Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talkk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: jimbo
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  68 69 70 [71] 72   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 6:29:43 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20863
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

You like your own idea and speak in 3rd person?

Yes, I was being silly, and it seems to sound less like bragging then saying someone is now suggesting MY idea, the idea that was rejected by most people on this board, the idea of making Flore's the HC, which I am now backing off a tad on, as there are some mentionable red flags:

1) His defenses bend, but seem to eventually break
2) Veteran QBs seem to figure out the way to attack it
3) There might be some character questions with him, if you ask Tua
4) How quickly can you find an up and coming OC, one that doesn't only design plays, but is also good at play calling during a game


with today's nfl it's almost impossible for a defense to completely shut down and offense...the offense has all the advantages, and the new kickoff rules are a joke...every possession seems to start with excellent field position...imo; that's what has created the extreme parity in the nfl...the last team with the ball and 30 seconds seems to be able to consistently drive for a winning field goal....

Add to that the juiced football that kickers can kick 70 yards now and the game is becoming a joke.
Post #: 1751
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 7:35:15 AM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 417
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
More and more seems to be coming out on a difference of opinion between the FO and KOC on QB this year

Was KOC pushed to start JJ?

Did KOC know he wasn't ready and design things to make him fail?

Kwesi/Grigson intent on making their young, cheap work?

Probably going to be a reckoning this offseason.

This seems like Spielman/Zimmer all over again.
Post #: 1752
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 9:14:42 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20863
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

More and more seems to be coming out on a difference of opinion between the FO and KOC on QB this year

Was KOC pushed to start JJ?

Did KOC know he wasn't ready and design things to make him fail?

Kwesi/Grigson intent on making their young, cheap work?

Probably going to be a reckoning this offseason.

This seems like Spielman/Zimmer all over again.

The finger pointing is underway because nobody wants to take accountability. What a completely dysfunctional organization. Been saying that for a while now.
Post #: 1753
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 9:40:54 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19950
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
The way KAM throws away draft picks seems to indicate he knows he sucks at making them. Add Theilen to the list of failures that he spent draft capitol on. It's beyond ridiculous.
Post #: 1754
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 9:50:10 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30525
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

For anyone who thought this was just a JJM problem and Brosmer would be the salve, need to see more? Hot garbage. That pick 6 was straight out of a HS game.

This is a KOC and KAM problem. Running an offense like you have a 10 year vet out there. KOC is not a developer of young QB. He can put a little polish on an old turd with some weapons around him (KFC, Darnold, etc.) And KAM's draft are shite.

This offense and team has no identity. That goes straight to the top.

And sorry, but Darnold looked the same to me. Sacked how many times? Two fumbles? One lost? Like 150 yards passing? For $100M+? No thanks.

And if the skill guys like JJ wanna pout and cry, catch the ****ing ball.

On one bright note, Turner seems to be getting better each week, IMHO.

9-3

Not sure what you guys have against winning. It's a puzzling phenomenon with you people.

Not every game can be perfect. Your expectations are unreasonable. The guy still has the #7 passer rating and #9 QB rating in the league. His team is 9-3. He's 23-6 (.793) during the regular season since the beginning of last season.

For $33-million, that's a huge bargain.

Defense is unbelievable.

The book is out on Darnold. A good defense can pressure him and give him happy feet. Running game and defense could carry SEA to one playoff victory.

You gotta protect him. Same with Jared Goff, who is averaging $53-million over four years. I don't see the Lions trying to part with Goff.

Like I said, your guys' expectations are unreasonable.


Unreasonable?
You were pounding the table for a QBOTF like Mahomes and Brady until we signed your USC QB. They had to reset the cap and Darnold has a portion of his last years contract on this years cap.

Darnold isn't something we missed on....we already had him and preferred Jones or giving JJ snaps.

Again how many snaps/throws did Darnold have until he was a serviceable NFL QB?

The whole key is still get JJ reps.....nothing is set in stone yet. The same philosphy is being used for Dart and Nix who also aren't rated very high.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1755
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 9:53:11 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30525
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
The rest of the season is developing and seeing what they want to keep. Vets are playing for a job.

There should be restructures going on right now if they want a job next year. TJ, Jones, Hargrave, O'Neil, maybe even Grenard.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1756
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 10:29:02 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
There is $26.5 million in dead cap this year, including money still on the books for Cine, Booth, Ingram, and Asamoah! And Murphy!

From 2022 draft remnants to players on the active roster, Kwesi knows no limits for spreading out dead money.
Post #: 1757
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 11:39:18 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30525
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

There is $26.5 million in dead cap this year, including money still on the books for Cine, Booth, Ingram, and Asamoah! And Murphy!

From 2022 draft remnants to players on the active roster, Kwesi knows no limits for spreading out dead money.


There are others....Van Ginkel, Jones, and Cashman. Void money was cleaned up and that is why their contracts were so high. Jones is making $11 million a year because 4-5 was void money so he is only making about 5-6.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1758
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 6:37:39 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

There is $26.5 million in dead cap this year, including money still on the books for Cine, Booth, Ingram, and Asamoah! And Murphy!

From 2022 draft remnants to players on the active roster, Kwesi knows no limits for spreading out dead money.


There are others....Van Ginkel, Jones, and Cashman. Void money was cleaned up and that is why their contracts were so high. Jones is making $11 million a year because 4-5 was void money so he is only making about 5-6.


Maybe you mean there are other categories (ex. void years), because Van Ginkel, Jones, and Cashman are not part of the $26.5 million in dead cap this year.

Darnold's $5 million is part of the dead cap because he is no longer on the team. Murphy's $4.2 dead cap figure either wasn't updated, was due to the Vikings signing him during the tampering period where he was technically a UFA, or some other/unusual reason.

And as for void money being 'cleaned up', saw two sites showing $47M in void money as of last Feb, and another site showing $52M in June. It's at least $44, so no cleaning up occurred. Maybe some shifting of the chairs on the deck...

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 12/2/2025 7:17:03 PM >
Post #: 1759
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 6:58:11 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
Vets are playing for a job. ... There should be restructures going on right now if they want a job next year.


There are a few vets that need to be cut outright. No more playing for a job, we know what they are. They are filler. Get the backups onto the field in these last five games to help analyze offseason needs.

Plenty of time to restructure some others before free agency begins.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 12/2/2025 7:24:31 PM >
Post #: 1760
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 7:09:34 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
I think we're around middle of the pack in stashed void year $ and on the low end of dead cap this year.

SF dead cap this year is $103+ million. Deebo 34, Armstead 15, Ward 12, Floyd 9, our very own Hargrave 6.7, etc.

Philly dead cap $86 million but they got a SB win out of it.

KC low dead cap, about $10 less than Minny.
Post #: 1761
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/2/2025 7:52:14 PM   
joejitsu

 

Posts: 15937
Joined: 3/21/2010
From: 60411
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: stfrank

And while we are speaking of lines, how about adding some young talent to the D-line too!
I think we all knew going old in the trenches wasn't going to work but we had no choice but to hope for the best....which we didn't get.


We've started to.

Turner has really come on of late.

And then the late round/undrafted guys have been showing.

Jalen Redmond has been a highlight this year and he's played 73% of the defensive snaps.

Levi Drake Rodriguez has looked good at times as well (45%).

Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins has shown some flashes too (20%).


If we can pick up a big talented player at center and nt, the lines would look a ton better. Turner and the pass rush would improve by default.And the oline would be more secure with the players we have now.
Post #: 1762
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 7:44:36 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30525
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joejitsu

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: stfrank

And while we are speaking of lines, how about adding some young talent to the D-line too!
I think we all knew going old in the trenches wasn't going to work but we had no choice but to hope for the best....which we didn't get.


We've started to.

Turner has really come on of late.

And then the late round/undrafted guys have been showing.

Jalen Redmond has been a highlight this year and he's played 73% of the defensive snaps.

Levi Drake Rodriguez has looked good at times as well (45%).

Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins has shown some flashes too (20%).


If we can pick up a big talented player at center and nt, the lines would look a ton better. Turner and the pass rush would improve by default.And the oline would be more secure with the players we have now.


Be nice to be able to hit on some of the picks....They have a better% on UDFA than draft picks lower than the 2nd round and that might be Flores.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1763
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 8:23:32 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24429
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

For anyone who thought this was just a JJM problem and Brosmer would be the salve, need to see more? Hot garbage. That pick 6 was straight out of a HS game.

This is a KOC and KAM problem. Running an offense like you have a 10 year vet out there. KOC is not a developer of young QB. He can put a little polish on an old turd with some weapons around him (KFC, Darnold, etc.) And KAM's draft are shite.

This offense and team has no identity. That goes straight to the top.

And sorry, but Darnold looked the same to me. Sacked how many times? Two fumbles? One lost? Like 150 yards passing? For $100M+? No thanks.

And if the skill guys like JJ wanna pout and cry, catch the ****ing ball.

On one bright note, Turner seems to be getting better each week, IMHO.

9-3

Not sure what you guys have against winning. It's a puzzling phenomenon with you people.

Not every game can be perfect. Your expectations are unreasonable. The guy still has the #7 passer rating and #9 QB rating in the league. His team is 9-3. He's 23-6 (.793) during the regular season since the beginning of last season.

For $33-million, that's a huge bargain.

Defense is unbelievable.

The book is out on Darnold. A good defense can pressure him and give him happy feet. Running game and defense could carry SEA to one playoff victory.

You gotta protect him. Same with Jared Goff, who is averaging $53-million over four years. I don't see the Lions trying to part with Goff.

Like I said, your guys' expectations are unreasonable.

We obviously can't protect any of the QBs we have playing this year. Sam would be 6-6 with this outfit we have. Probably 8-10 lost fumbles.

He had a worse o-line last season


Did he?

Our Big FA Center signing has missed most of the year with more concussions. His main replacement had never played Center at any level.

Our Big FA Guard is the 38th ranked Guard in the NFL.

We have a MASH unit at the other Guard position.

Darrisow has not been healthy all year. And has missed over 1/3 of the season.

O'Neill has missed over 1/4 of the season.

You people have short memories.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 1764
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 8:28:32 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24429
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

For anyone who thought this was just a JJM problem and Brosmer would be the salve, need to see more? Hot garbage. That pick 6 was straight out of a HS game.

This is a KOC and KAM problem. Running an offense like you have a 10 year vet out there. KOC is not a developer of young QB. He can put a little polish on an old turd with some weapons around him (KFC, Darnold, etc.) And KAM's draft are shite.

This offense and team has no identity. That goes straight to the top.

And sorry, but Darnold looked the same to me. Sacked how many times? Two fumbles? One lost? Like 150 yards passing? For $100M+? No thanks.

And if the skill guys like JJ wanna pout and cry, catch the ****ing ball.

On one bright note, Turner seems to be getting better each week, IMHO.

9-3

Not sure what you guys have against winning. It's a puzzling phenomenon with you people.

Not every game can be perfect. Your expectations are unreasonable. The guy still has the #7 passer rating and #9 QB rating in the league. His team is 9-3. He's 23-6 (.793) during the regular season since the beginning of last season.

For $33-million, that's a huge bargain.

Defense is unbelievable.

The book is out on Darnold. A good defense can pressure him and give him happy feet. Running game and defense could carry SEA to one playoff victory.

You gotta protect him. Same with Jared Goff, who is averaging $53-million over four years. I don't see the Lions trying to part with Goff.

Like I said, your guys' expectations are unreasonable.


Unreasonable?
You were pounding the table for a QBOTF like Mahomes and Brady until we signed your USC QB. They had to reset the cap and Darnold has a portion of his last years contract on this years cap.

Darnold isn't something we missed on....we already had him and preferred Jones or giving JJ snaps.

Again how many snaps/throws did Darnold have until he was a serviceable NFL QB?

The whole key is still get JJ reps.....nothing is set in stone yet. The same philosphy is being used for Dart and Nix who also aren't rated very high.

Man, you are a glutton for punishment. JJ McCarthy is an awful player, plain and simple.

Comparing Darnold's start to McCarthy's is crazy talk. Darnold had absolutely nothing around him in New York. His receivers were Jamison Crowder, Braxton Berrios and Breshad Perriman. His running back was a broken down Frank Gore, who was in his 16th season in the NFL. His tight end was Chris Herndon.

You really want to make that comparison? He may have had the least talented team in league history around him.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 12/3/2025 8:30:28 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 1765
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 8:54:11 AM   
Lars


Posts: 11479
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Midi-chlorians
Status: offline
Still talking about Darnold?! Yawn.

Saw that dude play against MN the other day. He looked the same as before. 150 yards passing. Sacked 4 times while holding the ball too long. 2 fumbles and 1 lost. Several poor throws.

JJM may not turn into anything, but that doesn't mean Darnold is something special. They could both be poor QB who won't get us a SB.

_____________________________

<this space for rent>
Post #: 1766
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 9:17:48 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
Talk of the SB is the crux of it. The Lions game was one of the most important games in decades because a win would have meant HFA. It was monumental. Then Darnold put up a choke job for the ages.

Still, I was thinking ok Darnold pissed away HFA but if he plays just average vs the Rams he can at least be in the conversation about who will QB the team. Of course, he shit the bed. Again.

That was it. The end. It became crystal clear Darnold did not and does not have what it takes. Can you imagine how bad he would have freaked out if the team magically made it to the SB? He'd probably still be frozen in the locker room.

It was great news the team was going to go in another direction, because Darnold would NEVER be the guy. There are many unknown QBs out there that are not proven chokers. Darnold was, so cross him off the list.
Post #: 1767
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 9:50:02 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30525
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

For anyone who thought this was just a JJM problem and Brosmer would be the salve, need to see more? Hot garbage. That pick 6 was straight out of a HS game.

This is a KOC and KAM problem. Running an offense like you have a 10 year vet out there. KOC is not a developer of young QB. He can put a little polish on an old turd with some weapons around him (KFC, Darnold, etc.) And KAM's draft are shite.

This offense and team has no identity. That goes straight to the top.

And sorry, but Darnold looked the same to me. Sacked how many times? Two fumbles? One lost? Like 150 yards passing? For $100M+? No thanks.

And if the skill guys like JJ wanna pout and cry, catch the ****ing ball.

On one bright note, Turner seems to be getting better each week, IMHO.

9-3

Not sure what you guys have against winning. It's a puzzling phenomenon with you people.

Not every game can be perfect. Your expectations are unreasonable. The guy still has the #7 passer rating and #9 QB rating in the league. His team is 9-3. He's 23-6 (.793) during the regular season since the beginning of last season.

For $33-million, that's a huge bargain.

Defense is unbelievable.

The book is out on Darnold. A good defense can pressure him and give him happy feet. Running game and defense could carry SEA to one playoff victory.

You gotta protect him. Same with Jared Goff, who is averaging $53-million over four years. I don't see the Lions trying to part with Goff.

Like I said, your guys' expectations are unreasonable.


Unreasonable?
You were pounding the table for a QBOTF like Mahomes and Brady until we signed your USC QB. They had to reset the cap and Darnold has a portion of his last years contract on this years cap.

Darnold isn't something we missed on....we already had him and preferred Jones or giving JJ snaps.

Again how many snaps/throws did Darnold have until he was a serviceable NFL QB?

The whole key is still get JJ reps.....nothing is set in stone yet. The same philosphy is being used for Dart and Nix who also aren't rated very high.

Man, you are a glutton for punishment. JJ McCarthy is an awful player, plain and simple.

Comparing Darnold's start to McCarthy's is crazy talk. Darnold had absolutely nothing around him in New York. His receivers were Jamison Crowder, Braxton Berrios and Breshad Perriman. His running back was a broken down Frank Gore, who was in his 16th season in the NFL. His tight end was Chris Herndon.

You really want to make that comparison? He may have had the least talented team in league history around him.


So if they used the same philosophy on Sam as JJM.....where would Sam be right now?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 1768
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 10:20:49 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9857
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
.
adam thielen signed with the steelers....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 1769
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 11:09:48 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19950
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
Guys that shouldn't see the field next year for the Vikings:

Hock - barely makes the needle move
Jones - too hurt
Kelly - life at hand
Murphy - what a terrible extension. PFF ranked 172 CB
Addison - trade before he demands more cash
Smith - retire
1 of Hargravde/Allen - cut

Guy that shouldn't see the stadium for the Vikings:

KAM - send him packing and get a real personnel guy in there.
Post #: 1770
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 11:29:28 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Guys that shouldn't see the field next year for the Vikings:

Hock - barely makes the needle move
Jones - too hurt
Kelly - life at hand
Murphy - what a terrible extension. PFF ranked 172 CB
Addison - trade before he demands more cash
Smith - retire
1 of Hargravde/Allen - cut

Guy that shouldn't see the stadium for the Vikings:

KAM - send him packing and get a real personnel guy in there.


Perfect.
Post #: 1771
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 11:56:16 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 79875
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Talk of the SB is the crux of it. The Lions game was one of the most important games in decades because a win would have meant HFA. It was monumental. Then Darnold put up a choke job for the ages.

Still, I was thinking ok Darnold pissed away HFA but if he plays just average vs the Rams he can at least be in the conversation about who will QB the team. Of course, he shit the bed. Again.

That was it. The end. It became crystal clear Darnold did not and does not have what it takes. Can you imagine how bad he would have freaked out if the team magically made it to the SB? He'd probably still be frozen in the locker room.

It was great news the team was going to go in another direction, because Darnold would NEVER be the guy. There are many unknown QBs out there that are not proven chokers. Darnold was, so cross him off the list.


Against an absolutely decimated Lions defense.

They had given up 31, 48, 17 (to a 5 win Bears team) and 34 the previous 4 weeks.

We scored 9 points.

Then the Lions gave up 45 the next week in their only Playoff game.
Post #: 1772
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 12:11:02 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9857
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Guys that shouldn't see the field next year for the Vikings:

Hock - barely makes the needle move
Jones - too hurt
Kelly - life at hand
Murphy - what a terrible extension. PFF ranked 172 CB
Addison - trade before he demands more cash
Smith - retire
1 of Hargravde/Allen - cut

Guy that shouldn't see the stadium for the Vikings:

KAM - send him packing and get a real personnel guy in there.

.
okay, but you have to show the cap hits....

hock --- we save $9mm
jones --- we save $8mm
kelly --- we save $9mm
murphy --- it costs $13mm dead cap - murph sucked in 2023 - i knew this was a mistake
addison --- it's a wash, but where are you going to find another wr that good that cheep?
smith --- it costs $6mm...always been a ton of dead cap with smith - go figure....
allen --- we save $4mmm
hargrave --- we save $11mmm

fire kam - it costs the wilfs a few bucks, but the team can only gain from his departure

tell o'connell someone else calls plays for the rest of this season - he can quit if he wants

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 1773
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 12:52:33 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19950
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
addison --- it's a wash, but where are you going to find another wr that good that cheep?


Thanks for the cap stuff. I hadn't looked it up. For Addison, I'd feel better giving Nailor some cash (he won't cost as much) and bring in an older vet. With his off the field stuff and drops, IMO, he's not going to worth the money he's going to ask for.
Post #: 1774
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 12/3/2025 1:03:38 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31715
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Guys that shouldn't see the field next year for the Vikings:

Hock - barely makes the needle move
Jones - too hurt
Kelly - life at hand
Murphy - what a terrible extension. PFF ranked 172 CB
Addison - trade before he demands more cash
Smith - retire
1 of Hargravde/Allen - cut

Guy that shouldn't see the stadium for the Vikings:

KAM - send him packing and get a real personnel guy in there.

.
okay, but you have to show the cap hits....

hock --- we save $9mm
jones --- we save $8mm
kelly --- we save $9mm
murphy --- it costs $13mm dead cap - murph sucked in 2023 - i knew this was a mistake
addison --- it's a wash, but where are you going to find another wr that good that cheep?
smith --- it costs $6mm...always been a ton of dead cap with smith - go figure....
allen --- we save $4mmm
hargrave --- we save $11mmm

fire kam - it costs the wilfs a few bucks, but the team can only gain from his departure

tell o'connell someone else calls plays for the rest of this season - he can quit if he wants


Those are not cap hits but rather mostly cap savings.

Kelly - $12.1 savings on OverTheCap ($0 guaranteed money, just salary, roster bonus, and workout bonus).

Smith will be a UFA after the season but yes his current cap hits are void year cap... right now to the tune of another 3 years and $10.6 million depending on what site is accessed. Stuck paying it one way or the other.

Murphy - keeping him around another year then cutting him changes a $10.2 mil cap hit to $10.8 cap savings.

Addison - I think the idea was to get return value for him while he still has another year on the rookie contract. After that, with free agency looming he probably won't be traded. So we're faced with agreeing to his terms or seeing him walk w/o any return. With WR salaries, I doubt they franchise him. Edit: I see Jeff explained his (different) rationale.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 12/3/2025 1:06:25 PM >
Post #: 1775
Page:   <<   < prev  68 69 70 [71] 72   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  68 69 70 [71] 72   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode