David Levine
Posts: 77939
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott So, I don't remember who they were but some posters in here used to repeatedly suggest that we acquire Derek Anderson as our QB. I always argued against that. So do any of those posters still harbor those thoughts now? Only starting QB in the NFL that's worse right now IMHO is JeMarcus Russell. Good lord, Tim Couch would outplay this guy right now. Anderson might be worse than Russell. Peter King made the same point about couch: I've made this point in the last couple of weeks, and it's more true now than it has been all season: The Cleveland Browns are no better off today than they were 10 years ago, when they were an expansion team, in the middle of their first season back after a four-year absence from the league. Just look at the quarterback play. In 1999, the season's midpoint came on Oct. 31. This year, it came on Nov. 1. Comparing the numbers of Tim Couch, who started Games 2 through 8 in 1999, and Derek Anderson, who has played all but the first 10 quarters this year: 1999 Tim Couch: Team win/loss: 1-7, Comp-Att: 104-196, Pct: .530, Yards: 1,161, TD: 7, Int: 5, Rating: 72.3 2009 D. Anderson : Team win/loss: 1-7, Comp-Att: 66-154, Pct: .429, Yards: 681, TD: 2, Int: 9, Rating: 36.2
|