Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  196 197 [198] 199 200   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:02:25 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4926
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:03:02 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.
Post #: 4927
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:04:32 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?


Of course; he has restructured before. I don't see it though as I don't think the FO want to add years....they added void years and he took a pay cut last year to free up cap.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4928
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:04:47 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 4929
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:07:20 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

I thought it was huge at one time but not so much anymore

-thought being the key work in that last sentence
Post #: 4930
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:09:14 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

10 biggest contracts in the NFL this season:

1) Aaron Rodgers (didn't live up to it)
2) Russell Wilson (didn't live up to it)
3) Kyler Murray (didn't live up to it)
4) Deshaun Watson (didn't live up to it)
5) Patrick Mahomes
6) Josh Allen
7) Derek Carr (didn't live up to it)
8) Dak Prescott (didn't live up to it)
9) Matthew Stafford (didn't live up to it)
10) Kirk Cousins (with the #14 QB rating, didn't live up to it)

Anyone seeing a trend here?


Again it is a double edge sword. You have maybe 8-9 wins w/o Kirk. I remember the Ponder, Teddy, Bradford years. Case we lucked into and he hasn't done that since for one year. Total Sabotage solution; you also are talking about something that can't be done anyway. They can't cut him due to cap and he has a no trade.

Your solution isn't one.

You gain 13 million by cutting Hicks and Kendricks alone. They will have cap space and if they resign TJ and Jefferson they can create more.


IMO you are far too optimistic with say $30 million cap.

First of all, we are starting 2023 with a cap deficit, so the $30 million ends up being around $20 million. Then you have the rookie class, and w/o a second rounder might be around $5 million.

Like magic, your $30 million is automatically reduced to $15 million.


The cap isn't locked in for 2023 yet but they had zero cap room last year and 28 million in dead cap and created 20 million. They have more breathing room this year and will obviously create more.

I see a better chance of keeping Harry over Kendricks and Hicks...those two have almost zero dead cap by cutting. So that could be a restructure (for Harry).


Oh, did you factor in the incredible costs to extend TWO "generational" talents in JJ and TJ?
Post #: 4931
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:11:35 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

10 biggest contracts in the NFL this season:

1) Aaron Rodgers (didn't live up to it)
2) Russell Wilson (didn't live up to it)
3) Kyler Murray (didn't live up to it)
4) Deshaun Watson (didn't live up to it)
5) Patrick Mahomes
6) Josh Allen
7) Derek Carr (didn't live up to it)
8) Dak Prescott (didn't live up to it)
9) Matthew Stafford (didn't live up to it)
10) Kirk Cousins (with the #14 QB rating, didn't live up to it)

Anyone seeing a trend here?


Again it is a double edge sword. You have maybe 8-9 wins w/o Kirk. I remember the Ponder, Teddy, Bradford years. Case we lucked into and he hasn't done that since for one year. Total Sabotage solution; you also are talking about something that can't be done anyway. They can't cut him due to cap and he has a no trade.

Your solution isn't one.

You gain 13 million by cutting Hicks and Kendricks alone. They will have cap space and if they resign TJ and Jefferson they can create more.


IMO you are far too optimistic with say $30 million cap.

First of all, we are starting 2023 with a cap deficit, so the $30 million ends up being around $20 million. Then you have the rookie class, and w/o a second rounder might be around $5 million.

Like magic, your $30 million is automatically reduced to $15 million.


The cap isn't locked in for 2023 yet but they had zero cap room last year and 28 million in dead cap and created 20 million. They have more breathing room this year and will obviously create more.

I see a better chance of keeping Harry over Kendricks and Hicks...those two have almost zero dead cap by cutting. So that could be a restructure (for Harry).


Oh, did you factor in the incredible costs to extend TWO "generational" talents in JJ and TJ?


Yes. You structure how you want. Usually the signing bonus makes the first year or 2 less.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4932
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:11:46 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Murp
I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

QBOTF needs to be done this year. One in trade(Lance, Wilson) and maybe 2 in the draft.

Keeping Kirk helps us land one or two players in FA this year.

The only upside of dumping Cousins is better draft position in 2024.

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 1/17/2023 9:13:04 AM >
Post #: 4933
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:13:31 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murp
I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

QBOTF needs to be done this year. One if FA(Lance, Wilson) and maybe 2 in the draft.

Keeping Kirk helps us land one or two players in FA this year.

The only upside of dumping Cousins is better draft position in 2024.


I don't think Wilson is a good option. Better to draft one than him. Lance may be very expensive.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4934
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:14:19 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.


Yes, the cap is going up which means ALL players we sign will be more expensive. And it goes up for every team.

It should result in roughly the same figure WRT a players % of the overall team cap.

The notion that an increasing cap figure is a benefit is mostly a myth.
Post #: 4935
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:16:30 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?


Of course; he has restructured before. I don't see it though as I don't think the FO want to add years....they added void years and he took a pay cut last year to free up cap.

Restructure for this year. No future years. It allows him to play this season and make future earnings at a new home the next year. I never said anything about an extension.

If not, he can sit on the bench at the age of 35. That potentially loses him a lot of money in the future. He will have far less people interested at 36, a year removed from the field.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/17/2023 9:18:47 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4936
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:16:40 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.


Yes, the cap is going up which means ALL players we sign will be more expensive. And it goes up for every team.

It should result in roughly the same figure WRT a players % of the overall team cap.

The notion that an increasing cap figure is a benefit is mostly a myth.


Salary cap or no room on the salary cap seems to be about the same, a myth. I thought there was no room last year. There always seems to be room.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4937
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:17:46 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?


Of course; he has restructured before. I don't see it though as I don't think the FO want to add years....they added void years and he took a pay cut last year to free up cap.

Restructure for this year. No future years. It gives him the opportunity to allow him to play this season and make future earnings at a new home in the future. I never said anything about an extension.

If not, he can sit on the bench at the age of 35. That loses him money in the future. He will have far less people interested at 36, a year removed from the field.


Whatever Brad......are you really a fan?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4938
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:20:22 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.


Yes, the cap is going up which means ALL players we sign will be more expensive. And it goes up for every team.

It should result in roughly the same figure WRT a players % of the overall team cap.

The notion that an increasing cap figure is a benefit is mostly a myth.


Salary cap or no room on the salary cap seems to be about the same, a myth. I thought there was no room last year. There always seems to be room.


Yes they carved out cap space in large part by creating void years for Cousins and I think Hunter. Enjoy that plan!
Post #: 4939
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:20:29 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?


Of course; he has restructured before. I don't see it though as I don't think the FO want to add years....they added void years and he took a pay cut last year to free up cap.

Restructure for this year. No future years. It gives him the opportunity to allow him to play this season and make future earnings at a new home in the future. I never said anything about an extension.

If not, he can sit on the bench at the age of 35. That loses him money in the future. He will have far less people interested at 36, a year removed from the field.


Whatever Brad......are you really a fan?

I want the quickest plan to success. That plan is not possible with Kirk Cousins at quarterback. PERIOD! I have already written off 2023, given the Cousins contract situation. Thank you Rick Spielman.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/17/2023 9:22:16 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4940
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:20:39 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The regime will be thinking strategically with the cap.

JJ will be a fortune. O'Neill's contract is going to kick in. After they sort out more mess next season, Darrisaw will enter his 4th year. He is trending towards a mammoth contract especially as he plays at a premium position.

The QBOTF will almost have to be via the draft.

If they dump massive amounts of cap into void years, I'd say that's an early indicator the Wilfs are preparing to sell the team.



darrisaw might be the only 'untouchable' I have....and i am not totally convinced he is

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 4941
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:21:11 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murp
I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

QBOTF needs to be done this year. One in trade(Lance, Wilson) and maybe 2 in the draft.

Keeping Kirk helps us land one or two players in FA this year.

The only upside of dumping Cousins is better draft position in 2024.



Should have done it last year. I was begging them to trade him and get rid of the other over paid vets last year but that ship has sailed.

They put themselves in a tough spot with his contract, horrible extension. Now it's their mess to clean up.

I would still try to trade him now if possible, if we can't, I'd keep him for one more year.

Looking at our schedule, aging roster, lack of defensive talent, lack of cap space and unimpressive drafting acumen;

I think we are going to have a really bad record next season regardless of QB.

It's an unintentional tank.

< Message edited by Murph -- 1/17/2023 9:22:39 AM >


_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 4942
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:21:11 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.


Yes, the cap is going up which means ALL players we sign will be more expensive. And it goes up for every team.

It should result in roughly the same figure WRT a players % of the overall team cap.

The notion that an increasing cap figure is a benefit is mostly a myth.

I guess I'm saying JJ will be highest paid WR ever when he signs.

But, he probably will be between 3-5 (in current WR salaries) when he gets to his 4th or 5th year.

Like Cousins, who actually is 10th highest paid QB now.
Post #: 4943
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:22:20 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

10 biggest contracts in the NFL this season:

1) Aaron Rodgers (didn't live up to it)
2) Russell Wilson (didn't live up to it)
3) Kyler Murray (didn't live up to it)
4) Deshaun Watson (didn't live up to it)
5) Patrick Mahomes
6) Josh Allen
7) Derek Carr (didn't live up to it)
8) Dak Prescott (didn't live up to it)
9) Matthew Stafford (didn't live up to it)
10) Kirk Cousins (with the #14 QB rating, didn't live up to it)

Anyone seeing a trend here?


Again it is a double edge sword. You have maybe 8-9 wins w/o Kirk. I remember the Ponder, Teddy, Bradford years. Case we lucked into and he hasn't done that since for one year. Total Sabotage solution; you also are talking about something that can't be done anyway. They can't cut him due to cap and he has a no trade.

Your solution isn't one.

You gain 13 million by cutting Hicks and Kendricks alone. They will have cap space and if they resign TJ and Jefferson they can create more.


IMO you are far too optimistic with say $30 million cap.

First of all, we are starting 2023 with a cap deficit, so the $30 million ends up being around $20 million. Then you have the rookie class, and w/o a second rounder might be around $5 million.

Like magic, your $30 million is automatically reduced to $15 million.


The cap isn't locked in for 2023 yet but they had zero cap room last year and 28 million in dead cap and created 20 million. They have more breathing room this year and will obviously create more.

I see a better chance of keeping Harry over Kendricks and Hicks...those two have almost zero dead cap by cutting. So that could be a restructure (for Harry).


Oh, did you factor in the incredible costs to extend TWO "generational" talents in JJ and TJ?


Yes. You structure how you want. Usually the signing bonus makes the first year or 2 less.


Wow, you really ran with that.
Post #: 4944
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:24:22 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The regime will be thinking strategically with the cap.

JJ will be a fortune. O'Neill's contract is going to kick in. After they sort out more mess next season, Darrisaw will enter his 4th year. He is trending towards a mammoth contract especially as he plays at a premium position.

The QBOTF will almost have to be via the draft.

If they dump massive amounts of cap into void years, I'd say that's an early indicator the Wilfs are preparing to sell the team.

Has there been some talk about them selling?


Why would there be? My statement is based on an if and an early indicator in relation to the regime looking at the cap strategically, i.e. several years down the road.
Post #: 4945
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:25:14 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Cousins tipped his cap this week when he said he loves playing for the Vikings. Translation: He's concerned he won't be making any money past 2023 and trying to buy the fans.

If you are so in love with the franchise, how about you restructure your contract so the franchise can build a competent defense? That would be my question if I were the GM.



exactly..

my first meeting this offseason is with Kirk and his agent

Team friendly deal so we can build or you are a lame duck QB next year


Good luck with your next coach/environment

Shhhh. Not so loud. People will think you are crazy for suggesting there may be an answer.

Dr. solution wasn't yours. Yours was cut or trade.

Now you are just making things up. I suggested those as two options.

It seems now that I have come up with added solutions that you are now doing a classic, Phil Riewer rope-a-dope. With the emphasis on dope.


You never mentioned a restructure...we can look back if needed. You mentioned Cut or Trade. You know it.

Are you admitting that a restructure is a good idea?


Of course; he has restructured before. I don't see it though as I don't think the FO want to add years....they added void years and he took a pay cut last year to free up cap.

Restructure for this year. No future years. It allows him to play this season and make future earnings at a new home the next year. I never said anything about an extension.

If not, he can sit on the bench at the age of 35. That potentially loses him a lot of money in the future. He will have far less people interested at 36, a year removed from the field.

His agent will be all over that one.
Post #: 4946
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:25:28 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
I'm struggling with this short of the sticks thing

but I don't really want to go with an unknown next year, either

and F the rebuilds, I'm way too far past my prime to wait around

but then again, the defense is a must, can you do worse than what you had out there, other than the last moments of a game, anyway

- actaually, F fb for awhile - sigh
Post #: 4947
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:25:29 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall
I would rather go all in for a QBOTF via trading Jefferson for a super high pick if the front office thinks their QBOTF is there and do a real rebuild.
Cutting or trading away Cousins for a retread piece of trash like Zach Wilson, Mayfield, ect feels like an epic waste of time.
Jefferson isn't going to want to stick around for a massive rebuild anyway.
For example, I would think the Bears would be very interested in Jefferson as the center piece of a trade that gets the Vikings the #1 overall pick.
Kwesi is going to thrive or be fired based on his "life after Kirk" move, if I was him I would make it the best possible move.


Ron...JJ is 23. 2023 isn't a rebuild.
Trading JJ at 23 would get him fired.
Get Creative and get a QBOTF w/o trading JJ.

Yep. You don't need a Top 5 pick to get a QBOTF. We just need to commit to doing it. We haven't done it since Ponder.


i would prefer to keep JJ too, but I am looking for a 15 year quarterback more than a 7 year WR

Cap is going up. We can do both.


Yes, the cap is going up which means ALL players we sign will be more expensive. And it goes up for every team.

It should result in roughly the same figure WRT a players % of the overall team cap.

The notion that an increasing cap figure is a benefit is mostly a myth.

I guess I'm saying JJ will be highest paid WR ever when he signs.

But, he probably will be between 3-5 (in current WR salaries) when he gets to his 4th or 5th year.

Like Cousins, who actually is 10th highest paid QB now.


I see.
Post #: 4948
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:27:25 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murp
I don't hate Kirk, he's a little above average but is massively overpaid.

For the people who seem to love Kirk and his Huge contract, I have a serious question.

I just want to know what the realistic plan is to win a Super Bowl with Kirk and the remaining cap space??

I don't think it's possible.

I've seen a shit ton of Viking teams go to the post season and lose.

I really don't care how many games we would have won with him or without him if it doesn't result in a Super Bowl, in fact, at this point in my life, I'd rather have better draft position then win a few extra games.

QBOTF needs to be done this year. One in trade(Lance, Wilson) and maybe 2 in the draft.

Keeping Kirk helps us land one or two players in FA this year.

The only upside of dumping Cousins is better draft position in 2024.



Should have done it last year. I was begging them to trade him and get rid of the other over paid vets last year but that ship has sailed.

They put themselves in a tough spot with his contract, horrible extension. Now it's their mess to clean up.

I would still try to trade him now if possible, if we can't, I'd keep him for one more year.

Looking at our schedule, aging roster, lack of defensive talent, lack of cap space and unimpressive drafting acumen;

I think we are going to have a really bad record next season regardless of QB.

It's an unintentional tank.


GREAT summation of the mess the team is in now.
Post #: 4949
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 9:28:20 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
So much for a miracle run through the playoffs. It made so little sense that I thought it actually WOULD happen just because that would have been a very Viking thing to have happen. It was a fun season though.

My wish-list going forward is simple. Let Kirk play out his last year and draft prospects for his replacement both this spring and next. He's $36,250,000 against the cap in 2023, $12,500,000 in 2024, and $6,250,000 in 2025. Yes, he only plays in 2023. The other two are void years. THAT'S TOO MUCH OF THE CAP!!! We're married to him for 2023 - fine. Please please please let's not double down one more time and throw an even bigger contract at him. This marriage is toxic and it needs to end. Don't throw cherry-picked stats at me to try and show that he's somehow a top-10 QB when he's clearly an 11-15. He's always been and always will be.

I'd rather start the quest to find a true top-10 QB that we can have on a rookie contract and use the additional cap space to get the O-line and defense correct.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 4950
Page:   <<   < prev  196 197 [198] 199 200   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  196 197 [198] 199 200   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode