Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 12:35:28 PM   
timz

 

Posts: 495
Joined: 11/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Not being Spielman outweighed any other factor.


I think this statement proves who the dumbass is. Based on this they could have hired you.
Post #: 3151
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 12:36:03 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.
Post #: 3152
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 12:42:58 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: timz

When Kwesi was hired I put a post on this board questioning the hiring of someone out of the Cleveland organization, one of the few franchises with less success over the years than MN. I was mocked and run off the board. Fans are sure singing a different tune now.

If you were mocked, it was because he spent 6 years with SF and then 1 with CLE.

Not being Spielman outweighed any other factor.


Exactly.

He was actually in Cleveland the year they went 11-5 and made the Playoffs for the first time in 18 years. They even won a Playoff game before narrowly losing to the Mahomes Chiefs. But the majority of his career before us was with the 49ers.

His resume wasn't the problem, his lack of ability at the bigger job was.
Post #: 3153
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:13:39 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Some drafts are terrible and fans moan about a bust but in reality there aren't always a lot of alternatives.

Even if there were only 1-2 quality players that Kwesi passed on I might give a pass.

But 2022 is looking like a solid draft to me.

I'd say any of the guys below make the Vikes a better team.
(Beyond Booth... it's slim pickings as expected.)

13 Jordan Davis DT - game changer
14 Kyle Hamiltion S - quality safety
17 Zion Johnson OG - starter
21 Trent McDuffie CB - starter
24 Tyler Smith OT - starter
25 Tyler Linderbaum C - starter
27 Devin LLoyd LB - starter
31 Daxton HIll S - starter
35 Roger McCreary CB - starter
36 Breece Hall RB - starter (I'll admit... I would not have been happy with this pick)
37 Jalen Pitre S - starter
41 Kenneth Walker III RB - starter (I'll admit... I would not have been happy with this pick)
Post #: 3154
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:24:08 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


No; it doesn't have to be pro bowl starter but it is looking like a lean draft.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3155
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:25:19 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft

It was a tremendous draft if you use your own copyrighted draft criteria: anyone with starts, even horrible starters = great draft pick.

Sadly, even by that standard, we get a fail.

Can you please amend your standard to include ‘showing improvement on special teams’? Maybe give Kwesi a shot …


Ingram is a horrible starter?
Evans is a horrible starter?

Usually 1st and 2nd round have pro bowlers and there is but one so far.

When you look at that draft it isn't only underwelming for our team.

Bill's original post was for the first two rounds. My post was mostly about Cine ... but

hanging your hat on Ingram - out of Cine-Booth-Ingram - is still a fail.

(Evans is also a fail until, 1) he stops deflecting passes to WRs in the endzone or, 2) he shows he can stay on the field).


Not hanging my hat on Ingram...truth be told he has looked better the last two games....Evans has looked pretty good also but I always wanted Davis over the trade down.

TBH the trade down was to get another 2nd round pick as I believe the had 5; 2023 so far looks better but who knows.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/10/2023 1:36:33 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3156
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:38:26 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it
Post #: 3157
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:40:42 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.
Post #: 3158
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:45:49 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3159
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:48:07 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3160
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:51:07 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....


He's on IR for four weeks, not the season. But he doesn't matter in this.. point is, after being 1-3 or 1-4 you thought we we still in the mix!
Post #: 3161
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:53:38 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.
Post #: 3162
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:54:40 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....


He's on IR for four weeks, not the season. But he doesn't matter in this.. point is, after being 1-3 or 1-4 you thought we we still in the mix!


Actually the schedule is easier the next 8 weeks and there was a chance to make the playoffs but w/o JJ the next 4 weeks it becomes almost impossible....but you probably already know that even if it was a different opinion than yours.

Tanking never is the answer....always try to make the playoffs but now that it looks like we can't....that changes.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3163
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 1:55:54 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3164
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:03:40 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....


He's on IR for four weeks, not the season. But he doesn't matter in this.. point is, after being 1-3 or 1-4 you thought we we still in the mix!


Actually the schedule is easier the next 8 weeks and there was a chance to make the playoffs but w/o JJ the next 4 weeks it becomes almost impossible....but you probably already know that even if it was a different opinion than yours.

Tanking never is the answer....always try to make the playoffs but now that it looks like we can't....that changes.


The next 8 weeks? You mean as part of a 14 game season? Ignoring the fact you cherry picked that while omitting @ Cincy and a pair of games against the Lions as three of the final four games?

A chance to make the playoffs, lol! Playoffs? Jim Mora would love you.

Different opinion? Nice try. I knew it was almost impossible to make the playoffs BEFORE JJ's injury.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/10/2023 2:10:32 PM >
Post #: 3165
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:06:37 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)


To hang your hat on Cine-Booth-Ingram being anything but a failure based on a week 5 PFF grade is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for you.
Post #: 3166
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:13:39 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)


To hang your hat on Cine-Booth-Ingram being anything but a failure based on a week 5 PFF grade is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for you.


Hanging my hat? Ranking Ingram in week 5 is the same as ranking him in week 1....too early to tell (same thing I said in week 1). Cine and Booth probably too early to tell also. Like I said I wanted Davis.
If you want to disparage Kwesi about the 2022 draft; go ahead...it isn't looking like a great draft for many teams but you better give him some credit for 2023; which you do struggle with. Oh and 2023 draft is way too early to tell.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/10/2023 2:15:55 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3167
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:19:15 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....


He's on IR for four weeks, not the season. But he doesn't matter in this.. point is, after being 1-3 or 1-4 you thought we we still in the mix!


Actually the schedule is easier the next 8 weeks and there was a chance to make the playoffs but w/o JJ the next 4 weeks it becomes almost impossible....but you probably already know that even if it was a different opinion than yours.

Tanking never is the answer....always try to make the playoffs but now that it looks like we can't....that changes.


So tanking is never the answer...until it is?
Post #: 3168
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:21:22 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Since the mood is tense today I'll add to the drama:


Adam Patrick
@Str8_Cash_Homey
·
2h
Vikings win percentage in 87 games with Kirk Cousins as their QB:

54.6

Vikings win percentage in previous 87 games with Christian Ponder, Matt Cassel, Josh Freeman, Teddy Bridgewater, Sam Bradford, Shaun Hill, and Case Keenum as their QBs

56.9


_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 3169
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:22:28 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
One place I will agree with Zimmer is that PFF rankings for O-Linemen are basically garbage.

Unless they know the responsibility for each player on each play, all they're doing is looking at the end result and not how they got there. A guy who allowed a "pressure" may have been doing the exact job asked of him because that may not have been his man to block.

Unless you are all straight up man blocking the guy across from you on every snap, its all noise, very little signal.
Post #: 3170
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:33:12 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)


To hang your hat on Cine-Booth-Ingram being anything but a failure based on a week 5 PFF grade is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for you.


Hanging my hat? Ranking Ingram in week 5 is the same as ranking him in week 1....too early to tell (same thing I said in week 1). Cine and Booth probably too early to tell also. Like I said I wanted Davis.
If you want to disparage Kwesi about the 2022 draft; go ahead...it isn't looking like a great draft for many teams but you better give him some credit for 2023; which you do struggle with. Oh and 2023 draft is way too early to tell.


Well you hang in there with Cine, Booth, and Ingram for however many more years

It's not looking like a "great" draft for many teams? How about a good draft? See, it's ok to have a good draft. Since you keep bringing it up, care to offer (for once) a well-researched opinion on how the 2022 draft is going league wide? Provide factual data. Don't move the goalposts.

And the 2023 draft is ok so far, nice try.
Post #: 3171
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:42:26 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


Losing JJeff is the big one actually but once again you may not get it....


He's on IR for four weeks, not the season. But he doesn't matter in this.. point is, after being 1-3 or 1-4 you thought we we still in the mix!


Actually the schedule is easier the next 8 weeks and there was a chance to make the playoffs but w/o JJ the next 4 weeks it becomes almost impossible....but you probably already know that even if it was a different opinion than yours.

Tanking never is the answer....always try to make the playoffs but now that it looks like we can't....that changes.


So tanking is never the answer...until it is?


I think you know the difference between tanking and playing out the year.

Tanking would be benching Kirk next week.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3172
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 2:45:29 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)


To hang your hat on Cine-Booth-Ingram being anything but a failure based on a week 5 PFF grade is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for you.


Hanging my hat? Ranking Ingram in week 5 is the same as ranking him in week 1....too early to tell (same thing I said in week 1). Cine and Booth probably too early to tell also. Like I said I wanted Davis.
If you want to disparage Kwesi about the 2022 draft; go ahead...it isn't looking like a great draft for many teams but you better give him some credit for 2023; which you do struggle with. Oh and 2023 draft is way too early to tell.


Well you hang in there with Cine, Booth, and Ingram for however many more years

It's not looking like a "great" draft for many teams? How about a good draft? See, it's ok to have a good draft. Since you keep bringing it up, care to offer (for once) a well-researched opinion on how the 2022 draft is going league wide? Provide factual data. Don't move the goalposts.

And the 2023 draft is ok so far, nice try.


Weird, again I wanted Davis and I think I remember who you wanted.....but continue on with the hanging your hat analogy.

Roy, Addison, and Pace have been getting good rankings but I actually am waiting on them also.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3173
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 3:04:28 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


LMAO, 5 days ago Phil was on his high horse criticizing tanking.

Now he says: Start by trading the assets away that we probably can't keep and have value....Davenport, Smith, Hicks, Cleveland, and our 2nd TE.


You know there is a difference now that Jjeff is hurt and we may be 1-6, 2-7 versus 1-3...but then again maybe you don't.



Oh, so you thought we were going places while being 1-3 or 1-4. Got it


If we had beat KC (and that game was certainly there for the taking)... things do look much different... whether it's a realistic outlook or not.
Post #: 3174
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/10/2023 3:06:11 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28649
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I feel strongly the 2022 offseason, Kwesi's first, set this franchise back years. There were two types of failures:

- A strategic failure by supposedly trying to competitively rebuild.
- Operational failures like totally f****** up the draft's 1st round pick and pair of 2nd round picks, paying more to Cousins, etc.


I hate trading back, take the best person available.

Kwesi seemed to go out of the way to show everybody he was the smartest person in the room, looking at all the studs he passed over for his duds made him look like a complete idiot.


The 2022 draft hasn't really been that great outside of the Ravens safety. Sauce Gardner is the only pro bowler so far from the first two rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_NFL_Draft


Why is it always "Pro Bowl or bust" with you?

If you get players that are legit starters (and not starters by default), its a successful draft. If you get Pro Bowlers or All-Pros, you've gone above and beyond.


Weirdly, he counts below average players who start as proof of a successful draft then turns around and says the entire draft isn't that good, is "looking thin", and is "underwhelming" because it lacks pro-bowlers.


Actually Ingram has improved the last 2 games....but you wouldn't get that either since it is a differing opinion. Similar to what I said at the beginning of the year about him....

When is the trade deadline Bill? That is the reason he see if you can't reel off some wins.....


So Ingram is trending!! LMAO.

That last part about the trade deadline and "he see" makes no sense.


Trending? Not sure what the means:

How the Vikings offensive linemen ranked among their respective positions in week 5:

Christian Darrisaw: 1st (of 67 tackles)
Garrett Bradbury: 2nd (of 32 centers)
Ezra Cleveland: 6th (of 67 guards)
Ed Ingram: 10th (of 67 guards)
Brian O'Neill: 31st (of 67 tackles)


To hang your hat on Cine-Booth-Ingram being anything but a failure based on a week 5 PFF grade is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, even for you.


Hanging my hat? Ranking Ingram in week 5 is the same as ranking him in week 1....too early to tell (same thing I said in week 1). Cine and Booth probably too early to tell also. Like I said I wanted Davis.
If you want to disparage Kwesi about the 2022 draft; go ahead...it isn't looking like a great draft for many teams but you better give him some credit for 2023; which you do struggle with. Oh and 2023 draft is way too early to tell.


Well you hang in there with Cine, Booth, and Ingram for however many more years

It's not looking like a "great" draft for many teams? How about a good draft? See, it's ok to have a good draft. Since you keep bringing it up, care to offer (for once) a well-researched opinion on how the 2022 draft is going league wide? Provide factual data. Don't move the goalposts.

And the 2023 draft is ok so far, nice try.


Weird, again I wanted Davis and I think I remember who you wanted.....but continue on with the hanging your hat analogy.

Roy, Addison, and Pace have been getting good rankings but I actually am waiting on them also.


And you moved the goalposts. I see you can't answer the request.

We differ greatly in how we view a successful draft, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
Post #: 3175
Page:   <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode