Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 3:53:26 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline 		I saw on Twitter today the new LB Hicks unloaded on the RB for GB almost the same way as ZED....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 351
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 5:49:22 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

Why not here? It's ok to talk about bands, right?

What percent of the people who used to post here regularly seven years ago post here today. Why is that?

The point of the entire blow up tonight was centered around, for me, treating other people like shit who post here.

* Boston Globe, 1/6/2002, Baltimore, A Pale Blue Dot - that's what I think about religion, but I respect people who have faith and enjoy going to church - and in my opinion, common decency requires

There ya go, Dan - carry on

I suspect they have either matured beyond my adolescent fixation on this team or have more interesting lives than I do.

I think some have moved onto sites that keep it 99% football. At least that is what I have seen.


I've never found a site that keeps it even 75% football. Most I've visited are much more vulgar and mean-spirited than talkvikes. My theory is that the clashes were more about posters' desire to control the narrative than the actual content of any given argument. The attempts to control naturally spark the rebellious nature of those who don't stand for that. I think there was a core group that viewed talkvikes as "theirs" and weren't flexible enough to enjoy new users and their opinions and styles.



_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 352
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 5:53:28 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Its not enough to win a game … this needs to be a good team at a minimum and compete for a championship at the median.

Until I know that, I will continue being a brooding short-tempered nasty jerk.

I'd say it's more that they need to compete for a playoff spot at a minimum, per the Wilfs mandate, and be pointed in the right direction with a plan to get there. That said, I think (don't *know*) that they are already good, so now I'm looking forward to the improvement I anticipate as the year proceeds.



_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 353
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 5:55:26 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Vikings WIN!

Cheese Lose

Cowpukes lose!

the holy triumvirate!

and I won the football pool....Its been a LONG time since I had a better football weekend.

Congratz. Same for me with the first experience of online wagering.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 354
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 6:42:40 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Its not enough to win a game … this needs to be a good team at a minimum and compete for a championship at the median.

Until I know that, I will continue being a brooding short-tempered nasty jerk.

I'd say it's more that they need to compete for a playoff spot at a minimum, per the Wilfs mandate, and be pointed in the right direction with a plan to get there. That said, I think (don't *know*) that they are already good, so now I'm looking forward to the improvement I anticipate as the year proceeds.

Semantics...

My post was an over-dramatic response to not being upbeat after game one.

Even though game one was a blast, its one game.

I'm eagerly looking forward to seeing how this unfolds.
Post #: 355
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 8:21:25 PM   
bongbong


Posts: 333
Joined: 10/27/2009
Status: offline 		I'm terrible at this sort of thing, but I'll offer the Vikes need an early lead. (Genius, i know.) Life's too short to watch Iggles football, but i doubt their ipo/ glorified college offence can play catch- up well in the NFL. Make Jalen throw and it could snowball.
Post #: 356
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 8:26:02 PM   
bongbong


Posts: 333
Joined: 10/27/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!
Post #: 357
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 8:46:25 PM   
Murph


Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 358
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/15/2022 10:56:42 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 9/15/2022 11:00:25 PM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 359
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 7:21:27 AM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I don't dishonor anyone Bill, you're just an a-- towards me.

All the Vikings WRs have a J in their name, that is why OBJ would fit right in. It would be nice to replace Bisi.





How do you spell #19's name?

Furthermore doesn't Jalen Reagor pretty much replace Bisi, and he's got the coveted J that you're after.



< Message edited by bstinger -- 9/16/2022 7:22:37 AM >

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 360
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 7:41:32 AM  1 votes
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 361
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 8:54:44 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 9/16/2022 8:56:36 AM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 362
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 9:32:07 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....



He would have won MVP one year but THAT was the year Peyton Manning threw 49 TDs

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 363
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 9:35:00 AM  1 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.
Post #: 364
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 9:38:09 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.


No they don't. Besides, it's Mt. Rushmore for a reason. Four players. 4. Quattro.
Post #: 365
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 10:17:48 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19590
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.


No they don't. Besides, it's Mt. Rushmore for a reason. Four players. 4. Quattro.

I think you got it right Bill. I just loved how Randle would get into the opposing players heads. McDaniel is the right choice imo.
Post #: 366
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 10:32:42 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13973
Status: offline 		I think, if I had to sub in anyone, on Vikings Mt. Rushmore, it would be Bud Grant

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 367
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:15:19 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.
Post #: 368
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:22:14 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19590
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.
Post #: 369
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:30:34 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.


Daunte played five more seasons.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 370
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:32:20 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19590
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.


Daunte played five more seasons.

Man time flies! He must not have played much. I just remember a brief stint with the Raiders and Dolphins.
Post #: 371
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:43:37 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19590
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline 		According to pro football reference he played 4 years after Minnesota. His teams records were 3-17 when he played.
Post #: 372
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:44:29 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28301
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.


Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury?
Post #: 373
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 12:45:39 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19590
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.


Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury?

Many people recover from injuries. He was made by Moss and Carter. He was extremely overrated.
Post #: 374
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/16/2022 1:00:49 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: bongbong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

OK, that's weird.

Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order:

Randall McDaniel
Alan Page
Fran Tarkenton
Randy Moss

Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple!

Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess.


Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp.


That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!


They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

Dante was only good because of Moss.


Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee....

28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....


Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame!

You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles.

And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota.

gzuz.

I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.


Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury?

Many people recover from injuries. He was made by Moss and Carter. He was extremely overrated.

In hindsight, take Kearse at @11 and Kerney @29 and RC or George could lead us to SB.
Post #: 375
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode