marty 
        
		   
		   
          Posts:  13496 
          
          Joined:  12/28/2007  
          
          Status: offline
        
		   
		 | 
        
	    
         
          The Packers still have Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley, and I think Boykin was a guy that Jennings was talking about being a future star.  They also have Eddie Lacy, who has been running really well despite facing some tough run defenses.  Add to that a defense that has been pretty stifling, and probably ready to start getting some takeaways, refs usually do well for the Packers at home, and the Packers -10 looks like a good bet.  OTOH, I didn't like it because the Packers are getting more conservative, not scoring a lot of points, and the Browns are coming off a pretty good loss (just like the Panthers were when the Vikes played them).        -----------------------------------      I had a feeling whichever way I was going on the Thursday night game, it was going to go the other way.  The post I erased, I had stated that I had gotten the last 2 Thursdays correct, and it's really hard to get 3 in a row, so I was going to go the opposite this week (going with Seattle) hoping to get 3 in a row.  I erased it, and went with my gut, which was saying Arizona.  I thought Seattle was the better team, but that it would be Arizonas' night at home.  I sometimes get too caught up in going with the unexpected, and should more often just pick the logical choice. 
          
		  
          
  < Message edited by marty -- 10/17/2013 10:38:48 PM  >					
			
		 
         
         
         
         
          	
         
		 |