Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  271 272 [273] 274 275   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 5:30:21 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40145
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
That’s a solid counter beo.
Post #: 6801
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 5:32:10 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2289
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

That’s a solid counter beo.


Wouldn't it be nice to have a list of past drafts and be able to say HELL YEAH i'd trade for 2 of those guys...

Of course, we wouldn't probably be having this discussion then.
Post #: 6802
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 5:50:03 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28105
Status: offline
Jets will end up with a weaker opponent SOS than us so will pick ahead of us. Just a couple of games today flipped the slight advantage we had, but the results of those games were needed to just get to tied records. And Cincy beating Clev.

Best hope to gain a spot is with LV currently beating Denver. Chi still in it vs GB.

I think Raiders win and we'll pick 11th.
Post #: 6803
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 5:52:13 PM  1 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28105
Status: offline
If Dobbs didn't go nuts and win those two games, we'd be tied with the NYG at #5. Loved those games, what a story... but we need a QB!

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/7/2024 5:55:58 PM >
Post #: 6804
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 6:09:05 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28105
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

For the shop JJ crowd...
(which is a legit strategy, he could be at his peak value this off season, save cap, etc... I get it)

Here is my counter argument.

Say you get a couple of 1st round picks.

2015. Trae Waynes
2016. Laquon Treadwell
2017 no pick
2018 Mike Hughes
2019 Garrett Bradbury
2020 Justin Jefferson
2020 Jeff gladney
2021 Darrisaw
2022 Cine
2023 Addison

Are there 2 guys on that list that trade for JJ?
Your chances of missing are SIGNIFICANT.

JJ is a known.
JJ produces even with Mullins at qb.

Get a cheap qb (rookie would be my first choice).
The expense of JJ is palatable with a rookie qb.

I don't know that you improve the team by getting rid of your best young player.



Spielman's picks have no bearing on having multiple extra first round picks in the future. And it appears Kwesi's second draft is an improvement on the initial one... but then again it's not that difficult to climb a bit higher than a collective rotting trash heap of draft busts.

Ultimately, assuming fair value (however that could be determined) of a JJ trade, the variability of the success/failure of the picks is THE barometer. Perhaps one way to roughly view that ahead of time for us armchair GMs is to discount the draft haul by say 40% (one could even translate to points and picks via the draft value charts). Also, it would be nice to take the cap savings from JJ and apply it to a pair of CBs but stuff like that is a gamble because they don't often become available.

So maybe the return of trading JJ isn't all that.

I don't think JJ is worth 1/7th of the cap (yes depending on the structure and maybe less over time), but predict the team extends him before the draft which means we have to go with a rookie QB. Not really a prediction because it's the likely outcome. The numbers suggest that. Kwesi's tenure is going to be based on a QB decision in his third year. The year he releases his well worn KFC security blanket... or more aptly his chewed up binky.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/7/2024 6:19:13 PM >
Post #: 6805
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 6:23:25 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28105
Status: offline
We're picking 11th.
Post #: 6806
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 6:55:55 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18339
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

2016. Laquon Treadwell




Really surprised to see him still in uniform on Sat.
Post #: 6807
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 7:39:36 PM   
joejitsu

 

Posts: 15150
Joined: 3/21/2010
From: 60411
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

2016. Laquon Treadwell




Really surprised to see him still in uniform on Sat.


I noticed that, too! Amazing. He let a pass go right through his hands. It reminded me of the old days with us.
Post #: 6808
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 7:49:53 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18339
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joejitsu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

2016. Laquon Treadwell




Really surprised to see him still in uniform on Sat.


I noticed that, too! Amazing. He let a pass go right through his hands. It reminded me of the old days with us.


Pretty good gig if you can get it. Most certainly wouldnt have made that kind of money as a teacher.
Post #: 6809
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 8:35:04 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10842
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

For the shop JJ crowd...
(which is a legit strategy, he could be at his peak value this off season, save cap, etc... I get it)

Here is my counter argument.

Say you get a couple of 1st round picks.

2015. Trae Waynes
2016. Laquon Treadwell
2017 no pick
2018 Mike Hughes
2019 Garrett Bradbury
2020 Justin Jefferson
2020 Jeff gladney
2021 Darrisaw
2022 Cine
2023 Addison

Are there 2 guys on that list that trade for JJ?
Your chances of missing are SIGNIFICANT.

JJ is a known.
JJ produces even with Mullins at qb.

Get a cheap qb (rookie would be my first choice).
The expense of JJ is palatable with a rookie qb.

I don't know that you improve the team by getting rid of your best young player.


This is a fantastic post. I think we need to add in one more thing to it though. If we trade JJ we don’t just get the draft picks we also get the cap space which equals even more players. The 30 mil in space could equal a great guard and a decent corner.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 6810
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/7/2024 9:12:54 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2289
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

For the shop JJ crowd...
(which is a legit strategy, he could be at his peak value this off season, save cap, etc... I get it)

Here is my counter argument.

Say you get a couple of 1st round picks.

2015. Trae Waynes
2016. Laquon Treadwell
2017 no pick
2018 Mike Hughes
2019 Garrett Bradbury
2020 Justin Jefferson
2020 Jeff gladney
2021 Darrisaw
2022 Cine
2023 Addison

Are there 2 guys on that list that trade for JJ?
Your chances of missing are SIGNIFICANT.

JJ is a known.
JJ produces even with Mullins at qb.

Get a cheap qb (rookie would be my first choice).
The expense of JJ is palatable with a rookie qb.

I don't know that you improve the team by getting rid of your best young player.


This is a fantastic post. I think we need to add in one more thing to it though. If we trade JJ we don’t just get the draft picks we also get the cap space which equals even more players. The 30 mil in space could equal a great guard and a decent corner.


Very true... that is the other side of the coin... adding players with money saved on moving JJ.

However, I'd bet that history might say FA additions are 50/50 chance of working out as well.
(meaning you sign 2 significant contracts... one seems to pay off, one is disappointing)

Would have to look into that more I guess.
Post #: 6811
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 9:22:02 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26953
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

For the shop JJ crowd...
(which is a legit strategy, he could be at his peak value this off season, save cap, etc... I get it)

Here is my counter argument.

Say you get a couple of 1st round picks.

2015. Trae Waynes
2016. Laquon Treadwell
2017 no pick
2018 Mike Hughes
2019 Garrett Bradbury
2020 Justin Jefferson
2020 Jeff gladney
2021 Darrisaw
2022 Cine
2023 Addison

Are there 2 guys on that list that trade for JJ?
Your chances of missing are SIGNIFICANT.

JJ is a known.
JJ produces even with Mullins at qb.

Get a cheap qb (rookie would be my first choice).
The expense of JJ is palatable with a rookie qb.

I don't know that you improve the team by getting rid of your best young player.


This is a fantastic post. I think we need to add in one more thing to it though. If we trade JJ we don’t just get the draft picks we also get the cap space which equals even more players. The 30 mil in space could equal a great guard and a decent corner.


Very true... that is the other side of the coin... adding players with money saved on moving JJ.

However, I'd bet that history might say FA additions are 50/50 chance of working out as well.
(meaning you sign 2 significant contracts... one seems to pay off, one is disappointing)

Would have to look into that more I guess.


Another thing to add---WR is easier to find than QB and the Line positions. I absolutley love watching JJ but if someone wanted to send a haul of picks and players for JJ...there would be pause.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6812
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 9:27:07 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28105
Status: offline
However, I'd bet that history might say FA additions are 50/50 chance of working out as well.
(meaning you sign 2 significant contracts... one seems to pay off, one is disappointing)


That's my general impression, although with zero data to back it up.

And their performance and value are both subjective. Take Murphy for example. 2 yrs, 17 million. He plays IMO like a bare minimum starter, but his salary isn't outlandish. So while he isn't helping the team reach the SB, perhaps we are getting our money's worth and he'd be considered a successful signing.

Plus, it's difficult to determine the real cost of free agents until the contract is expired. Za Smith is an example. No way was he going to play out year 3 of his contract here. He didn't even last for two years.
Post #: 6813
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 10:11:46 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13544
Status: offline
I can’t see the point of pouring more money into the rathole of KFC, given the needs we have to address.. JJ

Three IOL
3 min CB
3min DL
2 LB

I mean, really, our defense was decimated, and exposed at the end of the season..

Points allowed off the charts..

The OL is a mash unit in critical care.

Give 20% of the cap to KFC?

Insanity.

_____________________________

"Thou shall not bear false witness”
I am WRATH, incarnate.
@RlyeeNicole’sDad
Post #: 6814
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 10:43:56 AM   
fmaltes

 

Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/8/2008
Status: offline
Justin Jefferson is a generational player. We won the lottery here. You don't trade him for more lottery tickets. THis is like talking about trading Michael Jorden or Wayne Gretzky at their prime. You just don't do it. If they were stupid enough to trade JJ like we traded Moss, I will quit being a Vikings fan and I have been a fan for 57 years. JJ is like Giannis of the Bucks (I am a bucks fan). As a Bucks fan, I waited 50 years for such a player. The JJ discussion would be like trading Giannis. In terms of what will they actually do, they will sign JJ to a contract that makes him the highest paid WR in the league the same way they made Hoc the highest paid TE. That is the right move. Second, the salary cap is a fantasy number that can always be pushed into the future IF YOU HAVE COOPERATIVE PLAYERS. Essentially, every year you delay a cap hit, you reduce its actual hit by around 8-10% because of the expected annual increases in the salary cap. Kirk Cousins will have a current legacy cap hit of around $28 million. The "net cost" in 2024 if we sign him for $40 million is $12 million. That is not an unreasonable cost for even a bridge QB. Third, a lot of what Flores did was with smoke and mirrors because he had little talent to work with. This is a huge problem that can only be fixed through SEVERAL good drafts, not free agency. A strong offense can hopefully give us some hope and entertainment while we work to upgrade the overall talent of the team especially on defense. The place to get salary cap savings is by getting rid of Harrison Smith, Oniel and Phillips and gamble on developing young drafted players. That is a big gamble. A tougher question is whether we decide that Kwesi and KOC are the right team to lead this long-term rebuild.
Post #: 6815
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 10:45:55 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19217
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
I agree Dan. I don't think anyone would argue (outside of the chance that either Penix/Daniels/rookie comes in and lights it up) that he gives us the best chance for the next 2 years but who cares? Best chance at what? Sneaking in to the playoffs and getting smoked??

He has 1 playoff win in 6 years. Move on and eat the cap for next year. We aren't doing anything anyway next year.

As much as I love what Hunter can do, let him go too. KAM was stupid not to trade him. Can he still produce for 2-3 years? Probably but again, so what? We have a 12-16 sack guy on a team that can barely make the playoffs? Big whoop.

I would also do one of the following depending on what they do with QB.

A. You get Pinex: Keep O'Neil and trade Darrisaw
B. You stay with some form of a RHQB. Sign Darrisaw to an extension and resign Quesenberry. Trade O'Neil.

We need to start thinking 2-3 years down the line and stop with this bullshit that we are 1 piece away.
Post #: 6816
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 10:55:55 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 19189
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

I agree Dan. I don't think anyone would argue (outside of the chance that either Penix/Daniels/rookie comes in and lights it up) that he gives us the best chance for the next 2 years but who cares? Best chance at what? Sneaking in to the playoffs and getting smoked??

He has 1 playoff win in 6 years. Move on and eat the cap for next year. We aren't doing anything anyway next year.

As much as I love what Hunter can do, let him go too. KAM was stupid not to trade him. Can he still produce for 2-3 years? Probably but again, so what? We have a 12-16 sack guy on a team that can barely make the playoffs? Big whoop.

I would also do one of the following depending on what they do with QB.

A. You get Pinex: Keep O'Neil and trade Darrisaw
B. You stay with some form of a RHQB. Sign Darrisaw to an extension and resign Quesenberry. Trade O'Neil.

We need to start thinking 2-3 years down the line and stop with this bullshit that we are 1 piece away.

Excellent post Jeff!
Post #: 6817
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 10:59:47 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12104
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

Justin Jefferson is a generational player. We won the lottery here. You don't trade him for more lottery tickets. THis is like talking about trading Michael Jorden or Wayne Gretzky at their prime. You just don't do it. If they were stupid enough to trade JJ like we traded Moss, I will quit being a Vikings fan and I have been a fan for 57 years. JJ is like Giannis of the Bucks (I am a bucks fan). As a Bucks fan, I waited 50 years for such a player. The JJ discussion would be like trading Giannis. In terms of what will they actually do, they will sign JJ to a contract that makes him the highest paid WR in the league the same way they made Hoc the highest paid TE. That is the right move. Second, the salary cap is a fantasy number that can always be pushed into the future IF YOU HAVE COOPERATIVE PLAYERS. Essentially, every year you delay a cap hit, you reduce its actual hit by around 8-10% because of the expected annual increases in the salary cap. Kirk Cousins will have a current legacy cap hit of around $28 million. The "net cost" in 2024 if we sign him for $40 million is $12 million. That is not an unreasonable cost for even a bridge QB. Third, a lot of what Flores did was with smoke and mirrors because he had little talent to work with. This is a huge problem that can only be fixed through SEVERAL good drafts, not free agency. A strong offense can hopefully give us some hope and entertainment while we work to upgrade the overall talent of the team especially on defense. The place to get salary cap savings is by getting rid of Harrison Smith, Oniel and Phillips and gamble on developing young drafted players. That is a big gamble. A tougher question is whether we decide that Kwesi and KOC are the right team to lead this long-term rebuild.

I think we all agree QB is the most important position.

Why trade away a generational talent who will help our new young QBOTF develop? It doesn't make sense. The cap will go up every year and eventually we will be out of the dead cap problem we have. Pay JJ

If we need capital to go up and get Daniels or Penix, dip into the future drafts, maybe throw in O'Neill.
Post #: 6818
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:03:39 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19217
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

Justin Jefferson is a generational player. We won the lottery here. You don't trade him for more lottery tickets. THis is like talking about trading Michael Jorden or Wayne Gretzky at their prime. You just don't do it. If they were stupid enough to trade JJ like we traded Moss, I will quit being a Vikings fan and I have been a fan for 57 years. JJ is like Giannis of the Bucks (I am a bucks fan). As a Bucks fan, I waited 50 years for such a player. The JJ discussion would be like trading Giannis. In terms of what will they actually do, they will sign JJ to a contract that makes him the highest paid WR in the league the same way they made Hoc the highest paid TE. That is the right move. Second, the salary cap is a fantasy number that can always be pushed into the future IF YOU HAVE COOPERATIVE PLAYERS. Essentially, every year you delay a cap hit, you reduce its actual hit by around 8-10% because of the expected annual increases in the salary cap. Kirk Cousins will have a current legacy cap hit of around $28 million. The "net cost" in 2024 if we sign him for $40 million is $12 million. That is not an unreasonable cost for even a bridge QB. Third, a lot of what Flores did was with smoke and mirrors because he had little talent to work with. This is a huge problem that can only be fixed through SEVERAL good drafts, not free agency. A strong offense can hopefully give us some hope and entertainment while we work to upgrade the overall talent of the team especially on defense. The place to get salary cap savings is by getting rid of Harrison Smith, Oniel and Phillips and gamble on developing young drafted players. That is a big gamble. A tougher question is whether we decide that Kwesi and KOC are the right team to lead this long-term rebuild.

I think we all agree QB is the most important position.

Why trade away a generational talent who will help our new young QBOTF develop? It doesn't make sense. The cap will go up every year and eventually we will be out of the dead cap problem we have. Pay JJ

If we need capital to go up and get Daniels or Penix, dip into the future drafts, maybe throw in O'Neill.




That's the thing with this team. We are setup to succeed with a young QB. Look at the talent on O?

JJ
Addison
Hock (assuming he recovers). We were all down on him to start the year but when he went down, he lead the league for TE's with catches and yards
2 good tackles should we chose to keep them

There are teams that would kill for that talent on O.
Post #: 6819
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:08:52 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19217
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
Non roster wise my biggest fear, moving forward, is KOC. I'm pretty shocked at the year he had. Maybe it was Zimmer fatigue but I was super geeked going in to year 2 with him after what I saw from year 1.

He was building a culture, was somewhat innovative, had pretty good in game situational instincts ect....

Year 2? He basically turned in Chilly with his "KAO if you run it my way". Conservative one play, over the top risky the next. They talked in the offseason how they would prioritize the run game, signed Oliver ect and just pretty much abandoned it early.
Post #: 6820
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:15:30 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77426
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

I agree Dan. I don't think anyone would argue (outside of the chance that either Penix/Daniels/rookie comes in and lights it up) that he gives us the best chance for the next 2 years but who cares? Best chance at what? Sneaking in to the playoffs and getting smoked??

He has 1 playoff win in 6 years. Move on and eat the cap for next year. We aren't doing anything anyway next year.

As much as I love what Hunter can do, let him go too. KAM was stupid not to trade him. Can he still produce for 2-3 years? Probably but again, so what? We have a 12-16 sack guy on a team that can barely make the playoffs? Big whoop.

I would also do one of the following depending on what they do with QB.

A. You get Pinex: Keep O'Neil and trade Darrisaw
B. You stay with some form of a RHQB. Sign Darrisaw to an extension and resign Quesenberry. Trade O'Neil.


We need to start thinking 2-3 years down the line and stop with this bullshit that we are 1 piece away.


Solid point I hadn't considered.
Post #: 6821
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:20:15 AM   
marty


Posts: 12890
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
IF they drafted Penix, I would move Darrisaw to RT and trade O'Neill.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 6822
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:28:22 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40145
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Michael Jordon and Wayne Gretzky won a lot of championships in their prime. JJ’s appeared in one playoff game, didn’t do much, and we lost.

Picks to land you a franchise QB and let’s say a starting corner would do a lot more for this team.
Post #: 6823
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:28:40 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77426
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

IF they drafted Penix, I would move Darrisaw to RT and trade O'Neill.


I know you think all offensive line positions are swappable, but Darrisaw has only every played LT dating back to HS.

There is no guarantee he's any good on the right side.
Post #: 6824
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/8/2024 11:34:01 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77426
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Michael Jordon and Wayne Gretzky won a lot of championships in their prime. JJ’s appeared in one playoff game, didn’t do much, and we lost.

Picks to land you a franchise QB and let’s say a starting corner would do a lot more for this team.


Michael Jordan won his first Playoff series in his 4th season at age 24 before getting spanked in the 2nd round.

His first 3 season he was 1-9 in Playoff Games.

Won his first Championship at 27.
Post #: 6825
Page:   <<   < prev  271 272 [273] 274 275   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  271 272 [273] 274 275   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode