Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  164 165 [166] 167 168   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:13:21 AM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money


I would add Harrison Smith. If your corners are no good it’s obvious a safety isn’t worth paying for.

Vikings will need to score at least 40 to win any playoff game.

Zimmer can’t coach up a bad defense which makes him worthless.

I would think blitzing ever single play would be a good strategy given how bad the secondary is.

< Message edited by ronhextall -- 12/3/2019 6:15:11 AM >
Post #: 4126
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:14:31 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money

While I agree that the last drive ended in a thud, the list of 3 at the end there definitely seems like a game of one of these things is not like the others vis a vi this season.

< Message edited by Richard Neussendorfer -- 12/3/2019 6:15:35 AM >
Post #: 4127
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:17:42 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money


I would add Harrison Smith. If your corners are no good it’s obvious a safety isn’t worth paying for.

Vikings will need to score at least 40 to win any playoff game.

Zimmer can’t coach up a bad defense which makes him worthless.

I would think blitzing ever single play would be a good strategy given how bad the secondary is.

When your top 2 corners average giving up about a 76% completion rate you have a severe problem. No amount of hope is fixing this.
Post #: 4128
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:21:17 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money

While I agree that the last drive ended in a thud, the list of 3 at the end there definitely seems like a game of one of these things is not like the others vis a vi this season.

I guess my view is this is a tough league
You have to be incredibly smart with your personnel decisions
I just don’t any of the 3 are worth what they are getting paid
Bad ROI
I get Cousins QBR and all that, but the reality is he continues to fail on the biggest stages
0 and 8 on MNF, that’s like historic level bad
Post #: 4129
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:23:17 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money


I would add Harrison Smith. If your corners are no good it’s obvious a safety isn’t worth paying for.

Vikings will need to score at least 40 to win any playoff game.

Zimmer can’t coach up a bad defense which makes him worthless.

I would think blitzing ever single play would be a good strategy given how bad the secondary is.

When your top 2 corners average giving up about a 76% completion rate you have a severe problem. No amount of hope is fixing this.


Agreed and no one in the media has the stones to ask him what has happened to his defense
Suppose to be his thing
Maybe the game is passing him by?
When does Barr ever make an impact play?
Post #: 4130
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:28:28 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money


I would add Harrison Smith. If your corners are no good it’s obvious a safety isn’t worth paying for.

Vikings will need to score at least 40 to win any playoff game.

Zimmer can’t coach up a bad defense which makes him worthless.

I would think blitzing ever single play would be a good strategy given how bad the secondary is.

When your top 2 corners average giving up about a 76% completion rate you have a severe problem. No amount of hope is fixing this.


Agreed and no one in the media has the stones to ask him what has happened to his defense
Suppose to be his thing
Maybe the game is passing him by?
When does Barr ever make an impact play?

Barr is the new Greg Lewis. Makes a play once a month.
Post #: 4131
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:44:28 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

Upon further review Cousins is not innocent last night

That last drive had some awful throws

Since all evaluations can’t be made in a vacuum. You paid 75 mil for the guy to win big games

Just because he’s not Rhodes level hot garbage bad doesn’t mean it was a good decision to sign him

Cousins, Barr and Rhodes. A lot of tied up questionable money


I would add Harrison Smith. If your corners are no good it’s obvious a safety isn’t worth paying for.

Vikings will need to score at least 40 to win any playoff game.

Zimmer can’t coach up a bad defense which makes him worthless.

I would think blitzing ever single play would be a good strategy given how bad the secondary is.

When your top 2 corners average giving up about a 76% completion rate you have a severe problem. No amount of hope is fixing this.


Agreed and no one in the media has the stones to ask him what has happened to his defense
Suppose to be his thing
Maybe the game is passing him by?
When does Barr ever make an impact play?

Barr is the new Greg Lewis. Makes a play once a month.



ROI not good
Post #: 4132
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:48:40 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

< Message edited by Arlowe84 -- 12/3/2019 6:49:50 AM >
Post #: 4133
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:55:52 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.
Post #: 4134
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 6:58:46 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


The one thing we thought we were getting with Zimmer was an elite D. They ha e been anything but that. They have gotten worse over the years
Post #: 4135
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:02:24 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


The one thing we thought we were getting with Zimmer was an elite D. They ha e been anything but that. They have gotten worse over the years

I agree. The defense has been weak since the Saints exposed Rhodes badly in the second half of the playoff game. Considering we have the most money tied up into that side of the ball I think people have every right to be outraged by the obvious diminishing returns.
Post #: 4136
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:15:08 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


This isn't Zimmer's coaching style....the problem is he still trusts Rhodes. Just before the fake punt Rhodes was benched and the defense held and in fact Wilson had no one to throw to on 3rd down.

If you pay a shutdown corner and he can stop anyone look what happens.....look at the Ravens defense once they traded for Peters and Jimmy Smith came back from injury. The talent is there at other spots---Zimmer has to bench Rhodes. Mac, Hughes, and Waynes can do the job...I would have Hill out there over Rhodes also. Rhodes is our 5th best cover corner right now.

The Saints game is also when Thomas was able to anything he wanted against Rhodes.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 12/3/2019 7:16:12 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4137
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:22:07 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


This isn't Zimmer's coaching style....the problem is he still trusts Rhodes. Just before the fake punt Rhodes was benched and the defense held and in fact Wilson had no one to throw to on 3rd down.

If you pay a shutdown corner and he can stop anyone look what happens.....look at the Ravens defense once they traded for Peters and Jimmy Smith came back from injury. The talent is there at other spots---Zimmer has to bench Rhodes. Mac, Hughes, and Waynes can do the job...I would have Hill out there over Rhodes also. Rhodes is our 5th best cover corner right now.

The Saints game is also when Thomas was able to anything he wanted against Rhodes.

Agree totally Phil! If Rhodes isn't benched immediately we have the dumbest coach in NFL history. We cant have Rhodes and Waynes out there looking like the keystone cops. Start Hill immediately.
Post #: 4138
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:29:27 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


This isn't Zimmer's coaching style....the problem is he still trusts Rhodes. Just before the fake punt Rhodes was benched and the defense held and in fact Wilson had no one to throw to on 3rd down.

If you pay a shutdown corner and he can stop anyone look what happens.....look at the Ravens defense once they traded for Peters and Jimmy Smith came back from injury. The talent is there at other spots---Zimmer has to bench Rhodes. Mac, Hughes, and Waynes can do the job...I would have Hill out there over Rhodes also. Rhodes is our 5th best cover corner right now.

The Saints game is also when Thomas was able to anything he wanted against Rhodes.


I’m tired of hearing about talent

When are they going to produce?

Who is talented? Career days to Brendan Allen, Matt Moore, Chase Daniels, etc
I think we are confusing talent with high daft picks. Looks like a lot of busts to me

I see a bunch of slow plodders

< Message edited by Arlowe84 -- 12/3/2019 7:31:05 AM >
Post #: 4139
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:31:44 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 331
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
But when they dominate Det this weekend we can all say the D is back!
Post #: 4140
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:32:42 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

But when they dominate Det this weekend we can all say the D is back!

Is Kyle Sloter starting?
Post #: 4141
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:37:02 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


This isn't Zimmer's coaching style....the problem is he still trusts Rhodes. Just before the fake punt Rhodes was benched and the defense held and in fact Wilson had no one to throw to on 3rd down.

If you pay a shutdown corner and he can stop anyone look what happens.....look at the Ravens defense once they traded for Peters and Jimmy Smith came back from injury. The talent is there at other spots---Zimmer has to bench Rhodes. Mac, Hughes, and Waynes can do the job...I would have Hill out there over Rhodes also. Rhodes is our 5th best cover corner right now.

The Saints game is also when Thomas was able to anything he wanted against Rhodes.


I’m tired of hearing about talent

When are they going to produce?

Who is talented? Career days to Brendan Allen, Matt Moore, Chase Daniels, etc
I think we are confusing talent with high daft picks. Looks like a lot of busts to me

I see a bunch of slow plodders


Actually most of our talent is now on offense...pretty much everyone but Hunter, Kendricks, and Barr is fading on Defense. I do like our new DT (Watts) but he is being thrown into the fire due to non performance and Joseph's injury.

Odin and Watts showed me more in last nights game then the starting DTs. They have to develop the young guys because the old guys aren't getting it done. Harris and Smith are still great safeties, Griffen and Hunter are still great, our weakness is at Corner (as long as Rhodes is playing) and DT.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 12/3/2019 7:39:17 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4142
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:42:00 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


This isn't Zimmer's coaching style....the problem is he still trusts Rhodes. Just before the fake punt Rhodes was benched and the defense held and in fact Wilson had no one to throw to on 3rd down.

If you pay a shutdown corner and he can stop anyone look what happens.....look at the Ravens defense once they traded for Peters and Jimmy Smith came back from injury. The talent is there at other spots---Zimmer has to bench Rhodes. Mac, Hughes, and Waynes can do the job...I would have Hill out there over Rhodes also. Rhodes is our 5th best cover corner right now.

The Saints game is also when Thomas was able to anything he wanted against Rhodes.


I’m tired of hearing about talent

When are they going to produce?

Who is talented? Career days to Brendan Allen, Matt Moore, Chase Daniels, etc
I think we are confusing talent with high daft picks. Looks like a lot of busts to me

I see a bunch of slow plodders


Actually most of our talent is now on offense...pretty much everyone but Hunter, Kendricks, and Barr is fading on Defense. I do like our new DT (Watts) but he is being thrown into the fire due to non performance and Joseph's injury.

Odin and Watts showed me more in last nights game then the starting DTs. They have to develop the young guys because the old guys aren't getting it done. Harris and Smith are still great safeties, Griffen and Hunter are still great, our weakness is at Corner (as long as Rhodes is playing) and DT.

We clearly don't play Barr to his strengths. Obviously we never will with Zimmer around.
Post #: 4143
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:49:13 AM   
Ush


Posts: 2251
Joined: 7/17/2007
Status: offline
My $.02 cents:

1. Predictable loss. Didn’t know exactly how it was going to happen but, as a Viking fan, you just knew it was. We don’t win these games. It’s either fumbles or stupid penalties, or INT’s or bad play calling or horrible, inept play. It just happens every time and it’s so frustrating.

2. I have always been a huge Zimmer supporter but when you have 2 weeks to prepare and your defense plays like that, you have to get the blame. You are the defensive “genius” and your new plan was to play deep cover 2 most of the game?!? Even when they had 6 offensive linemen in most of the game?!?

3. Run defense has been bad all season....except against Dallas when Linval was out. Seems like teams are always 2nd and 4 or 2nd and 2. I liked Wilson in for Gedeon but he made some glaring mistakes last night in the run game.

4. It’s pretty clear that Rhodes won’t be here next year with that contract. Why not start giving Hughes and Hill a shot. They can’t play any worse.

5. CJ Ham.....what are you doing?!? You’re not gonna run it all the way back. Your job there was to get some yards and HOLD ON TO THE BALL! It would have taken a miracle to win but would have been nice to have a chance.

6. What is it with Bailey and extra points?

7. On our last drive, I would have liked to see a draw play to Mattison on either 3rd & 3 or 4th & 3. We ran a nice one on the previous TD drive. Don’t like the last 2 play calls in that sequence.

8. Why is is that we fall for fake punts every time? In certain situations you need to watch for a fake. That was one of them. It seems like we are always out coached and outsmarted.

9. As I said, Rhodes will be gone next season. With that being said, I’d bring back Waynes on a reasonable deal. If he wants #1 CB money then “see you later”. We really can’t afford to let him go with Hill one strike away from a season long ban. I’m guessing Linval might be on the chopping block too. This defense needs to be retooled. We need a guy that can make a push up the middle. We get no pass pressure from there and are getting gashed with runs up the gut. We are okay on runs that go wide....but up the middle we stink.

10. Good comeback by Kirk but he was helped by a great sideline catch by Kyle, a 30yd DPI for Diggs (I think the only flag thrown on SEA all night) and a broken coverage for Treadwell. Don’t want to take anything away from him because I thought he played okay but the final score could have been a lot worse.

11. Can I hear Russell Wilson say nothing on mic’ed up again?

12. We need to somehow win the division, meaning that we need to run the table and have GB slip against someone. I’m not confident we can do that with our defense playing the way it is.
Post #: 4144
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 7:51:58 AM   
Ush


Posts: 2251
Joined: 7/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

its probably not unrelated that Rhodes decline started when they tightened up illegal contact
Once he was not allowed to hold WRs that took away his one advantage
Speed was always his weakness
He looks really slow out there. Prolly has lost a half step. There was a draft argument whether he was a CB or S in the NFL. Combined with lack of elite pass rush allows him to get abused all over the field
Even the fumble he gave up a 3rd down conversion when coverage should have been tight

Zimmer can't adapt at all to the changing game. I'll be honest I'm not adapting well either. Dana was right on. The product becomes more unwatchable by the day. Teams are going to need coaches with lots of fresh ideas as the rules get dumber and dumber. Zimmer is not that guy.


The one thing we thought we were getting with Zimmer was an elite D. They ha e been anything but that. They have gotten worse over the years

I agree. The defense has been weak since the Saints exposed Rhodes badly in the second half of the playoff game. Considering we have the most money tied up into that side of the ball I think people have every right to be outraged by the obvious diminishing returns.


This.

Since the 2nd half of the Minneapolis Miracle, the D has been torched regularly. Even against backup and rookie QB’s.
Post #: 4145
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 8:10:06 AM   
Lars


Posts: 11418
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Midi-chlorians
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ush

My $.02 cents:

1. Predictable loss. Didn’t know exactly how it was going to happen but, as a Viking fan, you just knew it was. We don’t win these games. It’s either fumbles or stupid penalties, or INT’s or bad play calling or horrible, inept play. It just happens every time and it’s so frustrating.

2. I have always been a huge Zimmer supporter but when you have 2 weeks to prepare and your defense plays like that, you have to get the blame. You are the defensive “genius” and your new plan was to play deep cover 2 most of the game?!? Even when they had 6 offensive linemen in most of the game?!?

3. Run defense has been bad all season....except against Dallas when Linval was out. Seems like teams are always 2nd and 4 or 2nd and 2. I liked Wilson in for Gedeon but he made some glaring mistakes last night in the run game.

4. It’s pretty clear that Rhodes won’t be here next year with that contract. Why not start giving Hughes and Hill a shot. They can’t play any worse.

5. CJ Ham.....what are you doing?!? You’re not gonna run it all the way back. Your job there was to get some yards and HOLD ON TO THE BALL! It would have taken a miracle to win but would have been nice to have a chance.

6. What is it with Bailey and extra points?

7. On our last drive, I would have liked to see a draw play to Mattison on either 3rd & 3 or 4th & 3. We ran a nice one on the previous TD drive. Don’t like the last 2 play calls in that sequence.

8. Why is is that we fall for fake punts every time? In certain situations you need to watch for a fake. That was one of them. It seems like we are always out coached and outsmarted.

9. As I said, Rhodes will be gone next season. With that being said, I’d bring back Waynes on a reasonable deal. If he wants #1 CB money then “see you later”. We really can’t afford to let him go with Hill one strike away from a season long ban. I’m guessing Linval might be on the chopping block too. This defense needs to be retooled. We need a guy that can make a push up the middle. We get no pass pressure from there and are getting gashed with runs up the gut. We are okay on runs that go wide....but up the middle we stink.

10. Good comeback by Kirk but he was helped by a great sideline catch by Kyle, a 30yd DPI for Diggs (I think the only flag thrown on SEA all night) and a broken coverage for Treadwell. Don’t want to take anything away from him because I thought he played okay but the final score could have been a lot worse.

11. Can I hear Russell Wilson say nothing on mic’ed up again?

12. We need to somehow win the division, meaning that we need to run the table and have GB slip against someone. I’m not confident we can do that with our defense playing the way it is.


Excellent summary.

Totally agree on R. Wilson! That repetitive rah-rah shit was sooooooo annoying. I would be like dude STFU!!

What was up with the non-call on the false start on the SEA punt? And one time they had a guy just wander off the field after they broke the huddle and ran a play. Isn't that 12 men in the huddle??

_____________________________

<this space for rent>
Post #: 4146
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 8:14:33 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ush

My $.02 cents:

1. Predictable loss. Didn’t know exactly how it was going to happen but, as a Viking fan, you just knew it was. We don’t win these games. It’s either fumbles or stupid penalties, or INT’s or bad play calling or horrible, inept play. It just happens every time and it’s so frustrating.

2. I have always been a huge Zimmer supporter but when you have 2 weeks to prepare and your defense plays like that, you have to get the blame. You are the defensive “genius” and your new plan was to play deep cover 2 most of the game?!? Even when they had 6 offensive linemen in most of the game?!?

3. Run defense has been bad all season....except against Dallas when Linval was out. Seems like teams are always 2nd and 4 or 2nd and 2. I liked Wilson in for Gedeon but he made some glaring mistakes last night in the run game.

4. It’s pretty clear that Rhodes won’t be here next year with that contract. Why not start giving Hughes and Hill a shot. They can’t play any worse.

5. CJ Ham.....what are you doing?!? You’re not gonna run it all the way back. Your job there was to get some yards and HOLD ON TO THE BALL! It would have taken a miracle to win but would have been nice to have a chance.

6. What is it with Bailey and extra points?

7. On our last drive, I would have liked to see a draw play to Mattison on either 3rd & 3 or 4th & 3. We ran a nice one on the previous TD drive. Don’t like the last 2 play calls in that sequence.

8. Why is is that we fall for fake punts every time? In certain situations you need to watch for a fake. That was one of them. It seems like we are always out coached and outsmarted.

9. As I said, Rhodes will be gone next season. With that being said, I’d bring back Waynes on a reasonable deal. If he wants #1 CB money then “see you later”. We really can’t afford to let him go with Hill one strike away from a season long ban. I’m guessing Linval might be on the chopping block too. This defense needs to be retooled. We need a guy that can make a push up the middle. We get no pass pressure from there and are getting gashed with runs up the gut. We are okay on runs that go wide....but up the middle we stink.

10. Good comeback by Kirk but he was helped by a great sideline catch by Kyle, a 30yd DPI for Diggs (I think the only flag thrown on SEA all night) and a broken coverage for Treadwell. Don’t want to take anything away from him because I thought he played okay but the final score could have been a lot worse.

11. Can I hear Russell Wilson say nothing on mic’ed up again?

12. We need to somehow win the division, meaning that we need to run the table and have GB slip against someone. I’m not confident we can do that with our defense playing the way it is.


Excellent summary.

Totally agree on R. Wilson! That repetitive rah-rah shit was sooooooo annoying. I would be like dude STFU!!

What was up with the non-call on the false start on the SEA punt? And one time they had a guy just wander off the field after they broke the huddle and ran a play. Isn't that 12 men in the huddle??

Agreed. Save the rah rah nonsense for 5th grade kick ball. Accountability is the only thing that will motivate these guys.
Post #: 4147
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 8:22:37 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
That was another frustrating loss.

CLink and their fans - wow. Beautiful stadium and the fans bring it on every play. Every single play the decibels have to be well over a 100. Impressive, tough, hostile environment.

Good post Ush.

Drove me nuts to see two deep safeties when SEA had their 6th lineman in. I hate bleeding a slow death and they gnashed us with the run. Run blitz. Put 8 in the box.

Why do we play zone at all? We are terrible in zone it seems.

First priority is DT. I have hope JJ and Watts can handle NT but we need a force at the 3T desperately.


I hated our play calling on offense at times last night. We had 3 minutes on that final drive. They were giving us the middle. Wagners was 8 yards off the LOS and dropping fast. 3rd and 3 - knowing it was four down territory? Stupid not to run it.

WR screen to Bisi? Ruddy running a deep route? I hope those get wiped from the play book.

Actually incredibly impressed with Cousins. The drop off after Diggs is huge (even with Diggs not showing last night). He stood tall in the pocket. With zero run game - he again gave us a chance to win.

We miss Thielan.

We lost because of our run defense.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4148
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 8:36:17 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

That was another frustrating loss.

CLink and their fans - wow. Beautiful stadium and the fans bring it on every play. Every single play the decibels have to be well over a 100. Impressive, tough, hostile environment.

Good post Ush.

Drove me nuts to see two deep safeties when SEA had their 6th lineman in. I hate bleeding a slow death and they gnashed us with the run. Run blitz. Put 8 in the box.

Why do we play zone at all? We are terrible in zone it seems.

First priority is DT. I have hope JJ and Watts can handle NT but we need a force at the 3T desperately.


I hated our play calling on offense at times last night. We had 3 minutes on that final drive. They were giving us the middle. Wagners was 8 yards off the LOS and dropping fast. 3rd and 3 - knowing it was four down territory? Stupid not to run it.

WR screen to Bisi? Ruddy running a deep route? I hope those get wiped from the play book.

Actually incredibly impressed with Cousins. The drop off after Diggs is huge (even with Diggs not showing last night). He stood tall in the pocket. With zero run game - he again gave us a chance to win.

We miss Thielan.

We lost because of our run defense.

I always like hearing your perspective from the stadiums. Good stuff!
Post #: 4149
RE: General Vikes Talk - 12/3/2019 8:47:28 AM   
SteveR

 

Posts: 3574
Joined: 1/24/2011
Status: offline
I always viewed Rhodes through Patriots goggles. He seems the type of player they would avoid paying to retain or gain assets to continue to build their team. Even guys like Harrison Smith, they are good, but you have to keep in mind that you don't want to be paying premium prices for them when they are no longer good.

But, whatever, it was an entertaining game for the most part. I did not like Cousins' final pass. I thought he had a better open with the RB leaking out, but Cousins seemed locked into Irv. Otherwise, I thought Cousins helped keep the hope boat afloat. Rudy had some nice catches. Mattison had some good runs. I liked that guy who got the last sack on Wilson. He seemed to make that sack happen on nothing but will.

Rhodes has got to be done at this point, unless an offensive lineman reports as an eligible receiver. Then he can come in and cover that guy...maybe. As for Zimmer, eh...I've been done with Zimmer for quite a while, so not much to say. It was a typical Zimmer game. We know what we have with him at this point. Diggs could do a little less preening and a bit more catching at times. Our D is toast and has been for a long time when it counts. The Saints game has been mentioned, but I think it goes back even further than that. Luck broke our defense December 18, 2016. They flat-out quit in that game and their elite mystique was then gone. They then started sliding into beating up on weak teams and being average against good teams until finally being what we have today.

I thought the wins against Dallas and Denver were nice but kind of fool's gold. Garrett-led Dallas is guaranteed to do head-scratching things at times, like running twice on their last series when they were killing us with the pass, and then Denver had a weak QB. We were fortunate in both of those games at the end. Seattle is a much better measuring stick, and we actually hung with them to a degree. Like what would have happened if Rhodes wasn't in there? How about if Diggs pulls his head out and makes the catches he had his hand on? In a game like that, little things loom large. Of course, it goes both ways. What if Wilson didn't volleyball the football to us?

Anyway, I am curious to see what a no-Rhodes defense looks like. He was killing us and guys got to be questioning his presence and the coach for leaving him in there. I think benching him is one proactive thing they can do going forward to try to help the defense.
Post #: 4150
Page:   <<   < prev  164 165 [166] 167 168   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  164 165 [166] 167 168   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode