RE: 2015 WR's.

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: 2015 WR's.

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2015 WR's.

Page: << < prev 137 138 [139] 140 141 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 2015 WR's. - 12/20/2015 8:51:57 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

The Vikings will lose to either the Packers or Cardinals in the 1st round, or maybe to Seattle if Vikes win the division.

Right now I can't imagine a scenario where the Vikes win a game in the 1st round of the playoffs.

Post #: 3451

RE: 2015 WR's. - 12/20/2015 9:09:54 PM

Todd M

Posts: 40681
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline

Sucks to be you then.

Cause after than win no real person is fretting 1st round playoff matches.

Post #: 3452

RE: 2015 WR's. - 12/20/2015 9:12:12 PM 1 votes

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Sucks to be you then.

Cause after than win no real person is fretting 1st round playoff matches.

Its like those people who whine that winning the lottery would suck, due to all the taxes and shit ......

Post #: 3453

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/3/2016 7:28:16 PM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18933
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

Going for the improbable: Vikes & Packers TIE tonight. Vikes host Seattle for the NFC championship.

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 3454

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/4/2016 2:20:24 AM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Winning the division shouldn't be like winning the lottery. Packers had an off season, still won 10 games, and are still alive in the playofss.

The winner of Seattle/Minnesota might win the NFC, just not liking the Vikings' chances in the game very much at the moment. Probably better to bask in the glory of beating GB, then to think about another possible blowout loss next week.

Post #: 3455

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/4/2016 3:12:30 PM

Bill Johanesen

Posts: 28600
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Winning the division shouldn't be like winning the lottery. Packers had an off season, still won 10 games, and are still alive in the playofss.

The winner of Seattle/Minnesota might win the NFC, just not liking the Vikings' chances in the game very much at the moment. Probably better to bask in the glory of beating GB, then to think about another possible blowout loss next week.

I'm ****ing basking in the basking glory of witnessing the change of the guard in the NFC North last night! And packer scum can kiss my ass!

Post #: 3456

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/4/2016 3:26:36 PM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18933
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Winning the division shouldn't be like winning the lottery. Packers had an off season, still won 10 games, and are still alive in the playofss.

The winner of Seattle/Minnesota might win the NFC, just not liking the Vikings' chances in the game very much at the moment. Probably better to bask in the glory of beating GB, then to think about another possible blowout loss next week.

I'm ****ing basking in the basking glory of witnessing the change of the guard in the NFC North last night! And packer scum can kiss my ass!

Ew. Are you sure you want Packer scum in contact with your ass? Sounds dangerous.

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 3457

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 3:11:09 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Vikings over Seahawks
Packers over Wash

Panthers over Packers
Vikings over Cardinals

Panthers over Vikings

AFC

Texans over Chiefs
Steelers over Bengals

Patriots over Steelers
Broncos over Texans

Patriots over Broncos

Super Bowl

Patriots over Panthers

Post #: 3458

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 4:08:08 PM

Tim Cady

Posts: 10549
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: Wonderful World
Status: offline

Vikings over Seahawks - 29-17
Packers over Washington

Vikings over Cardinals
Packers over Panthers

Vikings host NFC Championship game, crush the Packers

Chiefs over Texans
Steelers over Bengals

Steelers over Denver
Patriots over Chiefs

Patriots host and beat Steelers AFC Championship game.

Vikings over Patriots in Super Bowl. With a little game planning help from Parcells and Tom Coughlin(I don't know if Zimmer know Coughlin but they are both from the tree, thinking that would be the brain I pick if I was facing Bellicheat in the Super Bowl).

_____________________________

Go the extra mile, it's never crowded!

Post #: 3459

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 5:45:43 PM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

So ..... If that happens Timbo, it's been nice knowing ya.
I'll die happy however.

Post #: 3460

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 6:58:54 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

We win against Sea, don't know how - am feeling a vibe, though

Vikes lose the flip and have to receive against AZ. CP atones for his error versus GB returning the opening kickoff for a TD. Our D holds them to 3 and out. Things start to tighten up on AZ and they never recover.

Championship game, and last game for the Vikings, at TCF Bank Stadium. We go out with a big bang: BOOM!

Post #: 3461

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 7:04:21 PM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18933
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

I'm torn. Do I want the Vikes to beat the Seahawks, Cards, whoever, and then Denver? To get revenge for three losses this season?

Or KC, revenge for Superbowl IV?

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 3462

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 7:11:17 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidAOlson

I'm torn. Do I want the Vikes to beat the Seahawks, Cards, whoever, and then Denver? To get revenge for three losses this season?

Or KC, revenge for Superbowl IV?

KC is so ancient history for me. However, I think we beat KC easier than Denver and I'll take a win anyway we can get it.

Post #: 3463

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 9:21:51 PM

thebigo

Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidAOlson

I'm torn. Do I want the Vikes to beat the Seahawks, Cards, whoever, and then Denver? To get revenge for three losses this season?

Or KC, revenge for Superbowl IV?

Pittsburgh would be a revenge game too.

Post #: 3464

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/8/2016 11:36:20 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Championship game, and last game for the Vikings, at TCF Bank Stadium. We go out with a big bang: BOOM!

Is that with a win or loss Ricky ? And if so, against whom ?

Post #: 3465

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/9/2016 8:13:24 AM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18933
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavidAOlson

I'm torn. Do I want the Vikes to beat the Seahawks, Cards, whoever, and then Denver? To get revenge for three losses this season?

Or KC, revenge for Superbowl IV?

Pittsburgh would be a revenge game too.

One this year, one next?

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 3466

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/9/2016 6:52:46 PM

Ian Joseph

Posts: 15350
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Championship game, and last game for the Vikings, at TCF Bank Stadium. We go out with a big bang: BOOM!

Is that with a win or loss Ricky ? And if so, against whom ?

Dude, nobody is calling for us to lose an NFCCG in Minnesota. Granted, most of us aren't talking about games that we haven't yet earned the right to play, but for the people that are?! Cmon, Marty.

_____________________________

Hate the message, not the messenger.

Enjoy the process; crave the goal.

Believe.

Post #: 3467

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/9/2016 6:56:08 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Ian, obviously Ricky saying 'Boom!', meant a WIN, I was just playin'.

Post #: 3468

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/9/2016 6:58:56 PM

Ian Joseph

Posts: 15350
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline

You heard it here first.. both the Rams and Chargers move to Los Angeles.

The stadium project to be approved will be delayed, as the NFL encourages the Rams and Chargers to work together on a solution. And the Chargers will get a sizable NFL kickback later that will offset a large portion of their stadium contribution or relocation fee.

_____________________________

Hate the message, not the messenger.

Enjoy the process; crave the goal.

Believe.

Post #: 3469

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/9/2016 9:28:42 PM

bohumm

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian Joseph

You heard it here first.. both the Rams and Chargers move to Los Angeles.

The stadium project to be approved will be delayed, as the NFL encourages the Rams and Chargers to work together on a solution. And the Chargers will get a sizable NFL kickback later that will offset a large portion of their stadium contribution or relocation fee.

I agree with this. I think the Raiders and 49ers are compelled to share a stadium. The St Louis proposal won't entice anyone.

Post #: 3470

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/11/2016 6:19:22 AM

Todd M

Posts: 40681
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline

JT2:

quote:

Redskins will beat the Packers. Seriously, they will demolish them.

So close! People carry Pete around on their shoulders every time he gets one right...like these clunkers of a prediction don't exist...

Post #: 3471

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 1:41:41 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

NE over KC - I think this game will go to overtime, Pats win just by a FG

GB over Arizona - Whichever team has more players coming out of the game before halftime, that will be the team to lose. If Davante Adams doesn't play this one, that means he only allowed himself to be uninjured for the Redskins' game, assuming the Pack would win that one, whIle losing to Minnesota and Arizona. Abracadabra will have to pick up the slack in his absence in order for GB to win.

Post #: 3472

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 1:45:16 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Seattle over Carolina - Wilson over Newton if it's a close game, it could be a lopsided win for Carolina, but I think a close game is more likely.

Denver over Pittsburgh - I think God wants Peyton to win this one.

Post #: 3473

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 1:58:44 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

You may be right

Post #: 3474

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 2:36:10 PM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian Joseph

You heard it here first.. both the Rams and Chargers move to Los Angeles.

The stadium project to be approved will be delayed, as the NFL encourages the Rams and Chargers to work together on a solution. And the Chargers will get a sizable NFL kickback later that will offset a large portion of their stadium contribution or relocation fee.

I agree with this. I think the Raiders and 49ers are compelled to share a stadium. The St Louis proposal won't entice anyone.

How wrong you both were.

Edit: guess Ian has Rams up there to move. I hope Chargers stay in SD as well as Oak staying put. Heard the NFL is kicking in a cool 100ml per for new stadium or renovations if each stays put.

That would be something if all 3 moved into the same stadium. They would all die a slow death

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3475