Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  105 106 [107] 108 109   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 9:06:04 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

Getting back to the D. Who runs the show, Zim? I just think they aren't playing up to where they should. Agreed that the middle is not as strong as it use to be. I think Linval has slowed down.

I think that's a huge element that we're missing. With Griff and Hunter killing it a presence up the middle would be deadly. Hopefully Linval can get back on track.
Post #: 2651
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 9:22:48 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

Getting back to the D. Who runs the show, Zim? I just think they aren't playing up to where they should. Agreed that the middle is not as strong as it use to be. I think Linval has slowed down.

I think that's a huge element that we're missing. With Griff and Hunter killing it a presence up the middle would be deadly. Hopefully Linval can get back on track.



We also need one of the young 3 techs to step up in a HUGE way.

We got top flight DEs, LBers, and Safeties. Mac is also a stud. Between Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes and Hill we should be able to cover on the outside.

You look at individual performances of the top flight guys, draft investment, and cap %, I feel like we are underperforming. Looking at the Bears last year, the rest of the defense made average guys look better. IDK if the same can be said here with DT.

Granted the Atlanta game, the Oakland, even some of the Eagles game, we were comfortable playing soft and giving up some yardage/points. But Stafford picked us apart all game and that was concerning.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 2652
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 9:23:37 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
Classic Zimmer in presser today...

Q: After such a physical game against Detroit, how do your players look to you in a short week?

A: I’ve asked a couple of them if they’re tired or they’re sore, and they said ‘maybe a little’ and I said ‘no one cares’. So that’s basically the extent of that conversation.
Post #: 2653
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 9:57:18 PM   
ambear

 

Posts: 4387
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: Fort Lauderdale
Status: offline
That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.
Post #: 2654
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 10:41:11 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.
Post #: 2655
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/22/2019 10:58:29 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

< Message edited by Pager -- 10/22/2019 11:26:52 PM >


_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 2656
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 12:35:35 AM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

The first we gave up for Bradford
Post #: 2657
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:16:00 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Vikes released Marcus sherels

Not a surprise. When Hughes was returning punts, the writing was pretty well on the wall.


Seems like it is a week early though.

They will need the roster spot for Hill when he's back....but not until after the Redskins game.

So is there some other reason for freeing up a roster spot?



Thielan is not likely to play. They'll probably activate Davis or Dillon.


I found this on Twitter. Not sure if it will be true with Hill returning.

https://twitter.com/vikingsspin/status/1186745953979518977?s=09

< Message edited by Bruce Johnson -- 10/23/2019 1:17:34 AM >


_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2658
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:22:14 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

.
Vikings PR@VikingsPR
The Vikings defense has not given up a rush longer than 18 yards in 2019, marking the shortest "long rush" allowed by an NFL team this season.

Minnesota has also only allowed one rushing touchdown this season, tied with San Francisco for the fewest in the NFL


This is fascinating. Why do you suppose this is? Good tackling?

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2659
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:24:42 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

Getting back to the D. Who runs the show, Zim? I just think they aren't playing up to where they should. Agreed that the middle is not as strong as it use to be. I think Linval has slowed down.

I think that's a huge element that we're missing. With Griff and Hunter killing it a presence up the middle would be deadly. Hopefully Linval can get back on track.



We also need one of the young 3 techs to step up in a HUGE way.

We got top flight DEs, LBers, and Safeties. Mac is also a stud. Between Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes and Hill we should be able to cover on the outside.

You look at individual performances of the top flight guys, draft investment, and cap %, I feel like we are underperforming. Looking at the Bears last year, the rest of the defense made average guys look better. IDK if the same can be said here with DT.

Granted the Atlanta game, the Oakland, even some of the Eagles game, we were comfortable playing soft and giving up some yardage/points. But Stafford picked us apart all game and that was concerning.


Hercules has been out for awhile, hasn't he?

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2660
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:31:46 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Great tweet on Kendricks.

https://twitter.com/NickOlsonNFL/status/1186845691458543616?s=09

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2661
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:40:24 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

Getting back to the D. Who runs the show, Zim? I just think they aren't playing up to where they should. Agreed that the middle is not as strong as it use to be. I think Linval has slowed down.

I think that's a huge element that we're missing. With Griff and Hunter killing it a presence up the middle would be deadly. Hopefully Linval can get back on track.



We also need one of the young 3 techs to step up in a HUGE way.

We got top flight DEs, LBers, and Safeties. Mac is also a stud. Between Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes and Hill we should be able to cover on the outside.

You look at individual performances of the top flight guys, draft investment, and cap %, I feel like we are underperforming. Looking at the Bears last year, the rest of the defense made average guys look better. IDK if the same can be said here with DT.

Granted the Atlanta game, the Oakland, even some of the Eagles game, we were comfortable playing soft and giving up some yardage/points. But Stafford picked us apart all game and that was concerning.


Hercules has been out for awhile, hasn't he?


He missed the Bears and Giants games. He's been back the past 2. Played 30% of the snaps against Philly and 18% against Detroit.
Post #: 2662
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 5:45:41 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17930
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
The guy we have to watch out for is Redskin rookie wr Terry McLaurin.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 2663
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 7:36:43 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9569
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

.
Vikings PR@VikingsPR
The Vikings defense has not given up a rush longer than 18 yards in 2019, marking the shortest "long rush" allowed by an NFL team this season.

Minnesota has also only allowed one rushing touchdown this season, tied with San Francisco for the fewest in the NFL


This is fascinating. Why do you suppose this is? Good tackling?



two very good safeties - harris & harry....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 2664
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 8:15:03 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12184
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.
Post #: 2665
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 8:59:45 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2666
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 9:37:21 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.


The biggest thing the Vikings FO did when they brought in Kubiak is address the offense this offseason. Drafting offense with the first 4 picks of 2019.

As the Defense ages the window is now---sharing FA and draft capital on offense this year has been big. Reif has played well and Rudolph who knows....maybe they aren't the two out the door and we let Waynes and Rhodes go instead?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2667
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 9:56:11 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.


The biggest thing the Vikings FO did when they brought in Kubiak is address the offense this offseason. Drafting offense with the first 4 picks of 2019.

As the Defense ages the window is now---sharing FA and draft capital on offense this year has been big. Reif has played well and Rudolph who knows....maybe they aren't the two out the door and we let Waynes and Rhodes go instead?


It might just work. The offense is looking great. The defense always looks great (duh). We can't afford an injury on offense though.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2668
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 10:09:37 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

Too many variables. Its a pretty empty stat, like Best Total Offense when its based on pass and run yardage.
Post #: 2669
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 10:26:47 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

Too many variables. Its a pretty empty stat, like Best Total Offense when its based on pass and run yardage.


So it could be even a bigger disparity than it currently shows?

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2670
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 10:31:48 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

Too many variables. Its a pretty empty stat, like Best Total Offense when its based on pass and run yardage.


So it could be even a bigger disparity than it currently shows?

Sure. If it suits your argument. That's the beauty of a generic stat.
Post #: 2671
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 10:34:01 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
#Vikings QB Kirk Cousins has a perfect passer rating (158.3) during this three-game win streak when... fullback C.J. Ham is on the field. He's completed 23 of 29 passes for 376 yards, 7 TDs, 0 INTs from '21' personnel -- the two-back, play-action offense they've envisioned.

(Andrew Krammer on Twitter).

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2672
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 10:35:03 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Brian O'Neill (95%) and Josh Kline (94%) both Top 10 in Pass Block Win Rate. Right side protection pretty good for Cousins.
NFL pass-blocking, pass-rushing rankings: 2019 PBWR, PRWR leaderboard https://t.co/iq6pfPo5z6

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 2673
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 1:13:40 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12184
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

The original argument(in here) was about high draft choices and big FAs. It has evened out.
Post #: 2674
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/23/2019 2:11:05 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: ambear

That's Zim all right. Don't really give a shit as long as the guys understand where he's coming from. I just think as was stated with all that has been invested on that side of the ball, things should be tighter than they seem to be.


Seems like someone posted in the last couple of months that our "investment" in the offensive side of the ball has pretty much evened up with our investment on the defensive side.



https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/defense/

highest % spent on defense in NFL.

On offense you've got

Oline: 1 - first rounder, 1 - 2nd, 1 - 3rd. 2 FAs. Even throw in Samia as a 4th.
RB: 2nd and 3rd.
WR - 5th and URFA - Include two more firsts in Treadwell and Patterson
TE: 2 second rounders.
QB both FA. Teddy - first

Dline: Holmes (3rd), Hunter (3rd), J Johnson (4th), Griff (4th) FA Joseph. Not sure how you want to count Stephen 7th or FA
LBers: 1st and 2nd
DB: 1st = Hughes, Waynes, Rhodes, Smith. 2nd: Mac.

5 firsts on defense to 4 on offense (two flamed out/ 1 injured).
4 second rounders on offense vs 2 on defense
2-2 on thirds

I'll stop there but slight lean to defense, last year's draft helped balance it out. Really hurts not hitting on offense with QB and both WRs.

Cap leans Defense in comparison to other teams. Draft pretty close, I'd say defensive lean. Gotta give Zim and coaches for picking and developing defense players.

That was off top of head. Did I miss any?

EDIT: Missed Teddy.

I don't think we are much different than most teams.


Click the link. We have the highest percentage of cap space dedicated to defense in the entire league.

The original argument(in here) was about high draft choices and big FAs. It has evened out.

I tend to break down the value of picks as: Day 1, Day 2, 4th rd (IMO the last chance to grab a decently regarded player), and rds 5-7 (a higher risk grab bag).

Honestly.

Since 2014

Ist rd.
D – Barr, Waynes, Hughes
O – Bridgewater, Treadwell, Bradbury
2nd-3rd rds.
D – Crichton, Kendricks, Alexander, Hunter
O – McKinnon, Cook, Elflein, O'Neill
4th rd.
D – Johnson, Gedeon, Holmes
O – Clemmings, Beavers, Samia
5th-7th rd.
D – Exum, james, Stephen, Watts, Price, Dubose, Robinson, Brothers, Weatherly, Kearse, Odenigbo, Lee, Tocho, Aruna, Downs, Smith Watts, Epps, Boyd
O – Yankey, Pruitt, Diggs, Thompson, Shephard, Bohringer, Morgan, Adams, Isidora, Hodges, Coley, Conklin, Gossett, Udoh, Mitchell, Johnson
Post #: 2675
Page:   <<   < prev  105 106 [107] 108 109   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  105 106 [107] 108 109   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode