Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: 2022 NFL draft

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2022 NFL draft Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 12:11:15 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

I can't see a TE or C prospect worth taking in the first two rds (unless Linderbaum drops).

So first two rds, I believe we are looking at best prospects at WR, Edge, OL, CB, S.

Subtract two positions and add TE and C to our third rd pool.

This should clear everything up.


I think you are Ouija Boarding safety.

You think we are good to go at S?


No, S has its issues. Bynum IMO is perhaps the player to take a risk with, but that's only because we have other needs.

Thinking the difference makers like Sauce, Stingley, Williams will be gone by 12, leaving all sorts of options who are a step below at DE and WR, as well as Davis. McDuffie belongs with the second tier CBs. Hamilton is the wild card.
Post #: 701
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 12:14:07 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
I think he means you are clairvoyant

I would not be upset with Hamilton at 12
Post #: 702
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 12:24:34 PM   
Steve Lentz


Posts: 36196
Joined: 7/19/2007
From: Omaha
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

I think he means you are clairvoyant

I would not be upset with Hamilton at 12



_____________________________

" I believe empathy is the most essential quality of civilization"
Post #: 703
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 1:13:25 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

I can't see a TE or C prospect worth taking in the first two rds (unless Linderbaum drops).

So first two rds, I believe we are looking at best prospects at WR, Edge, OL, CB, S.

Subtract two positions and add TE and C to our third rd pool.

This should clear everything up.


I think you are Ouija Boarding safety.

You think we are good to go at S?


No, S has its issues. Bynum IMO is perhaps the player to take a risk with, but that's only because we have other needs.

Thinking the difference makers like Sauce, Stingley, Williams will be gone by 12, leaving all sorts of options who are a step below at DE and WR, as well as Davis. McDuffie belongs with the second tier CBs. Hamilton is the wild card.

There's also the 'how can we assist the draft in biting green bay in the ass' factor.

My understanding is, as one of the first rd teams with two picks, there's a good chance they will try and move up for the WR Adams replacement of their choice. Something to keep in mind when choosing between positions ...

(which available WR would I least want the packers to move up for, if they haven't already, etc.)
Post #: 704
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 1:23:07 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22986
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
The only d-lineman that could possibly keep me away from drafting a corner in round one would be Jordan Davis. That kid looks like a beast to me. Outside of that it looks like a good year for great DB's and that should be the first pick given our needs.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 705
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 1:31:53 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

I think he means you are clairvoyant

I would not be upset with Hamilton at 12

He has every team captain intangible dominating Kwesi's laminated spreadsheet.

I can't wait to see the first espn photo op of our war-room ... staged with game-time Kwesi in ipods instead of a headset, holding an ipad over his mouth as he yells out functions and matrixes to the phone people.
Post #: 706
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:02:41 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

I can't see a TE or C prospect worth taking in the first two rds (unless Linderbaum drops).

So first two rds, I believe we are looking at best prospects at WR, Edge, OL, CB, S.

Subtract two positions and add TE and C to our third rd pool.

This should clear everything up.


I think you are Ouija Boarding safety.

You think we are good to go at S?


No, S has its issues. Bynum IMO is perhaps the player to take a risk with, but that's only because we have other needs.

Thinking the difference makers like Sauce, Stingley, Williams will be gone by 12, leaving all sorts of options who are a step below at DE and WR, as well as Davis. McDuffie belongs with the second tier CBs. Hamilton is the wild card.

There's also the 'how can we assist the draft in biting green bay in the ass' factor.

My understanding is, as one of the first rd teams with two picks, there's a good chance they will try and move up for the WR Adams replacement of their choice. Something to keep in mind when choosing between positions ...

(which available WR would I least want the packers to move up for, if they haven't already, etc.)


Yeah have wondered about that as an 'all things being equal' thing, or perhaps it's worth some value (ex. 3 percent/points/whatever). Any top WR we take would reduce options and hopefully increase trade-up competition/resources.

As far as who we don't want to see twice or more a year, Jameson Williams immediately comes to mind. But Olave, Wilson, and even Dotson and Burks would be problematic. I think London will be a bust.
Post #: 707
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:14:12 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 4/28/2022 2:17:05 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 708
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:14:41 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
Cringing at the thought of GB's Williams suddenly in the open field with just Minny's 4.6 forty Hamilton to beat. But he should be gone before #12. Detroit's problem

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2022 2:24:17 PM >
Post #: 709
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:17:30 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

I can't see a TE or C prospect worth taking in the first two rds (unless Linderbaum drops).

So first two rds, I believe we are looking at best prospects at WR, Edge, OL, CB, S.

Subtract two positions and add TE and C to our third rd pool.

This should clear everything up.


I think you are Ouija Boarding safety.

You think we are good to go at S?


No, S has its issues. Bynum IMO is perhaps the player to take a risk with, but that's only because we have other needs.

Thinking the difference makers like Sauce, Stingley, Williams will be gone by 12, leaving all sorts of options who are a step below at DE and WR, as well as Davis. McDuffie belongs with the second tier CBs. Hamilton is the wild card.

There's also the 'how can we assist the draft in biting green bay in the ass' factor.

My understanding is, as one of the first rd teams with two picks, there's a good chance they will try and move up for the WR Adams replacement of their choice. Something to keep in mind when choosing between positions ...

(which available WR would I least want the packers to move up for, if they haven't already, etc.)


Yeah have wondered about that as an 'all things being equal' thing, or perhaps it's worth some value (ex. 3 percent/points/whatever). Any top WR we take would reduce options and hopefully increase trade-up competition/resources.

As far as who we don't want to see twice or more a year, Jameson Williams immediately comes to mind. But Olave, Wilson, and even Dotson and Burks would be problematic. I think London will be a bust.

If we land a first round worthy CB ... I would agree. If we don't get a CB first two rds ... any WR drafted or undrafted could be problematic.
Post #: 710
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:22:35 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 4/28/2022 2:26:05 PM >
Post #: 711
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:34:38 PM   
Murph


Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.


17 games plus playoffs, hopefully. Injuries happen. What happens if JJ or Thielen go down for significant time? Our new offense runs a lot of 3-4 WR sets.

I'd be really surprised if we didn't draft a WR in this draft. I'm expecting one with one of our first 3 picks.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 712
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:40:16 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9558
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
.
.
their final year in college....


111-1540-18…justin jefferson


79-1572-15….jameson Williams

70-1058-12….garrett wilson

65-936-13….chris olave

88-1084-7…drake london


96-1820-26….randy moss --- wtf

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 713
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:40:32 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)


"...Bisi coming back..." OMG.

Bisi is exactly the player and position to target with a later round pick. Instead of saying depth isn't a problem, he should be saying what can the regime do to upgrade the position and send Bisi packing!
Post #: 714
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:47:41 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)


"...Bisi coming back..." OMG.

Bisi is exactly the player and position to target with a later round pick. Instead of saying depth isn't a problem, he should be saying what can the regime do to upgrade the position and send Bisi packing!


It is more of emergency 911 lets draft one in the 1st (that Marty suggests).

I do like a ton of the WR that will be available 3-6 rounds. They are bigger and faster than Bisi. I am fine with that; lets not draft one in the 1st.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 715
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:56:15 PM   
Murph


Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)


"...Bisi coming back..." OMG.

Bisi is exactly the player and position to target with a later round pick. Instead of saying depth isn't a problem, he should be saying what can the regime do to upgrade the position and send Bisi packing!


It is more of emergency 911 lets draft one in the 1st (that Marty suggests).

I do like a ton of the WR that will be available 3-6 rounds. They are bigger and faster than Bisi. I am fine with that; lets not draft one in the 1st.


Unless he's the best player available on our board.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 716
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 2:58:24 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77913
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)


I also need to see more than 1 good game out of ISM before I'm sure he's part of the future (or even the present).
Post #: 717
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:07:30 PM   
lyle chabot

 

Posts: 748
Joined: 7/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: The Happy Norseman

From all the mock drafts I've checked out, it appears that one (or more) of these guys will be available at 12:

WR - Jameson Williams
S - Kyle Hamilton
DE - Jermaine Johnson
CB - Derek Stingley Jr.

All positions of need for the Vikings, and all of them have the potential to be game changers. If one of them is there at 12, I hope Kwesi pulls the trigger instead of trading back.



Why does J Johnson have the potential to be a game changer? Is DE an all time deep position?

CB singles is my first choice if available at 12
WR Williams
S Hamilton
If all gone trade back in the teens ans get our fourth round pick back
Post #: 718
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:16:42 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
If there is nobody we like value-wise at 12 and no suitable trade partner, we could delay the pick in order to try to pay the lower slot! Kevin Williams' agent fought that, and it ended up roughly a compromise: https://www.twincities.com/2020/04/10/vikings-2003-draft-fiasco-the-who-worked-out-fine-the-how-not-so-much/

Interesting how Tice said the edict to trade down was a money decision (which I believe) while Woods says it was for more picks.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2022 3:18:26 PM >
Post #: 719
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:17:18 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lyle chabot

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: The Happy Norseman

From all the mock drafts I've checked out, it appears that one (or more) of these guys will be available at 12:

WR - Jameson Williams
S - Kyle Hamilton
DE - Jermaine Johnson
CB - Derek Stingley Jr.

All positions of need for the Vikings, and all of them have the potential to be game changers. If one of them is there at 12, I hope Kwesi pulls the trigger instead of trading back.



Why does J Johnson have the potential to be a game changer? Is DE an all time deep position?

CB singles is my first choice if available at 12
WR Williams
S Hamilton
If all gone trade back in the teens ans get our fourth round pick back


Or if they're all there - trade back also.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 720
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:26:29 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
National and BLESTO scouting services: http://www.draftdaddy.com/features/blesto.htm
Post #: 721
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:29:16 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)


"...Bisi coming back..." OMG.

Bisi is exactly the player and position to target with a later round pick. Instead of saying depth isn't a problem, he should be saying what can the regime do to upgrade the position and send Bisi packing!


It is more of emergency 911 lets draft one in the 1st (that Marty suggests).

I do like a ton of the WR that will be available 3-6 rounds. They are bigger and faster than Bisi. I am fine with that; lets not draft one in the 1st.

One of Kwesi's underrated hidden rough diamond gems, I'm sure:

Rd 3

WR Khalil Shakir, Boise State 6-0 196 4.43

Strengths: A coach's dream, combining competitive nature, exciting versatility and elite character on and off the field ... Voracious competitive spirit and vastly versatile ... Receiver used on direct snaps, as a running back, on jets sweeps and in return game ... Motor rarely gives opponents a chance to catch their breath No down gear into the teeth of the defense as route-runner Concentration to make wild circus catches ... Relishes contact and can play through it ... Absolute menace with the ball in his hands. (nfl.com)

Weaknesses: doesn't always brush his teeth twice a day.

Boom. a bigger version of Deebo and faster version Cooper Kupp (who ran a 4.62 at combine) rolled into one!

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 4/28/2022 3:30:32 PM >
Post #: 722
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:43:04 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9558
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)



No way bisi makes the final 53….

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 723
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:43:07 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

National and BLESTO scouting services: http://www.draftdaddy.com/features/blesto.htm

BLESTO-V. No respect. Ever.

The International Ring Size chart at the top is useful also.
Post #: 724
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/28/2022 3:46:16 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Before free agency, our biggest holes were C (Bradbury), G (Cole, Udoh), CB1, CB2 (Peterson), SCB (Alexander), LB (Barr, Vigil), DE / Edge [opposite of Hunter], NT (Pierce), TE (Conklin), FS (Woods)

If you give the benefit of the doubt to our FA signings (Edge Smith, LB Hicks, NT Phillips, SCB Sullivan, CB2 Peterson, G Reed), our biggest holes remaining are:

C, CB1, S, TE [IMO Bynum and Smith are promising but still question marks as full-time starters ... they need real competition and depth]

Also WR, Edge, OT ... depth sucks everywhere but RB … so premium positions could easily be addressed for depth now and cap flexibility later.


WR has Bisi coming back, Osborne, and Smith Marsette. Depth at WR really isn't a worry.

Osborne is a starter for all practical purposes so he doesn't count. ISM as the only back-up to JJ Thielen Osborne? Be serious.

(please don't bring up Bisi ... I will consider that a misfire and let it go this time but don't bring him up again)



No way bisi makes the final 53….

You never know with our new staff ... they can fix anything that's been zimmered.
Post #: 725
Page:   <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2022 NFL draft Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode