CPAMAN
Posts: 36324
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed quote:
ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed quote:
ORIGINAL: CPAMAN quote:
ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed quote:
ORIGINAL: CPAMAN Zach Greinke apparently had an opt-out clause in his contract with the Dodgers. He was (is) still signed for another three years at something like $71 million. Not enough money you say? So Greinke decides to become a free agent knowing that the Giants are vying for his services. Well, I say screw you to Zach Greinke! I hope the guy has arm trouble the rest of his career. The greed has become beyond compare. Any team that signs him to a longer contract is simply insane. He may have another one good season, perhaps two, and three good seasons would be a long shot. The Dodgers contract would have paid him through what probably will be his last three decent seasons, if that. Signing him to more money for more season is simply beyond idiotic. And shame on Greinke for being such an asshole. Opt outs are the new hedge by the upper level players, seeing how the market changes for $$$$ Tell me you wouldn't do that if you were a player. I wouldn't. I would honor my contract. $61 million? Your lifestyle cannot possibly change if you have a $100 million net worth or $140 million net worth. You are splitting hairs. Not to mention the real issue that is team loyalty and, oh, by the way, you signed a frickin contract. Honor the damn thing! Agents AND teams have to agree to these things, so the team knows this could well happen. Opt outs are in the NBA too. It's part of the deal. it's a hedge on both sides. If Greinke had struggled the past 2 years,no way does he opt-out. Because the market wouldn't pay him what he's getting. That's the risk/reward of these types of contracts. Does that make him an a-hole? that's a bit harsh. Several inhere, including me, wish Joe Mauer would just retire. Shouldn't he honor his contract? Another excellent point. I think several in here would like to see the Twins offer Mauer early retirement. They owe him $69 million minimum as it stands according to what we read. Offer him $50 million to play one more season (2016) and hang it up. He can totally suck next season as part of this arrangement and he gets $50 million paid out as he prefers. Make it over ten or more years if he prefers to alleviate some of the tax burden. Alternatively, add a clause that says, the Twins will also extend his contract another season and make it $85 million if he has a stellar season in 2016 and they want him back for the remaining two years of his existing contract plus one more year. Now, of course, all of you in here will argue, "why should Joe do anything?" He is under a no-trade contract and the Twins have to pay him. He can suck for the next three years and he gets $69 million. He can play a shitty first base or the Twins could eventually bench him (unlikely). Apparently, Mauer has shown that he is not embarrassed in the least by ill-performing. Sheople have been trained to believe that Joe is the "team's best player". And there are a few in here lurking who may be in this camp. I know the Star Trib site is filled with Mauer apologists who argue Joe is still the best player on the team because of his .350ish BA with RISP last season. You can mention to these sheople that Joe batted .140 behind 0-2 in the count, .232 behind 1-2 in the count, and .165 at 2-2 count. And you can mention that Joe struck out 112 times last season. But simply put, "Joe is the best player on the Twins roster, there is no disputing this fact."
_____________________________
Lots of Christopher Columbus statues available on ebay.
|