thebigo
Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Todd M Maybe there is a lesson in here... No excuse but I was freaking tired when I posted this morning. Having read the whole article I now see that it can be both. quote:
About 15 percent of the time, the laces do not arrive pointing directly toward the sky. “If you think of the sky as noon on a clock, sometimes the laces are at 10 o’clock or 2 o’clock,” Weatherford said. “I turn them in the air before I put the ball down. Some guys will put the ball down and then spin the laces toward the target, but that can freak out a kicker. I put it down static and let him get a clean look at it.” So I took incomplete information and wanted to drive home a point because it was about winning an argument. Showing someone up. I didn't come in neutral with interest in investigating the right answer. Nope, riled up by my 'debate opponent'. I'm going to try and not do that any more. The thing is, we were all a little off base on the mechanics and probably have learned something. I think there's a better way to get there though. I guess the long snapper who puts the laces up and the ball right in the holders wheelhouse 95% of the time is probably worth something. I don't know how "cherry picked" Austin's snaps were in his video, but it seems like Mcdermotts snaps caused the holder to reach one way or another with more frequency than Austins
|