bohumm
Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro quote:
ORIGINAL: McMurfy quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: McMurfy quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm Here's what I proposed in a column in the Twin Cities Reader (Way Back Machine alert): Make football and basketball players paid employees of their schools’ marketing/fundraising/alumni relations operations, since that's their primary function in the money machine. As employees, they would be free to take classes at no cost just like other employees, but would not be required to do so. However, since it would be better for marketing/fundraising/alumni relations if they enroll and attend classes, they would get a nominal bonus for doing so. They’d get better bonuses for actually advancing toward graduation and graduating, as these further boost marketing/fundraising/alumni relations effectiveness. Easy, and honest Neither easy nor honest. Think about all of the trouble college athletes get in now, with time/class/study table,limitations placed upon them as student athletes. Now give them more time and money and drop them in the geography of the general student population. Recipe for disaster. Nice that you think so highly of your beloved. Fine on the field, but keep them out of my neighborhood. This is essentially what happens now for the guys who would be a problem anyway. And Bohumm, I don't have a neighborhood, I bought acreage to keep everybody out of my neighborhood. My neighbors are all Douglas Firs Sounds sweet Murf. I have 88 acres of solitude and find that if you don't have a long enough driveway so you are in the middle of it someone can still squat across the road. That's fine as long as it's not a college football player----unless you live across the road from a stadium
|