Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  313 314 [315] 316 317   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 5:07:17 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77931
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

That means the Bears trading us "the next Mahomes

Yes, I believe the Bears are stupid enough to do it.

Just need to convince them this is another Herschel Walker trade, give them the best offer, and affirm that Fields can still do it for them, he just needs all the pieces surrounding him. And further, convince them that Williams will be a bust, and that he doesn't want to play for the Bears anyway.

The Vikings get Caleb Williams, and the dream begins ....


Why? Their GM has been "GM-ing" circles around ours....
Post #: 7851
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 5:10:47 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
Cousins inferring but not directly answering a question on a hometown discount = he'll be cheaper.

Jefferson saying he hopes to "Break the bank" because he deserves it is just a kid talking = he'll be cheaper.

'Allison' shouting "Let's get paid!" literally minutes after being drafted is just a kid talking = he'll be cheaper.

I love the Vikings uniquely uber-collaborative, quasi-socialist contract structure and its new slogan: "Give me millions less so others will have millions more from Kwesi's credit cards."
Post #: 7852
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 6:43:24 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13994
Status: offline
Our management and ownership are broken..

Our head coach is a square into round pounder of QB pegs..

He has no clue about game flow or how to exploit a weaknesss untillthey stop it more than once.

The defense is made up of 2-3 players executing the scheme, and 8 others just trying to not get penalized, burnt for not doing their assignment or thinking their particular position has no bearing on a play as it develops.

We have too many c b and safety players who are trying to make splash plays and whiffing badly.

Guys who can not cover, even in a zone.
They lack the speed to cover ground and close on throws to an area.
Sitting down in a Vikings zone isalmost always a guaranteed completion.
I am dismayed and aghast at how wide open receivers are in our pass defense..

Man to man is worse than useless against mobile QB’s..

Despite ample evidence from many consistently contending teams, that you offense is only as god ad your control of the LOS is on both side, our management and staff drafts receivers and CB’s, completely ignoring the fact that time to throw or no time to read route trees and make throws against a rush has a far bigger impact on success than the flashy catches made on less than accurate throws.

Getting gashed for yards between the 20’s is now completely acceptable.

The “ three man rush” is an invitation to let opposing receivers work the zones and pulling guards to lead sweeps and s teens..


Broken philosophy and misuse of personnel, who are marginal at best in most positions, is our well exploited position on both sides of the ball..

Points win games, defense wins games.

Yards and completion % are useless mvp contract padding stats.

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 7853
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 8:09:44 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Situationally this could make for one of the most exciting off seasons. If we land a shiny brand new QB that we all like everything changes.

1. Can Kwesi identify/land one of the best from the group?
2. Can Kevin develop him the right way?
3. Will be have Cousins in the way as the bridge QB?

Is there a QB we all like? I don't particularly like any of them. I'm only in favor of trading up for a QB if I see the equivalent of Andrew Luck or Joe Burrow.


R U Kidding? This is one of the best classes in a while. Williams, McCarthy, Penix, Maye, and Daniels....also Rattler, Mixon, etc. in the mid rounds. Some also like Nix...he is the one I am most worried about.

I'm not kidding. None of them look like Luck or Burrow to me.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 7854
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 9:25:32 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Why? Their GM has been "GM-ing" circles around ours....

I hope Poles feels that way, gets cocky and decides he can fleece the Vikings by trading the #1 pick to them.

The only move I have been impressed with the Bears is Montez Sweat. Their OL still sucks, the Pittsburgh WR sucked, not sure their drafting has been all that great.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7855
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 9:43:34 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9560
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 7856
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 10:06:43 PM   
JT2

 

Posts: 13742
Joined: 2/15/2011
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

I’ve read quite a few replies in social media from known, reputable names saying all 32 teams use PFF. I subscribed to PFF a few years ago and can confirm they have some real deep dive stuff. The “game grades” that get circulated amount to almost nothing compare to the whole of what’s available from them.


It's strange that he would single out PFF. Almost like a shout out, a plug. There are a multitude of sources available and used by NFL teams. Did he even mention our data/analytics team? Do we have one? What do they do, read PFF reports and report back to the boss? Seriously, I have no clue what our analytics team does. What's their budget? Who is on the team?

I would hope any team serious about contending for a championship would build and properly fund a data/analytics team better than one available to all of the other teams.

< Message edited by JT2 -- 2/12/2024 10:08:26 PM >
Post #: 7857
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/12/2024 10:08:39 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Why? Their GM has been "GM-ing" circles around ours....

I hope Poles feels that way, gets cocky and decides he can fleece the Vikings by trading the #1 pick to them.

The only move I have been impressed with the Bears is Montez Sweat. Their OL still sucks, the Pittsburgh WR sucked, not sure their drafting has been all that great.

Right. Focus on Claypool, not the deal that got them a very good Moore + your obsession Williams. Probably.

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 2/12/2024 10:11:04 PM >
Post #: 7858
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 1:36:48 AM   
JT2

 

Posts: 13742
Joined: 2/15/2011
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Looking forward to moving past 2023 now. Tired of great playoff football, to be honest.

Intrigued fascinated roused (not aroused) nervous apprehensive about the offseason.


I feel you. I love seeing it and hate that we don't have it.
Post #: 7859
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 4:05:57 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Moore was ok, not sure he is great, and they'll have to be paying him. The Packers seem to draft guys like him in later draft rounds.

I did give him credit for Sweat, I think that is a great pick up.

I am not obsessed with Williams, I just feel he is the best one, and would be worth taking a chance on him, even if it costs a lot.

Otherwise, I would probably stay put and go with Penix or JJ. I am not sure if I would trade up for Maye or Daniels.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 7860
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 6:00:00 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

How can any sane person. Watch all of the teams in the entirety of the playoffs, and still stick with the thought that “ Kirk Cousins …

What a loser choice for franchise QB..

Cap albatross and definition of “never damn good enough” except for a tight collar choke job when leadership is needed..

I’d take Justin Fields over Cousins..



When a guy with his experience doesn't know you have to spike the ball with no timeouts late in a game...

That's all you really need to know.

Time to move on. Take your lumps with a rookie

That was one of the more pathetic things I've ever seen. A sixth grader would have known to spike the ball in that instance. O'Connell shouldn't be let off the hook on this one either.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 7861
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 7:31:36 AM   
eagleflorida

 

Posts: 1633
Joined: 12/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

Our management and ownership are broken..

Our head coach is a square into round pounder of QB pegs..

He has no clue about game flow or how to exploit a weaknesss untillthey stop it more than once.

The defense is made up of 2-3 players executing the scheme, and 8 others just trying to not get penalized, burnt for not doing their assignment or thinking their particular position has no bearing on a play as it develops.

We have too many c b and safety players who are trying to make splash plays and whiffing badly.

Guys who can not cover, even in a zone.
They lack the speed to cover ground and close on throws to an area.
Sitting down in a Vikings zone isalmost always a guaranteed completion.
I am dismayed and aghast at how wide open receivers are in our pass defense..

Man to man is worse than useless against mobile QB’s..

Despite ample evidence from many consistently contending teams, that you offense is only as god ad your control of the LOS is on both side, our management and staff drafts receivers and CB’s, completely ignoring the fact that time to throw or no time to read route trees and make throws against a rush has a far bigger impact on success than the flashy catches made on less than accurate throws.

Getting gashed for yards between the 20’s is now completely acceptable.

The “ three man rush” is an invitation to let opposing receivers work the zones and pulling guards to lead sweeps and s teens..


Broken philosophy and misuse of personnel, who are marginal at best in most positions, is our well exploited position on both sides of the ball..

Points win games, defense wins games.

Yards and completion % are useless mvp contract padding stats.


Good list Dan........................sad though.
Post #: 7862
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 8:47:41 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

I’ve read quite a few replies in social media from known, reputable names saying all 32 teams use PFF. I subscribed to PFF a few years ago and can confirm they have some real deep dive stuff. The “game grades” that get circulated amount to almost nothing compare to the whole of what’s available from them.


It's strange that he would single out PFF. Almost like a shout out, a plug. There are a multitude of sources available and used by NFL teams. Did he even mention our data/analytics team? Do we have one? What do they do, read PFF reports and report back to the boss? Seriously, I have no clue what our analytics team does. What's their budget? Who is on the team?

I would hope any team serious about contending for a championship would build and properly fund a data/analytics team better than one available to all of the other teams.

KAM really wanted to make a splash in that 1st draft. He belly flopped. Outsmarted himself.

He just needed to take what was in front of him(Hamilton at #14 or small trade back for McDuffie).
Post #: 7863
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 9:52:00 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

I did the spotrac manage roster deal too.

We get to 60M by just doing some common sense transactions. Cutting Smith, Bradbury, Lowry, re-negotiating Hockenson.

Our cap space is middle of the pack, average age is middle of the pack. There is talent on the roster. Not as dire straits as we think.

Kwesi still needs a home run off season though.

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 2/13/2024 9:54:48 AM >
Post #: 7864
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 10:49:28 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9560
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

I did the spotrac manage roster deal too.

We get to 60M by just doing some common sense transactions. Cutting Smith, Bradbury, Lowry, re-negotiating Hockenson.

Our cap space is middle of the pack, average age is middle of the pack. There is talent on the roster. Not as dire straits as we think.

Kwesi still needs a home run off season though.


if we trade up our first draft pick after a QB will probably be in the 4th round...perhaps we can draft a starting center and save some cap there...should still be some good RBs in the 4th, too....

bpa might be the best way to go, instead of reaching for need on the third day....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 7865
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 10:51:02 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Moore was ok, not sure he is great, and they'll have to be paying him. The Packers seem to draft guys like him in later draft rounds.

I did give him credit for Sweat, I think that is a great pick up.

I am not obsessed with Williams, I just feel he is the best one, and would be worth taking a chance on him, even if it costs a lot..

Otherwise, I would probably stay put and go with Penix or JJ. I am not sure if I would trade up for Maye or Daniels.

Moore was better than ok. I didn’t say he was great although watching him against our CBs (especially the second game) he was devastatingly world class great ... pretty good otherwise ... 96R 1364YDS 14.2AVG 9TDS.

Nice GB shoutout there by the way ... meaningless otherwise.

I am obsessed with Cousins. I can’t not bash him. Its a filthy bias and I know it bores everybody but I can’t help myself. Oh well ... I think he is the worst one (for us) and he will cost a lot. [example to help others pull through their own psychological hangups]
Post #: 7866
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 11:03:13 AM   
Lars


Posts: 11418
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Midi-chlorians
Status: offline
You have to get the QB position right first. Period. We don't have that on our roster - with or without Cousins. The answer is not in FA. Therefore, we HAVE to draft a guy. First round. Period (I would take McCarthy).

Then you have to solidify the LOS. That means we need IOL, DT and have to deal with Hunter. I resign Hunter, let Bradbury go, and take a look at O'Neil. Draft more.

I would NOT sign JJ to a big contract. If he has trade value, I take it all day long.

HSmith - time to retire.

Draft more CB.

This should be a full rebuild year. Do it right, and next year they have a whole additional draft to keep restocking...

_____________________________

<this space for rent>
Post #: 7867
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 11:36:01 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

I did the spotrac manage roster deal too.

We get to 60M by just doing some common sense transactions. Cutting Smith, Bradbury, Lowry, re-negotiating Hockenson.

Our cap space is middle of the pack, average age is middle of the pack. There is talent on the roster. Not as dire straits as we think.

Kwesi still needs a home run off season though.


Outside of Hunter, what talent is there on defense? Flores held it together by going full-whacked with the schemes until those pesky OCs figured things out.

Assuming the contracts for eligible FAs do expire and Smith/Lowry are cut, here is our defense:

DL: Phillips, Roy, T.J. Smith
LB/Edge: Jones, Carter, Pace, Asamoah, Kwenkeu
CB: Blackmon, Murphy, Evans, Booth, Thompson
S: Metellus, Bynum, Cine, Ward, Jackson

IMO, the only players worth starting are Pace, Blackmon, and maybe one of the safeties (the best coverage safety).
Post #: 7868
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 11:52:39 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

I did the spotrac manage roster deal too.

We get to 60M by just doing some common sense transactions. Cutting Smith, Bradbury, Lowry, re-negotiating Hockenson.

Our cap space is middle of the pack, average age is middle of the pack. There is talent on the roster. Not as dire straits as we think.

Kwesi still needs a home run off season though.


Outside of Hunter, what talent is there on defense? Flores held it together by going full-whacked with the schemes until those pesky OCs figured things out.

Assuming the contracts for eligible FAs do expire and Smith/Lowry are cut, here is our defense:

DL: Phillips, Roy, T.J. Smith
LB/Edge: Jones, Carter, Pace, Asamoah, Kwenkeu
CB: Blackmon, Murphy, Evans, Booth, Thompson
S: Metellus, Bynum, Cine, Ward, Jackson

IMO, the only players worth starting are Pace, Blackmon, and maybe one of the safeties (the best coverage safety).

Obviously the defense needs more. If you acquire a #1 like Sneed, Murphy and Blackmon look a lot better as #2 and #3 CBs.

Offense has talent. We can make life for a rookie QB easier than a lot of teams.
Post #: 7869
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 11:54:37 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

You have to get the QB position right first. Period. We don't have that on our roster - with or without Cousins. The answer is not in FA. Therefore, we HAVE to draft a guy. First round. Period (I would take McCarthy).

Then you have to solidify the LOS. That means we need IOL, DT and have to deal with Hunter. I resign Hunter, let Bradbury go, and take a look at O'Neil. Draft more.

I would NOT sign JJ to a big contract. If he has trade value, I take it all day long.

HSmith - time to retire.

Draft more CB.

This should be a full rebuild year. Do it right, and next year they have a whole additional draft to keep restocking...

We seem to have trouble drafting solid CBs. Rhodes being the last one that really panned out.

Go get a proven one in FA.
Post #: 7870
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 12:02:42 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm


Well, you advocated 'going for it' this year.

- "restructure o'neill...$9.2mm" saved and is simply added to his upcoming mega cap hits.
- Hunter at $15mm... cheap! Plus his $14.8mm dead cap gets stashed in the future somewhere.
- Jefferson from upcoming $19mm to $14 mm. The balloon payments get stashed out there.

Did the site provide future total cap numbers after these deals?

People certainly have different philosophies.
Post #: 7871
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 12:22:48 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19458
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

You have to get the QB position right first. Period. We don't have that on our roster - with or without Cousins. The answer is not in FA. Therefore, we HAVE to draft a guy. First round. Period (I would take McCarthy).

Then you have to solidify the LOS. That means we need IOL, DT and have to deal with Hunter. I resign Hunter, let Bradbury go, and take a look at O'Neil. Draft more.

I would NOT sign JJ to a big contract. If he has trade value, I take it all day long.

HSmith - time to retire.

Draft more CB.

This should be a full rebuild year. Do it right, and next year they have a whole additional draft to keep restocking...

We seem to have trouble drafting solid CBs. Rhodes being the last one that really panned out.

Go get a proven one in FA.



We tried with Murphy. He was ok but what really stings is Cine/Booth vetrsus Hamilton/Mcduffy
Post #: 7872
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 12:28:13 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

it would be a shame if we drafted a top quarterback and he didn't have jeff and allison to throw to....

If he did, we'd never know if he was a top QB.

A top QB makes decent WRs look great. To jumpstart things, the QB can throw to Let's Get Paid, aka 'Allison'. Use Break The Bank's cap on IOL.



that's just a couple of kids talking about money - it's today's world....

let go of Harry and other dead-weight players...

extend hunter....

sign a 1st tier and 2nd tier dt and a couple of solid interior o-line....

sign a CB....

draft a QB....

three years?....let's go this season, baby....


JJ, Hunter, top DL, mid-tier DT, 2x mid-tier OL, CB.

What team's cap are you stealing from or what credit cards are you using? And we need a DE. And ILB. And we have ZERO backup OL if they hit free agency.

Agree on Smith, but what other dead weight players?



spotrac:

Bradbury...$5.7mm
lowry...$4.5mm
hunter...$14.8mm (dead money that factors out)
smith...$11.5mm

rework jefferson...$5mm
restructure o'neill...$9.2mm

present effective cap space...$20mm

adjusted cap space total...$70mm

jefferson...$already factored in
hunter...$15mm
top DL...$15mm (maybe less 1st year)
Mid-tier DL...$6mm
mid-tier OL (center)...$5mm
mid-tier OL (guard)...$5mm
CB...$5mm

sub total of new deals...$61.mm

new effective cap space...$9mm

I did the spotrac manage roster deal too.

We get to 60M by just doing some common sense transactions. Cutting Smith, Bradbury, Lowry, re-negotiating Hockenson.

Our cap space is middle of the pack, average age is middle of the pack. There is talent on the roster. Not as dire straits as we think.

Kwesi still needs a home run off season though.


Outside of Hunter, what talent is there on defense? Flores held it together by going full-whacked with the schemes until those pesky OCs figured things out.

Assuming the contracts for eligible FAs do expire and Smith/Lowry are cut, here is our defense:

DL: Phillips, Roy, T.J. Smith
LB/Edge: Jones, Carter, Pace, Asamoah, Kwenkeu
CB: Blackmon, Murphy, Evans, Booth, Thompson
S: Metellus, Bynum, Cine, Ward, Jackson

IMO, the only players worth starting are Pace, Blackmon, and maybe one of the safeties (the best coverage safety).

Obviously the defense needs more. If you acquire a #1 like Sneed, Murphy and Blackmon look a lot better as #2 and #3 CBs.

Offense has talent. We can make life for a rookie QB easier than a lot of teams.


Agree regarding a top CB. Sneed should be at least $15 million. You mentioned restructuring Hock... guess kicking that cap down the road can help pay for Sneed.

On offense, cutting scrub Bradbury means we will need a starting LG and a starting C. We also have to sign a complete set of backup OL because we have zero projected on the roster.

WR3. Does that spot default to Nailor? Too bad Powell is a FA (PR/WR4?).

Hoped we saved some cap for Darrisaw!

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 2/13/2024 12:47:38 PM >
Post #: 7873
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 12:35:39 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

You have to get the QB position right first. Period. We don't have that on our roster - with or without Cousins. The answer is not in FA. Therefore, we HAVE to draft a guy. First round. Period (I would take McCarthy).

Then you have to solidify the LOS. That means we need IOL, DT and have to deal with Hunter. I resign Hunter, let Bradbury go, and take a look at O'Neil. Draft more.

I would NOT sign JJ to a big contract. If he has trade value, I take it all day long.

HSmith - time to retire.

Draft more CB.

This should be a full rebuild year. Do it right, and next year they have a whole additional draft to keep restocking...

We seem to have trouble drafting solid CBs. Rhodes being the last one that really panned out.

Go get a proven one in FA.



We tried with Murphy. He was ok but what really stings is Cine/Booth vetrsus Hamilton/Mcduffy

I don't think we could have had both but one would really have made a difference.
Post #: 7874
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/13/2024 12:45:44 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
Here is the 2024 roster. Blue are under contract, orange are UFAs, and black are RFA. For anyone who believes OL and DL is important, you best not look.

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/MIN



Oh, my bad on $6M for the rookie pool. Spotrac factored in the missing 3rd round pick and shows $11.4M and $8.2M (Top 51) for the rookies. Darn salary increases!

We also have $3.5M in guaranteed dead cap from Cook and Otomewo. Peanuts! That will likely increase a lot. $6.8 for Davenport seems very likely.

So that's about $20 M.
Post #: 7875
Page:   <<   < prev  313 314 [315] 316 317   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  313 314 [315] 316 317   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode