bohumm
Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided. FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract. Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty? Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice? Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems. For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem? Inmates then run the asylum. When a star player doesn't like the coach it's easier for the owner to fire the coach than trade the player. It often creates insubordination. There's a reason why the NFL is king. The root of it is nonguaranteed contracts. The inmates? Plantation mentality much, Bill? Name a time one player got a coach fired.
|