kgdabom
Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thebigo quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: thebigo quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: thebigo quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: thebigo quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom Another RealGM find. Le'Veon Bell Remains Leery About Heavy Workload Sep 14, 2018 8:33 AM Le'Veon Bell recently had a conversation with former NFL running back Maurice Jones-Drew and expressed his concerns about being overused in what will almost certainly be his final season with the Pittsburgh Steelers. "[Bell] was happy for James Conner after that performance but that performance justifies why he's not there right now," Jones-Drew said on the Dave Dameshek Football Program. "If you're going to give James Conner 31 carries, imagine how many you'd give to Le'Veon Bell?" Bell also told Jones-Drew that there's nothing personal about what he views as a business decision to stay away from the team. "[Bell] said to me, 'People think that I don't like Pittsburgh, I don't like James Conner, I don't like these guys,'" Jones-Drew said. "He was like, 'Yes, I was disappointed they went out and spoke about my contract,' understandably so. He was like, 'But I still want them to do well, they're still guys that I work with and guys that I've put in this extra work with — blood, sweat and tears like I still want them to do well.'" Mike Florio/Pro Football Talk 99% of all NFL RBs want more workload not less. To me Bell doesn't love Football and it is just a business to him. Reminds me of Robert Smith. Robert Smith chose to retire while he still had his health. To me very much better than Bell's attititude. It's EXACTLY the same. I very much disagree despite your bold and caps. Robert Smith chose to retire. He decided to forego his future earnings as an NFL player. Smith never requested the Vikings run him less. Bell is whining about how much he is used while turning down massive pay trying for more pay. If those are exactly the same I guess I'm just not as enlightened as you bigo. No, you're just a little more obtuse. Nice name calling bigo. Did I not point out some very specific differences? You used the term EXACTLY the same in caps and bold. Prove how my differences really aren't differences. No name calling. Just mentioned a trait. What a load of BS. If I call you stupid I'm calling you a name even if you do have that trait. If I call you a coward I'm calling you a name even if you do have that trait. If you call me obtuse you are calling me a name even if I have that trait. Aren't you better than this? It seems like you aren't. I proved my point which you could have just acknowledged instead you try to defend your statements which were indefensible.
< Message edited by kgdabom -- 9/17/2018 5:17:18 PM >
_____________________________
"So let it be written. So let it be done."
|