Phil Riewer
Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: marty It is weird how posters want to move Ingram to the other guard.....isn't Oline stability a key to getting better? The Oline is relatively young. I would agree if the OL was great, I wouldn't change a thing if it were the Dallas OL of '94. The pass blocking is poor with both guard spots. Moving Ingram to LG where he played in college would probably make him better, maybe significantly better. Cleveland played LT in college. Moving him to RG, he would probably be the same as has been at LG, but he might be a little better, and maybe significantly better. IF Cleveland had a good LG to his right in college, moving to RG, it might feel more similar to his college days, having O'Neil to his right, instead of having Bradbury to his right. And moving to RG and having Bradbury to his left, it may also feel more like his college days, where he had essentially nothing to his left at LT 😉. The oline was improved last year and Ingram was a rookie.....resigning Bradbury points to the Coaches thinking the same (about continuity) and improving.
_____________________________
SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
|