Bill Johanesen
Posts: 29154
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. I'm excited to see what Ty Chandler and Kene Nwangwu can do for us Sunday night but I'm also not as optimistic as many online fans (twitter, facebook, what-have-you) are. Mattison doesn't get a lot of love (rightfully so - he's mediocre to poor) but all the replacements and backups have been highly touted. Unfortunately the stats and results don't agree. Mattison: 130 carries for 461 yards, 0 rushing TDs, long of 19, 3.5 yards/carry, 24 catches on 36 targets for 164 yards, 6.8 yards per catch, 3 receiveing TDs Cam Akers: 38 carries for 138 yards, 1 rushing TD, long of 19, 3.6 yards/carry, 11 catches on 12 targets for 70 yards, 6.4 yards per catch, 0 receiving TDs Ty Chandler: 23 carries for 87 yards, 1 rushing TD, long of 15, 3.8 yards/carry, 5 catches on 6 targets for 43 yards, 8.6 yards per catch, 0 receiving TDs The real blip in those stats is Mattison's poor catch rate. The modern NFL suggests you need a QB that can create, extend plays, etc. and a RB that is a natural pass catcher.
|