Tom Sykes
Posts: 6036
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer Oh you mean this one: Nick Olson @NickOlsonNFL · Dec 26 Kirk is throwing to the OPOY-favorite & a pro bowl TE behind two top-5-graded OTs with a good offensive head coach and is 19th in EPA/play, 14th in PFF grade & 13th in passer rating. He's definitely been clutch, but a better QB would've put a lot of those close games away early. I think Nick ignores 2 obivous things.....1) that the Giants have a good defense. 2) our defense played great but gave up the lead once again. 11-0 in one score games is our coach but Kirk has been clutch too. quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J Phil, let me ask ya? Is Nick Olson a Kirk hater or was a reading sarcasm the other day? Nick Olsen is a 'Kirk Hater' because he doesn't ignore how poorly KC plays at times (while acknowledging that he has 'definitely been clutch')? I don't remember other tweets from Olson, don't know who he is ... in that quote he may be guilty of downplaying the clutch performances this season compared to other factors ... but hater? C'mon. Its amazing how the pro-KC crowd want to give KC every shred of credit for the comebacks this year while spreading the blame for his .500 performances the 10 years prior. (yes I'm embellishing) Its true, there are anti-KCers who have put all the blame for losses on Kirk ... He has come through this season big time. He has also been very average at times. Or worse. I think its a fair point that, this season, he has found ways to dig himself out of the holes that he keeps putting this team in with poor decisions and poor throws. There are a lot other non-QB factors in that hole digging, of course. QBs get too much blame / credit. I'm not even thinking about .500 or blame. Just amazed at people like DF and Olson who can't shake the hate. But it's cool That's right ... get that last 'hate' jab in there before retreating behind 'But its cool.' Olsen's tweet above offers a valid point of view, it may be narrow but hateful? No.
|