Prescott
Posts: 15395
Joined: 10/3/2010
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: Prescott quote:
ORIGINAL: John Childress The Broncos were a playoff team last year with sorry Tebow at QB The Broncos were an 8-8 team that had some of the most amazing luck you've ever seen. They are now a serious contender for best team in the league by adding one player. They have 3 more wins and two patsies on the schedule. The Vikings were 3-13 with Peterson last year, they have 5 more wins with him this year and two games where they will be underdogs. "Most Valuable Player" is slanted to QBs, because QB is the most valuable position on the field. Teams win with shitty running backs all the time, you literally can have a stable of crappy ones rotating and still be an elite team, teams do it year after year. Meanwhile it's been what, 2 decades since a team has won with a bad QB. That's why I'd have the 2 awards and rename them. One for QB of the year, one for Player of the year. Most years they'd split that with one QB and one non QB, but if a QB dominated enough he could win both. Brad Johnson won a SB in 2003, 9 years ago. And three years before that, Trent Dilfer won a SB. Brad Johnson won a Super Bowl in 2002, and it was 10 football seasons ago, and he wasn't a bad QB. So yeah, Trent Dilfer won a ring 13 years ago. But that's the exception that drives the point home, not disproves it. My point wasn't so much that I wouldn't give Adrian Peterson the award, even the MVP. I'm saying when you start off with such an ambiguous and biased title as "most valuable", it's not surprising that players at the most valuable position get the award a ton. There is a very convincing argument to be made that Peyton Manning is "more valuable" depending on what that means. He's taken guys that looked average at best, and made them look great, and to some that is very valuable. When the season is over, both teams might have made a 5 game improvement over last year. Guys like NoShaun Moreingo, Decker and Denarious Thomas look 100x better with Manning, than they have without him. Meanwhile, Peterson make guys around him look better isn't as easy to see. It should be making Ponder look good, but it's not, same with the receivers. If you simply say "player of the year", you put it back on the individual and his performance. In that regard, Adrian Peterson wins going away. The season he is having at his position is one of the top 10 all time (probably end up being 1st or 2nd), while Manning is simply having a very good (but not great) year for a QB.
_____________________________
If I had a perfect day I would have it start this way Open up the fridge and have a tall boy Yeah
|