Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:51:05 AM   
Guest
quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Barnwell's 2018 Lessons

No team is one player away

During their cap disaster era earlier this decade, the Saints seemed capable of convincing themselves that they were perennially one player or one fix away from winning the Super Bowl. On one hand, we've seen how good they can be with Drew Brees and a good defense over the past two seasons, but the reality was that they were always a few players away. After going 11-5 in 2013, they handed a huge contract to star Bills safety Jairus Byrd, even though the deal required an onerous structure to fit into an already tight cap. He was a disaster in New Orleans and is now out of football. The Saints didn't turn things around until they had a killer draft in 2017.

The Vikings had their killer drafts before making their big free-agent move, but it was fair to look at what they did in this offseason and view them as serious Super Bowl contenders. After making it to the NFC Championship Game and returning virtually everyone from a dominant defense, the Vikings raised their floor at quarterback by replacing Case Keenum with Kirk Cousins on a $28 million per year deal. I liked the move, and I wasn't the only one.

Sixteen games later, Vikings fans aren't as enthused. The goalposts have begun to move in the way they often do when teams aren't satisfied with their quarterback. After grumbling about Cousins' record in prime-time games, he seemed to satiate Vikings fans with a 342-yard, three-touchdown performance against the Packers in Week 12, but that wasn't enough.

The impotent offense led Mike Zimmer to fire offensive coordinator John DeFilippo in December, and while Cousins and replacement offensive coordinator Kevin Stefanski helped push the offense to 68 points over two subsequent games, Vikings fans always seemed one rough series or quarter away from booing the offense again. In a must-win game on Sunday against the Bears, Cousins and the offense gave those fans plenty of opportunities to holler. Minnesota went three-and-out on its first four drives, racked up just three first downs by halftime, and finished with just 10 points.

With two fully guaranteed years left to go on Cousins' deal, the Vikings are basically tied in with him with precious little wiggle room to make changes for the foreseeable future. (There will certainly be Vikings fans dreaming of a scenario in which they trade Cousins and use the freed-up cap space to re-sign Teddy Bridgewater, and while it's theoretically possible given that Cousins' money is tied into a base salary, he would need to give his written consent for any trade.) After thinking they were one player away from a Super Bowl run, the Vikings are realizing that it isn't quite that simple.

Lesson: Be realistic about which elements of your team's play are likely to recur. During the offseason, fans often get hopeful about their team by counting on everything that went right to stay great while expecting everything that went wrong to improve. Teams can be just as optimistic internally. The Vikings had an incredibly healthy defense with an unsustainably great third-down rate in 2017. Their offensive line stayed healthy, and it allowed Keenum to post what would have been an impressive season for Cousins. I can't fault Minnesota for going after Cousins, but the front office probably now wishes it had re-signed someone like Bridgewater or Keenum and used the money to supplement the offensive line.




I seriously do not remember anybody in here gushing about Cousins being the “Final piece to the puzzle.”

Quite frankly I was extremely uncomfortable when I heard it all the time on TV, and radio.

I recall many like myself thinking Cousins was an upgrade to Keenum, but certainly not a world beating/ elite QB.

The more removed I get from the season the more questions I raise as to why in the hell couldnt Spielman/Zimmer/George Paton/ any other Vikings personnel executives see what MOST of us in here and around the country plainly saw. Our OLine was below average, and then lost Joe Berger to retirement. Then lose Nick Easton to injury.

Spielman’s answer-
Sign freaking Tom Freaking Compton
Draft cb Mike Hughes ahead of numerous OLine prospects and a run on OLineman in the draft.
Draft Brian O’Neill (Who I think even they perceived a project)
Low grade trade for a Giants backup center (Jones) who came in and got pushed all over the place, and then benched.


I’d have to say the Vikes got lucky that O’Neill came in and played as well as he did or it could’ve even been WORSE..

Serious GM Malpractice on the OLine...

Cousins is probably just a slightly above average QB with better pass pro, certainly not someone you ride to victory...
  Post #: 1751
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:52:04 AM   
McMurfy


Posts: 13792
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline
Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!
Post #: 1752
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:54:26 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14024
Status: offline
Out of that entire article...

What stands out, and defines fans and management alike ... is the insane belief that things that were good will always stay good and that the “bad” will get better with some effort.....



We were conference champions..
We played a tougher schedule.
The teams we faced were, “no purple blinders”, better than we were in coaching and execution.
We lost Sporano, unexpectedly and a noob had to step in.
We lost Shurmer to NYG, and the effect was huge.
Defilipo was a horrible choice as replacement.
Griff had a mental breakdown... something I know something about, and it affected everyone including the rubes here.
Griff has been one of our BEST defensive players, but now many want to cut, trade, restructure or otherwise reduce or eliminate the “perceived distraction” that is Everson Griffen.

Over and over some have pointed out and argued that we need to fix the offensive line with players and coaching.
For years we have tried to argue this fundamental problem.
We get shouted down by the finger pointers who want to blame cousins, Zimmer, cook, Rudolph, name your flavor of the week scapegoat, kickers, receivers... ad nauseum.

To me the smart ones watch the line play and bitch about it..
The rest is just clueless noise.

If your QB is “leading the league “in pass attempts under pressure”, you have a problem on the line.
Duh

If you have white knuckles on third and less than a yard because you know in your heart that trying to throw for it is a better option than dominating the line of scrimmage, you have a problem on the offensive Line.
Duh.

Management needs to pull its head out and fix the offense by starting with the unit that sucks the most..

I doubt any of our OL players would be starters on any of the playoff teams.

End of rant.

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 1753
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:55:00 AM   
Guest
quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB



Haha that gets my TV broken right after the 1st pick...
  Post #: 1754
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:55:34 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45026
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
The New Horizons spacecraft is well past Pluto and has taken the first ever pictures of a Kuiper Belt object. It still has not found a worse pair of guards than Remmers and Compton.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 1755
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:57:45 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14024
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB



You pulled this from where?

Because it looks a bit analy coated, as in out of your ass...


_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 1756
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 9:58:45 AM   
McMurfy


Posts: 13792
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB



You pulled this from where?

Because it looks a bit analy coated, as in out of your ass...



But it isn’t far fetched though is it?

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!
Post #: 1757
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 10:07:26 AM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
People get too caught up in QB salaries. If the QB is decent and his contract is up he is going to get huge money, that is just the way it is. The reason for that is drafting a QB is like playing Russian Roulette and most chambers have a bullet in them (the odds are not with you).

The stats I find interesting are:
1. Successful teams seem to have a good QB with a team friendly salary. Gives them room to add pieces.
2. Super Bowl winning teams to it early in a coach's tenure and not later.

#1 is mostly luck, not sure anybody is some great QB draft guru.
#2. message gets old or it is the wrong message. Give a coach 5 years and if you are not knocking on the door of a Super Bowl you don't extend and move on.

I find the draft boring and refuse to dig into all the stuff, all I know is OL better be chosen the first two rounds and a FA signing on the OL would also seem to be wise.

If Zimmer is defensive Jesus it would seem to me he should be able to do more with less if need be. Instead he seems to suck up all the resources and antagonizes the offense publicly. He reminds me of a more PC version of Buddy Ryan.

< Message edited by ronhextall -- 1/3/2019 10:09:27 AM >
Post #: 1758
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 10:11:54 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14024
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB



You pulled this from where?

Because it looks a bit analy coated, as in out of your ass...



But it isn’t far fetched though is it?

I wold be leading the caravan to Mankato with the tar, feathers,and lite rail track...



_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 1759
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 10:33:53 AM   
CPAMAN

 

Posts: 36324
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

Out of that entire article...

What stands out, and defines fans and management alike ... is the insane belief that things that were good will always stay good and that the “bad” will get better with some effort.....



We were conference champions..
We played a tougher schedule.
The teams we faced were, “no purple blinders”, better than we were in coaching and execution.
We lost Sporano, unexpectedly and a noob had to step in.
We lost Shurmer to NYG, and the effect was huge.
Defilipo was a horrible choice as replacement.
Griff had a mental breakdown... something I know something about, and it affected everyone including the rubes here.
Griff has been one of our BEST defensive players, but now many want to cut, trade, restructure or otherwise reduce or eliminate the “perceived distraction” that is Everson Griffen.

Over and over some have pointed out and argued that we need to fix the offensive line with players and coaching.
For years we have tried to argue this fundamental problem.
We get shouted down by the finger pointers who want to blame cousins, Zimmer, cook, Rudolph, name your flavor of the week scapegoat, kickers, receivers... ad nauseum.

To me the smart ones watch the line play and bitch about it..
The rest is just clueless noise.

If your QB is “leading the league “in pass attempts under pressure”, you have a problem on the line.
Duh

If you have white knuckles on third and less than a yard because you know in your heart that trying to throw for it is a better option than dominating the line of scrimmage, you have a problem on the offensive Line.
Duh.

Management needs to pull its head out and fix the offense by starting with the unit that sucks the most..

I doubt any of our OL players would be starters on any of the playoff teams.

End of rant.


Good post.

_____________________________

Lots of Christopher Columbus statues available on ebay.
Post #: 1760
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 11:09:43 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
If Spielman and Zimmer are on 1 year contracts is it going to be tough to get someone other than Stepanski and/or Hue?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1761
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 11:30:23 AM   
SoMnFan


Posts: 94902
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

If Spielman and Zimmer are on 1 year contracts is it going to be tough to get someone other than Stepanski and/or Hue?

Unless a promising up-and-comer wants to make a name for himself quickly, and then maybe advance within ....all the way to the top?
Lots of shiny toys here.
Post #: 1762
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 12:07:25 PM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
The Vikings are still a talented team and so it should be a very attractive job. (offensive coordinator) I'm ok with Stepanski, though. I don't know anything about Hue Jackson. It's good that I'm not the one to decide.

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 1763
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 12:44:05 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39296
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

If Spielman and Zimmer are on 1 year contracts is it going to be tough to get someone other than Stepanski and/or Hue?

Unless a promising up-and-comer wants to make a name for himself quickly, and then maybe advance within ....all the way to the top?
Lots of shiny toys here.


The only flaw with that logic is if he comes here and does well enough to garner HC opportunities, The Vikings likely do very well and that gets Zimmer and Speilman extensions...

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 1764
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 12:57:02 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39296
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CPAMAN

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteveR

quote:

ORIGINAL: CPAMAN

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: CPAMAN

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

To go from 13 wins, then add a franchise QB...then drop 5 wins from your total. There's absolutely nothing positive about that. This season was an abject failure.

Apparently, you are not a true fan if the season was not fulfilling for you.


Who said it was fullfilling? Last year was the bigger letdown for me since we were that much closer. I also don't tear my house down because one window leaks too. Nothing wrong with the foundation IMO.

You fix the problem that caused the leak and you prepare for the other leaks that you think that might come up next year.

The obvious leaks are the Oline, 3rd WR, and LB if they don't resign Barr. Tough calls are Rhodes/Waynes, Griffen, Richardson, and the TE position.


Mike Zimmer will have to lose a few bodies on defense in order to make the moves necessary to improve the most hapless O-line that any of us have ever witnessed.


Is it worth it/possible to get anything for Smith? I think he started to reach the stage of being-lauded-by-announcers-on-past-performance-and-is-not-that-amazing-anymore. It's purely my imagination that he doesn't like Zimmer anyway. When the camera was on Smith at times, he did not seem too into things.

Harrison Smith could be excellent trade bait.



He could be but he wont. Vikings and Zimmer will not part with him unless they get Khalil Mack type return and no one is offering that kind of package.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 1765
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 1:48:51 PM   
SoMnFan


Posts: 94902
Status: offline
Pardon me for not researching ... but did George Iloka disappear off the face of the earth?
We kept adding guys who no one's ever heard of all year.
Did he fall off the cliff so badly that he couldn't be counted on?
I honestly thought that was a shrewd acquisition at the time.
Post #: 1766
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 2:23:15 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Pardon me for not researching ... but did George Iloka disappear off the face of the earth?
We kept adding guys who no one's ever heard of all year.
Did he fall off the cliff so badly that he couldn't be counted on?
I honestly thought that was a shrewd acquisition at the time.

I think many expected, or atleast I did, that Iloka was brought in to play/back-up Sendejo (at the least) ... given his veteran and Zimmer experience.

Seems like Harris and Kearse, being homegrown, got first shot off the bench and played well-enough to keep Iloka sitting.
Post #: 1767
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 2:32:58 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Drafting a RB is totally independent from building an Oline....no matter what you want to pin on Cook. Quit the bs.


Nothing is independent. You only have so much "currency". Spending a high pick on a RB means one less swing at an O-Lineman.


Right. Don't get me wrong, I love Cook, I get as excited as anyone when he makes a big play. But this isn't about that. They also have Latavius. And he showed last year the offense can be successful without Cook. Drafting Cook was not a necessity.

Atta boy. Somebody who gets it.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 1768
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 2:38:04 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Drafting a RB is totally independent from building an Oline....no matter what you want to pin on Cook. Quit the bs.


Nothing is independent. You only have so much "currency". Spending a high pick on a RB means one less swing at an O-Lineman.


Right. Don't get me wrong, I love Cook, I get as excited as anyone when he makes a big play. But this isn't about that. They also have Latavius. And he showed last year the offense can be successful without Cook. Drafting Cook was not a necessity.


Coulda, Woulda Shoulda.

What's past is past. Learn from it and move on. Now if we draft a RB high this year it will be stupid. Let's concentrate on the team's weaknesses. Most notably the Oline. I sit with great anticipation and trepidation for what RS will do to fix this problem.


But that's what I'm saying. The Oline was a known weakness when Cook was drafted. I doubt management's ability to learn from mistakes.

This has been my beef for a number of years.

Like many in here, I watch a ton of football. When watching a successful franchise, both on and off the field, they seem to have a plan. When I watch the Vikings it's like a rudderless ship. They seem have no identity, and are just throwing darts into the sky in hopes of hitting something. If you ask me, that's a top-down problem.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 1769
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 2:52:32 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

Rick Spielman’s Draft Preview

1. DE
2. DT
3. S
4. OG
5. Trade Down
6. K
6. Trade Down
7. OT
7. WR
7. CB



You pulled this from where?

Because it looks a bit analy coated, as in out of your ass...



But it isn’t far fetched though is it?

I wold be leading the caravan to Mankato with the tar, feathers,and lite rail track...




Hopefully you'd have enough gas left to get you up 169 N for about 70 miles, then east on 494 E for another 15...
Post #: 1770
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 4:04:01 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Would ANY of the playoff teams start Kirk over their QBs ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1771
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 4:07:34 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Complain about the OL all you want, the same people will still be complaining about the OL next offseason, and the following offseason.

Even if the OL got mediocre, good, or even great, people will blame any percieved weakness on the OL, when the problem is Kirk isn't clutch, and Zimmer is outcoached and his playoff teams, or near playoff teams show up flat and or soft.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1772
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 4:11:49 PM  1 votes
Karl Juhnke


Posts: 13029
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Complain about the OL all you want, the same people will still be complaining about the OL next offseason, and the following offseason.

Even if the OL got mediocre, good, or even great, people will blame any percieved weakness on the OL, when the problem is Kirk isn't clutch, and Zimmer is outcoached and his playoff teams, or near playoff teams show up flat and or soft.


There are tangible numbers showing the the Vikings pass protection was at the bottom of the league. This isn't opinion. It's fact. I for one will quit complaining about it when those number no longer show us at the bottom of the league.

< Message edited by Karl Juhnke -- 1/3/2019 4:27:22 PM >
Post #: 1773
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 4:17:22 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Complain about the OL all you want, the same people will still be complaining about the OL next offseason, and the following offseason.

Even if the OL got mediocre, good, or even great, people will blame any percieved weakness on the OL, when the problem is Kirk isn't clutch, and Zimmer is outcoached and his playoff teams, or near playoff teams show up flat and or soft.


Trying to get something to stick, Marty?
Post #: 1774
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/3/2019 4:25:39 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
Alex Marvez@alexmarvez
Source tells me @Vikings are working to re-sign special teams coach Mike Priefer, whose contract is expiring. Team is exploring other options in case it doesn't happen.
Post #: 1775
Page:   <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode