Bill Johanesen
Posts: 28639
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen Had Kwesi extended JJ right away he probably could have locked him in at 31ml avv. We didn't have the cap room to lock him up earlier. Well, it technically could have been done by backending the deal where his cap numbers from say 2024 on would be in the $40+ million range. Ugh. Yes his market value, like the value of many others, has and will increase yearly or whenever. But paying him earlier probably would have meant more overall cap/money compared to waiting and paying a higher AAV. Rumor is that Kwesi wants a longer contract; JJ wants a shorter one so he can get another big one at 27-29... Rumors? More like some bloggers turn to fill content. Bloggers? Try SI. https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/what-might-justin-jefferson-contract-extension-look-like Kind of? Will Ragatz is the publisher of Inside the Vikings, an SI.com channel in the Fan Nation network. Its SI giving a space to bloggers. Basically their version of "Bleacher Report". I started my post out and clearly stated it as a rumor; if I remember correctly. Sure. A rumor by a blogger. This is news to me, I guess I assumed he was a "real" writer. I used to see this guy on Twitter but for some reason, and I'm sure quoted him once or twice, and for reasons I don't even remember, I blocked him. Semantics? He is at least real as opposed to say a fabricated twitter handle designed to look like one of the ESPN dudes who break news. But clearly, per his article (from June by the way) he has zero knowledge of what Kwesi or JJ's camp want (or if he knew he didn't want to say, but IMO that is not likely). And almost assuredly, if some insider spills the beans too early then they will not be an insider anymore. Personally, a rumor suggests there could be at least an inkling of a whisper, an inference, or perhaps a small thing one of the entities provides unofficially. Clearly, the article did not fit any of that criteria. But my definition of rumor doesn't match the official definition.
< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 9/20/2023 5:43:30 PM >
|