Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: Covid 19 and those infected

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: Covid 19 and those infected Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 4:59:28 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.
Post #: 451
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:07:18 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 452
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:08:03 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12133
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.

Who is it?
Post #: 453
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:12:08 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.

Who is it?

I had to look it up. I'm very apolitical.
Jo Jorgensen was chosen as the party's presidential nominee, becoming the first woman to receive the Libertarian nomination, after four rounds of voting.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 454
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:15:02 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12133
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.

Who is it?

I had to look it up. I'm very apolitical.
Jo Jorgensen was chosen as the party's presidential nominee, becoming the first woman to receive the Libertarian nomination, after four rounds of voting.

Well, if we don't want to be called sexist, I guess we should vote for her.
Post #: 455
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:16:04 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.

Who is it?

I had to look it up. I'm very apolitical.
Jo Jorgensen was chosen as the party's presidential nominee, becoming the first woman to receive the Libertarian nomination, after four rounds of voting.

Well, if we don't want to be called sexist, I guess we should vote for her.

Yep However I doubt that any liberals will vote for her. So if you want the conservatives to maintain any power you may need to vote for Trump whether you like him or not. I didn't vote for Trump last time. I have a lot of people bugging me to vote for him this time. I prefer a President who will support conservative values. If I were to vote to be honest I probably would vote for Trump. Polling location is half a mile from my house. I hate this. I hate the republican party. Since my vote won't change the election maybe I will vote for some third party candidate in protest. I think that's a better protest than not voting at all.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/12/2020 5:23:14 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 456
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:18:53 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Get back to me in 20 years on this. In 2040, short of the owners, nobody will remember one business that got burned (maybe the Target). The good will far outweigh the bad. Not even close.

I'm sorry it saddened you. I'm sorry it was a disappointment to you. I'm sorry it stirred up emotions in you. But if you can't see the point of it all, you need to check your values. The buildings and businesses can be rebuilt. For George Floyd and many others, however, life ended as a result of ongoing corruption and lack of institutional control that has existed for over 200 years.

It was time! Enough with the fancy talk and promises by politicians. Take to the streets and let your actions be heard. It if makes people uncomfortable for a few weeks, so be it. The alternative was life as usual, which for many, was no longer an option.

2020 was a bad year for pacifists.




Ugh!

By your 'logic', it would be OK if people burned the Hoiseth or Unome residence to the ground, and maybe one of our family members died, because the good outweighs the bad. After all, no one, outside of us or our families, will remember our burnt out home and dead family member in 20 years.

The problem with what is happening is not uncomfortable people, it is using one, or a series, of illegal actions by Police to justify additional illegal actions. This is the very reason we have laws. The Police Officers in the Floyd case are facing criminal punishment for their crimes. This is how law and order works. Law and order is not just preventing rioting and looting, law and order is preventing bad cops from getting away with murder.

To be even tacitly OK with rioting and looting, or even tacitly OK with Police killing a man in their custody is not law and order, it is being OK wioth crime because you do not care much about the victims of said crime.
Post #: 457
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:20:30 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12133
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
Question for Bruce or Bohum

The plasma(antibodies) that is being donated. Can it be used as preventative(poor man's vaccine) or is it just effective on someone who already has Covid19?
Post #: 458
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:23:38 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12133
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Get back to me in 20 years on this. In 2040, short of the owners, nobody will remember one business that got burned (maybe the Target). The good will far outweigh the bad. Not even close.

I'm sorry it saddened you. I'm sorry it was a disappointment to you. I'm sorry it stirred up emotions in you. But if you can't see the point of it all, you need to check your values. The buildings and businesses can be rebuilt. For George Floyd and many others, however, life ended as a result of ongoing corruption and lack of institutional control that has existed for over 200 years.

It was time! Enough with the fancy talk and promises by politicians. Take to the streets and let your actions be heard. It if makes people uncomfortable for a few weeks, so be it. The alternative was life as usual, which for many, was no longer an option.

2020 was a bad year for pacifists.




Ugh!

By your 'logic', it would be OK if people burned the Hoiseth or Unome residence to the ground, and maybe one of our family members died, because the good outweighs the bad. After all, no one, outside of us or our families, will remember our burnt out home and dead family member in 20 years.

The problem with what is happening is not uncomfortable people, it is using one, or a series, of illegal actions by Police to justify additional illegal actions. This is the very reason we have laws. The Police Officers in the Floyd case are facing criminal punishment for their crimes. This is how law and order works. Law and order is not just preventing rioting and looting, law and order is preventing bad cops from getting away with murder.

To be even tacitly OK with rioting and looting, or even tacitly OK with Police killing a man in their custody is not law and order, it is being OK wioth crime because you do not care much about the victims of said crime.

Thank you. Every time I saw a Talking Head(Cable News) say that it is just stuff and can be replaced, I wanted to say, "Let's burn down your mansion for the cause"
Post #: 459
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:26:58 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

People who vote for Trump this time around are either racists, xenophobes, sexists, homophobes, science deniers, etc, or they're willing to support a clear demagogue who embodies all of those things in order to get what they want. It may be law and order, abortion rights, financial considerations, etc, but the key is you have to say that whatever your thing is, it's more important than competence and the list of Trump attributes above. I get that some people may go that way, but it tells us a lot.....


I do not think that is true. I think many people will vote for the candidate this year that they think sucks less.

Do not like Trump, but think Biden is worse, many will vote for Trump.

Do not like Biden, but think Trump is worse, many will vote for Biden.


This is not my plan, but I know quite a few people that would desperately prefer another Republican to be the nominee over Trump, but who will probably still vote for Trump.

I did this in the 2004 election where I voted for the lesser of two evils and I did not like it. So, I promised myself to never vote for a candidate I did not like again. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and there is a 99+% chance I will do this again in 2020.

As of now there is a 99.99999999999999999% chance that the libertarian candidate will not win, but I still think it's better than voting for Trump or Biden.


No, there is a 100% chance that she will not win.

I am a MN voter and there is a 99+% chance Biden wins this state, so my vote does not really matter anyway. I am using it as a protest vote saying that I did not find either Trump or Biden acceptable.

It would be more tempting to vote for the lesser of two evils if MN was a true battle ground state, but I would almost certainly vote the same way.
Post #: 460
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:28:13 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Get back to me in 20 years on this. In 2040, short of the owners, nobody will remember one business that got burned (maybe the Target). The good will far outweigh the bad. Not even close.

I'm sorry it saddened you. I'm sorry it was a disappointment to you. I'm sorry it stirred up emotions in you. But if you can't see the point of it all, you need to check your values. The buildings and businesses can be rebuilt. For George Floyd and many others, however, life ended as a result of ongoing corruption and lack of institutional control that has existed for over 200 years.

It was time! Enough with the fancy talk and promises by politicians. Take to the streets and let your actions be heard. It if makes people uncomfortable for a few weeks, so be it. The alternative was life as usual, which for many, was no longer an option.

2020 was a bad year for pacifists.




Ugh!

By your 'logic', it would be OK if people burned the Hoiseth or Unome residence to the ground, and maybe one of our family members died, because the good outweighs the bad. After all, no one, outside of us or our families, will remember our burnt out home and dead family member in 20 years.

The problem with what is happening is not uncomfortable people, it is using one, or a series, of illegal actions by Police to justify additional illegal actions. This is the very reason we have laws. The Police Officers in the Floyd case are facing criminal punishment for their crimes. This is how law and order works. Law and order is not just preventing rioting and looting, law and order is preventing bad cops from getting away with murder.

To be even tacitly OK with rioting and looting, or even tacitly OK with Police killing a man in their custody is not law and order, it is being OK wioth crime because you do not care much about the victims of said crime.

I have Brad on ignore and this is a great example why. I think the actions being taken by many will set us back many years. People will use the burnings, lootings and murdering of innocent people as a justification for racism.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 461
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:34:46 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

Even if you are disappointed with the current fruits of the two party system, political nihilism is not the answer. Engage, assess, analyze, and vote.


I agree with this, although in doing so many will choose the lesser of two evils as I said in my other reply to you.

I personally know 6 or 7 people that will likely vote for Trump and only one actually really likes him.
Post #: 462
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:42:27 PM  2 votes
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine


Absolutely.

Biden is another old, white guy. He's not someone to be excited about.

But, Harris is.

All 4 members of 'The Squad' winning their primaries is.

Young and/or progressive people that are more concerned with the planet and the average person instead of lining more rich people's pockets moving up the chain is.


If I were a Republican strategist, I would be thrilled at the Squad winning their primaries. Neither side really wants to be judged by their extremists.

American elections are decided by the center. If either party moves too far to their base, they will lose.

I think Trump is one of the worse choices for President of all-time because of his personality, but I still would have thought long and hard about voting for him if the Dems had nominated Sanders. The Democratic Party elites understand this, which is why they got Pete and Klobachar to drop out and help defeat Bernie.
Post #: 463
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 5:53:48 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Also KG ... the only people talking about the ‘incredible progress’ we’ve made are the people that are either too blind or too complacent to see how far there is to go.


I do not think it logically follows that incredible progress has to men that progress should then stop. Calling civil rights advances "incredible progress" pretty much implies that civil rights progress is a great thing.

There has been incredible progress, but that does not mean we have reached where we need to go. On the other had, when there is still rioting and looting after the progress, you wonder why people do not at least recognize the progress happened, and, I don't know, maybe not burn their neighborhood down?

I think the problem is that most people do not know much about history and, what they do know, is the ugly 19th Century parts.

The thing that breaks my heart is that we know exactly how America has always incorporated people that used to be in the 'out' group and groups that used to be mired in poverty and discrimination, have been able to move beyond that and do as well as anyone.

How did this happen?

Seeing that America has opportunities and that 'people like them' could be successful if they do the right things. Right things include going to school, working hard and staying out of trouble.
Post #: 464
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 6:03:22 PM  3 votes
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?
Post #: 465
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 6:40:54 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?

Absolutely correct.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 466
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 8:54:54 PM   
unome

 

Posts: 985
Joined: 5/7/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?

Absolutely correct.


Thanks, I find it a little disturbing that no one left-of-center will come in and respond to Brad's comments that can only be described as tacitly approving of rioting and looting. The bolded comment above is horrible in my opinion. Shockingly bad.

And even if one makes the argument that the ends justify the means, I have seen no evidence that there would any gain in the rioters ends.

In fact, it seems to be the opposite:

"What’s often hard for people to see is that there are these white moderates who are part of the Democratic coalition as long as they perceive there to be order, but when they perceive there to be too much disorder they shift to the party that has owned the issue of order, which is the Republican Party. For some people, the idea that there are these swing Democratic-minded voters is hard to grasp, but there is pretty strong evidence that in 2016, and in 1968, that was an important and influential niche of voters." - Omar Wasow, a professor of politics at Princeton.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-violent-protests-change-politics

In case anyone did not know, the New Yorker is a pretty left-of-center publication, so this is not Fox News saying rioting hurts Democrats.




And to the one reader that gave my above post in response to Brad one star: Dear anonymous one-star voter, can you explain to me, via PM if you prefer, where my post was in error so that I may better understand how you think rioting or looting will help the cause of racial equality? Thanks
Post #: 467
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 9:05:30 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?

Absolutely correct.


Thanks, I find it a little disturbing that no one left-of-center will come in and respond to Brad's comments that can only be described as tacitly approving of rioting and looting. The bolded comment above is horrible in my opinion. Shockingly bad.

And even if one makes the argument that the ends justify the means, I have seen no evidence that there would any gain in the rioters ends.

In fact, it seems to be the opposite:

"What’s often hard for people to see is that there are these white moderates who are part of the Democratic coalition as long as they perceive there to be order, but when they perceive there to be too much disorder they shift to the party that has owned the issue of order, which is the Republican Party. For some people, the idea that there are these swing Democratic-minded voters is hard to grasp, but there is pretty strong evidence that in 2016, and in 1968, that was an important and influential niche of voters." - Omar Wasow, a professor of politics at Princeton.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-violent-protests-change-politics

In case anyone did not know, the New Yorker is a pretty left-of-center publication, so this is not Fox News saying rioting hurts Democrats.




And to the one reader that gave my above post in response to Brad one star: Dear anonymous one-star voter, can you explain to me, via PM if you prefer, where my post was in error so that I may better understand how you think rioting or looting will help the cause of racial equality? Thanks

Rioting and looting will never effect positive change. Brad is sick for even suggesting that.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 468
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 9:35:23 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10861
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?

Absolutely correct.


Thanks, I find it a little disturbing that no one left-of-center will come in and respond to Brad's comments that can only be described as tacitly approving of rioting and looting. The bolded comment above is horrible in my opinion. Shockingly bad.

And even if one makes the argument that the ends justify the means, I have seen no evidence that there would any gain in the rioters ends.

In fact, it seems to be the opposite:

"What’s often hard for people to see is that there are these white moderates who are part of the Democratic coalition as long as they perceive there to be order, but when they perceive there to be too much disorder they shift to the party that has owned the issue of order, which is the Republican Party. For some people, the idea that there are these swing Democratic-minded voters is hard to grasp, but there is pretty strong evidence that in 2016, and in 1968, that was an important and influential niche of voters." - Omar Wasow, a professor of politics at Princeton.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-violent-protests-change-politics

In case anyone did not know, the New Yorker is a pretty left-of-center publication, so this is not Fox News saying rioting hurts Democrats.




And to the one reader that gave my above post in response to Brad one star: Dear anonymous one-star voter, can you explain to me, via PM if you prefer, where my post was in error so that I may better understand how you think rioting or looting will help the cause of racial equality? Thanks

Rioting and looting will never effect positive change. Brad is sick for even suggesting that.


Boston Tea Party?

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 469
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 9:48:06 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.

Let's think about this with a clear mind for a second: do you think the people that need to change their mindset and becoming more open to racial equality will become more or less likely to do so after they see a group of people riot, loot and burn sections of their city down?

Absolutely correct.


Thanks, I find it a little disturbing that no one left-of-center will come in and respond to Brad's comments that can only be described as tacitly approving of rioting and looting. The bolded comment above is horrible in my opinion. Shockingly bad.

And even if one makes the argument that the ends justify the means, I have seen no evidence that there would any gain in the rioters ends.

In fact, it seems to be the opposite:

"What’s often hard for people to see is that there are these white moderates who are part of the Democratic coalition as long as they perceive there to be order, but when they perceive there to be too much disorder they shift to the party that has owned the issue of order, which is the Republican Party. For some people, the idea that there are these swing Democratic-minded voters is hard to grasp, but there is pretty strong evidence that in 2016, and in 1968, that was an important and influential niche of voters." - Omar Wasow, a professor of politics at Princeton.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-violent-protests-change-politics

In case anyone did not know, the New Yorker is a pretty left-of-center publication, so this is not Fox News saying rioting hurts Democrats.




And to the one reader that gave my above post in response to Brad one star: Dear anonymous one-star voter, can you explain to me, via PM if you prefer, where my post was in error so that I may better understand how you think rioting or looting will help the cause of racial equality? Thanks

Rioting and looting will never effect positive change. Brad is sick for even suggesting that.


Boston Tea Party?
I was actually wondering if somebody was going to bring up the Boston Tea Party.
I'm not a big fan of the Boston Tea Party as I really hate vandalism and destruction, but that was totally different from the recent events. No rioting at all that I know of. No looting. The Tea was dumped in the harbor. It was a very planned and coordinated protest against British taxation. Nobody got hurt that I know of. If somebody did please correct me.
I just did a quick Google of the Boston tea party and this popped up.

No one died during the Boston Tea Party. There was no violence and no confrontation between the Patriots, the Tories and the British soldiers garrisoned in Boston. No members of the crews of the Beaver, Dartmouth, or Eleanor were harmed.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/12/2020 9:53:11 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 470
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 9:58:56 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
The Boston Tea Party makes for some very interesting reading.
Only the tea was harmed. There was no damage to the ships or any violence against any person. They even tidied up the ships when they were done dumping the tea. The founding fathers of our country even when they did something potentially wrong they did it right.

George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were not fans of the event. Benjamin Franklin even offered to reimburse the British East India company.

https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-tea-party

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/12/2020 10:07:15 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 471
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 9:59:16 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22956
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

self-deleted




Ugh!

By your 'logic', it would be OK if people burned the Hoiseth or Unome residence to the ground, and maybe one of our family members died, because the good outweighs the bad. After all, no one, outside of us or our families, will remember our burnt out home and dead family member in 20 years.

The problem with what is happening is not uncomfortable people, it is using one, or a series, of illegal actions by Police to justify additional illegal actions. This is the very reason we have laws. The Police Officers in the Floyd case are facing criminal punishment for their crimes. This is how law and order works. Law and order is not just preventing rioting and looting, law and order is preventing bad cops from getting away with murder.

To be even tacitly OK with rioting and looting, or even tacitly OK with Police killing a man in their custody is not law and order, it is being OK wioth crime because you do not care much about the victims of said crime.

Thank you. Every time I saw a Talking Head(Cable News) say that it is just stuff and can be replaced, I wanted to say, "Let's burn down your mansion for the cause"

self-deleted

< Message edited by Brad H -- 8/13/2020 6:32:13 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 472
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 10:09:51 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22956
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: unome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H


It's unfortunate, but, if it takes looting and rioting to make changes that may have otherwise never come to fruition, count me in. I don't think anyone took joy in watching the events. It was upsetting. It was at times chaotic.



The riots and looting are the actions that will HARM progress, not the actions that will help create it.



self-deleted

< Message edited by Brad H -- 8/13/2020 6:32:34 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 473
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 10:11:17 PM  1 votes
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33742
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
The right way to protest.

From Footloose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWyURSaJixc

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/12/2020 10:13:34 PM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 474
RE: Covid 19 and those infected - 8/12/2020 10:22:53 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22956
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
self-deleted

< Message edited by Brad H -- 8/13/2020 6:32:54 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 475
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: Covid 19 and those infected Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode