Pager
Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager Not to look too far beyond the game and what's left of the 2018 Bears season, 2019 already projects as a considerably rougher go than 2018, the latter being the fourth straight fourth-place schedule for the Bears. Winning the NFC North steps the Bears up in opponent class. The Bears faced three 2018 playoff qualifiers: Seattle, Los Angeles and New England. Based on this year's finish, and it's a nice problem to have, next season they face six: the Rams, Chargers, Chiefs, Cowboys, Eagles and Saints. Plus two games against the ever-irritable Vikings, who missed this postseason because of their losses to the Bears. Exactly half of the Bears' 2019 games will be against teams finishing this season with winning records. For comparative purposes, that's the same percentage as this season, when the Bears had eight games against teams coming off winning records in 2017 https://sports.yahoo.com/duly-noted-bears-facing-qb-042515619.html You know, during any given year you play they exact same schedule as every other team in your division with the exception of two games. You get the last place teams if you finish in last place for those two games. It really isn't that much of a difference with the rest of the division. That being said, the Bears snuck up on and surprised a few people this year. That wont happen next year. I definately see a regression like the Vikings experienced this year. The only way the Bears regress is if they start having to pay some of these guys and lose others. Hicks, Fuller, Eddie Jackson and those 4 LBs are about as tough a defense as there is. The other guys aren't chopped liver either. They have addressed every part of both units. No weak spots. Maybe losing Fangio would set them back a little bit. It's a big deal playing TB vs NO, and Rams vs Arizona next year. IMO, ranking likelihood of wins (vs probably 2 wins vs last place schedule). 1 win, 2 losses, 2 wins. That could be a swing of the Bears winning 9 games vs 11 games. I'm not saying its the end all be all, but as we saw this year, a tie kept us from the playoffs. Bears forced an extraordinary amount of turnovers. Just like the Jags did the year before. I also read that they were pretyt healthy this year (like we were last year). I expect regression just like the Jags D. It will be a top 5 defense still but TOs have a component of luck. If the offense improves it will balance out any (#1 in takeaways and #3 in margin) defense regression.
_____________________________
Left picking up the pieces.
|