marty
Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
|
The Packers still have Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley, and I think Boykin was a guy that Jennings was talking about being a future star. They also have Eddie Lacy, who has been running really well despite facing some tough run defenses. Add to that a defense that has been pretty stifling, and probably ready to start getting some takeaways, refs usually do well for the Packers at home, and the Packers -10 looks like a good bet. OTOH, I didn't like it because the Packers are getting more conservative, not scoring a lot of points, and the Browns are coming off a pretty good loss (just like the Panthers were when the Vikes played them). ----------------------------------- I had a feeling whichever way I was going on the Thursday night game, it was going to go the other way. The post I erased, I had stated that I had gotten the last 2 Thursdays correct, and it's really hard to get 3 in a row, so I was going to go the opposite this week (going with Seattle) hoping to get 3 in a row. I erased it, and went with my gut, which was saying Arizona. I thought Seattle was the better team, but that it would be Arizonas' night at home. I sometimes get too caught up in going with the unexpected, and should more often just pick the logical choice.
< Message edited by marty -- 10/17/2013 10:38:48 PM >
|