RE: 2022 NFL draft

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: 2022 NFL draft

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2022 NFL draft

Page: << < prev 33 34 [35] 36 37 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:52:59 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28600
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

What a shit tone to set your 1st move 1st draft.

Too big for Kwesi.

Like I posted today, he's just hoping the networks are running commercials during our pick.

Not saying he is, but he COULD be a risk adverse chicken shit.

Post #: 851

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:55:52 PM

bongbong

Posts: 333
Joined: 10/27/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

What a shit tone to set your 1st move 1st draft.

Too big for Kwesi.

Really a horrible first impression for the fanbase.

You'd think you'd want to make an early splash - not a belly flop.

Looked over the edge of the platform, sharted in his Speedos then slipped on the ladder climbing back down.

This team....oofda!

Post #: 852

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:56:03 PM

Chris Olson

Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline

weird...but ultimately we are still waiting to see how the extra player pans out over time

still can get 4 starters in first 2 days

lmao

at least my taste is returning from covid...these beers are going down nicely...

gonna be a long night

Post #: 853

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:56:39 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28600
Status: offline

Maybe he watched Draft Day and has a plan nobody is privy to

Right now he is Spielman on steroids.

Post #: 854

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:56:40 PM

Karl Juhnke

Posts: 13023
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline

Seems like the only this would have made sense is if dropped 2 or 3 spots in the 1st. Not 20.

Post #: 855

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:57:04 PM

Dana Turner

Posts: 1958
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline

Way too much hand wringing going on. The Vikings are going to get at least 7 of the top 100 players and many draft experts have gushed about the solid first 100 guys in this draft. The #66 pick is just two picks out of the second round, this was not a bad trade, just not flashy and obviously the way you guys wanted it to go.

Post #: 856

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:58:03 PM

Daniel Lee Young

Posts: 14000
Status: offline

Well back to playing online golf…

_____________________________

**** you all.

Post #: 857

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:58:08 PM

bongbong

Posts: 333
Joined: 10/27/2009
Status: offline

Silver lining: per David's post a few days ago, our 1st rounders never stick, so, umm yay I guess?

Post #: 858

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:58:11 PM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

You know what comes out perfect.

DET gets 12

We get 32 and 34 and swap 3rd rounders.

So, we should have 32,34,46 and 66.

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 4/28/2022 9:00:40 PM >

Post #: 859

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:58:37 PM

Karl Juhnke

Posts: 13023
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline

Plot twist. maybe the problem wasn’t Rick. Maybe the propensity for trades was coming from above.

It was the Wilfs all along!

Post #: 860

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 8:58:48 PM

Chris Olson

Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

Way too much hand wringing going on. The Vikings are going to get at least 7 of the top 100 players and many draft experts have gushed about the solid first 100 guys in this draft. The #66 pick is just two picks out of the second round, this was not a bad trade, just not flashy and obviously the way you guys wanted it to go.

thanks coach, we needed that

I was sharpening my razor blades...

Post #: 861

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:00:13 PM

Chris Olson

Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

Plot twist. maybe the problem wasn’t Rick. Maybe the propensity for trades was coming from above.

It was the Wilfs all along!

Post #: 862

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:00:48 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

You know what comes out perfect.

DET gets 12

We get 32 and 34 and swap 3rd rounders.

Do think that’s what it was SUPPOSED to be?

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 863

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:01:52 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28600
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

Way too much hand wringing going on. The Vikings are going to get at least 7 of the top 100 players and many draft experts have gushed about the solid first 100 guys in this draft. The #66 pick is just two picks out of the second round, this was not a bad trade, just not flashy and obviously the way you guys wanted it to go.

?? Where are you getting that??

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2022 9:03:04 PM >

Post #: 864

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:01:52 PM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

I don’t mind the trade back to get a third and a better 2nd. I’ll get pissy if we trade back 4ths and 5ths for 6ths and 7ths

David we gave up 20 spots in the first round to move up 12 in the second. A third round pick isn't in the realm of proper compensation for that.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 865

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:02:46 PM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18932
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Another chart, #12 = 1200 with the return at 1430.

Edit - we gave up 440 more which would be 1640 if we gave up the 2nd.

Something doesn't sound right.

Can't say I'm a fan of the trade, but... weirdly, although it's a loss on Rich Hill's Chart, it's a win on PFF's and F-S.

Ignore Jimmy Johnson's, which everyone knows is nuts.

https://twitter.com/PFF_Brad/status/1519851311642157056

Maybe in their mock drafts, the Vikes liked the selection of players that showed up in the 30's. Like some players in positions of need often fell. So they felt they could squeeze out more value.

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 866

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:03:10 PM

Chris Olson

Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

You know what comes out perfect.

DET gets 12

We get 32 and 34 and swap 3rd rounders.

"the clock was running and it just got so confusing..."
Do think that’s what it was SUPPOSED to be?

Post #: 867

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:03:16 PM

TJSweens

Posts: 45016
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline

According to Doogie, we won on the ESPN chart.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."

Post #: 868

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:03:26 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: online

Is it possible that if Jameson reaches certain benchmarks, the Vikes will then get the Lion's 1st round pick next year ?

Sometimes there are things that aren't reported on right away with regards to trades.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 869

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:03:41 PM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

Seems like the only this would have made sense is if dropped 2 or 3 spots in the 1st. Not 20.

Does Kwesi even have a clue about the difference of moving back in the first to move up in the 2nd.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 870

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:03:49 PM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidAOlson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Another chart, #12 = 1200 with the return at 1430.

Edit - we gave up 440 more which would be 1640 if we gave up the 2nd.

Something doesn't sound right.

Can't say I'm a fan of the trade, but... weirdly, although it's a loss on Rich Hill's Chart, it's a win on PFF's and F-S.

Ignore Jimmy Johnson's, which everyone knows is nuts.

https://twitter.com/PFF_Brad/status/1519851311642157056

Maybe in their mock drafts, the Vikes liked the selection of players that showed up in the 30's. Like some players in positions of need often fell. So they felt they could squeeze out more value.

I looked at a draft tek chart.

Post #: 871

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:04:11 PM

Phil Riewer

Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

I don’t mind the trade back to get a third and a better 2nd. I’ll get pissy if we trade back 4ths and 5ths for 6ths and 7ths

David we gave up 20 spots in the first round to move up 12 in the second. A third round pick isn't in the realm of proper compensation for that.

Trade chart says it is a slight edge to us. In no shape or reality is it a Hershel walker trade. They are the Lions.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 4/28/2022 9:05:53 PM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq

Post #: 872

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:04:31 PM

TJSweens

Posts: 45016
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Is it possible that if Jameson reaches certain benchmarks, the Vikes will then get the Lion's 1st round pick next year ?

Sometimes there are things that aren't reported on right away with regards to trades.

No. They would have announced it.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."

Post #: 873

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:05:12 PM

Tom Sykes

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline

If we had traded our first and third instead of second ... maybe

Oh no ... I just felt cold icy fingers grab my spine ...

What if our whole draft strategy designed to get peewee Linderbomb?

Instead of Jameson, Davis, Hamilton, etc etc

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 4/28/2022 9:06:43 PM >

Post #: 874

RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 9:05:18 PM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

Way too much hand wringing going on. The Vikings are going to get at least 7 of the top 100 players and many draft experts have gushed about the solid first 100 guys in this draft. The #66 pick is just two picks out of the second round, this was not a bad trade, just not flashy and obviously the way you guys wanted it to go.

?? Where are you getting that??