RE: 2015 WR's.

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: 2015 WR's.

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2015 WR's.

Page: << < prev 138 139 [140] 141 142 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 3:18:41 PM

69in09

Posts: 8480
Joined: 1/13/2009
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline

The 50th anniversary of the NFL is supposed to be honoring the previous 49 Super Bowls and featured a lot of rematches of Super Bowls in the regular season.

With the remaining 8 teams there are 16 possible matchups for SB 50. By my count, 9 of those matchups would be repeats.

GB has played all the remaining AFC teams in a SB. KC, NE, Den and Pitt.

Seattle has been to 3 SB vs NE, Pitt and Denver.

CAR has been to 1 SB vs NE.

Ariz has been to 1 SB, vs Pitt.

Is it just me or does this seem like quite a coincidence?

_____________________________

This is my burner account.

Post #: 3476

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 4:01:41 PM

Daniel Lee Young

Posts: 14004
Status: offline

way to pad the post count...

_____________________________

**** you all.

Post #: 3477

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 7:04:21 PM

Tim Cady

Posts: 10549
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: Wonderful World
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tim Cady

Vikings over Seahawks - 29-17
Packers over Washington

Vikings over Cardinals
Packers over Panthers

Vikings host NFC Championship game, crush the Packers

Chiefs over Texans
Steelers over Bengals

Steelers over Denver
Patriots over Chiefs

Patriots host and beat Steelers AFC Championship game.

Vikings over Patriots in Super Bowl. With a little game planning help from Parcells and Tom Coughlin(I don't know if Zimmer know Coughlin but they are both from the tree, thinking that would be the brain I pick if I was facing Bellicheat in the Super Bowl).

I forgot to update after the Vikings won but lost last week. I stand by my AFC predictions and I think Seattle beats Panthers. Arizona over the Packers.

Seattle over Arizona

Seattle beats New England in Revenge Super Bowl rematch.

_____________________________

Go the extra mile, it's never crowded!

Post #: 3478

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/16/2016 9:17:53 PM

JC2015

Posts: 4922
Joined: 4/27/2015
Status: offline

I think the winner of Seattle-Carolina faces New England in the SB

Post #: 3479

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/18/2016 8:25:31 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

Looking like NE vs Car

Car wins

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3480

RE: 2015 WR's. - 1/18/2016 10:00:40 AM

Steve Lentz

Posts: 36196
Joined: 7/19/2007
From: Omaha
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tim Cady

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tim Cady

Vikings over Seahawks - 29-17
Packers over Washington

Vikings over Cardinals
Packers over Panthers

Vikings host NFC Championship game, crush the Packers

Chiefs over Texans
Steelers over Bengals

Steelers over Denver
Patriots over Chiefs

Patriots host and beat Steelers AFC Championship game.

Vikings over Patriots in Super Bowl. With a little game planning help from Parcells and Tom Coughlin(I don't know if Zimmer know Coughlin but they are both from the tree, thinking that would be the brain I pick if I was facing Bellicheat in the Super Bowl).

I forgot to update after the Vikings won but lost last week. I stand by my AFC predictions and I think Seattle beats Panthers. Arizona over the Packers.

Seattle over Arizona

Seattle beats New England in Revenge Super Bowl rematch.

Random thoughts on the playoffs.

Seattle was my pick as the best team. Wilson made some fantastic plays, but the 2 picks were too much to overcome. He also missed an easy touchdown to Baldwin in the 2nd half.

Newton is IMO the best player in football. I think Carolina can beat anyone, but their secondary can be exposed.

I would like to see Fitz and Arizona win it all, but just am not sold on them.

Will Brady win another one?

< Message edited by Steve Lentz -- 1/18/2016 10:02:42 AM >

_____________________________

" I believe empathy is the most essential quality of civilization"

Post #: 3481

RE: 2015 WR's. - 2/5/2016 7:54:42 AM

JC2015

Posts: 4922
Joined: 4/27/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JC2015

@ San Francisco W 24-23 - Bridgewater leads a late drive and Gary Anderson nails a game winning FG
Detroit W 31-17 Peterson goes off for 180 yards
San Diego W 19-13 neither offense gets untracked
@ Denver L 38-24 young DBs get exposed.
Kansas City W 27-21 Alex Smith scares me not
@ Detroit L 31-23 Stafford has one of his up games
@ Chicago W 27-17 workmanlike win
St. Louis W 24-10 not afraid of Nick Foles
@ Oakland W 27-24 Raiders show a low more than people expect, Vikings looking forward
Green Bay W 34-31 game that establishes this team with the national media as a contender
@ Atlanta L 30-17 letdown + good year from Ryan
Seattle W 27-23 Seattle caught looking forward
@ Arizona W 23-16 Palmer injured by then
Chicago W 42-13 the wheels have fallen off in Chicago by then
NY Giants W 44-26 No JPP = bad Giants defense
@ Green Bay L 33-31 tough nail biter

The only ones I really nailed were the first Lions game, second Bears game and the Giants game

Post #: 3482

RE: 2015 WR's. - 2/5/2016 7:56:45 AM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JC2015

quote:

ORIGINAL: JC2015

@ San Francisco W 24-23 - Bridgewater leads a late drive and Gary Anderson nails a game winning FG
Detroit W 31-17 Peterson goes off for 180 yards
San Diego W 19-13 neither offense gets untracked
@ Denver L 38-24 young DBs get exposed.
Kansas City W 27-21 Alex Smith scares me not
@ Detroit L 31-23 Stafford has one of his up games
@ Chicago W 27-17 workmanlike win
St. Louis W 24-10 not afraid of Nick Foles
@ Oakland W 27-24 Raiders show a low more than people expect, Vikings looking forward
Green Bay W 34-31 game that establishes this team with the national media as a contender
@ Atlanta L 30-17 letdown + good year from Ryan
Seattle W 27-23 Seattle caught looking forward
@ Arizona W 23-16 Palmer injured by then
Chicago W 42-13 the wheels have fallen off in Chicago by then
NY Giants W 44-26 No JPP = bad Giants defense
@ Green Bay L 33-31 tough nail biter

The only ones I really nailed were the first Lions game, second Bears game and the Giants game

See, John admits it when he's wrong! JK -- seriously, couldn't help it!

Post #: 3483

RE: 2015 WR's. - 2/5/2016 8:03:09 AM

JC2015

Posts: 4922
Joined: 4/27/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JC2015

2015 NFL Predictions

NFC

North
Vikings 12-4 | 11-5
Packers 11-5 | 10-6
Lions 7-9 | correct
Bears 5-11 | 6-10

South
Panthers 10-6 | 15-1
atnaltA 9-7 | 8-8
Saints 7-9 | correct
Bucs 4-12 | 6-10

West
Seahwaks 13-3 | 10-6
Cardinals 11-5 | 13-3
49ers 8-8 | 5-11
Rams 7-9 | correct

East
Giants 9-7 | 6-10
Cowboys 8-8 | 4-12
Eagles 7-9 | correct
Washingtons 5-11 | 9-7

16 teams

4 correct
4 within 1 game of my prediction

2 that were 2 games off
6 more than 2 games off

Not too bad

At least I pretty much nailed the NFC North!

Post #: 3484

RE: 2015 WR's. - 2/5/2016 8:07:56 AM

JC2015

Posts: 4922
Joined: 4/27/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JC2015

AFC

East
Patriots 11-5 (based on 2 game susp) | 12-4
Bills 11-5 | 8-8
Jets 9-7 | 10-6
Fish 6-10 | correct

West
Chiefs 9-7 | 11-5
Chargers 10-6 | 4-12
Broncos 7-9 | 12-4
Raiders 6-10 | 7-9

North
Ravens 10-6 | 5-11 (no Flacco)
Steelers 10-6 | correct
Bengals 7-9 | 12-4
Browns 4-12 | 3-13

South
Colts 10-6 | 8-8 (no Luck)
Texans 10-6 | 9-7
Titans 6-10 | 3-13
Jags 6-10 | 5-11

Did worse in the AFC

2 correct
6 within 1 game

2 within 2 games
6 more than 2 games off

Post #: 3485

RE: 2015 WR's. - 5/6/2016 7:00:58 AM

Todd M

Posts: 40681
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online

Two Vikings WR's will top any of the best marks over the last 5 years.

>6TD's.
> 967 yards

Post #: 3486

RE: 2015 WR's. - 5/6/2016 3:20:41 PM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Two Vikings WR's will top any of the best marks over the last 5 years.

>6TD's.
> 967 yards

Two WRs topping 6 TDs is feasible. Two topping 967 Yards is very doubtful. Diggs and Treadwell would probably have to be the ones to do it. Asking a rookie and a second year 5th round pick to both get a 1000 yards I would bet against it.

Post #: 3487

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/16/2016 8:33:33 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

People seem pretty optimistic about the Vikings this coming season, and I think reasonably so. I am probably a little more cautiously optimistic just because the NFL can be pretty unpredictable and I just have a feeling they will fall a little bit short of expectations.

Post #: 3488

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/16/2016 8:36:23 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

I am curious if people are more hopeful like I am, or do they feel more confidence as far as expecting good results.

I am curious as to what percentage chance do others think of for the Vikes winning the the division ?

I put it at 60/ (percent) Packers, 35 / Vikings, 4 / Bears, and 1 / Lions.

Post #: 3489

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/16/2016 9:25:42 PM

Brad H

Posts: 22986
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I am curious if people are more hopeful like I am, or do they feel more confidence as far as expecting good results.

I am curious as to what percentage chance do others think of for the Vikes winning the the division ?

I put it at 60/ (percent) Packers, 35 / Vikings, 4 / Bears, and 1 / Lions.

Defense will keep us in most games. If our QB goes down, we could be in big trouble. That was one thing they did not address in the off-season, which is a bit puzzling to me given the importance of the position.

The good news is, the QB's all looked strong last week.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3490

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/17/2016 10:15:16 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Does a 35 percent chance of winning the division for the Vikings sound about right to you guys and gals, or what percentage would YOU put it at, and why ?

Post #: 3491

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/17/2016 10:22:28 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

Post #: 3492

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/17/2016 11:02:39 PM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Does a 35 percent chance of winning the division for the Vikings sound about right to you guys and gals, or what percentage would YOU put it at, and why ?

Marty I put it at about 80%. About the only thing that can stop us is injuries. We are just way too far ahead of the rest of the pack IMO.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/18/2016 12:17:49 AM >

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 3493

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/17/2016 11:46:52 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

LOVE your optimism KGDABOM !

Anybody else feeling that good ?

Post #: 3494

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 8:04:31 AM

Brad H

Posts: 22986
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

LOVE your optimism KGDABOM !

Anybody else feeling that good ?

Tougher schedule, lots of Packers in a contract seasons, bullseye on the back. I say the Packers are a slight favorite.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3495

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 9:01:40 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

I think the Packers are going to fall on their face this season.

The signs were beginning to appear last year during the second half of the season. Finger pointing and McCarthy starting to lose the locker room. Coaches wear thin after being the HC of a team for so long.

There is also a disconnect between Erin and McCarthy as well and became evident when Erin was throwing his receivers under the bus to the media.

Packers 7-9 or worse

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3496

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 9:07:07 AM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

I'm talking to my Bears fan buddy yesterday. Of course he thinks the Packers are going to be great this year. I ask, "Why, what is so different?" Because they got J Nelson back ... really? They're going to the SB because the got a receiver back?

Post #: 3497

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 9:41:13 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

I'm talking to my Bears fan buddy yesterday. Of course he thinks the Packers are going to be great this year. I ask, "Why, what is so different?" Because they got J Nelson back ... really? They're going to the SB because the got a receiver back?

Very much a crap shoot as to whether Jordy will be Jordy or just another wr.

He hasn't even been able to practice yet although was just taken off the PUP late yesterday.

He tore his acl last preseason. Being 31 I doubt he will be the same guy.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3498

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 9:52:31 AM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39281
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online

Eddie Lacy is in better shape and Jordy's back.

That is apparently enough to put the pukers over the top.

Nothing else has changed from the team we beat for the NFCN title.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”

Post #: 3499

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/18/2016 10:00:44 AM

DavidAOlson

Posts: 18933
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

I'm talking to my Bears fan buddy yesterday. Of course he thinks the Packers are going to be great this year. I ask, "Why, what is so different?" Because they got J Nelson back ... really? They're going to the SB because the got a receiver back?

Very much a crap shoot as to whether Jordy will be Jordy or just another wr.

He hasn't even been able to practice yet although was just taken off the PUP late yesterday.

He tore his acl last preseason. Being 31 I doubt he will be the same guy.

He certainly won't be the uninjured 29-year-old that people remember. He's 2 years downhill, even if he had recovered completely.

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice

Post #: 3500