Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: 2024 Draft

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2024 Draft Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 10:59:40 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40477
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
If it goes Willam’s/Maye/Daniels I say take a stud on D and OL depth.
Post #: 751
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 11:30:03 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I don’t think Washington will be able to walk away from 4 1sts.

Hopefully we can.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 752
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 11:31:02 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I trust the general consensus that Nix is a bum but I worry Brad might be right on McCarthy.

Likely moot as we’re going to pry 2 from Washington or 3 if they won’t budge from the Pats if it goes Williams/Daniels.

I’d just as soon pay up and park ourselves at 2 right now.

That is far from a general consensus.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 753
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 11:31:23 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77790
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I trust the general consensus that Nix is a bum but I worry Brad might be right on McCarthy.

Likely moot as we’re going to pry 2 from Washington or 3 if they won’t budge from the Pats if it goes Williams/Daniels.

I’d just as soon pay up and park ourselves at 2 right now.


I don’t think Nix is a bum. I’d take him at 23.

I just worry he’s not going to translate to the Pro Game.

He could absolutely prove me wrong, but you’re banking on him being able to do a lot of things he hasn’t shown yet.

I’d guess at least 3 of the “Big 6” don’t pan out. I’m glad my livelihood doesn’t hinge on picking the right one.
Post #: 754
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 11:35:00 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I trust the general consensus that Nix is a bum but I worry Brad might be right on McCarthy.

Likely moot as we’re going to pry 2 from Washington or 3 if they won’t budge from the Pats if it goes Williams/Daniels.

I’d just as soon pay up and park ourselves at 2 right now.


I don’t think Nix is a bum. I’d take him at 23.

I just worry he’s not going to translate to the Pro Game.

He could absolutely prove me wrong, but you’re banking on him being able to do a lot of things he hasn’t shown yet.

I’d guess at least 3 of the “Big 6” don’t pan out. I’m glad my livelihood doesn’t hinge on picking the right one.

Nix is getting selected at 12 by the Broncos assuming the Vikings trade up in the draft. If not I'm hoping for McCarthy, Maye or Nix at 11.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 755
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 12:15:07 PM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44974
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

1. YOU DON'T KNOW BRADY WAS ANYTHING LIKE NIX IN COLLEGE. QUIT ASSUMING THAT HE WAS.

I am making the comparison based on Nix throwing with high accuracy.

Brady completed 62% of his passes in college. There's no comparison to make.

If you want to draw a comparison between low ADOT and high completion %....BINGO! When 28% of your throws are behind the los and another 39% are in the 0-9 yard range, any decent QB will complete an impressive percentage of passes.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 756
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 12:26:48 PM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44974
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabomb
The ADOT thing is him running his coaches offense to perfection.

It's Nix making one read and dumping. The system allowed him to do that. He didn't do as well when he played in a system that required him to do more. You can't dump 67% of your throws in the NFL.


I can’t remember the last guy who put up crazy numbers in a “gimmick” offense that translated to the NFL.

But see, this is where you are wrong. It's not a gimmick offense any more. The Ducks passed the ball 54% of the time last season. The average in the NFL was around 55-56% in 2023.

https://fftoday.com/stats/23_run_pass_ratios.html

How was the Ducks' offense gimmicky?

Conversely, Michigan passed the ball 39% of the time. By any standards, that's a way more gimmicky offense than what Oregon was running.

The Ducks offense is gimmicky because the QB makes one read and dumps the ball if the primary isn't open. You'll get insane completion % when the vast majority of your passes are behind the los or just a few yards across it. That works in a weak college conference. It won't work in the NFL.

Michigan's offense is not gimmicky at all. It's run heavy. The passing game involves the QB going through reads and progressions like an NFL offense.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 757
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 12:29:59 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77790
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

1. YOU DON'T KNOW BRADY WAS ANYTHING LIKE NIX IN COLLEGE. QUIT ASSUMING THAT HE WAS.

I am making the comparison based on Nix throwing with high accuracy.

Brady completed 62% of his passes in college. There's no comparison to make.

If you want to draw a comparison between low ADOT and high completion %....BINGO! When 28% of your throws are behind the los and another 39% are in the 0-9 yard range, any decent QB will complete an impressive percentage of passes.


My favorite take is “if you remove the dropped passes, his % is even better!”
Post #: 758
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:06:12 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

1. YOU DON'T KNOW BRADY WAS ANYTHING LIKE NIX IN COLLEGE. QUIT ASSUMING THAT HE WAS.

I am making the comparison based on Nix throwing with high accuracy.

Brady completed 62% of his passes in college. There's no comparison to make.

If you want to draw a comparison between low ADOT and high completion %....BINGO! When 28% of your throws are behind the los and another 39% are in the 0-9 yard range, any decent QB will complete an impressive percentage of passes.


My favorite take is “if you remove the dropped passes, his % is even better!”

I love it too. He goes up to 87% completions when removing drops. I guarantee you that you can remove drops for other QBs and they won't even go up to 80%.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 759
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:07:55 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabomb
The ADOT thing is him running his coaches offense to perfection.

It's Nix making one read and dumping. The system allowed him to do that. He didn't do as well when he played in a system that required him to do more. You can't dump 67% of your throws in the NFL.


I can’t remember the last guy who put up crazy numbers in a “gimmick” offense that translated to the NFL.

But see, this is where you are wrong. It's not a gimmick offense any more. The Ducks passed the ball 54% of the time last season. The average in the NFL was around 55-56% in 2023.

https://fftoday.com/stats/23_run_pass_ratios.html

How was the Ducks' offense gimmicky?

Conversely, Michigan passed the ball 39% of the time. By any standards, that's a way more gimmicky offense than what Oregon was running.

The Ducks offense is gimmicky because the QB makes one read and dumps the ball if the primary isn't open. You'll get insane completion % when the vast majority of your passes are behind the los or just a few yards across it. That works in a weak college conference. It won't work in the NFL.

Michigan's offense is not gimmicky at all. It's run heavy. The passing game involves the QB going through reads and progressions like an NFL offense.

Do you actually believe what you're saying about Nix not making reads?

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 3/24/2024 1:09:13 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 760
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:10:43 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
Brand New Mock with Vikings getting McCarthy at 11. It could happen if we weren't so hellbent on trading up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqhZzydPlpw

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 761
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:18:28 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40477
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
4 will be gone by 10.

Penix 15 to 20.

Nix in the 6th round.
Post #: 762
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:21:29 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40477
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Nix med priority UDFA.
Post #: 763
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 1:26:32 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77790
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
4 will be gone by 6.

Penix no later than 13.

Nix late 1st, early 2nd.
Post #: 764
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 6:22:03 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

4 will be gone by 6.

Penix no later than 13.

Nix late 1st, early 2nd.

Nix is a virtual lock to Denver at pick 12. Penix most likely Raiders at pick 13, but since they are the last of the teams really needing a QB they could risk waiting. .

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 3/24/2024 7:36:10 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 765
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 7:22:10 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
I don't know who Brett Kollman is, but his thought processes are pure genius IMO.

Brett Kollmann
@BrettKollmann
I feel like picks 2, 3, 4, and 5 all lining up for the chance to get Minnesota's picks should be some kind of warning sign to all of us.

I don't know what that warning is yet, but it's there.
4:02 PM · Mar 24, 2024
·
83.5K
Views

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 766
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 7:47:47 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
I'm 90% convinced we are trading up. I hate it, but I think when it comes to drafting Kwesi is an idiot. He will trade up and give up far more than it should cost to trade up. He will do "WHATEVER IT TAKES" those words that bring joy to every potential trade partner everywhere.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 767
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 7:56:47 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6795
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
With the blitz of articles this past week espousing how "aggressive" the Vikings will be in moving up in the draft, I'm starting to feel like it could be smoke on some level.

Like, could Kwesi be savvy enough to be letting teams think he is willing to give up 4 firsts to move up and let them sweat when we don't call?

Then they call us and we get a better deal?

And the other story this week being that we sent everyone to hang out with JJ this week as more smoke that he is the guy we really like and are moving to 4 for him...

and instead we pass and move up one spot for Penix?

Or to bait another team to move up for him?

Just seems weird that we would be so transparent
Post #: 768
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 9:46:44 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

With the blitz of articles this past week espousing how "aggressive" the Vikings will be in moving up in the draft, I'm starting to feel like it could be smoke on some level.

Like, could Kwesi be savvy enough to be letting teams think he is willing to give up 4 firsts to move up and let them sweat when we don't call?

Then they call us and we get a better deal?

And the other story this week being that we sent everyone to hang out with JJ this week as more smoke that he is the guy we really like and are moving to 4 for him...

and instead we pass and move up one spot for Penix?

Or to bait another team to move up for him?

Just seems weird that we would be so transparent

I appreciate you trying to cheer me up, but I'm convinced Kwesi will do whatever it takes to move up.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 769
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 9:51:59 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
I mentioned this mock where we got McCarthy at 11 earlier today, but I didn't check out who we got at 23. It was Jared Verse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqhZzydPlpw
We could have had Murphy. He was still on the board.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 770
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 10:07:29 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5870
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

4 will be gone by 6.

Penix no later than 13.

Nix late 1st, early 2nd.

Last year Levis (Round 2, pick 33) was a first rounder. Hooker (Round 3, pick 68) was a borderline first rd / 2nd rd pick. Willis the year before (Round 3, Pick 86) was a first rounder ...

Penix, Nix going top fifteen sounds unlikely to me (as some are predicting).

McCarthy as well ... the jump from where he started the draft process has been outrageous. Yes he does carry a championship pedigree, deserved or not, but I really believe his lack of performance on tape has worked for him. The same way it helped Lance. Most other QBs its a red flag, a knock against them, a sure sign of extra required development. The enigma of McCarthy and Lance has stoked fascination instead of caution.

I have no idea how it will play out ... but all the draft hyperbole that pushes prospects up in mock drafts has to be tempered by teams who are worrying about #2 Lance, #3 Wilson, #3 Darnold, #10 Rosen, #2 Trubiskey, #1 Winston, #2 Mariota etc etc etc.

For my money, Williams, Daniels and Maye (needing more development than the other two) look like future nfl QBs. And that's it.

McCarthy, Penix, Nix look like good college QBs that deserve a shot in the pros. If one of the three prove better than a back-up I'll be surprised.

Pleasantly surprised if we grab one.
Post #: 771
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/24/2024 10:14:01 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5870
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

With the blitz of articles this past week espousing how "aggressive" the Vikings will be in moving up in the draft, I'm starting to feel like it could be smoke on some level.

Like, could Kwesi be savvy enough to be letting teams think he is willing to give up 4 firsts to move up and let them sweat when we don't call?

Then they call us and we get a better deal?

And the other story this week being that we sent everyone to hang out with JJ this week as more smoke that he is the guy we really like and are moving to 4 for him...

and instead we pass and move up one spot for Penix?

Or to bait another team to move up for him?

Just seems weird that we would be so transparent

It would be nice to think that Kwesi improved from Draft #1 to Draft #2 and then punched the hyperdrive for this draft with all the draft dupery and flimflam that you are suggesting.
Post #: 772
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/25/2024 4:10:34 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

With the blitz of articles this past week espousing how "aggressive" the Vikings will be in moving up in the draft, I'm starting to feel like it could be smoke on some level.

Like, could Kwesi be savvy enough to be letting teams think he is willing to give up 4 firsts to move up and let them sweat when we don't call?

Then they call us and we get a better deal?

And the other story this week being that we sent everyone to hang out with JJ this week as more smoke that he is the guy we really like and are moving to 4 for him...

and instead we pass and move up one spot for Penix?

Or to bait another team to move up for him?

Just seems weird that we would be so transparent

It would be nice to think that Kwesi improved from Draft #1 to Draft #2 and then punched the hyperdrive for this draft with all the draft dupery and flimflam that you are suggesting.

I appreciate the FA moves that Kwesi has done this year, but I am in dread of what he will do in the draft.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 773
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/25/2024 5:54:29 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40477
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
One man’s dread is another man’s dream.
Post #: 774
RE: 2024 Draft - 3/25/2024 5:56:39 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40477
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I don't know who Brett Kollman is, but his thought processes are pure genius IMO.

Brett Kollmann
@BrettKollmann
I feel like picks 2, 3, 4, and 5 all lining up for the chance to get Minnesota's picks should be some kind of warning sign to all of us.

I don't know what that warning is yet, but it's there.
4:02 PM · Mar 24, 2024
·
83.5K
Views


4 and 5 might be lining up. I’m just hoping 2 and 3 aren’t closed off to the possibility.
Post #: 775
Page:   <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2024 Draft Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode