jbusse
Posts: 1309
Joined: 9/11/2013
From: Atlanta, GA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: jbusse quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: jbusse quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: jbusse quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer Just remember when you specifically pick out 3 players out of over average 40 that don't have the vaccine from each team it looks like you are only attacking the religious on the team, instead of the unvaccinated on the team....that is what I am spelling and pointing out. You do realize Phil That its just a matter of time before a new COVID variant produces an outbreak of non-vaccinated religious QB zombies. Thanks for defending personal choice over the well-being of our species. Good going. If the well being of our species was of primary importance in the U.S., then ivermectin and a few other medications would have been given a fair shake. I promise you if injecting Clorox or internal UVB would have saved lives, healthcare professionals would have done it. Convalescence continued to be used even after research showed it wasn't effective. To suggest that providers/public health policy decision makers (most are doctors) that have taken the Hippocratic Oath let politics, religion, or any other reason interfere with providing the best possible care is insulting. I volunteered to work in our ED clinically during the first peak. While we were still getting images/news reports of body bags in New York. It was scary AF. What evidence do you have to suggest that ivermectin was given a fair shake? I can cite plenty of studies that provide very strong clinical evidence that it's effective in the treatment of covid. Here's one: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-98106/v1 "Results: In total, 585 participants, including 270 females and 305 males, were included. Of these, 159, 357, and 110 patients received hydroxychloroquine, nitazoxanide, and ivermectin, respectively, with similar baseline characteristics and time-to-treat between them. The three groups had similar duration of positive rtPCR-SARS-CoV-2, clinical disease duration and recovery speed. Of the 585 patients, none was hospitalized, needed mechanical ventilation, or died, and 1.5% persisted with symptoms after recovery." Findings of this sort are not at all unusual. Your study: At least when combined with azithromycin, and vitamin C, D and zinc in the majority of the cases. https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2020/study-finds-over-80-percent-of-covid19-patients-have-vitamin-d-deficiency Please stop. It's well known that the re-purposed drugs need to be combined with zinc, vitamin D, and sometimes azithromycin. Why is that an issue? Because 40+ COVI19 positive patient studies all point to vitamin D mitigating COVID-19. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3872/rr-5 I would suggest that taking vitamin D by itself to treat covid is not nearly as effective as the combo of ivermectin, zinc, and vitamin D.
|