DavidAOlson
Posts: 18935
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: John Childress I had the same thought The teams that are normally powerhouses I see falling off somewhat I just can't see New England winning 12 games without Welker, Hernandez, and maybe Gronk I probably rate atnaltA too low because I still hate them from 98 I don't believe in Houston SF may be a little low but we have to see how that style of offense goes for a full year plus they had a key injury Any team with a running QB has a huge variance in the number of wins. Maybe they win 15, maybe 6. Because the Vikes depend so much on AD, and he has a significant risk of injury, their win range is also big. A team like Denver, which minimizes the risk to their key player, should have a narrower range. In the playoffs, a team that takes risks with a running QB will be more likely to win the Superbowl. They'll also be more likely to lose their first game.
_____________________________
I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice
|