RE: RE:The Packers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk



Message


Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 10:49:25 AM)

Youngster retires his Favre jersey

Posted: May 5, 2008
JS Online

David Witthoft finally shunned his Brett Favre jersey for a red shirt for the first time in 1,581 days.
The 12-year-old Ridgefield, Conn., boy wore the No. 4 jersey every day since receiving it as a Christmas gift in 2003.
 
David's father, Chuck Witthoft, said that his son's last day wearing the jersey was April 23 on his 12th birthday. Witthoft conceded his son started to become concerned about his appearance after the jersey barely came down to his belt line.
 
 
 
 
And after he got his ass kicked day after day. [&:]




Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 10:53:45 AM)

[image]http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/9143/davidwitthoft215x300ch9.jpg[/image]




Jeff Jesser -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 11:29:22 AM)

I reckon thers a bright feuture fer dat der boy. 




Trekgeekscott -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 11:33:15 AM)

Well on his way to being a postgame wife beater.




Jeff Jesser -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 11:39:26 AM)

Either that or a world class concerto on the banjo. 




Toby Stumbo -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/6/2008 8:39:10 PM)

[&:]




Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (5/31/2008 10:28:16 AM)

Packers | Team to remove Favre locker
Fri, 30 May 2008 09:46:49 -0700

The Associated Press reports the Green Bay Packers said they will remove retired QB Brett Favre's stall from the team's locker room following their mandatory June minicamp and give it to Favre. "Obviously, I didn't realize it was going to get this kind of attention," general manager Ted Thompson told the Wisconsin State Journal Thursday, May 29. "We talked to Brett and (his wife) Deanna several weeks ago, and we thought that anybody who played 16 years here as well as he did might want his own locker. I think it makes it a little easier, quite frankly, for the next guy to go into there."




Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (6/23/2008 9:17:26 AM)

Packers Profits Fall
Mon Jun 23, 2008

AP reports after a 13-3 regular season, two home playoff games and a final bow from QB Brett Favre, the Green Bay Packers figured to have a pretty good year from a financial perspective. And they did, but it wasn't the moneymaking blockbuster some might have expected, a development that reinforced Packers executives' long-term concerns about the financial health of the NFL. The Packers took in about $241 million in operating revenue for the 2007-08 fiscal year that ended March 31, about 10 percent more than the previous year. But thanks to a significant rise in player costs, the team's total operating profit fell more than 37 percent to $21.4 million. "We had a good year," Packers president and CEO Mark Murphy said. "But not as strong as you might have anticipated." Packers executives believe the team ranks just outside the league's top 10 most profitable franchises despite playing in its smallest media market. But they're worried about the future after watching the team's player costs skyrocket from $110 million in the 2006-07 fiscal year to $124 million last year. Murphy said the increase was mainly because of bonus payments due to veteran players, but also was an example of a growing trend around the league. Teams are spending more money to remain competitive without seeing a corresponding increase in revenue. That's why, Murphy said, NFL owners voted in May to opt out of their collective bargaining agreement with the players union. The current agreement remains in effect through the 2010 season, but owners hope to negotiate a new deal that would allow them to keep a bigger chunk of the money the league and teams take in. NFL owners recently said they are paying $4.5 billion to players this year, just under 60 percent of their total revenues.



Maybe they could sell some worthless stock to gullible fans. Oh, wait, they already do that. [&:]




So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:The Packers (6/29/2008 6:40:00 PM)

GREEN BAY, Wis. -- Nick Barnett tried suppressing a smile as he listened to the question.

"We've got some things in our pocket," he said, a slight grin remaining on his face.

A similar query came his way a few minutes later.Do you think your team will be more aggressive on defense this season? "We're working on some things," said Barnett, who is entering his sixth season as the Green Bay Packers' middle linebacker. "I don't want to give too much away on the packages we've been working on, but I'm really excited."

While most public attention has centered on the Packers' quarterback transition, the team quietly is tweaking its pass rush to level out an uneven performance in 2007. Although their pass defense ranked 12th among NFL teams this past season, the Packers exhibited a notable drop off during the final months.

They went without a sack in four of their final five games, a stretch that coincided with a knee injury that limited pass-rush specialist Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila. Observers who watch the team closely have said the Packers - they run a traditional man-to-man pass defense, requiring the defensive line to account for much of the pass rush -- did not make enough of an adjustment to account for Gbaja-Biamila's injury.

With its linebackers and defensive backs spending most of their time in coverage, Green Bay was left with one healthy pass-rusher -- defensive end Aaron Kampman - to disrupt quarterbacks. Kampman finished with 12 ½ sacks, while since-departed defensive tackle Corey Williams contributed seven, but the Packers' final sack numbers were as lopsided as they come.

Almost 90 percent of their 36 sacks came from defensive linemen; Barnett accounted for 3 ½ and fellow linebacker AJ Hawk had one.

[image]http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0628/nfl_g_barnett-hawk_300.jpg[/image]
Based on Barnett's smile and an active blitz package during minicamp earlier in June, it's fair to say those proportions will change in 2008.


Rather than representing a philosophical shift, coach Mike McCarthy said the new looks reflect the natural progression of a scheme that has now been in place for three years.

"You're seeing players that are now very comfortable in the base concepts of that defense," McCarthy said, "and the pressure packages have expanded more in how we're using different personnel as opposed to how many different types of pressures we're coming from. The most important thing is to put pressure on the quarterback. Whether it comes with four-man, five-man, six-man rushes or pressures, it's irrelevant. The bottom line is to get it done."

A commitment to pressure not only requires appropriate personnel, but also patience from the coaching staff. The Packers' cornerback duo of Charles Woodson and Al Harris is among the best in the league. But even Woodson and Harris can be beaten if an offense deals effectively with the blitz.

It was certainly a point of emphasis during Packers minicamp, which featured blitzes from all areas of the field. Of course, a blitz in an NFL minicamp could mean anything. The team could be practicing in order to improve those particular calls. Or, it could be experimenting with different combinations of personnel and schemes, with the intention of implementing less than half of what it tries in minicamp. And in the Packers case, coaches could simply have been giving their young quarterbacks a variety of different looks.

Listening to McCarthy, however, it seemed clear he is serious and committed to elevating Green Bay's defensive pressure, no matter the short-term consequences.


"If you pressure and you get burnt," he said, "you still have to continue to pressure if you need to."

That attitude will bring a smile not only to the face of Barnett, but also to Hawk and the rest of the Packers' deep linebacker corps. Blitzes are to linebackers what deep passes are to receivers: Although they are high-risk, blitzes are fun and can change a game in one play.

"Any linebacker will tell you he wants to blitz and he wants to make big plays," Hawk said. "We've always been aggressive, just in different ways. . . With all the guys we have on our defense, it's going to be fun to see what the coaches come up with.

"We feel we can be a dominating defense at all times and be consistent with it," Hawk added. "That's the biggest thing. Just coming off these offseason workouts and everything, I feel we've taken some steps to get there."


Kevin Seifert covers the NFL for ESPN.com
 




Guest -> RE: RE:The Packers (6/29/2008 8:49:32 PM)

I hope we pitch the shutout on opening day and show the NFL how a real defense dominates an opponent.




So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:The Packers (6/30/2008 5:22:35 PM)

Exactly Dan.
Read that and kind of went ....
"Ooooh, I'm scared"
The Central will have a dominant D in it .... ours.




Lynn G. -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/2/2008 4:02:40 PM)

They're reporting that Favre has indeed contacted the Packers about coming out of retirement.

It would be absolutely fantastic to have him back and get absolutely trounced on MNF opening week.




So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/2/2008 4:29:15 PM)

I thought even Favre would be above actually milking out this last retirement "announcement".
Nope, he's an even bigger drama queen than we thought he was.
Sick.




Lynn G. -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/2/2008 4:34:47 PM)

... and Aaron Rodgers is on a suicide watch.

The whole thing is pitiful.




Toby Stumbo -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/2/2008 10:09:21 PM)

He just loves the game of football, BAM!  




Lynn G. -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/2/2008 10:39:27 PM)

Breaking news.  It turns out that the "itch" Favre was talking about was just swimmer's itch.  Everyone back to what they were doing...




Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 9:07:18 AM)

Archie Manning Concerned about Favre's Legacy
Wed Jul 9, 2008

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports former New Orleans Saints QB Archie Manning is now among those with some misgivings about the prospect of Green Bay Packers QB Brett Favre coming out of retirement. Manning, who will be among speakers at the annual meeting of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. financial representatives later this month in Milwaukee, said in an interview Monday that he didn't want to see Favre's legacy lessened. He recalled how QB Johnny Unitas ended his career with the San Diego Chargers, no longer the feared quarterback he had been for so many years with the Baltimore Colts. At the age of 40, Unitas played for the Chargers in 1973 after being traded. He retired the next year. Manning himself retired from the NFL when he was 36. In fact, the last game he played in was against the Packers, when Manning was with the Minnesota Vikings in the 1984 season. "I'm not saying Brett shouldn't play some more," Manning said. "I know Brett, but I don't know everything going on with him. But early in my career, we went to play the Chargers one day and Johnny Unitas was in uniform, No. 19. It made me sad to see him in that uniform. Brett is physically better off than Johnny was at that stage of his career. But I personally don't want to see Brett in another uniform." By coming back to play for the Packers, Manning said, Favre would create the possibility of a career that "could close in storybook fashion." But it also would open the door for a bad year or injury completing it. If Favre wants to play again for the Packers, it puts GM Ted Thompson, a former teammate of Manning's, and HC Mike McCarthy in an awkward position, he said. "They've got a good team and good organization going there," Manning said. "It does put them in a tough situation. So I hope it works out. I'm crazy about him and I want him to be happy."




Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 9:08:45 AM)

No Way Out for Packers
Tue Jul 8, 2008

ESPN's John Clayton reports what an amazing transition for QB Brett Favre. In 2007, he's the king of Wisconsin again, coming off one of his best seasons. Now, he's like that unpopular relative who always threatened to show up at your house for the summer and then plops himself on the couch. GM Ted Thompson isn't returning Favre's text messages. The current and former president of the team -- Mark Murphy and Bob Harlan -- spoke out Tuesday and sounded quite content with the idea of Favre staying retired. Regardless of what top management in Green Bay thinks, it's going to be pretty hard to say no to Favre if he does want to come out of retirement. Cutting him isn't an option because he could potentially end up in the NFC North. Trading him won't be easy. Plus, who wants to officially be the person who will go down in history as the front office person who chased away Favre. If Favre wants to return, the Packers have no choice but to take him.




Jim Frenette -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 10:44:30 AM)

I just don't get it. How does anyone get the text messages from Ted Thompson's cell phone? The reports are that Brett sent him a text and yet we don't hear this as a fact from him. The media has a real problem with filling the air waves with news lately if they can't let this go and have it play its self out.




Jeff Jesser -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 12:37:28 PM)

I hope it continues because he's making a mockery out of himself everyday and the media outlets are finally picking up on it.  Our local guys had a 10 minute rant this AM about how he does this every year and it's making him look so desperate. 




Jim Frenette -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 1:07:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

I hope it continues because he's making a mockery out of himself everyday and the media outlets are finally picking up on it.  Our local guys had a 10 minute rant this AM about how he does this every year and it's making him look so desperate. 


but is he? Last week he denied that he wanted to come back. How do we REALLY know he sent a text to Thompson since he is on vacation and I'm guessing he might have his cell phone with him. Nobody seems to have talked to Thopmson to get that info.




Lynn G. -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 1:13:44 PM)

Jim,

Al Harris told the world on ESPN that Favre is telling people he's got the itch.  Mortenson confirmed that either he or someone had talked to Favre and he admitted he's thinking about coming back.

Whether he texted (is that a word?) Thompson or not doesn't change the fact that he is telling people he wants to come back.

He's become a caricature, and is in danger of people really resenting his very presence.




Jim Frenette -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 1:59:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

Jim,

Al Harris told the world on ESPN that Favre is telling people he's got the itch.  Mortenson confirmed that either he or someone had talked to Favre and he admitted he's thinking about coming back.

Whether he texted (is that a word?) Thompson or not doesn't change the fact that he is telling people he wants to come back.

He's become a caricature, and is in danger of people really resenting his very presence.


Lynn personally I could care less if he comes back or not. My rant is on the way the media is reporting it. They said yesterday that Favre sent Thompson a text. Now if he told them he sent the text, that is one thing. But that isn't the way it is being reported. So how do they know what are the text messages that Thompson receives since he is on vacation and no one has talked to him.




Lynn G. -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 2:06:06 PM)

Who knows?  Thompson told McCarthy who told a reporter?  

On the other side, Brett's brother Scott has frequently slipped information to reporters.

It doesn't have to come directly from Thompson.




thebigo -> RE: RE:The Packers (7/9/2008 5:37:58 PM)

The best of all worlds would be Favre coming back... as a Bear!




Page: <<   < prev  54 55 [56] 57 58   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode