Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  166 167 [168] 169 170   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 7:05:29 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 24000
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: joejitsu

It sounds like O’Neill’s calf injury is worse than evpected. That’s not what I wanted to hear.

Calf injuries are not something to mess with. They should shut him down.


The way he was carted off, I was assuming a tear, so not sure what "worse than expected" means

Calf muscle leads to the achilles. You don't mess with that.

I've torn a calf muscle before. Hurts like hell. No chance of playing for a couple of weeks, perhaps even a month, if that is what happened.

If he's out season over. No chance of winning wild card weekend.

This team is still 1-2 linemen short of being a good offensive line. They have no depth whatsoever. And that goes for a lot of positions.

It partially comes from paying the quarterback three times as much as he is worth.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4176
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 7:51:00 PM   
marty


Posts: 13302
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Lots of great points and discussions, thanks for the good writings peoples.

I have little bit of a queasy feeling with Mr. 4th and 26, just like I did with Richard Solomon (Denny Green's buddy that made the 2ndry suck for years).

The feeling I have is that while both are awful, they mask the fact that the head coach isn't really a head coach that will win a Super Bowl.

Maybe Denny Green and KOC were at their best as OCs ?

< Message edited by marty -- 1/2/2023 8:19:59 PM >


_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4177
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 7:52:55 PM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 353
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: joejitsu

It sounds like O’Neill’s calf injury is worse than evpected. That’s not what I wanted to hear.

Calf injuries are not something to mess with. They should shut him down.


The way he was carted off, I was assuming a tear, so not sure what "worse than expected" means

Calf muscle leads to the achilles. You don't mess with that.

I've torn a calf muscle before. Hurts like hell. No chance of playing for a couple of weeks, perhaps even a month, if that is what happened.

If he's out season over. No chance of winning wild card weekend.

This team is still 1-2 linemen short of being a good offensive line. They have no depth whatsoever. And that goes for a lot of positions.

It partially comes from paying the quarterback three times as much as he is worth.


Spielman did some nice things, but ultimately his demise is he made too many bad decisions. Sometimes the bad decisions impact the team more than the good ones.
And this has followed him pretty much everywhere he's been
He'll throw some gems in, but he also has some air balls.
Cook contract was just a bad decision in today's NFL. You have to spend your money wisely, and he's not worth the money IMO
He swung and missed on OL for years. Getting O'Neil, Cleveland and Darrisaw took like 5 years
I'll admit I was calling Bradbury a bust, but the current coaching staff seems to have gotten him to an acceptable level IMO
Post #: 4178
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 8:37:14 PM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 18016
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
KOC seems like the type that will give Donatell next year, to prove it with "his" players.


How do you justify keeping a DC that has the 32nd ranked defense?

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 4179
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 9:38:32 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14875
Status: offline
You don’t and shouldn’t do that.

Ne excuses, no regurts….

Fire his ass at 00:00 of last game of this season.

Period..

Fn dinosaur..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 4180
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/2/2023 9:44:57 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14875
Status: offline
KAM needs to sit KOC and Donatello down and let them know that the defense is inexcusable and it changes immediately.

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 4181
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 1:28:42 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9726
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

KAM needs to sit KOC and Donatello down and let them know that the defense is inexcusable and it changes immediately.


i agree with this; first order of business in to save this season....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 4182
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 8:43:47 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
Maybe this offseason more than most it will be helpful to cage or qualify posts about plans & decisions:
- I think the regime should...
- I think the regime will...

Two entirely different things. The latter is great when the replies stay on track because posters offer a broad range of pros and cons.
Post #: 4183
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 8:44:29 AM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
KOC would be making a huge gamble keeping Donatello.

Assuming 11-0 in one score games isn't going to happen again the defense is going to have to improve by leaps and bounds to approach 12-13 wins.

If next season tanks Donatello won't be the only once fans and media start questioning.
Post #: 4184
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 9:42:30 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
Without a tremendous amount of luck in free agency and instant impact from a limited draft class this offseason, I don't understand how the defense can be good next year regardless of who the DC is.

They can cut Harrison Smith, Kendricks, Hicks, and several others to gain cap, but the $30 million figure I've read here isn't very much. It's like the minimum you need to stay afloat, and we have to sign Hockensen.

So they will have to strike gold on the couple of mid-tier and several low to mid-tier types they sign. That is fool's gold.

And any draftees will have to be able to contribute right away or by default they are no help. Ugh, based on 2022 that is a sickening thought.

Then you potentially have a new defensive scheme. No DT to provide a rush inside, scraps at DE. Za Smith with no position.

Who would even want to be the DC of that mess?

Just what expectations do people have even if we managed to somehow get a top flight DC??

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/3/2023 9:46:25 AM >
Post #: 4185
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 9:57:17 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24000
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
The worst thing the Vikings could do right now is give Cousins any type of extension (count your blessings we aren't 6-10 with this defense). They have been very fortunate that this team will reach the playoffs. In any other given year this team could just as easily be 7-9, 8-8 heading into the final week of the season.

Cousins is under contract for one more year (as I understand it). I would bet almost every cent I have in the bank that he tries to renegotiate during the off-season. Management has to do everything it can to say no.

That means we need to start looking at quarterbacks for the draft so we can get a guy in and groom him. Or, look at potential free agent quarterbacks to sign during the offseason.

One more year until we can take off the 50-pound weight around our necks. Until then, the defense isn't going to be much better unless we have a witch running the defense. There isn't much talent there, and what is talented is pretty old.

As I see it, there is at a minimum between 6-8 teams looking for a quarterback. IMO, the Vikings need to start thinking about this.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/3/2023 10:01:49 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4186
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 9:57:17 AM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Without a tremendous amount of luck in free agency and instant impact from a limited draft class this offseason, I don't understand how the defense can be good next year regardless of who the DC is.

They can cut Harrison Smith, Kendricks, Hicks, and several others to gain cap, but the $30 million figure I've read here isn't very much. It's like the minimum you need to stay afloat, and we have to sign Hockensen.

So they will have to strike gold on the couple of mid-tier and several low to mid-tier types they sign. That is fool's gold.

And any draftees will have to be able to contribute right away or by default they are no help. Ugh, based on 2022 that is a sickening thought.

Then you potentially have a new defensive scheme. No DT to provide a rush inside, scraps at DE. Za Smith with no position.

Who would even want to be the DC of that mess?

Just what expectations do people have even if we managed to somehow get a top flight DC??


I would trade/sign FA for the best DB possible. Hope a new DC can generate a pass rush.

Frankly, I think spending big money on Linebackers and Safeties is a waste of money. You need a pass rush and shutdown corners the rest just doesn't matter.
Post #: 4187
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:00:48 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
Last offseason many predicted a roundabout .500 season. Some also said (and I totally agree) that without Kwesi making the tough decisions, we will only be good enough to string together several seasons of mediocrity thereby assuring mediocre draft slots.

Due to a crazy range of uncanny things "unlikely to be earned" next year lol, we ended up with a far better record but IMO are essentially a team that plays like it is only "still in the hunt" for the last playoff spot.

We will be going into the offseason perhaps 32nd (last) in terms of combined cap and draft assets.

So related to expectations for the defense, just what do people expect for next year as a whole? Another playoff run?

Barring an improbable SB run - or even with a SB run - I say this chapter of the Vikings needs to be blown up.
Post #: 4188
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:02:37 AM   
marty


Posts: 13302
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Without a tremendous amount of luck in free agency and instant impact from a limited draft class this offseason, I don't understand how the defense can be good next year regardless of who the DC is

Just a simple change back to a 4-3, and a more aggressive scheme that blitzes, could easily boost the defense up 15 spots.

You could hit on a FA pickup, or the 1st round draft pick. And then there is also the possibility of the highly drafted safety and cornerback from the past draft coming back, and flourishing in the new system.

And then you have an explosive offense to help you, with Cousins in the 2nd year of being in a great system. What great defensive coordinator would NOT want this position?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4189
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:04:51 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24000
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Last offseason many predicted a roundabout .500 season. Some also said (and I totally agree) that without Kwesi making the tough decisions, we will only be good enough to string together several seasons of mediocrity thereby assuring mediocre draft slots.

Due to a crazy range of uncanny things "unlikely to be earned" next year lol, we ended up with a far better record but IMO are essentially a team that plays like it is only "still in the hunt" for the last playoff spot.

We will be going into the offseason perhaps 32nd (last) in terms of combined cap and draft assets.

So related to expectations for the defense, just what do people expect for next year as a whole? Another playoff run?

Barring an improbable SB run - or even with a SB run - I say this chapter of the Vikings needs to be blown up.

I say the Vikes find a sucker to trade Cousins to. Heck, even Washington may want him back. The Raiders? The Jets always seem to have an appetite for bad quarterbacks. New Orleans?

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/3/2023 10:07:10 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4190
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:05:32 AM   
marty


Posts: 13302
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I think the Vikings have more studs on defense than the Giants, and the Giants are ranked #16, I think mostly from a more aggressive scheme.

Get Vic Fangio at defensive coordinator next season, and this defense will be ranked no less than #15, and could be top 10.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4191
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:11:17 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Without a tremendous amount of luck in free agency and instant impact from a limited draft class this offseason, I don't understand how the defense can be good next year regardless of who the DC is.

They can cut Harrison Smith, Kendricks, Hicks, and several others to gain cap, but the $30 million figure I've read here isn't very much. It's like the minimum you need to stay afloat, and we have to sign Hockensen.

So they will have to strike gold on the couple of mid-tier and several low to mid-tier types they sign. That is fool's gold.

And any draftees will have to be able to contribute right away or by default they are no help. Ugh, based on 2022 that is a sickening thought.

Then you potentially have a new defensive scheme. No DT to provide a rush inside, scraps at DE. Za Smith with no position.

Who would even want to be the DC of that mess?

Just what expectations do people have even if we managed to somehow get a top flight DC??


I would trade/sign FA for the best DB possible. Hope a new DC can generate a pass rush.

Frankly, I think spending big money on Linebackers and Safeties is a waste of money. You need a pass rush and shutdown corners the rest just doesn't matter.



Right now for 2023 we are 26th in cap space at $ -7.4 million. Top CBs sometimes do hit the market, but end up signing for obscene amounts. We will not be in the running for a star CB. Nor even an upper tier one. Maybe we will be able to be competitive in the mid-tier category. Our 'splash' signing.

As for last in cap + draft assets, I misspoke. The Saints are $ -58 million AND Philly has at least their 1st round pick.

The Bears have $ 119 million in cap space.
Post #: 4192
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:13:42 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45514
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Just a simple change back to a 4-3, and a more aggressive scheme that blitzes, could easily boost the defense up 15 spots.

Essentially the same personnel played an aggressive 4-3 last year. They weren't 15 spots better.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 4193
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:14:10 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Without a tremendous amount of luck in free agency and instant impact from a limited draft class this offseason, I don't understand how the defense can be good next year regardless of who the DC is

Just a simple change back to a 4-3, and a more aggressive scheme that blitzes, could easily boost the defense up 15 spots.

You could hit on a FA pickup, or the 1st round draft pick. And then there is also the possibility of the highly drafted safety and cornerback from the past draft coming back, and flourishing in the new system.

And then you have an explosive offense to help you, with Cousins in the 2nd year of being in a great system. What great defensive coordinator would NOT want this position?


Both sides of this coin are relying on opinion and speculation, but I at least am going off history, being realistic, considering odds, and factoring in cap implications.
Post #: 4194
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:15:59 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

The worst thing the Vikings could do right now is give Cousins any type of extension (count your blessings we aren't 6-10 with this defense). They have been very fortunate that this team will reach the playoffs. In any other given year this team could just as easily be 7-9, 8-8 heading into the final week of the season.

Cousins is under contract for one more year (as I understand it). I would bet almost every cent I have in the bank that he tries to renegotiate during the off-season. Management has to do everything it can to say no.

That means we need to start looking at quarterbacks for the draft so we can get a guy in and groom him. Or, look at potential free agent quarterbacks to sign during the offseason.

One more year until we can take off the 50-pound weight around our necks. Until then, the defense isn't going to be much better unless we have a witch running the defense. There isn't much talent there, and what is talented is pretty old.

As I see it, there is at a minimum between 6-8 teams looking for a quarterback. IMO, the Vikings need to start thinking about this.


Cousins extension last year is the sticking point in the 2023 rebuild option. He's not movable.
Post #: 4195
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:18:16 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 30046
Status: offline
More studs on defense than the Giants?

I don't know nor care about speculation of the Giants D personnel, but who are our studs on defense?
Post #: 4196
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:19:35 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24000
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

The worst thing the Vikings could do right now is give Cousins any type of extension (count your blessings we aren't 6-10 with this defense). They have been very fortunate that this team will reach the playoffs. In any other given year this team could just as easily be 7-9, 8-8 heading into the final week of the season.

Cousins is under contract for one more year (as I understand it). I would bet almost every cent I have in the bank that he tries to renegotiate during the off-season. Management has to do everything it can to say no.

That means we need to start looking at quarterbacks for the draft so we can get a guy in and groom him. Or, look at potential free agent quarterbacks to sign during the offseason.

One more year until we can take off the 50-pound weight around our necks. Until then, the defense isn't going to be much better unless we have a witch running the defense. There isn't much talent there, and what is talented is pretty old.

As I see it, there is at a minimum between 6-8 teams looking for a quarterback. IMO, the Vikings need to start thinking about this.


Cousins extension last year is the sticking point in the 2023 rebuild option. He's not movable.

Bummer. I know very little about contract issues.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4197
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:21:45 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45514
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

The worst thing the Vikings could do right now is give Cousins any type of extension (count your blessings we aren't 6-10 with this defense). They have been very fortunate that this team will reach the playoffs. In any other given year this team could just as easily be 7-9, 8-8 heading into the final week of the season.

Cousins is under contract for one more year (as I understand it). I would bet almost every cent I have in the bank that he tries to renegotiate during the off-season. Management has to do everything it can to say no.

That means we need to start looking at quarterbacks for the draft so we can get a guy in and groom him. Or, look at potential free agent quarterbacks to sign during the offseason.

One more year until we can take off the 50-pound weight around our necks. Until then, the defense isn't going to be much better unless we have a witch running the defense. There isn't much talent there, and what is talented is pretty old.

As I see it, there is at a minimum between 6-8 teams looking for a quarterback. IMO, the Vikings need to start thinking about this.


Cousins extension last year is the sticking point in the 2023 rebuild option. He's not movable.

Why not? He will only cost $6M in dead cap if we move him after June 1.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 4198
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:24:40 AM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Last offseason many predicted a roundabout .500 season. Some also said (and I totally agree) that without Kwesi making the tough decisions, we will only be good enough to string together several seasons of mediocrity thereby assuring mediocre draft slots.

Due to a crazy range of uncanny things "unlikely to be earned" next year lol, we ended up with a far better record but IMO are essentially a team that plays like it is only "still in the hunt" for the last playoff spot.

We will be going into the offseason perhaps 32nd (last) in terms of combined cap and draft assets.

So related to expectations for the defense, just what do people expect for next year as a whole? Another playoff run?

Barring an improbable SB run - or even with a SB run - I say this chapter of the Vikings needs to be blown up.

I say the Vikes find a sucker to trade Cousins to. Heck, even Washington may want him back. The Raiders? The Jets always seem to have an appetite for bad quarterbacks. New Orleans?

He has a NTC.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 4199
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2023 10:25:16 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24000
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Last offseason many predicted a roundabout .500 season. Some also said (and I totally agree) that without Kwesi making the tough decisions, we will only be good enough to string together several seasons of mediocrity thereby assuring mediocre draft slots.

Due to a crazy range of uncanny things "unlikely to be earned" next year lol, we ended up with a far better record but IMO are essentially a team that plays like it is only "still in the hunt" for the last playoff spot.

We will be going into the offseason perhaps 32nd (last) in terms of combined cap and draft assets.

So related to expectations for the defense, just what do people expect for next year as a whole? Another playoff run?

Barring an improbable SB run - or even with a SB run - I say this chapter of the Vikings needs to be blown up.

I say the Vikes find a sucker to trade Cousins to. Heck, even Washington may want him back. The Raiders? The Jets always seem to have an appetite for bad quarterbacks. New Orleans?

He has a NTC.

Bummer. I would also add a no extension clause.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4200
Page:   <<   < prev  166 167 [168] 169 170   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  166 167 [168] 169 170   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode