Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  307 308 [309] 310 311   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 9:39:08 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...
Post #: 7701
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 9:59:20 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40186
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


I believe it. Too bad god had other plans.
Post #: 7702
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:04:10 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28109
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.

Exhibit A would be the Packers. They drafted Rodgers in the first and groomed him for 3 years behind Farve. They drafted Love in the first round and groomed him for 3 years behind Rodgers.

Both times, the Packers were criticized for taking a QB in the first round when they should be bolstering the roster around their HOF QB. After year 1 with Love at the helm, I don't think they regret either decision.


I contend that their strategy, being way bolder and forward thinking than ours during the same period, is still too conservative. They could have moved on from Favre and Rodgers a year earlier each. That said, they were still able to trade both of them and receive compensation. We never drafted, therefore couldn’t trade our guy for anything, and now might pay him yet again and run it all back again. Their way netted two superbowl wins and should have been more. Our way netted one theoretical make believe MVP award.


Run it back originated as another way to say go for another championship.

The human myth went 4-4 before he was summarily relegated to the locker room. Guess we could run back his .500 record.
Post #: 7703
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:07:08 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28109
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.

I’m not sure we’ve learned anything.

It feels like our intense internal discussions are about how to continue to suckle at the Cousins teat* while waiting for the perfect prospect to fall into our lap (now in its third offseason).

Not, how do we commit to the long term solution first.

(*because really ... if we’re honest with ourselves ... being a Cousins sycophant is the strongest form of suction)


Kwesi may have learned something. And that was telling Cousins to go pound sand regarding his latest well-structured contract proposal.
Post #: 7704
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:13:15 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.

I’m not sure we’ve learned anything.

It feels like our intense internal discussions are about how to continue to suckle at the Cousins teat* while waiting for the perfect prospect to fall into our lap (now in its third offseason).

Not, how do we commit to the long term solution first.

(*because really ... if we’re honest with ourselves ... being a Cousins sycophant is the strongest form of suction)


Kwesi may have learned something. And that was telling Cousins to go pound sand regarding his latest well-structured contract proposal.

I hope so ...
Post #: 7705
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:14:12 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...

Possible. He’s a good QB. He was playing well. he’s a good match for O’Connell’s system. We would have won more games with him.

IMO all statements of truth.

Going past that is difficult for me obviously.

13-4 makes you playoff worthy, absolutely. Not necessarily playoff caliber. In fact, Its been 7 years since I’ve seen a playoff caliber Vikings team, not just a team squeaking into the playoffs based on an all-inclusive playoff format.
Post #: 7706
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:23:19 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...

Possible. He’s a good QB. He was playing well. he’s a good match for O’Connell’s system. We would have won more games with him.

IMO all statements of truth.

Going past that is difficult for me obviously.

13-4 makes you playoff worthy, absolutely. Not necessarily playoff caliber. In fact, Its been 7 years since I’ve seen a playoff caliber Vikings team, not just a team squeaking into the playoffs based on an all-inclusive playoff format.

Playoff caliber sure is subjective, especially in today's NFL. We were good enough to get to the NFCCG this year in this NFC, as Ive said several times -- doesn't mean we were great.
Post #: 7707
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:27:57 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.

I’m not sure we’ve learned anything.

It feels like our intense internal discussions are about how to continue to suckle at the Cousins teat* while waiting for the perfect prospect to fall into our lap (now in its third offseason).

Not, how do we commit to the long term solution first.

(*because really ... if we’re honest with ourselves ... being a Cousins sycophant is the strongest form of suction)


Kwesi may have learned something. And that was telling Cousins to go pound sand regarding his latest well-structured contract proposal.

I’m holding my breath. I’m hoping Kwesi had a big stinking team building epiphany but I’m also worried he just pushed a 2-3 year KC wink wink nudge deal down the road (to this year) like everything else.
Post #: 7708
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:31:28 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...

Possible. He’s a good QB. He was playing well. he’s a good match for O’Connell’s system. We would have won more games with him.

IMO all statements of truth.

Going past that is difficult for me obviously.

13-4 makes you playoff worthy, absolutely. Not necessarily playoff caliber. In fact, Its been 7 years since I’ve seen a playoff caliber Vikings team, not just a team squeaking into the playoffs based on an all-inclusive playoff format.

Playoff caliber sure is subjective, especially in today's NFL. We were good enough to get to the NFCCG this year in this NFC, as Ive said several times -- doesn't mean we were great.

I don’t see it all. I see a different level of contender.

To each their own.
Post #: 7709
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:34:34 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
And by contender I don’t mean great. I do mean good ... even watered down good.

We are a ways from that and a long ways from 2-3 games in the post-season good.
Post #: 7710
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:50:44 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77429
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


Only if he cut way down on the 7 fumbles.
Post #: 7711
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:51:05 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

And by contender I don’t mean great. I do mean good ... even watered down good.

We are a ways from that and a long ways from 2-3 games in the post-season good.

We were watered down good with Cousins and a semi healthy team minus the 20 turnovers the first few games.
Post #: 7712
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:53:10 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


Only if he cut way down on the 7 fumbles.

Of course and his teammates holding on to the ball a little better wouldn't hurt, either
Post #: 7713
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 10:54:25 AM   
marty


Posts: 12893
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Do Cousin's stats look similar to Stroud's, where he leads the team to the playoffs, and then a 1st, maybe 2nd round exit ?

I could envision a Cousin's led team, with this year's personnel, losing to just about any team in the 1st round of the playoffs, whether it was Dallas, Detroit, GB, Philly, or whomever.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7714
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 11:07:52 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10842
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Our defense kept us from starting 2-6. We damn near lost to the bears and league-worst panthers.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7715
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 11:12:30 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77429
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.

Exhibit A would be the Packers. They drafted Rodgers in the first and groomed him for 3 years behind Farve. They drafted Love in the first round and groomed him for 3 years behind Rodgers.

Both times, the Packers were criticized for taking a QB in the first round when they should be bolstering the roster around their HOF QB. After year 1 with Love at the helm, I don't think they regret either decision.


I contend that their strategy, being way bolder and forward thinking than ours during the same period, is still too conservative. They could have moved on from Favre and Rodgers a year earlier each. That said, they were still able to trade both of them and receive compensation. We never drafted, therefore couldn’t trade our guy for anything, and now might pay him yet again and run it all back again. Their way netted two superbowl wins and should have been more. Our way netted one theoretical make believe MVP award.


Agreed. 3 years is a really long time to sit. And it forces you to make a 2nd contract decision with too small of a sample.

If Love sat for 2 years instead of 3, he likely has his early season growing pains and strong finish last year. And then GB would've had a better version of Love this year, and who knows how far they'd have gone? ANd you can probably push the timeframe back another year.

My take is there are guys who are ready Day 1, and others who would likely benefit from sitting anywhere from 6-8 games to a full year.

If a QB needs to sit for 2 years or more, they're a serious project that probably should've been drafted on Day 3.
Post #: 7716
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 11:22:10 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Do Cousin's stats look similar to Stroud's, where he leads the team to the playoffs, and then a 1st, maybe 2nd round exit ?

I could envision a Cousin's led team, with this year's personnel, losing to just about any team in the 1st round of the playoffs, whether it was Dallas, Detroit, GB, Philly, or whomever.

Or winning.

That's where I really struggle with this board. Too many people want to take a scenario like above and attach a negative to it. IOW, if everything went right we would of squeaked into the playoffs and lost. Right!

And of course I choose the opposite path. One thing leads to another then the sticks and stones start flying.

sigh
Post #: 7717
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 11:47:49 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


Only if he cut way down on the 7 fumbles.

Of course and his teammates holding on to the ball a little better wouldn't hurt, either

And this is the issue, for me at least.

Cousins falls short and it always comes with hypothetical qualifiers [from his defenders].

You can't get less hypothetical than throwing short of the sticks on 4th down to end a playoff game against a horrible playoff team. But even then, its all the other things that happened to contribute to that loss ...

And now, we get to it ... the eventual conclusion of this 'reasoning' ...

Cousins gets injured which makes it certain that he would have accomplished what he never come close to doing when healthy?

Okay. We are all entitled to our own fantasies.
Post #: 7718
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 12:05:32 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26955
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

If the Vikings are not looking at a long-term solution at quarterback, they are not a serious franchise.


At least they drafted a QB last year....better start drafting one every year.....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7719
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 12:06:31 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28109
Status: offline
More Cousins stats. Big whoop.

After 12 years, he is what he is. A career .246 guy against teams with winning records. 1 playoff victory.

He milks stats and big contracts, but he is a robotic game manager. When the pressure is on in the playoffs, some QBs answer the call. Cousins covers his helmet ear holes then after a 3-and-out looks around with an upside down shit eating grin before sitting in his safe spot. Or he just stops the pressure by throwing short of the sticks.

Stay strong Kwesi!

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/31/2024 12:19:30 PM >
Post #: 7720
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 12:17:44 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28109
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


Only if he cut way down on the 7 fumbles.

Of course and his teammates holding on to the ball a little better wouldn't hurt, either

And this is the issue, for me at least.

Cousins falls short and it always comes with hypothetical qualifiers [from his defenders].

You can't get less hypothetical than throwing short of the sticks on 4th down to end a playoff game against a horrible playoff team. But even then, its all the other things that happened to contribute to that loss ...

And now, we get to it ... the eventual conclusion of this 'reasoning' ...

Cousins gets injured which makes it certain that he would have accomplished what he never come close to doing when healthy?

Okay. We are all entitled to our own fantasies.



I did like Fantasia... not as a fantasy but for it's artistry.
Post #: 7721
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 12:25:11 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28109
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Our defense kept us from starting 2-6. We damn near lost to the bears and league-worst panthers.


Those two one-score 'wins' prevented Minnesota from starting 0-6... could have really been in the running for Caleb Williams. Woulda, coulda, but those were the days.
Post #: 7722
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 12:47:29 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18346
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

69.5% of his throws and had 18 touchdown passes to five interceptions

Hard to imagine that couldn't of gotten you at least into the championship game, in this year's NFC, even for an ass‐kisser ...


I believe it. Too bad god had other plans.

Maybe God has bigger things in mind for Kirk - I wouldn't know, though
Post #: 7723
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 1:13:09 PM   
marty


Posts: 12893
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Or winning.

That's where I really struggle with this board. Too many people want to take a scenario like above and attach a negative to it. IOW, if everything went right we would of squeaked into the playoffs and lost. Right!


Had Kirk went on a Super Bowl run and won a SB in the past, I may have guessed he would win a playoff game or 2, but even then you can be ousted in the 1st round like Flacco.

We would have hoped for a playoff run if Kirk had stayed healthy, we can hope, but really can't assume.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7724
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/31/2024 1:13:38 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5824
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Our defense kept us from starting 2-6. We damn near lost to the bears and league-worst panthers.


Those two one-score 'wins' prevented Minnesota from starting 0-6... could have really been in the running for Caleb Williams. Woulda, coulda, but those were the days.

Dang. I had forgotten about that. I will have to curb my KC superlatives now.

I do agree though, it was a lot easier to project a deep playoff run with Kirk ... after the injury, not before.
Post #: 7725
Page:   <<   < prev  307 308 [309] 310 311   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  307 308 [309] 310 311   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode