Chris Olson
Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom I have been completely torn on the WRs in this draft, but after going somewhat in depth my rankings are #1 Jeudy #2 Lamb #3 Ruggs #4 Mims # 5 Jefferson, but #6 for the Vikings due to his being a slot receiver making him and Thielen not coexist too well. #6 Reagor #5 for the Vikings #7 Aiyuk #8 Pittman #9 Claypool #10 Shenault I'm really hoping we get one of the top 7 and add Tyler Johnson Later. I don't think we can get one of those at pick 58 and pick 25 is too early for Jefferson, Reagor, and Aiyuk IMO. So a trade back or trade up may need to happen. nice list, kg I am torn on how I would rank players... I know the idea that not taking Jefferson because he is used as a slot guy, but he was super productive and at 6-3. good hands and routes, I can't see him disappointing as an outside guy...actually seems more versatile than Mims... Mims concerns me because of the potential route running problem Baylor WR's seem to have...not sure if it is fair to lump him in with them, but I have seen him ranked all over the place...Lindy's has him as the 19th best WR...which I don't really see either, but that is certainly a question The more discussion there has been about not taking a slot guy because we want more 2 TE sets and so forth is interesting...I was thinking a quick, slot guy that can house a 3-yard slant would compliment Thielen and Sharpe...but maybe that isn't what we are looking for...or maybe that is all smoke... If we are looking at a Run heavy offense, then Edwards really might make great sense, as he is a good blocker, but is he Treadwell II? Less of a problem if we take him in the 2nd than first, but I want a speedy and dynamic player if we take a WR high, not sure if he is that... I love Aiyuk, a little cool on Reagor...I don't buy Shenault as a pro...he was gimmicky, but always came through for the Buffs Pittman and Claypool would be OK in rd 2 If we take WR in rd 1, I am leaning more to Jefferson over Mims (assuming the top 3 are gone), a small trade down from 25 would be great!
|