vikes Talkk (12/17/2025 3:30:17 PM)

The Allen and Hargreaves contracts are making it difficult to maneuver other key positions. I would even argue Greenard and Van Ginkel while very good players are signed 1 year too long. Kwesi was truly the autopen the past 2 seasons.



Page: <<   < prev  75 76 77 78 [79]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode