Phil Riewer
Posts: 29251
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson I know he makes effort to run with the ball after catching it, too. Point taken. I feel like I am a bad guy because I have been defending Rudolph until now. It's just that we didn't protect our quarterback and we didn't run the ball very well last year. I came to the conclusion that it's not all on the O-linemen. Rudolph has strengths. He catches almost everything and he converts first downs and scores touchdowns. But it still is a team game. That doesn't make you a bad guy in this. There are some that say Rudolph isn't good. I think Rudolph is good---I just think he is the one you trade or cut over Waynes or Griffen (at this point). I saw how little Cousins went to Rudolph except for one game. Diggs and Thielen are so dominant that Rudolph is the fourth or fifth option which makes him expendable at 7.5 million. Rudolph was the third option in the passing game catching about 4 passes per game. In the next to last game last season against Detroit he busted out for 9 receptions on 9 targets, 122 yards and 2 TDs. I think assuming he remains on the team he will continue to be the #3 option, but eventually be supplanted by Smith for that role. Again....targets last year Thielen 153 Diggs 149 Rudolph 82 Treadwell 53 RBs 75 (cook 49 Murray 26) He is a third option but when you have Thielen and Diggs with so many targets (like I mentioned in the last post)...you can get by w/o Rudolph if they find someone better than Treadwell (beebe, Mitchell, etc.)
_____________________________
SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
|