Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 10:26:24 AM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 32977
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: online
I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2551
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 10:36:36 AM  3 votes
The Happy Norseman

 

Posts: 758
Joined: 12/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dave Odle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

Solid post. In particular, I like the take on Dalvin Cook. I've been saying for 12 years that running back is the easiest position on the field to replace. It happens all over the league. Guy gets hurt, replacement doesn't miss a beat. Hell, Rashad Penny has been one of the best backs in the league over the past four weeks.

OMG take a look at the top 3 rushers by week:

Week 17 so far - Rashaad Penny, D'Onta Foreman, Elijah Mitchell

Week 16 - Rex Burkhead, Rashaad Penny, Sony Michel

Week 15 - Jonathan Taylor, Miles Sanders, Craig Reynolds

Week 14 - Dalvin Cook, Rashaad Penny, Alvin Kamara

Week 13 - Jonathan Taylor, Sony Michel, Miles Sanders

Week 12 - Joe Mixon, Elijah Mitchell, Dontrell Hilliard

The Dalvin Cook contract is every bit as crazy as the Cousins or Smith contracts. He's due $43.5-million in base salary over the next four years with a $55.2 cap hit.

At this point, we aren't going to have any money for Justin Jefferson.

It's a matter of value. Right now, I think you could probably lure away a solid RB like D' Ernest Johnson from the Browns for a song. He's a RFA next year and their running game didn't miss a beat as he filled in for Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt when they were injured. Along w/ Mattison, our running game would be fine and not drop off too much. Plus, the guy has never had a salary over 850k, which means you wouldn't be breaking the bank on him.

Minshew is intriguing as competition for QB1. I won't bag on Mond when we've never actually seen the guy play in regular season.

Cook should be moved. He and Cousins are only two of several overpriced contracts. I'm more than happy to unload any of the high profile selfish pricks on the roster who missed games because they refused to get vaccinated. They need to purge now. The offense needs to be rebuilt around Jefferson as quickly as possible.

Trading players based on vaccination is a good way to get the #1 pick in 2023. Any great vaccinated QBs coming out that year?


Successful QB's are leaders. Look at Rothlisberger and the Steelers last night. It was a meaningless game but the Steelers played with some serious intensity because they wanted Rothlisberger to win his final game as a Steeler. No one on the Vikings is running through a brick wall for Cousins. Why? Maybe it's because the next time he puts the team in front of himself it will be the first. Whether it's shirking accountability when he plays poorly, not working with the team to restructure his contract, or not getting vaccinated to increase his odds of playing every week. The guy is not a leader and he'll never win a Superbowl.

_____________________________

If the Cubs can win the World Series...
Post #: 2552
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:13:01 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Kellen Mond is 'liking' social media posts that point out that Zimmer's comments were cold and mean-spirited about "not particularly" wanting to see Mond play on Sunday because he "sees him every day in practice".

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2553
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:14:39 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5870
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

The best chance we have to get a franchise QB is to be one of the worst teams for a season and get a top draft pick.

I'm OK with a 2-15 season next year if we have a new front office making the picks.

Clean house and bottom out next year with a focus on 2023-2026 being the years we make a run.

JJ, Darrisaw, O'Neil, and Irv Smith are my keepers. Everyone else is fair game.


Another way would be trading Jefferson to a team like Jacksonville. They have their QB and still suck.

No ... freakin' ... way. Life is too short.

Accepting a down year or two is like biding your time until you win the lottery. Which most teams / people don't.

Also, you don't cash in a once-in-a-decade draft prize like JJ to try your luck again at the nearest blackjack table. Sometimes it has less to do with the draft pick and more to do with the situation the college QB is drafted into. You don't squander all your talent so you can draft Kenny Pickett or whomever so they can throw to Osborn and Bisi Johnson.

Yes, you have to sell out for a real good qb (or get real lucky which excludes us) ... but ... it still has to be done in a competent, strategic way.

You do it yesterday. And today. But not the day after tomorrow.
Post #: 2554
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:19:04 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5870
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Kellen Mond is 'liking' social media posts that point out that Zimmer's comments were cold and mean-spirited about "not particularly" wanting to see Mond play on Sunday because he "sees him every day in practice".

I usually hate to see player comments posted outside the lockerroom.

Since Zimmer isn't big enough to admit or see his own idiocy and Spielman doesn't have the balls to reel him in ...

mark me down for liking Mond's liking.
Post #: 2555
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:23:06 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Kellen Mond is 'liking' social media posts that point out that Zimmer's comments were cold and mean-spirited about "not particularly" wanting to see Mond play on Sunday because he "sees him every day in practice".

I usually hate to see player comments posted outside the lockerroom.

Since Zimmer isn't big enough to admit or see his own idiocy and Spielman doesn't have the balls to reel him in ...

mark me down for liking Mond's liking.


Same here. As a coach you directly control whether a player gets a chance or not. To not allow him in the game and then also criticize the player publicly is a chicken shit move. More fake tough guy crap if you ask me. Zimmer's a fraud.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2556
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:27:11 AM   
geoffrey greitzer

 

Posts: 1450
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
How about the Wilfs getting off their ass and getting something done.

Slick Rick needs to go too! Good old boys and nepotism has run rampant. Best fans, best stadium, perfect name for the region and team. Time to step up.

Find a GM with insight and balls to push things.

Slick has missed way too many times. Patterson is the only coach that elevates players.. Others seem to do worse once they get to Minnesota. We need a teacher, a motivator, and imagination.

I've been watching and hoping for over 50 years. Cousins has value to other teams. Trade, Get Case back for a year or so. Find a QB. Mond? Draft one this year. We all deserve better

< Message edited by geoffrey greitzer -- 1/4/2022 11:28:30 AM >
Post #: 2557
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:35:58 AM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 2558
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:41:24 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The Happy Norseman

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dave Odle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

Solid post. In particular, I like the take on Dalvin Cook. I've been saying for 12 years that running back is the easiest position on the field to replace. It happens all over the league. Guy gets hurt, replacement doesn't miss a beat. Hell, Rashad Penny has been one of the best backs in the league over the past four weeks.

OMG take a look at the top 3 rushers by week:

Week 17 so far - Rashaad Penny, D'Onta Foreman, Elijah Mitchell

Week 16 - Rex Burkhead, Rashaad Penny, Sony Michel

Week 15 - Jonathan Taylor, Miles Sanders, Craig Reynolds

Week 14 - Dalvin Cook, Rashaad Penny, Alvin Kamara

Week 13 - Jonathan Taylor, Sony Michel, Miles Sanders

Week 12 - Joe Mixon, Elijah Mitchell, Dontrell Hilliard

The Dalvin Cook contract is every bit as crazy as the Cousins or Smith contracts. He's due $43.5-million in base salary over the next four years with a $55.2 cap hit.

At this point, we aren't going to have any money for Justin Jefferson.

It's a matter of value. Right now, I think you could probably lure away a solid RB like D' Ernest Johnson from the Browns for a song. He's a RFA next year and their running game didn't miss a beat as he filled in for Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt when they were injured. Along w/ Mattison, our running game would be fine and not drop off too much. Plus, the guy has never had a salary over 850k, which means you wouldn't be breaking the bank on him.

Minshew is intriguing as competition for QB1. I won't bag on Mond when we've never actually seen the guy play in regular season.

Cook should be moved. He and Cousins are only two of several overpriced contracts. I'm more than happy to unload any of the high profile selfish pricks on the roster who missed games because they refused to get vaccinated. They need to purge now. The offense needs to be rebuilt around Jefferson as quickly as possible.

Trading players based on vaccination is a good way to get the #1 pick in 2023. Any great vaccinated QBs coming out that year?


Successful QB's are leaders. Look at Rothlisberger and the Steelers last night. It was a meaningless game but the Steelers played with some serious intensity because they wanted Rothlisberger to win his final game as a Steeler. No one on the Vikings is running through a brick wall for Cousins. Why? Maybe it's because the next time he puts the team in front of himself it will be the first. Whether it's shirking accountability when he plays poorly, not working with the team to restructure his contract, or not getting vaccinated to increase his odds of playing every week. The guy is not a leader and he'll never win a Superbowl.

I think we should trade Cousins just like you.

My beef is with vaccine rules that are more about PR and keeping sponsors than keeping people safe.

Appoximately 1 million fans cram into stadiums every week but let's try to make an example of a perfectly healthy player with a miniscule chance of having serious problems from Covid. Makes no sense considering every single player can contract and spread the virus.
Post #: 2559
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:46:10 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.
Post #: 2560
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 11:57:32 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77867
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.


Those are more than "big moves".
Post #: 2561
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:09:41 PM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.



Who do you think you can get with that?
Post #: 2562
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:11:15 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22981
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

The best chance we have to get a franchise QB is to be one of the worst teams for a season and get a top draft pick.

I'm OK with a 2-15 season next year if we have a new front office making the picks.

Clean house and bottom out next year with a focus on 2023-2026 being the years we make a run.

JJ, Darrisaw, O'Neil, and Irv Smith are my keepers. Everyone else is fair game.

2-15 is a bit much for me. The difference between 7-10 and 11-6 is not that much. If you are 2-15, you've got a long way to go.

The truth is, I don't think there's a simple and quick answer to our problems. Firing Spielman and Zimmer would be a start. Perhaps trading a guy like Cook gets us some good prospects. This team isn't that far away, it just needs some new guys at the top pulling the strings. They've had their chance. They didn't get it done.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 2563
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:32:25 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.



Who do you think you can get with that?

Veteran: Minshew, Mayfield, Darnold

Draft Pick:

Pickett: Major trade up (probably additional 1s) Don't do it.

Corral: Trade up. (Maybe an additional 1 or a 2 and Cook)

Willis: Depends on his post season games and workouts. Could be there when we pick.
Post #: 2564
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:34:33 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.
Post #: 2565
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:34:52 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5870
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.


Those are more than "big moves".

It's like staying in your cave all winter curled up in a bear skin around a fire, patiently starving so you can better stuff yourself with plump rabbit in the spring. But then you're too weak in the spring to chase anything, even when the mother of all plump rabbits is nibbling on your bum.

OK, a horrible analogy. But ... yes, you have to commit to improvement but sacrificing a leg so you can run better? No bueno!

Losing first so you can win? No bueno!
Post #: 2566
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:36:34 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

The best chance we have to get a franchise QB is to be one of the worst teams for a season and get a top draft pick.

I'm OK with a 2-15 season next year if we have a new front office making the picks.

Clean house and bottom out next year with a focus on 2023-2026 being the years we make a run.

JJ, Darrisaw, O'Neil, and Irv Smith are my keepers. Everyone else is fair game.

2-15 is a bit much for me. The difference between 7-10 and 11-6 is not that much. If you are 2-15, you've got a long way to go.

The truth is, I don't think there's a simple and quick answer to our problems. Firing Spielman and Zimmer would be a start. Perhaps trading a guy like Cook gets us some good prospects. This team isn't that far away, it just needs some new guys at the top pulling the strings. They've had their chance. They didn't get it done.

Post #: 2567
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:43:19 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.

Cook has a 8.3M hit and 10.4M hit the next 2 years for the team that trades for him.

I could see a Miami or Jets team looking for playmakers take that on.
Post #: 2568
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:49:12 PM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.



Who do you think you can get with that?

Veteran: Minshew, Mayfield, Darnold

Draft Pick:

Pickett: Major trade up (probably additional 1s) Don't do it.

Corral: Trade up. (Maybe an additional 1 or a 2 and Cook)

Willis: Depends on his post season games and workouts. Could be there when we pick.



Those veteran QB's are all proven losers IMO. They have had more starts to prove themselves than the Vikings would likely give them going forward.

Darnold and Mayfield have had years under center, they make Cousins look like Joe Montana. Mayfield has an offensive coach, good line, excellent running game, and decent receivers and he is their problem, not their answer. Swap Cousins for Mayfield and they could have easily won the AFC North.

Huntley is intriguing to me. Perhaps giving them Cook would tempt them, considering their troubles at RB.

< Message edited by ronhextall -- 1/4/2022 12:52:37 PM >
Post #: 2569
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:58:10 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.



Who do you think you can get with that?

Veteran: Minshew, Mayfield, Darnold

Draft Pick:

Pickett: Major trade up (probably additional 1s) Don't do it.

Corral: Trade up. (Maybe an additional 1 or a 2 and Cook)

Willis: Depends on his post season games and workouts. Could be there when we pick.



Those veteran QB's are all proven losers IMO. They have had more starts to prove themselves than the Vikings would likely give them going forward.

Darnold and Mayfield have had years under center, they make Cousins look like Joe Montana. Mayfield has an offensive coach, good line, excellent running game, and decent receivers and he is their problem, not their answer. Swap Cousins for Mayfield and they could have easily won the AFC North.

Huntley is intriguing to me. Perhaps giving them Cook would tempt them, considering their troubles at RB.

The veterans I listed are all one year guys.

They would be the bridge to the draft pick taking over eventually. Like Garropolo.
Post #: 2570
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 12:59:39 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I'll never be okay with a 2-15 season.

Many of us have been waiting more than 50 years for a Superbowl victory. We've had more than our share of crappy seasons and/or crappy endings to good seasons. Why should we have to settle for more of that?

It's called short term pain for long term gain.

Are you content with finishing 7-10 through 10-7 every year and drafting 12-20? Perpetually stuck in mediocrity will never get us to the SB.

You have the best chance of getting a franchise QB if you are drafting in the top 3-5 picks. We're never bad enough to get that.

I think we can make about 3 or 4 big moves(trade Cousins, trade Cook, trade Smith or extend Hunter) and find a franchise QB and still contend for a playoff spot next year. Then contend for SB in following years.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Of course we need the right person making those decisions. I'm all in for Assistant GM of Chiefs.



Who do you think you can get with that?

Veteran: Minshew, Mayfield, Darnold

Draft Pick:

Pickett: Major trade up (probably additional 1s) Don't do it.

Corral: Trade up. (Maybe an additional 1 or a 2 and Cook)

Willis: Depends on his post season games and workouts. Could be there when we pick.



Those veteran QB's are all proven losers IMO. They have had more starts to prove themselves than the Vikings would likely give them going forward.

Darnold and Mayfield have had years under center, they make Cousins look like Joe Montana. Mayfield has an offensive coach, good line, excellent running game, and decent receivers and he is their problem, not their answer. Swap Cousins for Mayfield and they could have easily won the AFC North.

Huntley is intriguing to me. Perhaps giving them Cook would tempt them, considering their troubles at RB.

Huntley for Cook would work for me.

Get Huntley for a couple cheap years to see if he can consistently produce.
Post #: 2571
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 1:03:34 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22981
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.

There's always a sucker around every corner.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 2572
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 1:07:47 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22981
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.

Cook has a 8.3M hit and 10.4M hit the next 2 years for the team that trades for him.

I could see a Miami or Jets team looking for playmakers take that on.

Texans, Niners, Falcons, Dolphins, Jets, Ravens. Even the Rams always feel the need to overspend on a high-profile guy, but I'm not sure they have any cap room. If the Bills have cap room, they may feel they are a running back away from a title.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/4/2022 1:09:35 PM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 2573
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 1:16:52 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77867
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.

Cook has a 8.3M hit and 10.4M hit the next 2 years for the team that trades for him.

I could see a Miami or Jets team looking for playmakers take that on.


Possibly, but I doubt you get better than a 2nd or 3rd for him.
Post #: 2574
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/4/2022 1:29:10 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I doubt anyone is trading for Cook with his contract, his history of injury, his potential legal issues, and the fact that the delta between what you can get out of Cook at his best and what you can get from a back the next level or two down doesn't merit taking on the issues I listed.

Cook has a 8.3M hit and 10.4M hit the next 2 years for the team that trades for him.

I could see a Miami or Jets team looking for playmakers take that on.


Possibly, but I doubt you get better than a 2nd or 3rd for him.

Injuries, uncertain legal situation, and the lack of a meaningful delta over a guy you could pay half of that or even less would seem to dampen the market. Why trade for a guy who will miss a few games, be mediocre or worse as the season wears on, and who may be suspended at any point, especially for $8.3M?
Post #: 2575
Page:   <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode