Karl Juhnke
Posts: 13586
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DavidAOlson quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen Another chart, #12 = 1200 with the return at 1430. Edit - we gave up 440 more which would be 1640 if we gave up the 2nd. Something doesn't sound right. Can't say I'm a fan of the trade, but... weirdly, although it's a loss on Rich Hill's Chart, it's a win on PFF's and F-S. Ignore Jimmy Johnson's, which everyone knows is nuts. https://twitter.com/PFF_Brad/status/1519851311642157056 Maybe in their mock drafts, the Vikes liked the selection of players that showed up in the 30's. Like some players in positions of need often fell. So they felt they could squeeze out more value. This is the part people don’t account for. All the draft trade tools are just that. Tools. They are not the final word. They provide a baseline that you then need to apply to your draft board and come with some sort of integrated decision.
< Message edited by Karl Juhnke -- 4/28/2022 9:18:16 PM >
_____________________________
Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Not fit! Donald Trump - 6 July 2016
|