Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  118 119 [120] 121 122   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 2:14:14 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.

On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.

For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.

I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

I'm feeling that myself. It's not like theyre kicking everyone else's ass. Well, the Bears ...

But if we're actually any good but just don't know it yet this would be the week to show it.
Post #: 2976
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 2:22:17 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19464
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jbusse

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

The Vikes have signed former Gophers QB Tanner Morgan. Awesome!



OK. Why?

Mitch Leidner wasn't available.


I realize it's only PS but this makes me really question KOC's ability to find the right guy. Dude had, arguably..... top 5 Oline, great RB's and NFL level WR's for years and still was, at best, average. No mobility, weak arm ect. He was a good leader to be fair.
Post #: 2977
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 2:51:52 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.

On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.

For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.

I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers



That's not necessarily true.

In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.

In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015

In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019

In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2978
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 4:50:15 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.

On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.

For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.

I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers


No matter what one calls it, they are forced to get on the right side of the salary cap ledger if they plan to pay JJ, then Darrisaw, and $58 million in current dead cap in 2024, while still paying the likes of O'Neill and Hock. That involves getting rid of too expensive veterans, and at least consider trading Hunter and Cousins to move up in the draft and/or help get defensive talent.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/5/2023 4:52:25 PM >
Post #: 2979
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 4:51:14 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2980
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 5:05:29 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.
Post #: 2981
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 5:12:17 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/5/2023 5:13:25 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2982
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 5:33:52 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19617
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.

We already have one part of that equation. And KOC is a relative unknown. Some good some bad.
Post #: 2983
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 6:00:07 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

One thing that we hear on this forum repeatedly is that the Vikings need to "tear it down" and "reboot" to get higher draft picks. Yet, when one looks at the top teams in the league, NONE of them did this
. Also, historically, in the NFL at least, this has not been the approach of Super Bowl teams. Drafting well, no matter what your spot, is critical. Besides drafting talented players, drafting players that fit your offensive/defensive schemes is also essential. Unfortunately, I think the last two drafts we drafted less talented players and players that may not fit our schemes. Having a coaching staff and organization that can develop players and put them in the best place to succeed is also critical. A big concern to me is the horrible first draft of the GM. The second draft may also be weak. The Vikings simply have a less talented team this year than last year. I personally thought there were more talented players on the board each time after the first pick this year.
On Kirk Cousins, There were no realistic replacements that were actually better than him the last two years. That changes this next year with the draft. The Vikings can probably get a very good QB prospect in the 1st round. I would still keep Kirk for one more year even drafting a new QB.
For now, the best thing the Vikings can do this year is double-down on an aggressive offense and hope the defense can be an effective speed bump.
I actually think they may win the Kansas City game if they cut out the turnovers

That's not necessarily true.
In 2000 the Patriots went 5-11. In the 2001 draft they got Richard Seymour and Matt Light. They won the Super Bowl in 2001 and obviously many more years.
In 2010 the Denver Broncos went 4-12. In 2011 they drafted Von Miller. They won the Super Bowl in 2015
In 2012 the Chiefs went 2-14. In 2013 they got Andy Reid as a new coach and drafted Eric Fisher and Travis Kelce. They won the Super Bowl in 2019
In 2016 the Rams went 4-12. In 2017 they drafted Cooper Kupp. They won the Super Bowl in 2021.


You picked 4 teams that have a great history.....how many coaches did the Lions, Texans, Jets, Bears, Bills, Giants, and Jaguars go thru? Agreeing to be a coach or gm on a forced rebuild or tank job is like being a pawn for eviction night on Big Brother.


You picked several teams with lousy histories to argue your point that he picked several teams with great histories.

And I'd take the Giants history.


Of course you would; you want to tank. Hire back Les Steckel and a shit GM then.


You missed the part where they have won fairly recent Super Bowls. Now you are off on some weird rabbit-path.

And your point made no sense anyway.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/5/2023 6:02:15 PM >
Post #: 2984
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 8:22:04 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
You would never get the top 3 coach and GM last year if your plan was to tank in the near future. You know what the point is. You hire David F as coach and Bill J as GM in the Spring of 22.

Sorry I have to spell it out Bill.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2985
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 8:49:23 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
The Bears start winning some games, could increase the chances of the Vikings either getting Caleb with the 1st pick, or trading up for him.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 2986
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/5/2023 10:28:23 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

The Vikes have signed former Gophers QB Tanner Morgan. Awesome!



OK. Why?


To back up C.J. Ham.
Post #: 2987
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 2:12:05 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9568
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

The Vikes have signed former Gophers QB Tanner Morgan. Awesome!



OK. Why?


To back up C.J. Ham.



apparently, jaren hall has missed some practices and possibly has an undisclosed personal issue...morgan is signed to the practice squad....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 2988
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 3:41:18 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9568
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
.
.
Alec Lewis@alec_lewis
The #Vikings have signed OL Hakeem Adeniji to their 53-man roster, a source says. Has been on the practice squad. Played 39 games from 2020-22 for the Bengals at multiple spots (right guard, left tackle, etc.).

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 2989
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 7:46:51 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
Bears win!
Post #: 2990
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 9:05:02 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 2991
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 9:17:39 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.


Yeah I gave up following his so-called thought process. But as the GM to your HC in his bizarro world, we're tanking so either get on board or don't let the door hit you on your way out.
Post #: 2992
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 9:23:06 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.

Yeah I gave up following his so-called thought process. But as the GM to your HC in his bizarro world, we're tanking so either get on board or don't let the door hit you on your way out.


You know the point...did you want the best HC and GM possible in 2022? Shouldn't have fired Spielman and Zimmer if tanking was needed. Things would have imploded like you wanted.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2993
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 10:01:29 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.

Yeah I gave up following his so-called thought process. But as the GM to your HC in his bizarro world, we're tanking so either get on board or don't let the door hit you on your way out.


You know the point...did you want the best HC and GM possible in 2022? Shouldn't have fired Spielman and Zimmer if tanking was needed. Things would have imploded like you wanted.


Wake up Rip Van Riewer, it's not 2022 and your clients Spielman and Zimmer are long gone. But keep moving the goalposts like it's 1999!
Post #: 2994
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 10:13:16 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.

Yeah I gave up following his so-called thought process. But as the GM to your HC in his bizarro world, we're tanking so either get on board or don't let the door hit you on your way out.


You know the point...did you want the best HC and GM possible in 2022? Shouldn't have fired Spielman and Zimmer if tanking was needed. Things would have imploded like you wanted.


Wake up Rip Van Riewer, it's not 2022 and your clients Spielman and Zimmer are long gone. But keep moving the goalposts like it's 1999!


A goal posts move would be to advocate a tank after you push to hire top 3 HC and GM in 2022 and say you are for winning. Having a tough time justifying it now in your brain Mr. Tank Bill?

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/6/2023 10:14:27 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 2995
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 11:38:27 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
Shit. I missed where we hired a Top 3 GM.

(Or coach for that matter...)
Post #: 2996
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 11:50:32 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
I'm a season ticket holder. And the talk that won't stop is, "We need to tank so we have a shot at winning it all someday."

Great! I'm all excited about traveling 4 hours one way and spending even more money on the Vikings while the organization is "trying" to lose. Well, ok, I'm wrong, they are trying to win but it might take years. In the mean time they want me to keep spending money on them.

Isn't the NFL great!?

- im really not a season ticket holder - but I did have a single obstructive view twice - and im most certainly done being a fan if he formula is to lose in order to get a higher draft pick
Post #: 2997
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 11:54:26 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.
Geez I point out some instances where a bad record led to some key draft picks which led to a Super Bowl as a counterpoint to the idea that it had NEVER worked ever... and seven posts later I'm used as an example of who a team should hire as a head coach if that team wanted to tank. That escalated quickly.

Yeah I gave up following his so-called thought process. But as the GM to your HC in his bizarro world, we're tanking so either get on board or don't let the door hit you on your way out.


You know the point...did you want the best HC and GM possible in 2022? Shouldn't have fired Spielman and Zimmer if tanking was needed. Things would have imploded like you wanted.


Wake up Rip Van Riewer, it's not 2022 and your clients Spielman and Zimmer are long gone. But keep moving the goalposts like it's 1999!


A goal posts move would be to advocate a tank after you push to hire top 3 HC and GM in 2022 and say you are for winning. Having a tough time justifying it now in your brain Mr. Tank Bill?


LOL, I see you are now making up stuff. Too bad, I'm not going down your rabbit hole. Enjoy!
Post #: 2998
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 12:23:07 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
https://www.tankathon.com/nfl

- Carolina needs a leap in development for Bryce Young or Dalton playing a lot. @Chi week 10, key game!
- Chicago is looking better, just need them to have one more win than us by year's end. Air it out Justin Fields!
- It's imperative the Raiders Jimmy G. starts playing well when he returns. They have some nice opportunities for victories!
- Hoping Denver found some momentum from the second half last week. Next up, hosting the Jets!

A move from 5 to 4 this week is the most realistic scenario.
Post #: 2999
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/6/2023 1:07:44 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

quote:

ORIGINAL: jbusse

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

The Vikes have signed former Gophers QB Tanner Morgan. Awesome!



OK. Why?

Mitch Leidner wasn't available.


I realize it's only PS but this makes me really question KOC's ability to find the right guy. Dude had, arguably..... top 5 Oline, great RB's and NFL level WR's for years and still was, at best, average. No mobility, weak arm ect. He was a good leader to be fair.

Local boy PR move. Maybe 10% he lives in the neighborhood so he can bike in tomorrow, sign him.
Post #: 3000
Page:   <<   < prev  118 119 [120] 121 122   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  118 119 [120] 121 122   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode