RE:The Packers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk



Message

Phil -> RE:The Packers (11/30/2007 9:14:49 PM)

I was utterly shocked beyond belief that the ref's didn't all throw their flags once they saw that Favre was hurt. They sure did the game E.J. hit him.



Rob Viking -> RE:The Packers (12/1/2007 1:00:37 AM)

McCarthy has done a great job thus far. But he should have challenged the spot towrds the end of the game opting for a 50+ yard FG. Grant clearly had the 1st. As for Rodgers, he really impressed me with how calm he was. So much so it looked like he was at mini camp. He looked good better than Alex Smith ever has, a guy chosen 23 spots ahead of him.



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/1/2007 6:02:38 AM)

[quote="Rob Viking"]McCarthy has done a great job thus far. But he should have challenged the spot towrds the end of the game opting for a 50+ yard FG. Grant clearly had the 1st. As for Rodgers, he really impressed me with how calm he was. So much so it looked like he was at mini camp. He looked good better than Alex Smith ever has, a guy chosen 23 spots ahead of him.[/quote] He didn't have a challenge left at that time. He had used them up. Rodgers is going to be a prime example of having a first round QB sit for a year or two and learn and the benefits you get from that.



Ward Peterson -> RE:The Packers (12/1/2007 7:57:37 PM)

Rodgers has got to lose that Radar O'Riley hat for the post game interview. You're in the spotlight now kid.



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/1/2007 9:22:27 PM)

[quote="Ward Peterson"]Rodgers has got to lose that Radar O'Riley hat for the post game interview. You're in the spotlight now kid.[/quote] Plus he needs a decent haircut. I cringed when they showed him on the sidelines. Blech.



David Moufang -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 6:29:20 PM)

Favre named Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year [img]http://graphics.jsonline.com/graphics/packer/img/news/dec07/xbrettsi03.jpg[/img]



John Childress -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 6:37:38 PM)

Why does that pic look it was photoshopped and it is really Favre on a toilet?



Toby Stumbo -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 6:40:38 PM)

You have some weird perversions??? :lol:



Trekgeekscott -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 6:41:07 PM)

[quote="David Moufang"]Favre named Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year [img]http://graphics.jsonline.com/graphics/packer/img/news/dec07/xbrettsi03.jpg[/img][/quote] Well isn't that nice. Not even the best QB in the NFC. At BEST, 4th best QB in the NFL. Not the best player in his own division. Well it sure looks like Madden, Buck and Berman did a good job in their campaign to give the old man another worthless award.



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 9:47:05 PM)

I never noticed how much the yellow helmet doesn't match the yellow pants! How could they be that far off?



Trekgeekscott -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 9:57:03 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]I never noticed how much the yellow helmet doesn't match the yellow pants! How could they be that far off?[/quote] We're talking about rural Wisconsin here. Not fashion mecca's like Milan or Paris.



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 10:29:31 PM)

Bummer about the Sports Illustrated cover jinx thing Packer fans. :whistling:



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 11:25:16 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]Bummer about the Sports Illustrated cover jinx thing Packer fans. :whistling:[/quote] Yeah, it really turned out bad for those other losers like Armstrong, Brady and the Boston Red Sox.



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/4/2007 11:37:07 PM)

Hey - I'm sure the jinx doesn't work every time. You'll be fine. Really you will. :D



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/5/2007 3:53:01 AM)

[quote="Lynn G."]Hey - I'm sure the jinx doesn't work every time. You'll be fine. Really you will. :D[/quote] Quiet you!



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/5/2007 4:24:34 AM)

Just praying that they don't put Adrian Peterson on Madden. :whistling:



Jeff Jesser -> RE:The Packers (12/5/2007 6:02:19 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]Just praying that they don't put Adrian Peterson on Madden. :whistling:[/quote] Terrible for us but it's a lock unless he turns them down (he won't IMO). :angry:



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 3:54:31 AM)

I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:



Todd M -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 6:22:30 AM)

Nice work from the trenches Lynn. :viking:



Easy E -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 6:51:28 AM)

[quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Everytime I hear that, I think what whiny babies they are. I'd like to think Viking fans are better than that.



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 3:56:23 PM)

We won't whine for five years Eric. Maybe a couple of months... ;)



Trekgeekscott -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 3:57:48 PM)

[quote="Easy E"][quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Everytime I hear that, I think what whiny babies they are. I'd like to think Viking fans are better than that.[/quote] The way I see it, the hit on Adrian was bad, unfortunate and it cost us Adrian for a couple of games. We haven't lost since and Adrian came back last Sunday and looked as good as ever. No harm done. We can now move on... I just don't want to see DBs throwing their bodies at his knees like Harris did again. I am ready to move on though.



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 5:12:08 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Way to do a broad painting job on how all Packer fans are Lynn. In the 4 Packer forums I see, no one has said anything about this. But then why bother with facts when misrepresentation is so much more fun.



Lynn G. -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 5:13:50 PM)

Way to misread my post. I never said that ALL Packer fans are doing this. I certainly know my husband isn't. You may need to check YOUR facts Craig before you berate me for misrepresentation.



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:The Packers (12/7/2007 7:40:31 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]Way to misread my post. I never said that ALL Packer fans are doing this. I certainly know my husband isn't. You may need to check YOUR facts Craig before you berate me for misrepresentation.[/quote] Forget it. I apologize as I told myself I wouldn't about this garbage and only talk football.



Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode