RE: College Football (Future Vikings!)

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!)

Page: << < prev 123 124 [125] 126 127 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 2:18:54 PM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

Personally, that Buffs area and campus seemed like heaven to me back in the day.
Was always shocked they fell off the map. And saddened.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3101

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 2:31:35 PM

McMurfy

Posts: 13790
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

Personally, that Buffs area and campus seemed like heaven to me back in the day.
Was always shocked they fell off the map. And saddened.

It is, may have mentioned it before, but my Sister went there and I visited when I was around 22.
I walked around campus one day in the Spring when she was at class and I did not see one girl that wasn't hot.
All long legs, pretty faces and tanned skin.

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!

Post #: 3102

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 2:37:00 PM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

As usual you read between my lines.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3103

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 3:38:20 PM

Brad H

Posts: 22611
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

I'd like to see all conferences limited to eight teams. That way they could play every team in their conference. Big conferences is ruining college football, IMO.

The Big Ten has 14 teams. That says it all. Especially when only three of them are really big, and the rest are mediocre (at-best). I see zero value in Rutgers and Maryland being a part of the conference. I barely see any value in Penn State.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 11/30/2016 3:40:34 PM >

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3104

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 4:21:28 PM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17809
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

I'd like to see all conferences limited to eight teams. That way they could play every team in their conference. Big conferences is ruining college football, IMO.

The Big Ten has 14 teams. That says it all. Especially when only three of them are really big, and the rest are mediocre (at-best). I see zero value in Rutgers and Maryland being a part of the conference. I barely see any value in Penn State.

SEC has 14 as well. They only have a big 1

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3105

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 5:18:50 PM

Jeff Jesser

Posts: 19062
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

I'd like to see all conferences limited to eight teams. That way they could play every team in their conference. Big conferences is ruining college football, IMO.

The Big Ten has 14 teams. That says it all. Especially when only three of them are really big, and the rest are mediocre (at-best). I see zero value in Rutgers and Maryland being a part of the conference. I barely see any value in Penn State.

Gives the Gophers 2 legit chances at conference wins?

Post #: 3106

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 5:34:29 PM

Brad H

Posts: 22611
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

I'd like to see all conferences limited to eight teams. That way they could play every team in their conference. Big conferences is ruining college football, IMO.

The Big Ten has 14 teams. That says it all. Especially when only three of them are really big, and the rest are mediocre (at-best). I see zero value in Rutgers and Maryland being a part of the conference. I barely see any value in Penn State.

SEC has 14 as well. They only have a big 1

Agreed. When you have 14 in your conference, you shouldn't be playing Chattanooga or the Citadel in week 11. It should be against league rules. What I have always said is, if you schedule them and lose you should have to forfeit your bowl eligibility.

That's what I like about Pac 12 football. They schedule solid, non-conference opponents. It jumps up and bites them from time-to-time, but if I'm a season ticket holder I want my money's worth. USC had Alabama, Utah State and Notre Dame as non-conference opponents this season. UCLA had Texas A&M, UNLV and BYU. Ticket holders should demand it.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 11/30/2016 5:40:24 PM >

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3107

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 11/30/2016 7:34:18 PM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17809
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

CFB is simply not regulated. Reminds me of how the sport of Boxing was conducted.

If the B10 or P12 champs don't get in the playoff it's a sham. more of an invitational than a playoff.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3108

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/1/2016 8:02:05 AM

Brad H

Posts: 22611
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

CFB is simply not regulated. Reminds me of how the sport of Boxing was conducted.

If the B10 or P12 champs don't get in the playoff it's a sham. more of an invitational than a playoff.

Truthfully, I think it's going to be USC and Michigan in the Rose Bowl, who many think are the best teams in the two conferences. I watched nearly the entire Michigan/Ohio State game last weekend. I thought Michigan was a better football team than Ohio State.

If Washington wins, they are very likely to be in the big four, which means the next highest rated team from the Pac 12 goes to the Rose Bowl. With a loss, Colorado would likely drop below USC in the rankings. The only thing holding back Michigan would be that Wisconsin or Penn State would have to pass up Michigan in the rankings. I don't think the polls will allow that.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3109

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/1/2016 8:10:16 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17809
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

CFB is simply not regulated. Reminds me of how the sport of Boxing was conducted.

If the B10 or P12 champs don't get in the playoff it's a sham. more of an invitational than a playoff.

Truthfully, I think it's going to be USC and Michigan in the Rose Bowl, who many think are the best teams in the two conferences. I watched nearly the entire Michigan/Ohio State game last weekend. I thought Michigan was a better football team than Ohio State.

If Washington wins, they are very likely to be in the big four, which means the next highest rated team from the Pac 12 goes to the Rose Bowl. With a loss, Colorado would likely drop below USC in the rankings. The only thing holding back Michigan would be that Wisconsin or Penn State would have to pass up Michigan in the rankings. I don't think the polls will allow that.

Agree on Michigan being the best B10 team.

If Wash and Clemson were to lose it would put the committie in a spot they don't want to be in.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3110

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/1/2016 8:23:27 AM

Brad H

Posts: 22611
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

CFB is simply not regulated. Reminds me of how the sport of Boxing was conducted.

If the B10 or P12 champs don't get in the playoff it's a sham. more of an invitational than a playoff.

Truthfully, I think it's going to be USC and Michigan in the Rose Bowl, who many think are the best teams in the two conferences. I watched nearly the entire Michigan/Ohio State game last weekend. I thought Michigan was a better football team than Ohio State.

If Washington wins, they are very likely to be in the big four, which means the next highest rated team from the Pac 12 goes to the Rose Bowl. With a loss, Colorado would likely drop below USC in the rankings. The only thing holding back Michigan would be that Wisconsin or Penn State would have to pass up Michigan in the rankings. I don't think the polls will allow that.

Agree on Michigan being the best B10 team.

If Wash and Clemson were to lose it would put the committie in a spot they don't want to be in.

It wouldn't stun me to see Clemson lose. In fact, I'm kind of pulling for it. I would love to see Washington move up to #3 and play Ohio State, with Michigan getting destroyed by Alabama.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 12/1/2016 8:25:49 AM >

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!

Post #: 3111

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 8:18:57 AM

Andy Lowe

Posts: 6655
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: Dublin, OH
Status: offline

More than anything what this year is showing, is that 4 spots are not enough.

Other than Bama there's about 6 teams that have legit arguments either way

I've long thought to be thorough we should have 8 teams in or 10 with top 2 getting a bye

4 is just not enough IMO

Post #: 3112

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 8:41:15 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17809
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

I think they knew that going in. But rather than setting it up correctly the first time they seem to insist on taking baby steps

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3113

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 8:42:16 AM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

My Buffs proved they are not-ready-for-prime-time, yet.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3114

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 9:44:41 AM

McMurfy

Posts: 13790
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

My Buffs proved they are not-ready-for-prime-time, yet.

Hung tough in the first half, headed in the right direction, but that is also a pretty complete Washington team.

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!

Post #: 3115

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 9:45:13 AM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

Agreed
Hope it doesn't derail the rebuild.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3116

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 10:08:36 AM

Jeff Jesser

Posts: 19062
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline

Be patient my man. The Gophers have proven that a rebuild take a minimum of 55 years.

Post #: 3117

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 10:13:25 AM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Be patient my man. The Gophers have proven that a rebuild take a minimum of 55 years.

Sweet. I'll be 110. I can do it.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3118

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 1:56:46 PM

bohumm

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Lowe

More than anything what this year is showing, is that 4 spots are not enough.

Other than Bama there's about 6 teams that have legit arguments either way

I've long thought to be thorough we should have 8 teams in or 10 with top 2 getting a bye

4 is just not enough IMO

As soon as it's clear that the most money can be made by the most people- --other than the players, of course- -this will happen. It's all about money for the powers that be in college football.

Post #: 3119

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 2:00:02 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18174
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

Personally, that Buffs area and campus seemed like heaven to me back in the day.
Was always shocked they fell off the map. And saddened.

Downtown Boulder and the ped mall area is a special place for sure. As is Iowa City and Madison. A very pleasant buzz about those places

Post #: 3120

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 2:52:00 PM

SoMnFan

Posts: 94902
Status: offline

Sooners stretching out the lead over Okie State 38-20 with nine left.

_____________________________

Work like a Captain.
Play like a Pirate.

Post #: 3121

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 7:59:41 PM

bohumm

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

Personally, that Buffs area and campus seemed like heaven to me back in the day.
Was always shocked they fell off the map. And saddened.

Downtown Boulder and the ped mall area is a special place for sure. As is Iowa City and Madison. A very pleasant buzz about those places

I thought the pleasant buzz I felt in Madison when I went to school there had more to do with what caused me to drop out and enter rehab than something special about the place. Seriously, though, I always thought a good college town would be a perfect place to live, especially in retirement.

Post #: 3122

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/3/2016 8:40:46 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18174
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Anyone know much about the new Buffs coach?
Used to love Colorado, while overlooking the whole bible-thumping thing.
Glad to see them return to relevancy.

Glad they're on the rise.
Colorado and Utah have been great additions to the Pac-12.
I'd like to see a Texas school add and one other at some point.

Personally, that Buffs area and campus seemed like heaven to me back in the day.
Was always shocked they fell off the map. And saddened.

Downtown Boulder and the ped mall area is a special place for sure. As is Iowa City and Madison. A very pleasant buzz about those places

I thought the pleasant buzz I felt in Madison when I went to school there had more to do with what caused me to drop out and enter rehab than something special about the place. Seriously, though, I always thought a good college town would be a perfect place to live, especially in retirement.

I never really went downtown Madison until last July when Donna and I wanted to get away for a weekend. We headed to Madison and it happened to be Art Fair in the Square weekend. Wonderful place. So's Boulder. And I lived in Iowa City. Pleasant buzz indeed - nothing mind altering for me.

When I would go to Iowa City in my late teens, though, there definitely was a serious buzz going on, no doubt!

Post #: 3123

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/4/2016 7:15:10 AM

Jason Dorn

Posts: 6282
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Minnesota-born and raised
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Lowe

More than anything what this year is showing, is that 4 spots are not enough.

Other than Bama there's about 6 teams that have legit arguments either way

I've long thought to be thorough we should have 8 teams in or 10 with top 2 getting a bye

4 is just not enough IMO

As soon as it's clear that the most money can be made by the most people- --other than the players, of course- -this will happen. It's all about money for the powers that be in college football.

12-is a possiblity. Keep the computer system. Weight Conference Championships and appearances.

Top 4 seeds receive a bye into Quarter Finals and select in order one of the 4 sites ... for example Sugar, Orange, Rose, Fiesta are sites on New Years day. Alabama is first and selects the Sugar etc.

Seeds 5-12 playoff week after Conference Championships with winners facing top 4 seeds in Quarter Finals and the loser eligible for a bowl.

5-8 either host or select a site such as Atlanta, Detroit, Seattle, Yankee Stadium, Minneapolis, St Louis, Indy etc. with 5 selecting first.

For arguments sake a undefeated W Mich team passes Ok St (no champ game) and Loiusville earning the 12th seed.

Wisconsin and Colorado fall but not out based on appearing in Champ game, however Oklahoma does pass both.

Michigan the 5th seed either selects site or hosts 12th seed Western Michigan. 6 vs 11 Penn St vs Florida State 7/10 Oklahoma vs USC 8/9 Wisconsin vs Colorado.

Either bracket or re-seed for quarter finals. Semi finals the next week and the Championship in a week or 2.

< Message edited by Jason Dorn -- 12/4/2016 7:19:45 AM >

_____________________________

Skol ... Vikings can win the Super Bowl.

Post #: 3124

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 12/4/2016 8:36:35 AM

Jeff Jesser

Posts: 19062
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline

Gonna be some pissed off fans out there today. May finally lead to the riots that blow up the 4 game only system. Who ya got? I know OSU will get in on past accomplishments but they got beat by the conference champs.

Hell if that were part of the criteria Minnesota only has 1 less National Champ. Shouldn't we be considered?