bohumm
Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1 quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: Murph quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson quote:
ORIGINAL: Todd M quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson To allow your best o-lineman on a bad offensive line go in free agency and not acquire a starter in free agency, then to not address it early in the draft- well, that would be malpractice. Our 1st pick has to go to OL. And I really don't want to hear Spielman say they had x amount of players the same so we dropped down. Only one I would not complain about is Parsons. Guy could have a 1998 Moss like effect on defense. Turning a good defense into a great defense. Kahlil Mack like. I agree; first pick has to be offense with the exception of Parsons. No way you can pick someone with a history of assault at this point..... I disagree. If you have a chance at a great player you can spin it enough to make that pick just fine. Agreed. Overreaction is what cost us the opportunity to draft Warren Sapp. Conversely, it let Moss fall to us. They can spin it, but do check into his character of late. If he checks out perfect, whatever that means, then maybe. Of course, we currently have a dramatically worse offensive line than we fielded last year, when it was horrible in pass pro. The horribles are back, we added a horrible, and got rid of our best OL from last year. So, no, we still can't take him even if he checks out 100% (whatever that means) from a character standpoint.
|