RE: General Vikes Talk

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:20:28 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

How high do the Vikings think they have to go to get a QB they like?

How much are the Vikings willing to trade to do so?

Same questions for any number of teams needing a QB.

There is a balance or limit between trying to get who you want vs bidding against yourself.

Perfect world, they read the board correctly and the QB they like drops to #11 then they select a highly-rated CB at #23.

Post #: 176

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:26:40 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah recently suggested on the “Move the Sticks” podcast that the Washington Commanders might be the ideal trade partner for the Vikings.

quote:

“If you’re Minnesota…I think that Washington might be your best shot if you want to get up into the top three,” Jeremiah stated. “I don’t think New England is going to get out of there…but I think Washington, they have the 36th and the 40th picks. If you traded to 11 with Minnesota, you could get a haul of picks from the Vikings.”

The Vikings don’t have a pick in the second or third round this year to offer, but perhaps the No. 11 and 23 overall picks plus their 2025 first-rounder entices the Commanders enough to move back seven spots and be OK missing out on North Carolina’s Drake Maye and LSU’s Jayden Daniels.

Such a move would also give the Commanders the ammunition to move back up into the top 10 if they wanted to get Michigan QB J.J. McCarthy.

quote:

“I know the Chargers, it’s all been out there that they would love to get out of [pick No.] 5, so if you’re Washington, could you go from 2 to 11 then comeback up to 5,” Jeremiah said. “You’ve still got extra picks [and] you would still get the fourth quarterback. Say if you really like J.J. McCarthy, for example. You’re like, ‘I can get J.J. McCarthy, a future [first-round pick] and a bunch of other stuff.’”

If the Commanders were to trade with Minnesota, they could also simply take the best player available at No. 11 and use the 23rd overall pick on either Washington QB Michael Penix Jr. or Oregon QB Bo Nix.

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/is_a_commanders_trade_in_the_works_after_vikings_acquire_a_second_first_round_pick/s1_13132_40113983

Overall interesting. As an aside, he said Wash would move back seven spots but guessing he meant nine spots... which could/would change what he thought it would require to trade up to #2.

Post #: 177

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:31:18 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

Apparently our two first round picks, on the value chart, get you to between 3 and 4.

Now, when you're trading up that high and for a QB, the chart can go a bit out the window, but its a good starting baseline.

So adding next year's #1 should theoretically be enough to get you to #2.

Post #: 178

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:32:48 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Stud defender at #11, Penix or Nix at #23 ?

The problem there is if we stay at 11 and don't take a QB, every other team looking for a QB knows they need to just jump to 22 or better to snipe us.

Post #: 179

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:33:19 PM

Todd M

Posts: 40598
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline

No way Kwesi is going to be snaked.

It would be a dream to get to 2. No excuses. You didn’t have to settle for 3,4, or 5. Your cards laid bare.

Post #: 180

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:38:11 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

Overwhelming number of options and opinions on value.

So today the counter is they trade #11 and #23 and walk away with a top CB, a top DL, and the top IOL... then Darnold does a Mayfield and his extension immediately puts us in cap hell next year.

Post #: 181

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:40:35 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

Apparently our two first round picks, on the value chart, get you to between 3 and 4.

Now, when you're trading up that high and for a QB, the chart can go a bit out the window, but its a good starting baseline.

So adding next year's #1 should theoretically be enough to get you to #2.

IOW two firsts and two seconds for #2.

Post #: 182

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 12:40:51 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

It’s exciting to be a Vikings fan again!!

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 183

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:04:08 PM

ratoppenheimer

Posts: 9554
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline

.
.
if the top 4 qb’s are gone at 11, we trade down for more ammo with selecting penix the objective….

< Message edited by ratoppenheimer -- 3/15/2024 1:05:38 PM >

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.

Post #: 184

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:09:57 PM

joejitsu

Posts: 15382
Joined: 3/21/2010
From: 60411
Status: offline

I don’t think we make this kind of trade without having a trade partner and player already on the hook. The two firsts are going to get us in the top 5.

Post #: 185

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:14:58 PM

Murph

Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline

I have to give Kwesi credit, he is cooking this off season!

He said at his presser that they had a lot of contingencies in place. This gives them so much more flexibility.

I'm guessing that they already have a potential trade up partner that they've had discussions with and know the price of poker before they consummated the trade with Houston.

My dream of Jayden Daniels in purple has my hopes up higher today.

< Message edited by Murph -- 3/15/2024 1:16:07 PM >

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".

Post #: 186

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:15:59 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

.
.
if the top 4 qb’s are gone at 11, we trade down for more ammo with selecting penix the objective….

If the top 4 qb’s are gone at 11, we select penix...

Post #: 187

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:39:30 PM

beo

Posts: 2365
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline

My guess...

Vikes want Maye.

DRAFT Scenario 1
1. C. Williams,
2. J. Daniels (very possible )
3. Vikes trade with NE to get Maye

DRAFT Scenario 2
1. C. Williams,
2. D. Maye
3. J. Daniels
4. Harrison
5. If Vikes love J. McCarthy... trade up and grab him

DRAFT Scenario 3
1. C. Williams,
2. D. Maye
3. J. Daniels

Vikes value rest as lower value.... either take a guy at 11 or try at 23.

TREMENDOUS flexibility... and for decent cost IMO.

Pretty excited.

Post #: 188

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:51:22 PM

marty

Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

If the Commanders were to trade with Minnesota, they could also simply take the best player available at No. 11 and use the 23rd overall pick on either Washington QB Michael Penix Jr. or Oregon QB Bo Nix.

But wouldn't teams want to snipe Washington and trade ahead of the #23 pick for a QB, or does that only happen if Minnesota owns the pick ? (That is, if Minnesota goes BPA at #11, then wants Nix or Penix at #23).

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 189

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:53:07 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

My guess...

Vikes want Maye.

DRAFT Scenario 1
1. C. Williams,
2. J. Daniels (very possible )
3. Vikes trade with NE to get Maye

DRAFT Scenario 2
1. C. Williams,
2. D. Maye
3. J. Daniels
4. Harrison
5. If Vikes love J. McCarthy... trade up and grab him

DRAFT Scenario 3
1. C. Williams,
2. D. Maye
3. J. Daniels

Vikes value rest as lower value.... either take a guy at 11 or try at 23.

TREMENDOUS flexibility... and for decent cost IMO.

Pretty excited.

Sure there is flexibility there, helped by being fine with Maye, McCarthy, or "a guy" at #11.

That's a takeoff on the old Air Force adage:
Flexibility is the key to airpower... indecision is the key to flexibility.

And they have to consummate a trade which is far from a given. But on paper they are sitting pretty good.

Post #: 190

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 1:56:35 PM

marty

Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 191

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:00:35 PM

Murph

Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

What if Denver offers the farm to the Cardinals and jump us for McCarthy, if that's who KOC/Kwesi have identified?

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".

Post #: 192

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:05:01 PM

beo

Posts: 2365
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

What if Denver offers the farm to the Cardinals and jump us for McCarthy, if that's who KOC/Kwesi have identified?

Vikes are the only team with 2 1st picks this year I believe... seems like Vikes would at least get a call if that happened...

Now, they could get pulled into a bidding war.

But I would guess at this point they have a lot of leverage to get the guy they want.

Post #: 193

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:06:33 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

What if Denver offers the farm to the Cardinals and jump us for McCarthy, if that's who KOC/Kwesi have identified?

Or this happens because Den and Oak don't have much of a farm to trade up with:

https://www.si.com/nfl/2024/03/13/free-agency-mock-draft-first-round-picks-predictions#gid=ci02d83a41b0002684&pid=23-houston-texans-from-cle

Post #: 194

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:12:22 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28598
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

What if Denver offers the farm to the Cardinals and jump us for McCarthy, if that's who KOC/Kwesi have identified?

Vikes are the only team with 2 1st picks this year I believe... seems like Vikes would at least get a call if that happened...

Now, they could get pulled into a bidding war.

But I would guess at this point they have a lot of leverage to get the guy they want.

Yep, the two 1st rounders THIS year should weigh in their favor big time. GMs want it all now.

Post #: 195

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:18:14 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

If the Commanders were to trade with Minnesota, they could also simply take the best player available at No. 11 and use the 23rd overall pick on either Washington QB Michael Penix Jr. or Oregon QB Bo Nix.

But wouldn't teams want to snipe Washington and trade ahead of the #23 pick for a QB, or does that only happen if Minnesota owns the pick ? (That is, if Minnesota goes BPA at #11, then wants Nix or Penix at #23).

Of course the same thing applies to Washington.

Post #: 196

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:18:55 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77901
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am guessing the Vikings are trading #11 and #23 for pick #5 with S.D., and the Vikings take JJ McCarthy.

Is that a fair trade, or is it a Kwesi trade of giving up a little too much ?

And do you guys and gals like McCarthy enough to make that trade ?

What if Denver offers the farm to the Cardinals and jump us for McCarthy, if that's who KOC/Kwesi have identified?

Unless we trade up to #2, I don't expect any trade to be announced until the pick we're trading up to is on the clock.

Post #: 197

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:19:06 PM

Murph

Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline

For the first time it feels like the new regime has a plan and are executing it this off season. It does give me hope.

I hope this isn't just my hangover of euphoria from ridding ourselves of Cousins and his bad contract.

< Message edited by Murph -- 3/15/2024 2:20:19 PM >

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".

Post #: 198

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:19:24 PM 1 votes

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

It’s exciting to be a Vikings fan again!!

For now at least. Until Kwesi ****s it all up.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”

Post #: 199

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/15/2024 2:32:37 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

The leverage with New England to convince them to trade the #3 to us comes with the threat to trade up to #2. "Hey look NE, if I'm offering you 11, 23, and and a future 3rd. Anything more than that I'm going to talk to 1 and 2."

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 200