thebigo
Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote:
ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark C. Johnson Hi Talkvikes crew. Thought I'd chime in some this year. Hope that's okay! Yes, you could end up with a Mahomes or a Mayfield. Does that mean you don't draft a QB high in the first round? Of course not. The question seems to be should the team trade JJ to acquire picks and take a shot at one of the top QB's next draft? JJ is the most gifted receiver in the NFL, no question. He'll cost a fortune to sign to his next contract. We've had Moss, Carter, Diggs and now Jefferson to name a few of the standout receivers the team has had. Zero Super Bowl appearances with any of them. Their fault? No, of course not. I'd trade JJ at the end of the season IF I determined that the overall talent on the roster is not capable of making it to the Super Bowl. Having the best receiver in the NFL doesn't matter if the team overall isn't good enough to make it to the Super Bowl. Bottom line...would you rather have the best receiver in football or a true star at QB? Giving up JJ would be a very hard decision. Obviously, you could screw up the draft and get another Ponder, but you could also get the next great QB. Wow We lost ONE game and now the calls to trade JJ are surfacing. He is one of the top 5 players in the NFL. You don't trade talent like that unless you get a king's ransom. You don't actively shop them either. You build around them. He is ESTABLISHED talent. He has ESTABLISHED himself as one of the best in the game. You don't trade them for the crapshoot that a draftpick can be. JJ is here at least the next few years. This year. Next year on 5th year option and then we can franchise him two more years after that. Why on Earth would anybody actively shop him unless he is totally disgruntled, which he isn't? In fairness the question of trading JJ for multiple #1's has been around for a while. The idea is give Hou/AZ (or whomever) multiple 1's to get the #1 overall and taking William's. I'm not advocating it but I see the logic. If they keep playing the way they did this week they may not have to trade much. 9/150....wth are you talking about? JJ made plays all over the field against a top secondary. Do you even know what you are saying? Then they moved coverage to JJ and Addison and KJ made plays....that is the way it works. You certainly don't have your facts straight. Addison and KJ did NOT make plays during the second half in which JJ was invisible. Addison had one catch, no scores. KJ had one catch, no scores. True we didn't have the ball but 3 times after half time (I forgot about that)....so the adjustments were earlier. The passes went to Addison, TJ, KJ, Mattison, and even Oliver as adjustments starting in the 2nd quarter. I suspect that our adjustments were more Tampa Bay's defense adjustments in the second half
|