Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: NFL Draft 2021

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: NFL Draft 2021 Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 10:42:53 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Pete Schrager does not base his mock draft after watching film and suggesting who the teams should draft. He doesn't watch film. He bases his mock based on talking to his contacts and gather their interest on particular players. From what I have heard, he has a good track record for accuracy.

Who does he select on behalf of the Vikings? Kwitty Paye. Hmmm.

https://www.nfl.com/news/peter-schrager-2021-nfl-mock-draft-1-0-pats-trade-up-for-justin-fields-cardinals

The thing that stands out to me is that he doesn't see Vera-Tucker going in the first round. Wow. That would be shocking.

< Message edited by Bruce Johnson -- 4/8/2021 10:45:23 AM >


_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 751
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 11:01:57 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
Edge rushers do tend to fly off the board early.

I see Vera Tucker going in the the 20's. So trading down and getting him around 21 or so could yield trading partners 2nd rd pick.

From left to right

O'Neal
Tucker
Bradbury
Udoh
Cleveland

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 752
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 11:10:39 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
I found this quote about Paye:

Paye is a caliber of athlete that I’m not sure the NFL has ever seen. His sub-6.5 three-cone at over 260 pounds is nothing short of unprecedented for a man that size.

https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-edge-defender-rankings

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 753
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 11:14:36 AM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Paul Allen mentioned this name as a player who would be an outstanding choice in the third round. (Rashad Weaver out of Pitt)

Weaver is arguably the best run-defending edge in the draft. He has the ideal combination of size and length that makes blocking him a chore. He controls every interaction he’s a part of with his consistent hand placement and technique

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 754
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 11:16:17 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Edge rushers do tend to fly off the board early.

I see Vera Tucker going in the the 20's. So trading down and getting him around 21 or so could yield trading partners 2nd rd pick.

From left to right

O'Neal
Tucker
Bradbury
Udoh
Cleveland



Why ONeal at LT and Ezra at RT?

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 755
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 11:37:22 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Edge rushers do tend to fly off the board early.

I see Vera Tucker going in the the 20's. So trading down and getting him around 21 or so could yield trading partners 2nd rd pick.

From left to right

O'Neal
Tucker
Bradbury
Udoh
Cleveland



Why ONeal at LT and Ezra at RT?

Basing it off of what the team did when Rieff was sent home to digest his pay cut a couple weeks before week one last season. O'Neal was seen running with the first team at LT.

Moving Cleveland to RG in practices around this time might suggest they're getting him use to playing on the right side so he can bump out to RT.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 756
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 12:27:24 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Edge rushers do tend to fly off the board early.

I see Vera Tucker going in the the 20's. So trading down and getting him around 21 or so could yield trading partners 2nd rd pick.

From left to right

O'Neal
Tucker
Bradbury
Udoh
Cleveland



Why ONeal at LT and Ezra at RT?

Basing it off of what the team did when Rieff was sent home to digest his pay cut a couple weeks before week one last season. O'Neal was seen running with the first team at LT.

Moving Cleveland to RG in practices around this time might suggest they're getting him use to playing on the right side so he can bump out to RT.



Fair enough - it seems backward to me, but it is the Vikings. In training camp, Ezra was listed as the third string LG and if I remember right practiced the most at LG befure Elf went down and Samia was a disaster. ONeil has done well at RT, and I would move Ezra back to his natural position. Kind of like the question of moving Hunter to RDE.

We'll see what the draft brings!

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 757
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 12:50:26 PM   
Pauldiercks1

 

Posts: 241
Joined: 2/1/2019
Status: offline
If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.
Post #: 758
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 1:23:56 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.


And what if Ezra does a decent job at LT? What if he excels at it? Then we only need to fix the interior. Your plan makes perfect sense. Unfortunately you will likely meet the argument that you are not an NFL executive so what the heck could you possibly know. In the meantime our so-called experts will continue to fumblef@ck their way through another season of terrible line play coupled with finding out the third-stringer plays better than the anointed starter and the backup - only after injuries of course.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 759
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 1:35:16 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.


So by drafting or trading for a LT that excels, are you advocating not giving Cleveland a shot to play the position he played at in college? Would he then be a 2nd round backup? Or you could be implying he stay at RG, which IMO is a disaster waiting to continue.
Post #: 760
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 2:07:49 PM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
Keep in mind O'Neal was a LT in college as well.

But nonetheless as Pager pointed out this is the Vikings so there's really no telling what they'll do. About the only thing we can count on is that it will make no rhyme or reason and more than likely blow up in their face.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 761
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 2:21:19 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Edge rushers do tend to fly off the board early.

I see Vera Tucker going in the the 20's. So trading down and getting him around 21 or so could yield trading partners 2nd rd pick.

From left to right

O'Neal
Tucker
Bradbury
Udoh
Cleveland

Or nothing if someone swipes him earlier. If you want him, take him. We have holes.
Post #: 762
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 2:39:37 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Keep in mind O'Neal was a LT in college as well.

But nonetheless as Pager pointed out this is the Vikings so there's really no telling what they'll do. About the only thing we can count on is that it will make no rhyme or reason and more than likely blow up in their face.

Not only that, but he may be agitating for the chance to play HIS college position because LTs get paid more, which seems as fair as anything else.
Post #: 763
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 3:18:39 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
O'Neill was also a right tackle. But enough jacking these players positions around. No wonder the OL is crap.

Clamor for the punter to move to LT for all I care, just be sure to state you have also written Cleveland off after only a year. Unless you believe Spielman's BS which is translated to "I don't have a clue, plus I'm a liar":

"It all depends on what happens over these next couple months on who’s here and who’s not here," Spielman said. "Then it’s the coaches figuring out what’s our best five and where are you going to line them all up at? We’re very excited about some of these young offensive linemen and usually these offensive linemen continue to grow and get better every year. So I think with a Bradbury and with O’Neill and now Ezra, I think we’re very excited about having a young core up there that’ll continue to grow and get better. But I think the coaches will determine what’s the best lineup, and we have had a lot of discussion about that already."
Post #: 764
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 3:21:47 PM   
Pauldiercks1

 

Posts: 241
Joined: 2/1/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.


So by drafting or trading for a LT that excels, are you advocating not giving Cleveland a shot to play the position he played at in college? Would he then be a 2nd round backup? Or you could be implying he stay at RG, which IMO is a disaster waiting to continue.


Why are so many worked up about giving Cleveland a shot at LT? So he played there in college- so did a lot of NFL guards. I don't really care all that much honestly. I don't see him as a star either place. We don't know that he wouldn't be a disaster at LT?

I don't want to go into the season planning to give a guy a tryout at LT and see where it goes. As far as I'm concerned we fill in a good LT and a guard and Cleveland can fight his ass off for a starting spot. I don't know why we feel we owe him more than that. If he's a good backup LT I can live with that. If he earns a starting spot I can live with that also.

< Message edited by Pauldiercks1 -- 4/8/2021 3:24:09 PM >
Post #: 765
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 3:27:07 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.


So by drafting or trading for a LT that excels, are you advocating not giving Cleveland a shot to play the position he played at in college? Would he then be a 2nd round backup? Or you could be implying he stay at RG, which IMO is a disaster waiting to continue.


Why are so many worked up about giving Cleveland a shot at LT? So he played there in college- so did a lot of NFL guards. I don't really care all that much honestly. I don't see him as a star either place. We don't know that he wouldn't be a disaster at LT?

I don't want to go into the season planning to give a guy a tryout at LT and see where it goes. As far as I'm concerned we fill in a good LT and a guard and Cleveland can fight his ass off for a starting spot. I don't know why we feel we owe him more than that. If he's a good backup LT I can live with that. If he earns a starting spot I can live with that also.


Because he sucked at pass-blocking at G. He's not built for it. At least try him at LT, to do otherwise is a waste of a valuable second-round pick. We don't have 'luxury' picks.
Post #: 766
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 4:30:16 PM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
This is good stuff for us.

https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-biggest-pro-and-con-for-pffs-top-offensive-line-prospects

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 767
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 5:02:04 PM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
My sense is that Vera-Tucker is fading as we approach the draft. Of course I don't really know anything, but I figure that since he is seen more as a guard and his athletic numbers were a bit pedestrian, he may not be on the Vikings short list for a pick at #14. It's possible Darrisaw and Slater go before us and then the Vikings select Paye. I'm just wondering if Darrisaw and Slater are gone, then a really good player will fall to us. I wonder who that will be. If it's a quarterback, then perhaps the Vikings will trade back.

Just speculating and thinking out loud. Better than quarreling though, right?

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 768
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 5:12:38 PM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
Barmore seems to be dropping too. Here is is rated as an "end of the second round" player.

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-draft-idl-rankings-marino

I'd like to get some of that. I mean, if he goes in the back end of the second round, the young man may have something to prove.

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 769
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 6:52:44 PM   
joejitsu

 

Posts: 15424
Joined: 3/21/2010
From: 60411
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

My sense is that Vera-Tucker is fading as we approach the draft. Of course I don't really know anything, but I figure that since he is seen more as a guard and his athletic numbers were a bit pedestrian, he may not be on the Vikings short list for a pick at #14. It's possible Darrisaw and Slater go before us and then the Vikings select Paye. I'm just wondering if Darrisaw and Slater are gone, then a really good player will fall to us. I wonder who that will be. If it's a quarterback, then perhaps the Vikings will trade back.

Just speculating and thinking out loud. Better than quarreling though, right?


I still like Vera Tucker. He's a plug and play lg, and he can play lt if needed. If we can trade down a couple of spots and get him, that's all the better.
Post #: 770
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 7:17:09 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Barmore seems to be dropping too. Here is is rated as an "end of the second round" player.

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-draft-idl-rankings-marino

I'd like to get some of that. I mean, if he goes in the back end of the second round, the young man may have something to prove.

quote:

Barmore


I'd have no problem with selecting a DT if there is amazing value. Otherwise I'm not feeling it. We still have (if I remember right) hercules, Watts and Lynch as development guys, as well as Weatherly and Holmes that can play inside in a pinch.

I see IOL, DE, S, 3rd WR (in that order) as higher priorities.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 771
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/8/2021 7:25:58 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pauldiercks1

If they move ONeal to LT I see that as a mistake and they have not learned a darn thing over the past 7 years.

Leave him where he excels and draft or trade for a LT that excels. Draft a guard in the third round and lets get this mess fixed.


So by drafting or trading for a LT that excels, are you advocating not giving Cleveland a shot to play the position he played at in college? Would he then be a 2nd round backup? Or you could be implying he stay at RG, which IMO is a disaster waiting to continue.


Why are so many worked up about giving Cleveland a shot at LT? So he played there in college- so did a lot of NFL guards. I don't really care all that much honestly. I don't see him as a star either place. We don't know that he wouldn't be a disaster at LT?

I don't want to go into the season planning to give a guy a tryout at LT and see where it goes. As far as I'm concerned we fill in a good LT and a guard and Cleveland can fight his ass off for a starting spot. I don't know why we feel we owe him more than that. If he's a good backup LT I can live with that. If he earns a starting spot I can live with that also.


Because he sucked at pass-blocking at G. He's not built for it. At least try him at LT, to do otherwise is a waste of a valuable second-round pick. We don't have 'luxury' picks.



Why wouldn't we give him a shot at LT??? There's no guarantee that a drafted LT (in any round) would be better.

He was projected by quite a few to go in the first round, has an amazing RAS score and profile for LT, and had great production in college at LT. If you have ridiculous amounts of time, like I do, go read the draft thread last year We have Hill as a backup LT, and he played there better than RT. And Hill was our starter at RT until Oneil wally pipped him.

I think he'll be an above average LT, wish we would have thrown him in there last year and saved the salary. I was actually impressed with Ezra's performance at RG. Improved each start, and with a good offseason could improve his pass blocking (his run blocking is already pretty good) to average, which would be miles above what we've had.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 772
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/9/2021 3:54:05 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9563
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

My sense is that Vera-Tucker is fading as we approach the draft. Of course I don't really know anything, but I figure that since he is seen more as a guard and his athletic numbers were a bit pedestrian, he may not be on the Vikings short list for a pick at #14. It's possible Darrisaw and Slater go before us and then the Vikings select Paye. I'm just wondering if Darrisaw and Slater are gone, then a really good player will fall to us. I wonder who that will be. If it's a quarterback, then perhaps the Vikings will trade back.

Just speculating and thinking out loud. Better than quarreling though, right?



i saw vera-tucker mock deep in the 2nd round a month back - i see that as good for us...it reinforces the trade back philosophy - don't fall for the media mock bullshit...he's the same player we loved before, if we can gain a 2nd and grab him the more power to us....

i still say micah parsons or trade back, and then use our many 3rds and 4ths to trade up and draft some solid dropping talent...i would shoot for three picks in the first two rounds and two picks in the 3rd...trade with a seattle or if a qb falls and a team is willing to overpay....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 773
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/9/2021 7:31:41 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

My sense is that Vera-Tucker is fading as we approach the draft. Of course I don't really know anything, but I figure that since he is seen more as a guard and his athletic numbers were a bit pedestrian, he may not be on the Vikings short list for a pick at #14. It's possible Darrisaw and Slater go before us and then the Vikings select Paye. I'm just wondering if Darrisaw and Slater are gone, then a really good player will fall to us. I wonder who that will be. If it's a quarterback, then perhaps the Vikings will trade back.

Just speculating and thinking out loud. Better than quarreling though, right?



i saw vera-tucker mock deep in the 2nd round a month back - i see that as good for us...it reinforces the trade back philosophy - don't fall for the media mock bullshit...he's the same player we loved before, if we can gain a 2nd and grab him the more power to us....

i still say micah parsons or trade back, and then use our many 3rds and 4ths to trade up and draft some solid dropping talent...i would shoot for three picks in the first two rounds and two picks in the 3rd...trade with a seattle or if a qb falls and a team is willing to overpay....


So if we trade back...is there a backup QBOTF that we can draft in the 2nd round if we draft OLINE in the first?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 774
RE: NFL Draft 2021 - 4/9/2021 9:50:00 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

My sense is that Vera-Tucker is fading as we approach the draft. Of course I don't really know anything, but I figure that since he is seen more as a guard and his athletic numbers were a bit pedestrian, he may not be on the Vikings short list for a pick at #14. It's possible Darrisaw and Slater go before us and then the Vikings select Paye. I'm just wondering if Darrisaw and Slater are gone, then a really good player will fall to us. I wonder who that will be. If it's a quarterback, then perhaps the Vikings will trade back.

Just speculating and thinking out loud. Better than quarreling though, right?



i saw vera-tucker mock deep in the 2nd round a month back - i see that as good for us...it reinforces the trade back philosophy - don't fall for the media mock bullshit...he's the same player we loved before, if we can gain a 2nd and grab him the more power to us....

i still say micah parsons or trade back, and then use our many 3rds and 4ths to trade up and draft some solid dropping talent...i would shoot for three picks in the first two rounds and two picks in the 3rd...trade with a seattle or if a qb falls and a team is willing to overpay....


So if we trade back...is there a backup QBOTF that we can draft in the 2nd round if we draft OLINE in the first?


I'd prefer to move up in the first for Fields or Lance but if we could grab Mond in the 2nd or early 3rd; I'd be pretty happy


Kellen Mond Scouting Report

Positives: Athletic quarterback with a next-level arm who flashes brilliance. Patient in the pocket and buys as much time as necessary. Senses the rush and steps up to avoid defenders. Athletic, easily eludes defenders, and picks up yardage with his legs when necessary. Possesses a quick release and a live arm, gets speed on throws, and easily drives downfield passes. Fires the ball through tight windows, leads receivers with passes, and throws targets open. Loses no ball speed throwing on the move.

Displays a sense of timing and does not have receivers waiting for the ball to arrive. Knows where his targets are on the field and quickly locates the open wideout. Spreads the ball around and uses all his receivers. Sets up screen throws, puts touch on passes, and delivers a catchable ball. Effectively commands the offense.

Featured | 2021 NFL Mock Draft: Tony Pauline sees quarterbacks in high demand

Negatives: Very slow moving his head away from the primary target and gives away passes at times. Must do a better job selling ball fakes. Can be erratic with his pass placement.

Analysis: Mond is an athletic quarterback who displayed a lot of progress in his game last season. He possesses a terrific amount of upside and has starting potential at the next level if he gets hooked up with the proper coach and continues developing his game.

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 775
Page:   <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: NFL Draft 2021 Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode