RE: Gopher Football (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Other Minnesota Sports] >> Minnesota Golden Gophers



Message


David Levine -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 12:02:49 PM)

Gophers football players face expulsion, 1-year suspension over sexual assault allegation
Sexual assault allegation could lead to expulsions, 1-year suspensions.

By Joe Christensen and Brandon Stahl Star Tribune staff writers DECEMBER 15, 2016 — 11:03AM

Five of the 10 University of Minnesota football players suspended from the team in the fallout of a student's sexual assault allegation now face expulsion from school, the players' attorney, Lee Hutton, said Wednesday night.

Four other players face a one-year suspension and another could get probation stemming from the Sept. 2 incident. The school discipline comes weeks after a criminal investigation resulted in no arrests or charges.

A woman's claim that she was assaulted in the early morning hours after the Gophers' first game, documented through police reports and court testimony, ultimately led to an investigation by the school's office for Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action.

Hutton said the EOAA recommended expulsion for Ray Buford, Carlton Djam, KiAnte Hardin, Dior Johnson and Tamarion Johnson; one-year suspensions from the university for Seth Green, Kobe McCrary, Mark Williams and Antoine Winfield Jr., and probation for Antonio Shenault.

Some of the players were directly accused in the alleged sexual assault; the involvement of others is unclear. Hutton, who is representing all 10 players, said he is working on their appeals.

University President Eric Kaler wrote in a letter to donors Wednesday that football coach Tracy Claeys, with athletic director Mark Coyle's support, decided to suspend the players from the team ahead of its Dec. 27 bowl game in San Diego.

"The need to take actions like this is incredibly disappointing. Unfortunately, these types of situations are difficult for the University because we are limited in what we can say," Kaler wrote. "While we strive to be transparent in all that we do, the fact is that, under the law, our students have privacy rights that we value and respect."

Hutton confirmed that all the suspensions stem from the incident in a Dinkytown apartment after the team's season-opening victory over Oregon State. After the complaint was first reported, the Gophers suspended four players — Buford, Hardin, Dior Johnson and Tamarion Johnson — for an unspecified violation of team rules. Those players missed three games while police investigated.

They were reinstated when the Hennepin County attorney declined to press charges. The Star Tribune initially did not specify the nature of the investigation because the players were not charged.

The university's statement said: "Due to privacy restrictions relating to student educational data, there is nothing further the University can share."

Reporting to police

According to police reports and the student's testimony, the student, who is part of the gameday operations at TCF Bank Stadium, drank five to six shots of vodka on the night of Sept. 1 before heading out of her apartment with her roommates toward Dinkytown.

She then went with two football players to the Radius, an off-campus apartment building. Though she said her memory was spotty, she recalled Djam in a common area asking her to go up to his apartment. She would later testify that she had no intention of having sex.

She said she felt panicked when Djam walked her into his bedroom, but later testified that he never pushed her, prevented her from leaving or said anything threatening to her.

Asked during a court hearing why she didn't leave, she said, "I felt scared, trapped, isolated with someone I felt had power over me."

At some point, they began having sex. The police report said "she doesn't have a recall about how the sex acts started."

After Djam, others followed. She told police she saw a line of men waiting to take turns.

"I was removing myself from my mind and my body to help myself from the pain and experience going on," she testified.

She estimated there were at least a dozen men. "I was shoving people off of me," she testified. "They kept ignoring my pleas for help. Anything I said they laughed. They tried to cheer people on."

About an hour and a half later, she said, she was allowed to leave. She called her sister, who told her to go to the hospital immediately, where she was given a rape exam, while her mother made a report to Minneapolis police. The next day, an officer sat down with the student, who described her version of what happened.

On Sept. 8, police investigators Eric Faulconer and Matthew Wente interviewed Djam. He acknowledged having sex with the woman, but was adamant that it was consensual. As proof, he played them three separate videos, totaling about 90 seconds, taken that morning.

During an 8-second clip, the woman "appears lucid, alert, somewhat playful and fully conscious; she does not appear to be objecting to anything at this time," Wente wrote in his report. After viewing two additional videos, he wrote "the sexual contact appears entirely consensual."

Police later interviewed four other players, who each said the sex was consensual.

On Sept. 30, Wente sent the investigation to the Hennepin County Attorney's office for possible prosecution. In it, he wrote about the videos, "at no time does she indicate that she is in distress or that the contact is unwelcome or nonconsensual."

On Oct. 3 the attorney's office announced there would be no charges.

Afterward, the alleged victim filed a restraining order against six of the players, asking that they be made to stay away from the stadium. After a judge granted the orders, the woman dropped a petition against one of the players.

Hutton, the players' attorney, appealed, setting up a hearing where the woman testified for several hours. The hearing eventually ended in a settlement — the restraining order would be dropped, but the players still had to stay 20 feet away from the woman and have no contact with her. The two sides also agreed that neither would be able to file a lawsuit.

"I'm glad this is over," the student read in a statement after the hearing. "This has never been about punishing anyone, I just wanted to feel safe. Because of this resolution that we came to, now I do."

Claeys and Coyle briefly addressed the matter separately Wednesday. Both said they were prohibited from discussing details of the university investigation.

http://www.startribune.com/sex-assault-allegations-triggered-suspension-of-gophers-football-players/406564806/




Karl Juhnke -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 2:32:21 PM)

As is often the case, the truth is somewhere in between. I doubt if she went up to the apartment not knowing that sex was at least a possibility, thus the initial 'playful' videos. But I also doubt there's any way she was signing up for 10 guys to take turns with her.

And just on a side note, These guys are football players at a major university. They are big men on campus, physically chiseled and attractive. They should have no problem attracting women in a conventional manor. Instead they go for this stupid gang mentality thing. Idiots.

They are not men. They are emotionally addled boys in men's bodies.




Bill Jandro -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 5:33:18 PM)

I don't have words to describe how emberassing this continues to be.

There has to be a pretty lengthy laundry list of these incidents the last 40 years.

When it continues to keep happening this University needs to make some internal changes as to how the U is ran.




David Levine -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 6:54:48 PM)

Jon Krawczynski ‏@APkrawczynski 6m6 minutes ago
Entire team participated in show of force. Gophers say they will boycott all football activities until they get answers from Coyle, Kaler

chipscoggins ‏@chipscoggins 10m10 minutes ago
Players said they won't back down if scholarships are threatened to be pulled

Jon Krawczynski ‏@APkrawczynski 8m8 minutes ago
Antoine Winfield Sr just blistered the entire university. says his son is innocent and will not attend school if Kaler and Coyle are here

Marcus R. Fuller ‏@Marcus_R_Fuller 15m15 minutes ago
#Gophers WR Drew Wolitarsky makes a statement on behalf of team. They demand to meet with U board of regents about lifting 10 suspensions

Marcus R. Fuller ‏@Marcus_R_Fuller 9m9 minutes ago
Minnesota's football players want to meet with regents without AD Coyle and U President Kaler present. They'll boycott all team activities.

Darren Wolfson ‏@DWolfsonKSTP 18m18 minutes ago
Players want meeting w/ Board of Regents, request that Kaler & Coyle are not there. Boycott will remain in effect until suspensions lifted.

chipscoggins ‏@chipscoggins 2m2 minutes ago
I've covered a lot of messes with Gophers athletics but never anything like this. Kaler and Coyle have a major problem on their hands




David Levine -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 6:56:19 PM)

Minnesota Football: Gopher football players to boycott Holiday Bowl
The players are boycotting the bowl game in protest of the suspension of 10 of their teammates
by IowaGopher Dec 15, 2016, 3:42pm PST

The Star Tribune’s Joe Christensen is reporting that the Minnesota Golden Gopher football team boycotted today’s practice and held a players-only meeting, where they decided to boycott the Holiday Bowl in protest of 10 players being suspended.

After coming to their decision, the players reportedly brought in head football coach Tracy Claeys to inform him of their intentions. The players are expected to meet with media members tonight to announce their plans and state the conditions the university would need to meet in order to avoid a boycott of the Holiday Bowl.

This comes after several Gopher football players sent out Tweets earlier today using the hashtag #WeHadEnough, expressing their displeasure with the university’s decision to indefinitely suspend 10 of their teammates. The suspensions followed the conclusion of a Title IX investigation into an incident that took place on the night of Sept. 2 and led to sexual assault allegations being made against four Gopher players. The Title IX investigation concluded with five players being recommended for expulsion, four for one-year suspensions, and one for one-year of probation.

We’ll have more details after the players make their announcement tonight.

http://www.thedailygopher.com/2016/12/15/13976686/minnesota-football-gopher-players-boycott-holiday-bowl-suspensions




David Levine -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 7:06:34 PM)

Gophers players boycott football; bowl game participation in jeopardy
It's a protest after 10 teammates were suspended earlier this week in the latest fallout of a September sexual assault investigation. It could include the Holiday Bowl.

By Joe Christensen Star Tribune DECEMBER 15, 2016 — 6:59PM

University of Minnesota football players announced Thursday they are boycotting all football practice and team activities — even their Dec. 27 bowl game if need be — in protest of 10 teammates being suspended from the team earlier this week in the latest fallout of a September sexual assault investigation.

The Gophers had a players-only meeting Thursday afternoon and later brought in head coach Tracy Claeys to inform him of their plans, sources told the Star Tribune.

What appeared to be every Gophers player appeared Thursday at a university athletic building to deliver a united announcement, saying they are immediately boycotting team activities and are willing to boycott the Holiday Bowl if their teammates are not reinstated. That would require reversing Tuesday’s decision to suspend the 10 players from the team.

Quarterback Mitch Leidner, receiver Drew Wolitarsky and tight end Duke Anyanwu stood in front of the full team.

“As a player, it became about more than the game,” Wolitarsky said.

The players on Thursday night called out university President Eric Kaler and athletic director Mark Coyle, saying the school leaders supported and delivered unjust punishment.

Half of the 10 players suspended also face expulsion from school, the players’ attorney, Lee Hutton, said Wednesday night.

Hutton said the university’s Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action office recommended expulsion for Ray Buford, Carlton Djam, KiAnte Hardin, Dior Johnson and Tamarion Johnson; one-year suspensions from the university for Seth Green, Kobe McCrary, Mark Williams and Antoine Winfield Jr., and probation for Antonio Shenault.

The school discipline comes weeks after a criminal investigation resulted in no arrests or charges.

Some of the players were directly accused by a female student in the alleged sexual assault in the early morning hours after the Gophers’ first game on Sept. 2; the involvement of others is unclear. The woman’s claims have been documented through police reports and court testimony, and ultimately led to the EOAA investigation.

Hutton, who is representing all 10 players, said he is working on their appeals.

Whose decision?

University President Eric Kaler said in a letter to university boosters dated Wednesday that Claeys made the decision to suspend the players, with support from athletic director Mark Coyle. Coyle echoed that statement when he briefly met with media on Wednesday night.

But two sources said Thursday that the decision was made at a level higher than Claeys. The players also said Thursday night that they believe the decision did not come from Claeys.

The Gophers are scheduled to play Washington State on Dec. 27 in the Holiday Bowl in San Diego.

The players asked for patience from the Holiday Bowl officials.

Early signals

Midday Thursday, several Gophers players took to Twitter in what appeared to be a show of unity with their teammates. They tweeted about “family” and made references to standing by each other, using the hashtag #WeHadEnough.

From 2017 co-captain Jonathan Celestin: “#WeHadEnough I’ll ride for my family any given day.”

http://www.startribune.com/gophers-football-players-plan-to-threaten-boycott-of-bowl-game/406928136/




Mr. Ed -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 9:02:35 PM)

Soap Opera

"As The Toilet Swirls"




bgdavis -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 9:44:57 PM)

From what I've read, this strikes me as the actions of an administration trying to maintain a half-assed appearance of political correctness by throwing several student athletes under the bus. By punishing these players that were determined to be clear of any criminal issues, the U officials are effectively declaring that they think they are above the law. The timing of it is also odd - why not wait until after the bowl game to deal with this? I think the students have a legitimate beef here, and the support from Winfield and other parents will likely embolden their position.

This could end up as a no win situation for either side. If the administration backs down, they look weak and would be seen as knuckling under to student demands, possibly inviting further pressures in the future. If the players back down, they end up looking weak and potentially splintered, possibly leading to further bad blood between players and/or coaches in the future. This is also likely to be a major blackeye for the university with respect to retaining current players and recruiting future players. Would you want to play for a school that pulls this crap?

As for the potential boycott of the bowl, has a team ever done that before? There would likely be huge financial losses for the venue, lost TV coverage, hotels, etc. How would they handle ticket refunds? Hotel refunds? Would the U have to pay a fine?




SoMnFan -> RE: Gopher Football (12/15/2016 11:21:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

Soap Opera

"As The Toilet Swirls"

Don't care how offended the players are.
Stop behaving like dogs in heat.




Bill Jandro -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 7:36:39 AM)

This University has a history of over reaction to this kind of incident.

I remember when 3 BB players had a threesome and the girl later cryied rape. The 3 players were kicked off the team and they forfieted the next game which if I remember correctly was against Northwestern.

The players should have only been suspended until they had their due process. The only thing forfieting the next game accomplished was more negative press toward the university. That was back when Keller was in charge.

If these players were all cleared in the court of law months back leave a sleeping dog alone.




stfrank -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 7:58:39 AM)

It almost seems like a good time for the U to drop football altogether. The powers that be are never willing to support the program whole heartedly and the consequences are crap like this happening every 10 years or so. After this one, what kid is going to want to play ball here anyways? Heck, all of the top talent in the state already leaves for other programs and the others do better at smaller schools so just quit already.




Jeff Jesser -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 8:29:56 AM)

After building a brand new, on campus, stadium? The state would never get public backed dollars for anything sports related in the future.


It is time to blow up the entire program though and start from scratch.




stfrank -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 8:34:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

After building a brand new, on campus, stadium? The state would never get public backed dollars for anything sports related in the future.


It is time to blow up the entire program though and start from scratch.


They have to blow it up now. I see a mass exodus from this program no matter the outcome of this current scandal.




MDK -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 9:49:54 AM)

Seriously? Getting to play football since you have been exonerated of charges is a right? It is a right???????????????????

They embarrassed the team and the University. The coach (even if pressured) has every right to suspend players for behavior that embarrasses the team and the University.

Has everyone been out of touch with all of the sexual abuse by University Athletes, particularly football players, despite major efforts to clean up athletic programs? Are you not aware that many of these athletes off the field have in the past been sexual predators who have not had to deal with consequences in the past because they generate money for the program?

And they (football) doesn't generate money for the University. The money brought in doesn't go to the science programs for new research equipment. It doesn't go to the humanities so that students can study abroad.

Yes, it does help the non generating sports provide scholarships. But the money goes primarily into the area where it is generated. It stays within the athletic departments.

College football is nothing more than the minor leagues for the NFL. Get the NFL to pay for its own player development.




ronhextall -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 9:51:20 AM)

As a father of daughters I am in no way defending these players actions (and I am not saying the female was 100% innocent either, I don't know).

What I am saying is the University should have done everything they were going to do to the players at the time they investigated. They should have ended it way back at that time, if that included kicking players off than so be it. The situation should have been dealt with and closed months ago. The University sets themselves up for this kind of blow back by picking at the scab months later.

Should be an interesting game of chicken. No matter what happens I think some football players will be leaving and the program takes even more steps backwards.




MDK -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 10:01:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

Soap Opera

"As The Toilet Swirls"

Don't care how offended the players are.
Stop behaving like dogs in heat.


Dogs in heat don't cheer their fellow dogs while they are screwing the female dog.




MDK -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 10:04:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

As a father of daughters I am in no way defending these players actions (and I am not saying the female was 100% innocent either, I don't know).

What I am saying is the University should have done everything they were going to do to the players at the time they investigated. They should have ended it way back at that time, if that included kicking players off than so be it. The situation should have been dealt with and closed months ago. The University sets themselves up for this kind of blow back by picking at the scab months later.

Should be an interesting game of chicken. No matter what happens I think some football players will be leaving and the program takes even more steps backwards.


Yes, it should have been dealt with right away. Suspending someone from school.......that is problematic.

Suspending them from a football team.......it is not a player's right to be on the team.




TJSweens -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 10:17:00 AM)

The problem is that the players don't get that the county decides whether or not to charge based on the law and evidence. The University can suspend and expel based on their own code of conduct. I have no doubt these players instructed about the code of conduct, consequences for violating the code of conduct and had to sign a form stating they understood it.




MDK -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 10:56:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

The problem is that the players don't get that the county decides whether or not to charge based on the law and evidence. The University can suspend and expel based on their own code of conduct. I have no doubt these players instructed about the code of conduct, consequences for violating the code of conduct and had to sign a form stating they understood it.


Excellent point Tim.




Mr. Ed -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 1:40:16 PM)

http://www.startribune.com/gophers-football-boycott-sparks-backlash-online/407107005/




MDK -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 2:02:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

http://www.startribune.com/gophers-football-boycott-sparks-backlash-online/407107005/


Just read that Ed........some pretty spot on comments by many on the subject.




Karl Juhnke -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 2:24:43 PM)

This is a real sticky situation. I believe the university brought this entirely on itself by the bungled handling of this incident. It's exactly what I was talking about earlier about not being forthcoming in properly explaining their actions. The team thought the issue had long been settled. Now this new punishment comes down, without warning or explanation. They stonewall it, show no transparency, just announce a bunch of punishments and say trust us it's justified...just because we say so.

Not that I'm siding with the players walkout either. Now they are trying to do the exact same thing the U did. Take matters into their own hands. Wanting the players re-instated with no explanation or due process.

The U is stuck between a rock and hard place now. Damned if they give in to the players and set a terrible precedent, damned if they don't give in creating the biggest mess is Minnesota athletic history...and that's saying something.




Karl Juhnke -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 2:29:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bgdavis

From what I've read, this strikes me as the actions of an administration trying to maintain a half-assed appearance of political correctness by throwing several student athletes under the bus. By punishing these players that were determined to be clear of any criminal issues, the U officials are effectively declaring that they think they are above the law. The timing of it is also odd - why not wait until after the bowl game to deal with this? I think the students have a legitimate beef here, and the support from Winfield and other parents will likely embolden their position.

This could end up as a no win situation for either side. If the administration backs down, they look weak and would be seen as knuckling under to student demands, possibly inviting further pressures in the future. If the players back down, they end up looking weak and potentially splintered, possibly leading to further bad blood between players and/or coaches in the future. This is also likely to be a major blackeye for the university with respect to retaining current players and recruiting future players. Would you want to play for a school that pulls this crap?

As for the potential boycott of the bowl, has a team ever done that before? There would likely be huge financial losses for the venue, lost TV coverage, hotels, etc. How would they handle ticket refunds? Hotel refunds? Would the U have to pay a fine?


I agree with much of your post, but don't agree with the bolded part. It's not a matter of being above the law. There's law and then there's university and team policies. If a player goes up to a coach and screams "Screw you, you big jerk. I don't feel like practicing today." He has broken no law. But don't bet on that player playing any time soon. He violated team policy and is being punished for it.




TJSweens -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 2:48:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: bgdavis

From what I've read, this strikes me as the actions of an administration trying to maintain a half-assed appearance of political correctness by throwing several student athletes under the bus. By punishing these players that were determined to be clear of any criminal issues, the U officials are effectively declaring that they think they are above the law. The timing of it is also odd - why not wait until after the bowl game to deal with this? I think the students have a legitimate beef here, and the support from Winfield and other parents will likely embolden their position.

This could end up as a no win situation for either side. If the administration backs down, they look weak and would be seen as knuckling under to student demands, possibly inviting further pressures in the future. If the players back down, they end up looking weak and potentially splintered, possibly leading to further bad blood between players and/or coaches in the future. This is also likely to be a major blackeye for the university with respect to retaining current players and recruiting future players. Would you want to play for a school that pulls this crap?

As for the potential boycott of the bowl, has a team ever done that before? There would likely be huge financial losses for the venue, lost TV coverage, hotels, etc. How would they handle ticket refunds? Hotel refunds? Would the U have to pay a fine?


I agree with much of your post, but don't agree with the bolded part. It's not a matter of being above the law. There's law and then there's university and team policies. If a player goes up to a coach and screams "Screw you, you big jerk. I don't feel like practicing today." He has broken no law. But don't bet on that player playing any time soon. He violated team policy and is being punished for it.


I agree, this is not the U placing itself above the law. Like I said earlier, there is a code of conduct to which student athletes have to adhere. There are also consequences laid out for violations of the code that include suspension and expulsion. A student can violate the code of conduct and be subject to discipline without being charged with a crime.




bgdavis -> RE: Gopher Football (12/16/2016 2:54:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: bgdavis

From what I've read, this strikes me as the actions of an administration trying to maintain a half-assed appearance of political correctness by throwing several student athletes under the bus. By punishing these players that were determined to be clear of any criminal issues, the U officials are effectively declaring that they think they are above the law. The timing of it is also odd - why not wait until after the bowl game to deal with this? I think the students have a legitimate beef here, and the support from Winfield and other parents will likely embolden their position.

This could end up as a no win situation for either side. If the administration backs down, they look weak and would be seen as knuckling under to student demands, possibly inviting further pressures in the future. If the players back down, they end up looking weak and potentially splintered, possibly leading to further bad blood between players and/or coaches in the future. This is also likely to be a major blackeye for the university with respect to retaining current players and recruiting future players. Would you want to play for a school that pulls this crap?

As for the potential boycott of the bowl, has a team ever done that before? There would likely be huge financial losses for the venue, lost TV coverage, hotels, etc. How would they handle ticket refunds? Hotel refunds? Would the U have to pay a fine?


I agree with much of your post, but don't agree with the bolded part. It's not a matter of being above the law. There's law and then there's university and team policies. If a player goes up to a coach and screams "Screw you, you big jerk. I don't feel like practicing today." He has broken no law. But don't bet on that player playing any time soon. He violated team policy and is being punished for it.

Part of the problem is that U has not been very forthcoming with details that explain why these individuals are being punished. The U has the right to lay down it's own penalties for violations of conduct, etc. But without disclosing how or what happened or which policies were violated, it raises concerns over fairness and consistency in how the rules are being enforced. It also sets a precedent that any students accused of certain types of behaviors will automatically be assumed guilty with little to no recourse and punished as such, even if police investigations find no evidence of wrong-doing.




Page: <<   < prev  329 330 [331] 332 333   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode