Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: Jeff Jesser, Pager, Bill Jandro
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  187 188 [189] 190 191   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:10:23 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5906
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

At #2 there would be an opportunity for a few drawn up plays for DJ.

Like in the RZ. Plays like - don’t epically choke…get it on the ****ing end zone.

Great idea. Really.

(although … we’d be depriving the intl space station of watching Sam’s crop circle spin move through the retractable roof)
Post #: 4701
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:14:52 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
KOC might be planning that, but doesn't that tell your starting QB you don't have confidence in him, in the red zone ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4702
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:16:46 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Until next Monday, over Darnold, Jones has shown he can win a playoff game (provided he is facing a Donatell defense), and not throw a bunch of air balls. But his 2nd playoff game wasn't the best.

Jones is merely a cheaper option for next year.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4703
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:18:43 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

Brad, I hope you and all friends and family are staying safe out there in SoCal. The scenes on the news are horrific and otherworldly. My best to you and yours. ~ Lars

Thank you sir. I'm quite a ways from the action but could be closer next time. The next fire is always right around the corner.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4704
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:23:03 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
It’ll be an open competition from the beginning.

JJM will win it. Then the future begins.

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4705
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:23:31 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

My apologies to the board for my part in resurrecting Cousins as a flyswatter.

I’m done with it for now.

No apologies necessary. I brought him up last week when such a double standard was being applied. With Sam's predecessor all we heard was that he pads his stats, screw qb rating because the only stat that matters is the last two minutes, he holds the ball too long, he can't win big games.

It's like you said; if everything about that game was the same, except the name of the QB was Kirk Cousins, the same guy defending Sam would be at the front of the angry mob with torches and pitchforks.

With that, I apologize for continuing the KC comparison.

Actually, that's not fair. Cousins had a body of work showing his failures during crunch time with the Vikings. Darnold had 3-4 bad passes on Sunday night, and outside of that has been spectacular all season. If we got rid of every guy that had one off night, there wouldn't be anyone left on the roster. Reichard would have been gone eight weeks ago and our interior o-line would all be free agents.

So no, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison.

And on that note, why is it that I have to prove my point? Why don't you guys try proving yours at some point?

What makes you think McCarthy is a better option than Darnold next season? That's the question at hand. Yet still, nothing but crickets. One person said because he won a college championship. That was the only rationale, as bad as it could be. Another brought up salary, which has a little merit should the Vikes sign him or franchise tag him.

I haven't seen one person break down the X's and O's on what McCarthy offers, and it's pretty obvious why.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/10/2025 9:34:23 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4706
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:27:48 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Until next Monday, over Darnold, Jones has shown he can win a playoff game (provided he is facing a Donatell defense), and not throw a bunch of air balls. But his 2nd playoff game wasn't the best.

Jones is merely a cheaper option for next year.

Both, however, have completed a pass in the NFL.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4707
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:29:08 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Sam had a good year with some nice highlights. But with the loss in Detroit and a collection of poor passes/decisions I think the best you can call him in 7.65/10. I’m not signing off on that.

No one knows how JJM will do or how he would have done. Who possibly could? I look forward to watching him write his own story.

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4708
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:31:55 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Sam had a good year with some nice highlights. But with the loss in Detroit and a collection of poor passes/decisions I think the best you can call him in 7.65/10. I’m not signing off on that.

No one knows how JJM will do or how he would have done. Who possibly could? I look forward to watching him write his own story.

Look, I'm right there with you on McCarthy. I hope the guy is special. However, I'm not going into next season without a contingency plan to a rookie with no experience when I just had a guy have a special season and there is an option to sign him for one year.

Letting Darnold go is not a plan, it's pixie dust.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/10/2025 9:35:02 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4709
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:39:34 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Daniel Jones showed he already had chemistry with the Vikings when he threw a TD to Van Ginkel in game 1.

< Message edited by marty -- 1/10/2025 9:42:26 AM >


_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4710
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:40:18 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Daniel Jones showed already had chemistry with the Vikings when he threw a TD to Van Ginkel in game 1.

Solid point. He's already scored more points for the Vikings than McCarthy.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4711
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:47:00 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 23187
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KOC might be planning that, but doesn't that tell your starting QB you don't have confidence in him, in the red zone ?

If we had an interior offensive line that could actually move the defensive line it would all be a moot point. Philadelphia and Detroit don't have to worry about drawing up crafty pass plays. They just run it down your throat. The same could be said for Buffalo, Baltimore, you name it.

Our offensive line is a joke, people.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4712
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 9:59:28 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27859
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

My apologies to the board for my part in resurrecting Cousins as a flyswatter.

I’m done with it for now.

No apologies necessary. I brought him up last week when such a double standard was being applied. With Sam's predecessor all we heard was that he pads his stats, screw qb rating because the only stat that matters is the last two minutes, he holds the ball too long, he can't win big games.

It's like you said; if everything about that game was the same, except the name of the QB was Kirk Cousins, the same guy defending Sam would be at the front of the angry mob with torches and pitchforks.

With that, I apologize for continuing the KC comparison.

Actually, that's not fair. Cousins had a body of work showing his failures during crunch time with the Vikings. Darnold had 3-4 bad passes on Sunday night, and outside of that has been spectacular all season. If we got rid of every guy that had one off night, there wouldn't be anyone left on the roster. Reichard would have been gone eight weeks ago and our interior o-line would all be free agents.

So no, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison.

And on that note, why is it that I have to prove my point? Why don't you guys try proving yours at some point?

What makes you think McCarthy is a better option than Darnold next season? That's the question at hand. Yet still, nothing but crickets. One person said because he won a college championship. That was the only rationale, as bad as it could be. Another brought up salary, which has a little merit should the Vikes sign him or franchise tag him.

I haven't seen one person break down the X's and O's on what McCarthy offers, and it's pretty obvious why.


Point is the 10 Million Dollar contract versus 40+.....once we went from Chains to Darnold/QBOTF $$$ wise we added pieces. That is the whole point. JJM and Jones at 18?
You just aren't getting the fill the roster option---there is a lot of holes next year so Darnold has to prove he is worth that in playoff wins to actually go that direction. They already drafted JJM and have Jones waiting in the wings so it isn't like Darnold staying was more than 50% any way....now it is in the 25%.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 1/10/2025 10:55:36 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4713
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 10:00:34 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27859
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KOC might be planning that, but doesn't that tell your starting QB you don't have confidence in him, in the red zone ?

If we had an interior offensive line that could actually move the defensive line it would all be a moot point. Philadelphia and Detroit don't have to worry about drawing up crafty pass plays. They just run it down your throat. The same could be said for Buffalo, Baltimore, you name it.

Our offensive line is a joke, people.


They already rebuked that....Sam had plenty of time early---he held onto the ball too long most of the first half. They would have went less pressure later if he hadn't been so off early.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 1/10/2025 10:23:01 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4714
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 10:02:19 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5906
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Until next Monday, over Darnold, Jones has shown he can win a playoff game (provided he is facing a Donatell defense), and not throw a bunch of air balls. But his 2nd playoff game wasn't the best.

Jones is merely a cheaper option for next year.

Jones is nothing more than a possible backup for monday night. As its been pointed out, he might not even be the backup.

Nobody is seriously game planning Jones against the rams.

That being said, if Sam plays like he did last weekend … I could care less about puncturing a hole in his already deflated confidence balloon. That means so much less than trying to win this game.
Post #: 4715
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 10:27:31 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Are there things that Jones might offer over Darnold for next year, or would it all be about the money ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4716
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 10:44:15 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29159
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Kirk Cousins got paid $2.7-million per win in 2022 when the team won 13 games. Darnold got paid $715k per win this season.


I only refused to answer such a dumb question.

Why? Because we are talking about our options moving forward, not about comparing our current quarterback to our old quarterback.



So it IS about Cousins v Darnold?

Make up your mind.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/10/2025 10:45:38 AM >
Post #: 4717
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 10:58:54 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29159
Status: offline
Well, we should have home field advantage Monday. Or at least a neutral environment.
Post #: 4718
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:00:14 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27859
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Are there things that Jones might offer over Darnold for next year, or would it all be about the money ?


Matters how much Jones wants....it could be someone else if he isn't staying for 10 million....so I guess yes the $$$$

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4719
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:18:26 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45138
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H
Actually, that's not fair. Cousins had a body of work showing his failures during crunch time with the Vikings. Darnold had 3-4 bad passes on Sunday night, and outside of that has been spectacular all season. If we got rid of every guy that had one off night, there wouldn't be anyone left on the roster. Reichard would have been gone eight weeks ago and our interior o-line would all be free agents.

So no, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison.

And on that note, why is it that I have to prove my point? Why don't you guys try proving yours at some point?

Let's clear some things up
Darnold had a lot more than 3-4 bad passes. He had that many in the red zone in the 1st quarter alone. Darnold had his own record of abject failure. Cousins had an 11-0 record in one score games in 2022, including a lot of late game drives to overcome one of the worst defesnses in football. Everything you said about this roster can be said about that 2022 roster and more. This is absolutely an apples to apples comparison.

As to our point, Tom and I have both said we want to see what Sam does in the playoffs before making a decision. Noone is prushing McCarthy as the guy. If Darnold proves not to be the guy then they need to find out what McCarthy is.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 4720
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:21:48 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
McCarthy’s the guy.

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4721
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:32:58 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29159
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Oh … And just to be clear …

waiting for one good pass on Mon to coronate Sam’s ass … NO.

Sam has to have a great game against the Rams just to START rebuilding his own dike.

Anything less than very good with a win doesnt do it … it has to be at least as good as the Lions game was bad … just to get to 1-1 square one in critical games. And 1-1 buys you nothing in this world, certainly not 40M of my play money.

Its not until our SECOND playoff game, if there is one, that Sam starts to move his needle with this team.
If our regime has any balls at all.

Sorry. Not my rules, take it or leave it … just the cold ruthless law of nature, whether you’re a qb, lion, wildebeest or samurai otter.


That's it.

His redemption tour within a redemption tour starts, but does not end, on Monday. I think he'll settle down, but that doesn't negate what happened last week because it was so egregious.
Post #: 4722
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:37:21 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
A mediocre performance against the Rams, and I think Sam is gone, not even a franchise tag.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4723
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:38:08 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29159
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

My apologies to the board for my part in resurrecting Cousins as a flyswatter.

I’m done with it for now.

No apologies necessary. I brought him up last week when such a double standard was being applied. With Sam's predecessor all we heard was that he pads his stats, screw qb rating because the only stat that matters is the last two minutes, he holds the ball too long, he can't win big games.

It's like you said; if everything about that game was the same, except the name of the QB was Kirk Cousins, the same guy defending Sam would be at the front of the angry mob with torches and pitchforks.

With that, I apologize for continuing the KC comparison.

Actually, that's not fair. Cousins had a body of work showing his failures during crunch time with the Vikings. Darnold had 3-4 bad passes on Sunday night, and outside of that has been spectacular all season. If we got rid of every guy that had one off night, there wouldn't be anyone left on the roster. Reichard would have been gone eight weeks ago and our interior o-line would all be free agents.

So no, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison.

And on that note, why is it that I have to prove my point? Why don't you guys try proving yours at some point?

What makes you think McCarthy is a better option than Darnold next season? That's the question at hand. Yet still, nothing but crickets. One person said because he won a college championship. That was the only rationale, as bad as it could be. Another brought up salary, which has a little merit should the Vikes sign him or franchise tag him.

I haven't seen one person break down the X's and O's on what McCarthy offers, and it's pretty obvious why.



Only "3-4 bad passes" lol. Not to mention what you have repeated the past few days... only 1-2 passes "he'd like to have back".

WW
Post #: 4724
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:40:09 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14358
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Oh … And just to be clear …

waiting for one good pass on Mon to coronate Sam’s ass … NO.

Sam has to have a great game against the Rams just to START rebuilding his own dike.

Anything less than very good with a win doesnt do it … it has to be at least as good as the Lions game was bad … just to get to 1-1 square one in critical games. And 1-1 buys you nothing in this world, certainly not 40M of my play money.

Its not until our SECOND playoff game, if there is one, that Sam starts to move his needle with this team. If our regime has any balls at all.

Sorry. Not my rules, take it or leave it … just the cold ruthless law of nature, whether you’re a qb, lion, wildebeest or samurai otter.

Man, the expectations have really gone up in this place.

Again, Cousins took his team to 13-4 and you couldn't stand him. And that team was much worse than this year's ...

Hang out until Mon, you may or not get some help with your double-standard from Sam.

Monday makes no difference to me. At 14-3 with the #6 passer rating, he has done enough to convince me he can lead this team a long ways. If he had the offensive line that Jared Goff or Jalen Hurts had, there is no telling what the Vikings' record would have been.

You guys do realize, without Darrisaw, he has one of the worst offensive lines in football, right?

This isn't about Darnold or Cousins. It's about Darnold or McCarthy.

[insert emoji-cackle]

Yeah no Darrisaw but Robinson and a good defense evens it out to Darrisaw and a putrid defense. Even the bad iol has been less bad this year.

Its not about Darnold or Cousins because you dont have a leg to stand on.

For you, it is about Darnold or JJM because you can make up whatever shit you want until JJM plays.

Its easy to imagine Darnold having a horrific game on Mon, signing elsewhere and stinking it up like Cousins, and jjm taking us to a 15-2 season … only to still have to listen to you droning on about how we should have kept Darnold.

Because its all about your argument for you. Its about the Vikings moving forward for the rest of us.

Again, Kirk Cousins was nine years older than Darnold and his age was starting to show. So no, it isn't apples to apples and isn't all about numbers. In addition, after he refused to get vaccinated I refused to support him (that's on me, admittedly). The quarterback has to be a leader.

BTW, how is Kirk Cousins looking this season? Nobody wants to address that, do they? Why? Because I was right! He's a shitty leader whose agent belongs on Mount Rushmore.


Stop patting yourself on the back..

Some of us wanted cousins gone after the 2019-2020 season, because his contact demands were crippling the team.. but no..

The stat Stan’s maneged to convince management that yards and completing % = we’re far more important than building a sound team and getting younger and cheaper across the board..
Post #: 4725
Page:   <<   < prev  187 188 [189] 190 191   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  187 188 [189] 190 191   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode