Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  304 305 [306] 307 308   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/19/2023 5:49:22 PM   
Jeff Allen

 

Posts: 8660
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Twin Cities
Status: offline 		Thoughts on Trey Lance...should the Vikings trade for him?
Post #: 7626
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/19/2023 6:31:50 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Even though almost any QB gives me more hope than Cousins, SF seems like a smart franchise, so if they're willing to give up this soon on Lance, I don't want him.

Also, he doesn't give you 5 years of a cheap rookie contract.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7627
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/19/2023 6:32:47 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		I would rather have Anthony Richardson or DTR in this year's draft, since Caleb Williams is probably a pipe dream.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7628
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 7:58:13 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen
Thoughts on Trey Lance...should the Vikings trade for him?


For me it depends how his leg looks. If his x rays are good I do it if the asking price is a third (or even two thirds). I read that some worry or compare him to Josh Rosen but you still take the chance.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 4/20/2023 8:27:14 AM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7629
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 8:04:38 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

Thoughts on Trey Lance...should the Vikings trade for him?


No, if Lance was all that the 49ers wouldn't let him go.

I'd rather draft a guy and his cheap contract for 5 years

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 7630
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 8:32:37 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline 		Lance's contract would be very reasonable for the next two years with SF having to pay the signing bonus....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7631
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 10:03:07 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline 		Without looking at the trading price … after Young and Stroud I would put Lance first (who was the designated starter this past season over Garappolo before his injury), and then Herndon. Well before Levis and Richardson who are real long shots pushed up by desperation at the position.

IMO Lance is probably more a victim of circumstance than someone not meeting expectations. He definitely needs another season or two of seasoning but they all do if they’re not named Brock Purdy. Drafted raw to sit behind a a starter (like we are hoping to do), they saw enough in Lance to pick him as the starter … I just dont buy they’ve given up on him.

I’m sure nobody is more shocked by Purdy’s success than SF. While having 2 potential young long term starters on the roster is a great situation, I assume they would be open to trying to recoup some of the heavy capital they paid to draft Lance. Because they are pro-active, not because they made a bad choice. (its too early to tell)

I wouldnt mind staying put and drafting Levis or Richardson (or Hooker) … because you never know … but trading assets to move up over trading for Lance who STILL looks like a much better prospect on paper just doesnt make sense to me. All things being relative. (I assume Lance would be much more expensive so its just idle talk)
Post #: 7632
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 10:40:12 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19458
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline 		Something doesn't smell right with the Lance situation. Like others have pointed out. If SF is so "smart" why are they trying to get rid of him and roll with Purdy/Darnold and "??"?

I heard (on some national show, not sure which) that they tried to get him an accuracy coach before he got hurt. He was that bad.

Trade back (or up if you have 'a guy') and roll with Cousins for this year. Should have good cap #'s next year and a fresh guy that now knows the system.
Post #: 7633
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 10:50:48 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40598
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		I'm saving our draft picks and advocating for Jake Haener in the 3rd round.
Post #: 7634
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 11:29:57 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline 		It's possible that SF "knows" something about Lance in regard to him not being or not going to be a good QB. It's also possible that they struck gold with Purdy, know it, and are just wisely trying to get something for Lance. Either way, I don't want him. If he sucks then it's bad for us. If he's awesome, we won't know until 2024 and guess what - that means we get to pay him megabucks the very next year.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7635
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 11:54:28 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Something doesn't smell right with the Lance situation. Like others have pointed out. If SF is so "smart" why are they trying to get rid of him and roll with Purdy/Darnold and "??"?

I heard (on some national show, not sure which) that they tried to get him an accuracy coach before he got hurt. He was that bad.

Trade back (or up if you have 'a guy') and roll with Cousins for this year. Should have good cap #'s next year and a fresh guy that now knows the system.


I think if you find a 7th rounder; it is a way better contract than even Lance. Rookie 1st rounders drafted early are still paid. Hurts as 2nd not so much. If Purdy as a 7th is the same you roll with him. If you really want to roll with the cheap contract for a QB; the value isn't that great for the top 5 picks.

JJeff at 1.23 4/13million;
Joe Burrow at 1.1 4/36

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 4/20/2023 12:00:16 PM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7636
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 2:07:16 PM   
fmaltes

 

Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/8/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

Thoughts on Trey Lance...should the Vikings trade for him?


No, Hendon Hooker much better prospect. Not even close in comparison. I was shocked that the 49ers paid so much in draft picks for him. See pre-draft review of Trey Lance here: https://www.nfl.com/prospects/trey-lance/32004c41-4e01-6787-f7d5-ee3cea053121
Post #: 7637
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 2:23:21 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19458
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline 		My guess is that its Levis that is the guy looking sad and waiting for far too long.
Post #: 7638
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 2:24:26 PM   
Murph


Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline 		I'd much prefer moving up for Stroud or Richardson than trade for Lance. Stroud is better than both. Richardson and Lance have about the same amount of football experience but Richardson is more athletic and we get 5 years of control with Richardson.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 7639
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 2:31:43 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline 		If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 7640
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 2:57:33 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.


Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7641
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 3:01:00 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

Thoughts on Trey Lance...should the Vikings trade for him?


No, Hendon Hooker much better prospect. Not even close in comparison. I was shocked that the 49ers paid so much in draft picks for him. See pre-draft review of Trey Lance here: https://www.nfl.com/prospects/trey-lance/32004c41-4e01-6787-f7d5-ee3cea053121

Have you compared the Hooker and Lance draft profiles for yourself? Not that they mean a lot.

Or did I misread you ... you meant that Hooker is not close by comparison?

Lance's main drawbacks were lack of experience and being young ... which have been somewhat mitigated by now.

www.nfl.com/prospects/trey-lance/32004c41-4e01-6787-f7d5-ee3cea053121
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/hendon-hooker/3200484f-4f29-7694-9fe6-58ca0d039d74
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/anthony-richardson/32005249-4338-7833-9fd1-1d5e168eb504

Again, we have no idea what it would take to move up or down or trade for any of these prospects ... but just on the basis of QB skills (not freak athleticism) I would take Lance, Hooker before Richardson.

I'll be very disappointed if we don't take a QB in the first two rds. or trade for one.
Post #: 7642
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 3:22:50 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13972
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.


Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.


KFC HAS A NO TRADE CLAUSE..

HOW MUCH TO BUY THAT OUT?

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 7643
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 3:36:14 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.


Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.


KFC HAS A NO TRADE CLAUSE..

HOW MUCH TO BUY THAT OUT?


My guess is Cousins has more interest in SF than SF has interest in Cousins.
Post #: 7644
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 3:54:03 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.



Sold!

If we could get rid of KFC and recoup just a pick in draft day 4 it would be a good day.
Post #: 7645
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 4:00:12 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline 		The main reason I am not against Trading for Lance is that we will get to see him for 2023 and 2024 for maybe 2 thirds w/o trading Kirk and 7-8 million in salary or if you trade Kirk you get draft capital.

It would look good on either side of the fence. You can't find an upside backup for less than that and he has QBOTF potential.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7646
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 4:10:59 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28301
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

If you trade for Lance you do it by sending them KC, getting Lance and a pick or two. I'd ask for one of their 3rds this year and their 1st next year. I would accept their 2nd if they balk. SF likes KC and they are ready to win, not the right situation for Lance to try and develop in.

Lance starts 2023 and if he's a bust we have a high draft pick for 2024. Pair our pick with the one we get from SF to move near the top of the draft to get the QBOTF, if Lance isn't that.


Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.


KFC HAS A NO TRADE CLAUSE..

HOW MUCH TO BUY THAT OUT?


My guess is Cousins has more interest in SF than SF has interest in Cousins.

Yep, pretty sure cousins would jump at the chance to go to a team with San Francisco's roster.
Post #: 7647
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/20/2023 8:44:43 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.

I used to be of this mindset, and was thinking of the possibility of a QB like Caleb Williams. I now believe that is a pipe dream, and whoever has the 1st pick, will draft him (or whomever the best rated QB is in the next draft).

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7648
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/21/2023 5:11:20 AM  1 votes
Todd M

 

Posts: 40598
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		Next year people will say the next year is the one with a QB or 2 worth trading up for...
Post #: 7649
RE: General Vikes Talk - 4/21/2023 7:53:44 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17927
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Add in the 2024 1st rounder we get for Hunter and we suddenly have the capital to move into the #1 spot.

I used to be of this mindset, and was thinking of the possibility of a QB like Caleb Williams. I now believe that is a pipe dream, and whoever has the 1st pick, will draft him (or whomever the best rated QB is in the next draft).

It's very rare the #1 overall pick is for sale. This year was an outlier.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 7650
Page:   <<   < prev  304 305 [306] 307 308   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  304 305 [306] 307 308   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode