David F.
Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson Is it bad to present some surprising stats that shed light on a Vikings player or the Vikings team in a positive manner when most of us are struggling with disappointment? Or do most of us come here to find new reasons to be angry about how bad the team is doing? If the stats need major manipulation and cherry-picking to appear positive then yes, it's bad. Imagine I asked dentists if they think chewing Trident gum is good for the teeth and the answers were: no, no, no, yes, no, no, no, no, yes, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, yes, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, yes, no, no, no, no, yes, yes, no, yes, yes, no, no, yes, no, no and no. And then I made the claim that 'four out of five dentists say chewing Trident gum is good for the teeth'. Is that a good representation of the facts? I might further ask, why do you feel the need to see stats manipulated to feel good? There's only the truth and the choice is yours as to whether you feel good about it or not.
_____________________________
I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
|