Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 9:37:34 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12058
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.



I was thinking that exact same thought during and after the game. I just really REALLY hope that we did that because we are finally smart and not because that was simply the gameplan and we got lucky. What I'm saying is that I hope the team is ready and eager to do the same thing when the situation calls for very little running, exploiting one particular matchup over and over, or any other strategy that diverges from what an old-school coach would call 'normal'.

And we didn't have to show GB anything. Preseason was all vanilla so Kubiak and Step should be able to surprise GB a few times.
Post #: 326
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 9:37:45 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 76802
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: jbusse

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinemmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

You have to love on successive plays Cousins throws a pass to Dalvin in the flat who gets tackled for no gain.Falcons LBer Deon Jones

stands over Cook celebrating as the broadcast team lauds about how Jones is the best LBer in the league nobody knows about.

Next play Dalvin absolutely trucks over that same Jones about 25 yards down the field. Dalvin changes the scoreboard two plays later from 19 yards out.

Special player w/ better blocking bodes well.

Favorite play of the game, Dalvin trucking a guy who had him lined up
Dudes a real football player
Still think he hits the hole faster than any back we've had
I'm sure that will get shot down, but it just appears that way to me.
Love how he bursts thru small openings.
That can make a shitty O line look ok. An ok O line look good, and an above-average O Line look fantastic.
Hope we keep growing what we saw, and I hope we realize the scouting that will be done on us from this point on.
Creativity in play-calling is going to start to get more important every week. Starting now.


Cook is so fun to watch.

Very smooth and explosive.
(seems like a contradictory statement, but he is smooth and fast! )


I told my buddy here to draft Cook in FF; that he'd be monster this year. First time in 17 years I don't have a FF team, kinda nice to turn off the games after the Vikes played.

Cook reminds me a bit of Robert Smith. He could hit the hole and be through it with the best of them (pls Cook & AP among the top Vikes I've seen speed through the hole). Smith was also deceptively fast, so smooth, you didn't realize the chunks of yards he was eating up. Loved the debate on who would be faster Smith or Moss.

Cook is fast, but not Moss/Smith fast. However, Cook runs with more power and is harder to tackle. Robert Smith so fast and seldom gets recognition for it. As I said before I have seen Randy Moss get caught from behind. Have never seen Robert Smith get caught from behind. Not saying I'm just saying.

I think you're mistaken about Smith not getting recognition for being fast. My recollection was that it was often mentioned that he ran the 100M in college, and I would imagine that OSU is reasonably competitive nationally.


Correct. Speed was always the #1 (positive) attribute accredited to Smith.

Hell, after rushing for 1100 yards and 18 TDs as a freshman in college, he didn't even play football as a sophomore to focus on running track.
Post #: 327
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 10:08:51 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44310
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 328
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 10:11:28 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
Ramblings...


I like some of the optimism here, but.....

I am not ready to say GB is terrible this year, I do agree that Trustinksky is terrible, not "Suck beyond all suck" bad, but bad.


I cant take much information from this first game, it was one of those that just snowballed on the falcons, we arent that good and they arent that bad, IMO


didnt like the PI challenge, waste (did not like the PI call, but NO WAY that is overturned), plus there was another penalty that would have been enforced


would have liked Cook pulled sooner, i wonder if the few that think he is pedestrian are still sticking with that opinion.



thought a couple more pass reps would have been OK in the second half, but not complaining/second guessing


i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him


getting pretty concerned on Elf


Rudy could have/should have been let go....we still tend to hang on to vets one year too long, ie greenway, sendejo, Rudy....IMO

< Message edited by drviking -- 9/10/2019 10:28:40 AM >


_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 329
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 10:31:46 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.


pretty much anytime we wanted, we could have played action and killed them, they were selling out on the run, but we didnt need to


like i said previously, i would have preferred a few more reps to practice are pass protection, but understand why we didnt

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 330
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 10:51:00 AM   
jbusse

 

Posts: 1308
Joined: 9/11/2013
From: Atlanta, GA
Status: offline
FWIW, PFF graded Bradbury poorly, at 35.1. No where to go but up. The rest of the O-line: Reiff at 63.7, Elflein at 58.1, Kline at 62.3, and O'Neill at 65.6.
Post #: 331
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 10:52:33 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10833
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.


pretty much anytime we wanted, we could have played action and killed them, they were selling out on the run, but we didnt need to


like i said previously, i would have preferred a few more reps to practice are pass protection, but understand why we didnt


The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game. This reminds me of how enthralled many are/were of AD's rushing titles. THEY ARE MEANINGLESS.

One come a day there's going to be a parade down Washington Avenue and won't be for anything other than winning enough to get to the Super Bowl and then winning that.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 332
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:16:11 AM  2 votes
mikegreitzer

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 9/15/2018
Status: offline
Agreed. From the perspective of big numbers, nothing has been achieved in the NFL but big contracts.

For Kirk Cousins, the same. He needs to be a player who plays a part on this team, not a passer/leader who takes them to "another level".

https://vikings61.com/kirk-cousins-will-become-champion-by-role-not-by-numbers/
Post #: 333
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:18:20 AM   
kevinemmer


Posts: 4650
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Bozeman, MT
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Ramblings...


I like some of the optimism here, but.....

I am not ready to say GB is terrible this year, I do agree that Trustinksky is terrible, not "Suck beyond all suck" bad, but bad.


I cant take much information from this first game, it was one of those that just snowballed on the falcons, we arent that good and they arent that bad, IMO


didnt like the PI challenge, waste (did not like the PI call, but NO WAY that is overturned), plus there was another penalty that would have been enforced


would have liked Cook pulled sooner, i wonder if the few that think he is pedestrian are still sticking with that opinion.



thought a couple more pass reps would have been OK in the second half, but not complaining/second guessing


i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him


getting pretty concerned on Elf


Rudy could have/should have been let go....we still tend to hang on to vets one year too long, ie greenway, sendejo, Rudy....IMO


Good stuff Doc,

I pretty much agree on all.

Except I didn't even know who Harris was when we picked him up.

The snowball win concerns me; not too many games you can expect that to occur (esp early in game).

Our running attack late to "seal" games reminds me of Chili trying to run against 8-10 in the box (Dumbo Package).

If you don't make them pay here and there with play action you are doomed to 3-and-outs, a gassed Defense late in games and hanging on by a thread or a loss.

The "Turtle Prevent D" doesn't help our cause late either, and combined with "run at all costs Offense" when we are up late is a recipe for disaster. It doesn't seem like Zimmer has learned from past mistakes in this regard.

I hope he does, we shall see.

< Message edited by kevinemmer -- 9/10/2019 11:27:52 AM >
Post #: 334
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:22:56 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44310
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.


pretty much anytime we wanted, we could have played action and killed them, they were selling out on the run, but we didnt need to


like i said previously, i would have preferred a few more reps to practice are pass protection, but understand why we didnt


The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game. This reminds me of how enthralled many are/were of AD's rushing titles. THEY ARE MEANINGLESS.

One come a day there's going to be a parade down Washington Avenue and won't be for anything other than winning enough to get to the Super Bowl and then winning that.


You should and it's nothing at all like being enthralled with AD's rushing titles. I am talking about TEAM performance, not individual. The fact is that Atlanta was 29th in the NFL against the run. Our strategy once we got ahead was to run and chew the clock. The strategy worked because of the effectiveness of the defense. Not because of the effectiveness of the running game.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 335
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:23:02 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39776
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game.


Save for TE yardage, right? Cause even though we won, Rudolph has to go. Hope he's there for the parade...
Post #: 336
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:23:28 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Expect #Vikings CB Mackensie Alexander to miss about 4 weeks with dislocated elbow. Big blow to the Vikings secondary with Hughes and Hill both out.

(Vikeologist on Twitter)

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 337
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:27:31 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Top Graded #Vikings on offense yesterday via @PFF

- Adam Thielen 85.0
- CJ Ham 78.4
- Chad Beebe 73.2

Lowest Graded #Vikings on offense yesterday
- Garrett Bradbury 35.1
- Ameer Abdullah 48.5
- Pat Elflein 58.1

(Matt Anderson on Twitter)

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 338
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:37:30 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18189
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinemmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Ramblings...

i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him



Good stuff Doc,

I pretty much agree on all.

Except I didn't even know who Harris was when we picked him up.


I'm curious, did you call for him in beginning of the draft or in rounds 6 or 7?
Post #: 339
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:43:52 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/09/10/mackensie-alexander-doesnt-need-elbow-surgery/

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 340
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:44:01 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.


pretty much anytime we wanted, we could have played action and killed them, they were selling out on the run, but we didnt need to


like i said previously, i would have preferred a few more reps to practice are pass protection, but understand why we didnt


The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game. This reminds me of how enthralled many are/were of AD's rushing titles. THEY ARE MEANINGLESS.

One come a day there's going to be a parade down Washington Avenue and won't be for anything other than winning enough to get to the Super Bowl and then winning that.


goal is to win the Super Bowl, i dont give two flippety doos about any regular season game


using a blow out game (winning or losing) to get some experience on your newly built oline would make some sense, imo. even if they were using Mannion, some passing reps for the oline would be useful

ymmv

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 341
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:45:35 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinemmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Ramblings...

i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him



Good stuff Doc,

I pretty much agree on all.

Except I didn't even know who Harris was when we picked him up.


I'm curious, did you call for him in beginning of the draft or in rounds 6 or 7?


i didnt have him in the first round


i might have to look, maybe 4th or 5th


i think i started asking for Kearse in the 6th or 7th

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 342
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:47:40 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18189
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinemmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Ramblings...

i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him



Good stuff Doc,

I pretty much agree on all.

Except I didn't even know who Harris was when we picked him up.


I'm curious, did you call for him in beginning of the draft or in rounds 6 or 7?


i didnt have him in the first round


i might have to look, maybe 4th or 5th


i think i started asking for Kearse in the 6th or 7th

Thanks
Post #: 343
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:48:05 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Center Brett Jones has gone to the #Vikings facility expecting to re-sign with the team after being released last Tuesday. I have not heard what the Vikings will do to create a roster spot.

(Chris Tomasson on Twitter)

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 344
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:55:16 AM   
marty


Posts: 12681
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I am surprised wtih the Alexander injury, that bettors are favoring Minnesota this week.

The spread started with the Pukers as a 3 point favorite, most places that has stayed the same, some have changed to 2 1/2.

And most bettors are betting the under, expecting the Vikes to win in a low scoring game.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 345
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 11:57:00 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39776
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/09/10/mackensie-alexander-doesnt-need-elbow-surgery/


He should ice it this week and get back in the game if that's the case. I mean it's no longer dislocated, right?
Post #: 346
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 12:04:25 PM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinemmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Ramblings...

i can probably find some posts of mine from the draft calling for Harris, i was pretty happy when we got him as an UDFA, wanted to draft him



Good stuff Doc,

I pretty much agree on all.

Except I didn't even know who Harris was when we picked him up.


I'm curious, did you call for him in beginning of the draft or in rounds 6 or 7?


i didnt have him in the first round


i might have to look, maybe 4th or 5th


i think i started asking for Kearse in the 6th or 7th

Thanks



i guess they pulled the older draft threads, so i cant go look


those threads were pretty fun to go back and look at several years later

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 347
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 12:04:50 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
PFT Power Ranking


7. Saints (1-0; No. 8): It’s been a long time since they’ve been 1-0.

8. Vikings (1-0; No. 11): The Vikings finally figured out how to best use Kirk Cousins... As little as possible.

9. Packers (1-0; No. 16): The “audible thing” provided good cover for the fact that the defense appears to be significantly improved.
Post #: 348
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 12:05:00 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10833
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Couple of thoughts on the other posts.

We did what Bilichick does. Finally. They couldn't stop the run, we f****** ran it down their throats. Would 1-2 play-actions have helped extend a drive or two late in the game. Sure. But the game was over by mid way through the 3rd Quarter. Atlanta was warming up their back-up. It's a good thing we are pseudo-debating this (instead of "real issues"). Didn't think twice during or after the game about offensive play calling.

Elf has to be on a short leash. Garrett is tough. So is Hicks, Daniels, Clark, Cox, etc, etc, etc. Yes they were attacking him, and so will every other defensive coordinator worth a grain of salt. You can argue 2nd string all day, but Jones best year in the NFL dwarfs Elf's best year. I'm not saying pull him today, but Elf completely whiffed on too many plays not to be worried. Almost got Cousins killed on that fumble. OR you better have a scheme that protects him, which is tough with a rookie Center.

I would say we ran effectively enough. I wouldn't say we ran it down their f****** throats. The Vikings piled up 102 rushing yards on 5 explosive plays, which is quite impressive. We didn't really control the ball that well on the ground outside of that. The remaining 33 runs averaged 2.12 ypc. Even if you take out Cousins's sneak totals of 4 yards on 6 carries, you have 27 carries at an average of 2.47.

The defense and special teams combined to give the offense some short fields and the offense took advantage nicely and turned them into touch downs. When it came to the grind it out, control the ball eat the clock phase of the game, they were not all that effective running the ball.


pretty much anytime we wanted, we could have played action and killed them, they were selling out on the run, but we didnt need to


like i said previously, i would have preferred a few more reps to practice are pass protection, but understand why we didnt


The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game. This reminds me of how enthralled many are/were of AD's rushing titles. THEY ARE MEANINGLESS.

One come a day there's going to be a parade down Washington Avenue and won't be for anything other than winning enough to get to the Super Bowl and then winning that.


You should and it's nothing at all like being enthralled with AD's rushing titles. I am talking about TEAM performance, not individual. The fact is that Atlanta was 29th in the NFL against the run. Our strategy once we got ahead was to run and chew the clock. The strategy worked because of the effectiveness of the defense. Not because of the effectiveness of the running game.


The Vikes averaged 4.5 yards per carry. Pulling out the five best carries might help an argument and that's about it. As has been posted by others a few times since the game the Vikes could have run play-action pass to great success any time they wanted but they chose not to - because they didn't need to. I also posted this morning that I really REALLY hope we stuck to the run because we finally got smart and didn't just get lucky and stumble across a winner by chance.

4.5 yards per carry against a defense that knows we're running is complete domination. The Vikes won that game from start to finish with a sound strategy and therefore I don't give two flipety doos. In fact, now I don't even give one.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 349
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/10/2019 12:07:29 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10833
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

quote:

The goal is to win the game. I don't give two flipety doos about how many yards we gained in any facet of the game.


Save for TE yardage, right? Cause even though we won, Rudolph has to go. Hope he's there for the parade...



The yardage that has concerned me in the past and that I've always brought up is his yards-per-catch. Yards-per-catch is a good indicator of a receivers speed and ability to avoid tackles. Rudy is terrible at that because he has the speed of a glacier and falls down at the first hint of a touch.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 350
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode